SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

11,842 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700K with the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is a study in stark contrast, creating a desktop system where the processor operates in an entirely different performance tier than the graphics card. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 51st percentile, resulting in a combined system percentile of 70. This configuration is a CPU-dominant build where the Radeon RX 6500 XT will define the limits of graphics-intensive tasks, leaving the substantial processing power of the Core i7-13700K largely untapped in gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a viable scenario for this pairing. The Radeon RX 6500 XT, with its 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus, is positioned at the 51st percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is roughly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which suggests it is suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, not high-refresh-rate play. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and 2-thread score of 2262 are more than capable of feeding frames, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 9608 will cap frame rates well below the thresholds required for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The Core i7-13700K provides an excellent foundation for streaming due to its 16 cores and 24 threads, which can handle game capture and encoding overhead. However, the Radeon RX 6500 XT lacks the raw rendering horsepower to run modern games at high quality while simultaneously encoding a stream. The GPU’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 4456 indicates limited compute resources for handling the encoding workload without impacting game performance, making this a CPU-heavy solution that is still constrained by the graphics card.

Video Editing: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and a PassMark Multi-Thread score of 45887, placing it 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX. This processing power will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export times. The GPU will assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but its 4 GB VRAM and 143.9 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors for high-resolution or complex compositions, making this a system that is fast for CPU-bound edits but slow for heavy GPU-dependent tasks.

3D Rendering: Similarly, the CPU dominates this workload. The 3DMark Max Threads score of 12412 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16292 indicate strong performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 5.765 TFLOPS is modest, meaning GPU-accelerated renders will be slower than what a more balanced system would offer. The RX 6500 XT’s 16 ray accelerators and 1024 shading units are entry-level specifications for this task.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for the system, driven entirely by the CPU. The PassMark Data Compression score of 595292 and Data Encryption score of 33249 demonstrate high throughput for compilation, code analysis, and running virtual machines. The 16 cores and 24 threads allow for parallel builds and multiple container instances. The GPU is largely irrelevant for these tasks, so the imbalance is not a concern here, making this a capable developer workstation.

Student and Office Work: The system is massively over-provisioned for this category. The CPU’s PassMark Single-Thread score of 4333 ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheets, but the discrete GPU is unnecessary for office productivity. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated in the CPU could handle these tasks alone, making the RX 6500 XT a redundant addition that adds cost and power draw without benefit. The data shows this is a high-performance foundation for heavy workloads, not a typical student machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system holds a combined percentile of 70 among all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700K compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900’s score of 46971.

Q: What is the GPU’s position relative to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT’s average benchmark score of 11842 is 1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080’s score of 11960.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700K supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 143.9 GB/s, utilizing a 64-bit bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Core i7-13700K?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node.

Q: Is the Radeon RX 6500 XT still in production?

A: No, the production status for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is listed as End-of-life.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-S codename. It features 16 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that provides substantial parallel processing capability. The base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it has a TDP of 125 W. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core.

The benchmark data clearly establishes this as a high-end processor. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and PassMark single-thread score of 4333 indicate excellent per-core performance, which translates to fast response times in daily use and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. More importantly, the multi-threaded scores are exceptional. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 45887 place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, showing its capability in heavily threaded workloads. This is further evidenced by a Geekbench multi-core score of 19429.

The processor’s position relative to its nearest rivals is remarkably tight. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, while being 0.5% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535. This cluster of scores, all within a 0.8% range, indicates that the i7-13700K is at the very top of its performance class, matching workstation-level processors from the previous generation. The PassMark integer math score of 154446 and floating-point math score of 114867 further underline its strength in compute-heavy tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system is fundamentally unbalanced, with the processor and graphics card operating in different performance leagues. The CPU’s percentile rank of 89 versus the GPU’s percentile rank of 51 creates a scenario where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for any graphical workload. In gaming, the CPU’s 3DMark 4-thread score of 4469 and 8-thread score of 8193 are more than sufficient to process game logic and physics, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 9608 will limit the frame rate. The data suggests the GPU will be at 100% utilization while the CPU remains underutilized, leaving processing headroom unused.

For compute and productivity tasks, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2716 and data compression score of 595292 are indicative of a processor that can handle complex simulations and data processing, but the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 4456 shows it is not a powerful accelerator. In applications that can leverage GPU compute, the RX 6500 XT will be the limiting factor, slowing down tasks that might otherwise benefit from the CPU’s massive thread count.

The FPS scaling evidence further clarifies this imbalance. The GPU’s performance is close to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which is a 1080p-class card. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores, however, are comparable to top-tier desktop processors. This means the GPU will reach its maximum output at lower resolutions, capping frame rates, while the CPU has substantial headroom to push higher frame rates if paired with a more powerful GPU. The system is a compute powerhouse paired with an entry-level graphics solution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers top-tier benchmark results. Its average benchmark score is 46881, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 30745 in multi-core and 2116 in single-core. The Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 19429 and a single-core score of 2529. The 3DMark suite shows a progression from 2262 in the 2-thread test to 12412 in the max-thread test, indicating strong scaling with thread count. The PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 45887 and a single-thread score of 4333.

The GPU’s performance is far more modest. Its average benchmark score is 11842, placing it in the 51st percentile of all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 235, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 48289. The PassMark G3D score is 9608, with a G2D score of 815. The GPU compute score is 4456. These numbers place the RX 6500 XT at a mid-range level, roughly 1% below the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 and 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

The combined picture is one of extreme disparity. The CPU is a top-11% performer, while the GPU is a median performer. The combined system percentile of 70 reflects this average, but it masks the fact that the GPU will be the limiting factor in the vast majority of gaming and graphics applications. The system’s overall performance is defined by the GPU’s mid-range capability, despite the CPU’s high-end potential.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who have minimal requirements for 3D graphics acceleration. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 45887 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745, making compilation and testing fast. Students in computer science or engineering fields will find the CPU more than adequate for any coding or simulation tasks, though the GPU will not support advanced graphics work.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will see strong performance. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, will accelerate export times in video editing software. For small business workstations that handle databases, virtualization, or complex spreadsheets, the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 595292 indicates high throughput. However, the inclusion of the RX 6500 XT is questionable for these users, as the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 would be sufficient for basic display output.

Gamers at 1080p who are willing to accept medium settings and lower frame rates could use this system, but they would be paying for CPU performance they will never utilize. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for modern game textures, and its performance, which is 1% slower than the GTX 1080, is not sufficient for high-fidelity gaming. This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a workstation CPU with a placeholder GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 24 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 16 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2310 MHz, a game clock of 2610 MHz, and a boost clock of 2815 MHz. Memory is a significant limitation, with only 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 143.9 GB/s.

The benchmark scores reflect this entry-level configuration. The PassMark G3D score of 9608 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 235 show that the GPU is not designed for high-end gaming. Its FP32 performance is 5.765 TFLOPS, which is low compared to modern graphics cards. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 54724 is higher than the OpenCL score of 48289, suggesting better performance in Vulkan-based applications. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering, the GPU’s 16 ray accelerators and 1024 shading units are insufficient for demanding ray-traced workloads. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, and the 143.9 GB/s bandwidth will cause bottlenecks when streaming large datasets. The GPU can handle light 3D work and basic video encoding, but its performance is best suited for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings, as its nearest rival, the GTX 1080, is a previous-generation card that it slightly trails in average score.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system that pairs a top-tier Intel Core i7-13700K processor with a mid-range AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, while the GPU is an entry-level RDNA 2.0 part. The combined system percentile is 70, but this number is skewed by the CPU’s high percentile of 89 and the GPU’s lower percentile of 51. The system is a high-performance workstation for CPU-bound tasks, with a graphics solution that is only suitable for casual gaming or basic display output.

The CPU’s performance is comparable to top-tier rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, with an average score within 0.2%, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535, within 0.5%. The GPU’s performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, with an average score that is 1% lower. This pairing creates a system where the CPU is the primary investment, and the GPU is a secondary consideration. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $409, and for the GPU it is 199 USD.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Radeon RX 6500 XT’s PassMark G3D score of 9608 and its position relative to the GTX 1080 and GTX 1660 suggest that it is a 1080p gaming card. In games at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. Expect average frame rates in the range of 30 to 60 FPS for modern AAA titles, depending on the title’s optimization and VRAM usage.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU will struggle significantly. The 4 GB VRAM will be exceeded by many modern games, causing texture pop-in and stuttering. The 64-bit memory bus and 143.9 GB/s bandwidth will also become a severe bottleneck. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 1136 in 3DMark will not help in this scenario, as the GPU is simply not powerful enough to render frames at this resolution. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming, as the GPU’s performance is far below the requirements.

The CPU’s performance in gaming-related benchmarks, such as the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2262 and 4-thread score of 4469, indicates it can handle high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU will cap the frame rate well below the CPU’s potential. The estimated FPS figures are subject to significant variance based on game engine, but the general conclusion is that this is a 1080p gaming system that requires medium to low settings for playable frame rates, with the CPU never being the bottleneck in any gaming scenario.