SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700HX

34,554 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700HX and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation represent a specific high-end mobile pairing, but the benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the CPU’s strong multi-threaded capabilities and the GPU’s surprisingly modest standing in the database. The processor, a Raptor Lake-HX part with 16 cores and 24 threads, is clearly designed for heavy computational lifting, while the graphics chip, despite its professional "RTX 5000" branding, does not perform like a top-tier gaming or rendering solution. This analysis examines the raw scores, percentile positions, and workload implications for this laptop combination, with a clear note that no measured frame rates exist for this exact configuration in the provided data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes ECC support, and has an integrated UHD Graphics 770. The chip is unlocked for overclocking and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores climb from 1024 in single-thread, to 3738 in 4-thread, 6416 in 8-thread, and peak at 8988 in max-thread tests. This progression indicates efficient utilization of its core count. In Cinebench, the multi-core scores are particularly telling: R15 multi-core hits 3277, R20 multi-core reaches 11290, and R23 multi-core achieves 20479. The single-core Cinebench scores are 272 (R15), 1593 (R20), and 1875 (R23), which are solid but not exceptional for a high-end mobile part. The Passmark suite reinforces this: multi-thread score is 32637, integer math is 116617, and floating-point math is 85863, while single-thread is 3819.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 34554, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is 0.2% ahead with a score of 34485, the Intel Core i5-13450HX is 0.6% ahead at 34333, and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is 0.9% ahead at 34260. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 is 0.9% behind at 34881. This means the i7-13700HX is essentially tied with these processors, differing by less than one percent in aggregate performance. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with authority, but it is not a class leader; it sits in the upper mid-range of desktop-class performance in a mobile package.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are robust, but the GPU’s single benchmark result is a significant outlier. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, based on the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process, has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596. This score places the GPU in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, which is surprisingly low for a chip with 9728 shading units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. The GPU’s average benchmark score is also 3596, indicating only one data point. Its nearest rivals are all older, lower-end parts: the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 is 0.1% ahead at 3594, the GeForce GT 735M is 0.6% behind at 3616, the GeForce GTX 1050 is 0.9% behind at 3629, and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 is 1.5% behind at 3649.

This creates a confusing picture. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, a boost clock of 2115 MHz, and a 120 W TDP. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Yet its benchmark percentile suggests it performs like a much weaker card. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 53, which is average. The data indicates that the CPU is the dominant performer, while the GPU is a bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU’s 84th percentile versus the GPU’s 21st percentile shows a massive imbalance. For workloads that rely on the GPU, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, this pairing will underperform relative to the CPU’s capabilities.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596, which is in the 21st percentile, suggests that this is not a high-refresh gaming GPU. The nearest rivals, including the GTX 1050 and GT 735M, are entry-level cards from previous generations. Based on this, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation will likely struggle with modern AAA titles at ultra settings, especially at 1440p or 4K resolutions. The CPU, with its strong single-thread score of 1024 in 3DMark and 3819 in Passmark, will not be the limiting factor in most games; the GPU will be.

For esports titles or older games, the CPU’s high multi-thread performance might allow for decent frame rates if the GPU can keep up, but the GPU’s low percentile indicates it will cap performance well below what the CPU can feed. The 16 GB VRAM is generous, but the raw compute throughput, as evidenced by the Steel Nomad score, is not sufficient for high-end gaming. Users should expect frame rates comparable to a low-end desktop GPU from several generations ago, which means 1080p at medium or low settings for demanding titles, and possibly 1440p for less intensive games. These are estimates, not measured data, and the actual performance could vary, but the benchmark evidence points to a weak gaming experience relative to the CPU’s potential.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear bottleneck: the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-heavy workloads. The CPU’s 84th percentile versus the GPU’s 21st percentile is a massive gap. In gaming, the CPU’s scores for 8-thread (6416) and max-thread (8988) workloads are more than sufficient for modern game engines, which typically use 4 to 8 threads. The GPU’s Steel Nomad score of 3596, however, is far below what is needed to drive high frame rates at high resolutions. The FPS scaling, if it existed, would show that increasing resolution or graphical settings would tank performance because the GPU is already near its limit.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU is the star. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 and Passmark multi-thread score of 32637 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy parallel tasks. The GPU would not be a bottleneck for these tasks unless they use GPU acceleration, in which case the weak GPU would slow things down. The combined percentile of 53 reflects this imbalance: the system is average overall because one component is strong and the other is weak. For a balanced system, users would want a GPU closer to the CPU’s percentile, but the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is not that. The CPU is the bottleneck in tasks that are purely single-threaded, but that is rare in modern workloads; the GPU is the primary bottleneck for visual and compute-heavy graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a suitable platform. The GPU’s 21st percentile and Steel Nomad score of 3596 indicate it cannot produce high frame rates at 1080p or 1440p in demanding titles. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will cap performance, making high-refresh gaming (144Hz or higher) unrealistic except in very lightweight esports games.

Streaming: The CPU’s strong multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 20479) can handle software encoding for streaming without a dedicated encoder, but the GPU’s weak performance means the game will run poorly, which ruins the stream. Hardware encoding via the GPU would be possible, but the GPU’s low score suggests it might struggle with simultaneous encoding and gaming.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The Passmark data compression score of 392725 and integer math score of 116617 indicate fast processing for codecs and effects. The GPU can assist with some effects, but its low score means previews and renders that use GPU acceleration will be slow. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for large projects, but the compute power is lacking.

3D rendering: The CPU will handle CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) well due to its 24 threads and Cinebench R23 score of 20479. GPU-based rendering (e.g., Octane, V-Ray) will be slow because the GPU’s FP32 performance is not in the data, but its Steel Nomad score suggests it is far behind current generation GPUs. This is a mixed bag: good for CPU rendering, bad for GPU rendering.

Software development: The CPU is excellent for compilation and multi-threaded builds. The Passmark multi-thread score of 32637 and 3DMark max-thread score of 8988 show strong parallel processing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this is a solid scenario.

Student and office work: This is overkill for the CPU but fine. The single-thread score of 3819 in Passmark and 1024 in 3DMark is more than enough for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU’s low score does not matter for these tasks. The 55 W TDP means the laptop will have decent battery life if not under load.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a niche user: someone who needs a powerful CPU in a laptop for productivity tasks but does not require high-end graphics. Content creators who do CPU-based video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the i7-13700HX’s 24 threads and Cinebench R23 score of 20479. Software developers who compile large codebases will see fast build times due to the Passmark multi-thread score of 32637. Students in engineering or computer science fields will have a laptop that handles simulations and coding well. Small business workstations that run data analysis or financial models will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 116617.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p should avoid this build. The GPU’s 21st percentile means it will not deliver smooth gameplay in modern titles. Users who need GPU-accelerated tasks, such as AI inference or professional 3D modeling with real-time viewports, will be disappointed. The target audience is strictly CPU-centric professionals who do not game or use GPU-heavy applications. The 16 GB VRAM is a lure, but the raw compute power is not there to use it effectively.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700HX is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34554.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H is 0.2% ahead of the i7-13700HX in average score, with a score of 34485 versus 34554.

Q: What is the GPU’s single benchmark score and percentile?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596, placing it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Is the GPU’s performance similar to any other graphics cards?

A: Yes, the GPU’s score is within 1.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545, GT 735M, GTX 1050, and AMD Radeon HD 6770.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming frame rates?

A: No, there are no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 53, indicating an average system overall, driven by the CPU’s high score and GPU’s low score.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is soldered to the motherboard using the Intel BGA 1964 socket, meaning it cannot be upgraded. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users can choose between those, but the memory bus is dual-channel. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and external GPUs. The GPU is also soldered and not upgradeable, with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, so the total power draw is 175 W, which is typical for a high-end laptop.

The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the 120 W GPU and 55 W CPU, a laptop power adapter of at least 200 W would be sensible. Since this is a laptop, upgrades are limited to memory and storage. The next sensible upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or swap in a faster NVMe SSD using the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform itself is not upgradeable for the CPU or GPU, so users should buy the configuration they need upfront. The GPU’s successor is the Blackwell-MW, and the CPU’s successor would be a newer Intel generation, but neither is compatible with this socket.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core i7-13700HX and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with 16 cores and 24 threads, performing in the 84th percentile. The GPU is a professional mobile graphics chip with 16 GB of VRAM, but its benchmark score places it in the 21st percentile, which is low. The combined percentile is 53, meaning this system is average compared to all other pairings. The build is a paradox: a powerful CPU paired with a weak GPU. It is suited for CPU-intensive tasks like software development, data analysis, and CPU-based rendering, but it is not a gaming machine or a GPU-accelerated workstation. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is an estimate, and those estimates are not favorable. This is a workstation for a specific user who values the CPU above all else.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds