SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700HX

34,554 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

45,152 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile represents a flagship-class laptop configuration that sits at the 84th percentile for both CPU and GPU performance, placing it firmly in the upper tier of mobile computing hardware. This combination leverages Intel’s Raptor Lake-HX architecture with 16 cores and 24 threads, clocked from a 2.10 GHz base to a 5.00 GHz boost, alongside NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 10,496 shading units and 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. The benchmark results indicate a system designed to handle the most demanding workloads, from high-refresh gaming to professional 3D rendering, though it is critical to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing; all frame rate discussions herein are estimated from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its hybrid design, implied by the core and thread counts, allows the chip to balance high single-thread responsiveness with substantial multi-threaded throughput. The processor’s benchmark scores paint a clear picture: in 3DMark’s single-thread test, it scores 1,024, while scaling to 2, 4, 8, and 16 threads yields scores of 1,990, 3,738, 6,416, and 8,051 respectively, culminating in a max-thread score of 8,988. This scaling pattern shows near-linear improvement up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that, which is typical for a hybrid architecture where performance cores handle heavy loads and efficiency cores assist with background tasks.

In Cinebench tests, the processor achieves 1,875 points in R23 single-core and 20,479 points in multi-core, representing an 11x multiplier from single to multi-threaded performance. The R20 results show 1,593 single-core and 11,290 multi-core, while R15 shows 272 single-core and 3,277 multi-core. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle lightly-threaded applications like web browsing or office productivity with ease, while also excelling at heavily-parallel workloads such as video encoding or software compilation. PassMark results reinforce this: integer math scores 116,617, floating-point math scores 85,863, and extended instructions score 24,127, suggesting strong arithmetic and SIMD capabilities. Data compression scores 392,725, and encryption scores 22,386, which are relevant for file archiving and secure communications.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 34,554 places it at the 84th percentile of all processors. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Core i7-13700HX is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H (score 34,485), 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13450HX (score 34,333), and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (score 34,260). However, it trails the AMD Ryzen 5 150 by 0.9%, which scores 34,881. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the 13700HX is competitively positioned within its class, offering performance nearly identical to its closest alternatives but with the advantage of newer architecture and higher boost clocks. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache, split as 2 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, helps maintain low latency for frequently accessed data, benefiting both gaming and productivity scenarios.

Gaming Performance

It must be stated clearly that no measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores, specifically the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score and the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, rather than direct in-game testing.

Given the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,871 and its PassMark G3D score of 30,034, this system is expected to deliver very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most modern titles. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 31.80 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 169.7 GPixel/s suggest it can handle demanding rasterization workloads, while the 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. At 1080p ultra settings, the combination of a high single-thread CPU score (1,024 in 3DMark) and the GPU’s raw throughput should push frame rates well above 144 FPS in esports titles and above 100 FPS in AAA games, though these are estimates. At 1440p, the GPU’s 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes more critical, and frame rates are expected to remain high, likely in the 80-120 FPS range for demanding titles. At 4K, the 24 GB VRAM capacity ensures no memory-related stuttering, but frame rates may drop to 60-80 FPS in the most graphics-intensive games, again based on synthetic score extrapolation.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,479 indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, as it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render at lower resolutions. The single-thread score of 1,875 in R23 is sufficient for game logic and physics calculations. Users should treat these as directional estimates, not guarantees, as actual gaming performance depends heavily on game optimization, driver maturity, and thermal headroom within the specific laptop chassis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU complement each other across different workload types. The CPU’s percentile rank of 84 and the GPU’s percentile rank of 84 are identical, indicating that neither component is significantly stronger or weaker than the other relative to their respective markets. This parity means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as strategy games or physics simulation, the 13700HX’s 16 cores and 24 threads will keep up with the GPU’s rendering demands. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or ray tracing, the RTX 5090 Mobile’s 10496 shading units will be the limiting factor, which is appropriate for a laptop-class GPU.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, points to the GPU becoming the bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (1,024 in 3DMark single-thread) is likely sufficient to drive the GPU to near-maximum utilization, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s fill rate and bandwidth will cap performance. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 30,034 versus the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 32,637 suggests that in mixed workloads, they are comparable in throughput, but the GPU is specifically optimized for graphics. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1,908 indicates adequate physics processing for gaming, while the GPU’s compute score of 13,401 in PassMark shows strong parallel compute for tasks like AI inference or video processing.

The 55W TDP of the CPU and 95W TDP of the GPU mean that in a laptop chassis, thermal management will be critical. The system’s combined power draw is substantial, and prolonged gaming sessions may cause thermal throttling, which would skew the balance toward the component with better thermal headroom. Benchmark data does not account for chassis-specific cooling, so the observed balance in synthetic tests may not translate perfectly to real-world sustained loads.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is targeted at enthusiasts and professionals who require desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop). Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates will benefit from the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, though they should expect that at 4K, the GPU will be the primary limiter. Content creators editing 4K or 8K video will leverage the CPU’s 16 cores, which score 20,479 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the GPU’s 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 performance for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. 3D artists using ray-traced renderers will appreciate the 82 RT cores, while machine learning developers can utilize the 328 tensor cores for training and inference tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will find the 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache beneficial, as the PassMark multi-thread score of 32,637 indicates strong parallel processing. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile platform and ensures data integrity for long-running simulations. Small business workstations that need to run accounting software, databases, or moderate CAD workloads will find the system more than capable, though the premium positioning of this hardware implies it is not a cost-conscious choice. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $485, but this is only for the processor itself and does not reflect total system cost.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, as listed in the FACT PACK.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 Mobile have?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates from synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates ECC memory support is true for this CPU.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is based on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process, with a chip designated as GB203.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core i7-13700HX scores 34,554, which is 0.2% higher than the Core Ultra 5 336H’s score of 34,485.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a top-tier mobile GPU based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. It features 10,496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units, delivering a texture rate of 496.9 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 169.7 GPixel/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 31.80 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 31.80 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating balanced compute capabilities for both single and half precision workloads.

Memory-wise, the GPU is equipped with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, achieving a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of VRAM that will accommodate high-resolution textures and large datasets without paging. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps. The GPU also includes 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, which accelerate ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The base clock is 990 MHz with a boost clock of 1515 MHz, which is conservative for a mobile GPU, likely to manage thermals within the 95W TDP.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 5,871 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 201,834 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 198,405 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 30,034 and a GPU compute score of 13,401. The average benchmark score is 45,152, placing the GPU at the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5090 Mobile is 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (score 44,795), but 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (score 45,384), 1.0% behind the Intel Arc A730M (score 45,592), and 1.8% behind the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (score 45,972). These small deltas suggest the RTX 5090 Mobile is competitive with desktop-class GPUs from the previous generation, despite its mobile form factor. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; the entire motherboard must be replaced to change processors. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, which is beneficial for workstation tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling fast NVMe SSDs and high-bandwidth peripherals. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is available for basic display output or troubleshooting, but the discrete RTX 5090 Mobile will handle all graphics-intensive tasks.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, which offers ample bandwidth for the GPU’s data transfers. The GPU has no power connectors, as it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) soldered onto the motherboard, drawing power from the laptop’s internal power delivery system. The TDP is 95W, and combined with the CPU’s 55W TDP, the total system draw is significant, requiring a robust power adapter and cooling solution. The suggested PSU field is null, which is expected for a laptop, but users should ensure the laptop’s power brick can sustain peak loads.

For a sensible next upgrade, users would look at the laptop’s storage and memory, as these are the most accessible components. Adding more DDR5 memory or faster NVMe storage would be straightforward. However, upgrading the CPU or GPU is not feasible due to the BGA socket and soldered GPU. The platform is designed to be a complete package at purchase time, with no meaningful component-level upgrades except for memory and storage. The 24 GB VRAM and 16-core CPU are both near the top of their respective classes, so the only future-proofing concern would be the thermal solution and battery life, which are not covered by the benchmark data.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: laptop) that pairs a 16-core, 24-thread Intel Core i7-13700HX with a 24 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile. Both components are at the 84th percentile of their respective markets, meaning this system outperforms 84% of all CPUs and 84% of all GPUs in the database. The combination is designed for high-end gaming and professional workloads, but the lack of measured FPS data means the exact gaming performance is not verified, only estimated from synthetic scores. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 34,554 and the GPU’s average score of 45,152 combine to create a system that is well-suited for tasks requiring both strong single-threaded responsiveness and massive parallel throughput.

The build’s overall tier is high-end, given the percentile ranks and the specifications. The 30 MB L3 cache on the CPU and the 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU indicate a system that minimizes data bottlenecks. The GPU’s 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU’s 20,479 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggest that this is a workstation-class laptop in gaming clothing. The lack of a launch MSRP for the GPU and the $485 launch MSRP for the CPU (which is just the processor) suggest a premium product, but pricing is not the focus of this analysis. The pairing is current and active, with the CPU released in January 2023 and the GPU in March 2025, indicating a modern platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is anchored by its 3DMark scores, which show a progression from 1,024 single-thread to 8,988 max-thread, and its Cinebench scores, which reach 20,479 in R23 multi-core. The average benchmark score is 34,554, with a percentile rank of 84. The nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H, which is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 5 150, which is 0.9% ahead. This puts the 13700HX in a tight cluster of mid-to-high-end processors where performance differences are marginal.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is highlighted by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,871, which is a modern DirectX 12 test, and its Geekbench scores of 201,834 (OpenCL) and 198,405 (Vulkan). The PassMark G3D score of 30,034 is also strong. The average benchmark score is 45,152, with a percentile rank of 84. The GPU is 0.8% ahead of the RTX 4070 Ti but trails the RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 1.8%, showing it is competitive with desktop GPUs from the previous generation. Combined, the CPU and GPU both sit at the 84th percentile, indicating a balanced system where neither component drags down the other. The combinedPercentile is also 84, confirming that this pairing is consistent in its performance tier. The data suggests that users will experience high frame rates in games and fast render times in productivity apps, but the exact figures remain estimates due to the absence of measured FPS data.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth should drive frame rates above 144 FPS at 1080p and above 100 FPS at 1440p in most titles, based on the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,871, though these are estimates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,024 ensures minimal bottleneck at these resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, scoring 20,479 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, can handle game encoding via x264 or x265, while the GPU’s NVENC (not specified but implied by tensor cores) can offload this task. The combined CPU and GPU performance allows for simultaneous gaming and streaming without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 116,617 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 201,834 indicate strong performance in timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The 24 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers and multi-layer compositions in tools like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 82 RT cores and 31.80 TFLOPS FP32, combined with its 24 GB VRAM, make it suitable for GPU-accelerated renders in Blender or Octane. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,479 also supports CPU-based rendering in apps like Cinema 4D, though the GPU will be faster for most tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache, scoring 32,637 in PassMark multi-thread, speed up code compilation and test execution. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running builds or database operations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,875 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1,057 handle everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets with ease, though this hardware is overkill for such workloads and would be better utilized in demanding scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds