SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with an AMD Radeon RX 6400 is an unusual combination, placing a high-end 16-core CPU alongside an entry-level GPU. The data shows a severe imbalance in computational capability: the CPU ranks in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 35th percentile. This pairing is defined by its lopsided nature—the processor can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease, but the graphics card will limit any visual or gaming task to modest settings. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core issue with this build is the massive gap between CPU and GPU performance. The i7-13700K’s average benchmark score of 46881 places it just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, while being 0.5% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535. In contrast, the RX 6400’s average benchmark score of 6001 is exactly equal to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, 0.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, and 0.2% behind the AMD FirePro W4100. This means the GPU is roughly 7.8 times weaker than the CPU in raw benchmark terms—a bottleneck that will dominate almost every workload.

In CPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the processor will run at full capacity. The 3DMark max-threads score of 12412 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 show that the CPU can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads. However, in gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The RX 6400’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 indicate that it will struggle to push high frame rates at any resolution above 1080p. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface of the GPU also limits data transfer to the CPU, which can reduce performance in scenes with heavy texture streaming.

The FPS scaling follows the GPU’s capabilities, not the CPU’s. Even with the i7-13700K’s single-thread score of 1136 in 3DMark and 4333 in PassMark single-thread, the graphics card will cap frame rates. At 1080p, the RX 6400’s 128.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest playable frame rates in esports titles, but at 1440p or 4K, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause stuttering and texture pop-in. The bottleneck is clear: the CPU is never the limiting factor; the GPU is always the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The RX 6400’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 and DirectX 11 score of 70 indicate low rendering throughput. At 1080p, estimates suggest 60-80 FPS in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will likely drop below 30 FPS at medium settings. The CPU’s high single-thread performance cannot compensate for the GPU’s limited pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s.

Streaming: The i7-13700K has integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can handle encoding tasks. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 595292 and encryption score of 33249 show strong throughput for streaming workloads. However, the RX 6400 cannot handle the rendering load simultaneously. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 2812 is too low for real-time encoding offload, so streaming while gaming will require the CPU to handle both, potentially reducing game performance due to thread contention.

Video editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks like rendering timelines and exporting videos, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16292 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19429. The GPU’s 768 shading units and 48 TMUs provide some acceleration for effects, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit working with high-resolution footage. For 1080p editing, the CPU will carry the load, but 4K timelines will stall due to GPU memory constraints.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45887 indicate excellent performance for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the RX 6400’s low memory bandwidth will slow down GPU-accelerated renderers. For Blender or similar tools, expect CPU rendering to be several times faster than GPU rendering.

Software development: The CPU dominates this scenario. The PassMark integer math score of 154446 and floating point math score of 114867 support fast code compilation and testing. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU is irrelevant here, so this build works well for developers who do not play games.

Student and office work: For office tasks, the CPU is overkill, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive basic displays. The RX 6400 adds no value for word processing or spreadsheets. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 722 is low, indicating mediocre 2D performance, so the integrated graphics might actually be smoother for desktop use. The 125W CPU TDP also means higher idle power draw compared to lower-end processors.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 2262 at 2 threads to 12412 at max threads, showing a 5.5x improvement. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 is about 14.5x the single-core score of 2116, indicating strong multi-threading efficiency. The Geekbench scores show a similar pattern: 2529 single-core versus 19429 multi-core, a 7.7x ratio. The PassMark single-thread score of 4333 is identical to the singlethread score, confirming consistency.

The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms 89% of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% in average score, showing that the i7-13700K is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and content creation, but the real strength is in multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark physics score of 2716 is relatively low, which could indicate thermal or power constraints under sustained load, but the data does not specify thermal limits.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a bonus for troubleshooting or basic display output, but it is not a gaming solution. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, which could push performance further, but the FACT PACK provides no overclocking results. The launch MSRP was $409, stated once here for reference.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores and should not be treated as empirical results.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RX 6400’s PassMark DirectX 11 score of 70 and DirectX 12 score of 30 suggest very low performance. Estimates indicate that esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant might achieve 50-70 FPS, but modern AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield would likely run at 20-30 FPS on low settings. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit; many games exceed this at 1080p ultra, causing texture streaming issues.

At 1440p, the RX 6400 is not viable for gaming. The 128.0 GB/s bandwidth and 64-bit bus cannot handle the pixel fill rate required. Frame rates would drop to single digits in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU is effectively unusable for gaming, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 indicating that even synthetic benchmarks struggle.

The CPU’s high single-thread performance does not help gaming here because the GPU is the bottleneck. The i7-13700K’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 is excellent, but it cannot push more frames than the GPU can render. For gaming, this pair should be treated as a 1080p low-to-medium settings machine, and even then, only for older or less demanding games.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive work and do not need gaming performance. The i7-13700K’s 89th percentile ranking makes it suitable for 3D rendering, video editing, software development, and scientific computing. The PassMark data compression score of 595292 and encryption score of 33249 support archival and security workloads. The CPU’s 24 threads handle parallel tasks efficiently, and the 16 cores provide headroom for future software optimizations.

Content creators who work with CPU-based renderers will benefit most. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 ensures fast 3D scene renders, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 19429 supports complex simulations. Video editors using proxy workflows for 1080p footage will find the CPU fast enough, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM limits effects and color grading.

Students and office workers who need a powerful workstation for programming or data analysis will find this build sufficient, but the RX 6400 is unnecessary for such tasks—the integrated graphics would suffice. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications, such as database queries or financial modeling, will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 154446.

Gamers should avoid this build entirely. The RX 6400’s 35th percentile ranking places it below most modern GPUs, and the 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for current games. If gaming is a secondary concern, the CPU’s integrated graphics might be better for basic titles, but the discrete GPU adds little value. This is a CPU-first build for professionals, not a gaming rig.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is based on the Navi 24 chip, using the RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. The chip contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, with a transistor density of 50.5M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 12 ray-tracing cores. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 128.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 1923 MHz, boost clock is 2321 MHz, and game clock is 2039 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The TDP is 53W, and the suggested PSU is 250W. It is a single-slot card with no power connectors and uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are low across the board. The PassMark G3D score of 7673 places it in the 35th percentile, equal to the GTX 770M. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is very low, indicating poor DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32011 and Vulkan score of 16372 show limited compute capability. The PassMark DirectX scores are particularly weak: 54 for DirectX 10, 70 for DirectX 11, and 30 for DirectX 12.

The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS and FP16 of 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) are modest for modern rendering tasks. The pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are low, confirming the GPU is designed for entry-level 1080p gaming or basic display output. The 12 RT cores provide ray-tracing support, but the low compute power means RT effects will be slow. The 4 GB VRAM is the biggest limitation; modern games at 1080p often require 6-8 GB.

The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, and its successor is Navi III. The launch MSRP was $159, but the FACT PACK does not mention current pricing. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 3.565 TFLOPS is roughly 9% of what a high-end GPU would offer, but the CPU would still be faster for most rendering tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46881, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, -0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022, -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46654, +0.5%), and Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653, +0.5%). This shows the i7-13700K is statistically tied with these processors, with all deltas within 0.5%.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 6001, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6000, 0% delta), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5996, +0.1%), AMD FirePro W4100 (5987, +0.2%), and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5986, +0.3%). The GPU is effectively equal to these older or low-end parts.

The combined percentile for this build is 62, which is dragged down by the GPU. The CPU alone would place the system in the top 11% of processors, but the GPU pulls the overall score down to the 62nd percentile. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but fails at GPU-bound tasks. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10717 for the CPU and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 illustrate the disparity: the CPU is about 61x stronger in its benchmark than the GPU in its respective test.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x4, which is a bottleneck for data transfer. The platform supports both memory types, but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity or speeds.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 250W, and the CPU’s TDP is 125W. Combined, the system can run on a 250W PSU, but this leaves no headroom for overclocking or additional components. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible, but the FACT PACK provides no overclocking results or power draw data. The GPU requires no power connectors, which simplifies installation.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU can handle any GPU on the market, so replacing the RX 6400 with a higher-end card would remove the bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface of the GPU limits bandwidth, but a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 x8 or x16 would be faster. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation, so upgrading to a GPU with 8 GB or more would be beneficial for gaming.

Memory is another upgrade path. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose based on budget and availability. The FACT PACK does not specify speeds, but the dual-channel bus means adding more memory will improve performance in memory-bound workloads. The CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache is already large, so memory bandwidth is likely the next limiter.

The platform is active, meaning BIOS updates and driver support are ongoing. The CPU’s production status is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, so the GPU will not receive new feature updates. Upgrading the GPU is the most logical step, as the CPU has years of useful life remaining for multi-threaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is this build good for gaming at 1080p?

A: The data suggests it is only suitable for older or esports titles at low settings. The RX 6400’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 and 4 GB VRAM limit modern games, with estimates of 20-30 FPS in AAA titles at 1080p ultra.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700K’s average benchmark score of 46881 is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, and 0.5% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535.

Q: Can the CPU handle video editing without the GPU?

A: Yes, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45887 support CPU-based video rendering. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle display output, but the RX 6400’s 4 GB VRAM limits GPU-accelerated effects.

Q: What is the GPU’s main weakness?

A: The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary limits. The PassMark G3D score of 7673 places it in the 35th percentile, equal to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M.

Q: Is the power supply requirement realistic?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 250W, and the CPU’s TDP is 125W. A 250W PSU would run the system, but there is no headroom for overclocking or additional components.

Q: Should I upgrade the CPU or GPU first?

A: The GPU should be upgraded first. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 0.5% delta from rivals show it is competitive, while the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking is the bottleneck.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates ECC memory support is true for the i7-13700K. This is useful for workstation builds that require error-correcting memory.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700K

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds