SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700HX

34,554 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration aimed at users who need both substantial multi-core processing power and high-tier graphics acceleration. The data shows a system that sits in the 83rd percentile overall, indicating a strong performance tier, though the specific benchmark results reveal a nuanced picture of where its strengths and limitations lie. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided FACT PACK, which contains no measured frame rate data for this exact combination; therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration positions it as a high-core-count mobile part designed for demanding parallel workloads, and the benchmark scores confirm this orientation.

In multi-threaded tests, the CPU demonstrates commanding performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 is particularly telling, as is the 3DMark max-threads score of 8988. These results suggest that the processor can sustain heavy loads across all 16 cores, making it suitable for video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The PassMark multithread score of 32637 further reinforces this, and the data compression score of 392725 indicates strong throughput in data-heavy tasks. The 84th percentile standing among all CPUs places it above the majority of processors, with its average benchmark score of 34554 only 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H and 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, showing it is competitive with but not dominant over these rivals.

Single-thread performance, while not as spectacular, is still robust. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1875 and the 3DMark single-thread score of 1024 indicate solid responsiveness for everyday tasks and applications that rely on fewer cores. The PassMark single-thread score of 3819 is respectable, and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 1990 suggests that lightly threaded workloads, such as older games or certain productivity apps, will run smoothly. The floating-point math score of 85863 and integer math score of 116617 in PassMark highlight the processor's arithmetic capabilities, which are crucial for scientific computing and financial modeling. However, the PassMark find prime numbers score of 124 is notably lower in isolation, though this is a specialized test that does not reflect general performance.

The architecture’s efficiency is also evident in the scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The scores progress from 1990 (2-thread) to 3738 (4-thread) to 6416 (8-thread) and finally to 8988 (max-threads), showing that performance scales well as more cores are engaged, though with diminishing returns after 8 threads. This is typical of a hybrid architecture where not all cores are identical in capability. The presence of ECC memory support and the unlocked multiplier suggest that this CPU is also intended for professional and enthusiast use cases, where reliability and tuning are valued.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in balancing cost and performance. The memory bus is dual-channel, and while no specific bandwidth figure is provided, the support for DDR5 implies high transfer rates are achievable. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for connecting high-speed NVMe SSDs and the GPU, although the GPU itself in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or power-saving modes. The CPU's TDP of 55 W is moderate for a high-core-count part, and this suggests that the system’s power supply, while not explicitly rated in the FACT PACK, must be capable of handling the combined load of the CPU and GPU. Since the GPU has a TDP of 110 W, the total power draw for the core components is substantial, and the PSU headroom is a critical design consideration for laptop builders.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that focusing on memory and storage would yield the most benefit. Given the CPU’s support for DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5, upgrading to faster DDR5 modules and a Gen 5 NVMe SSD would maximize the platform's potential. The CPU itself is already at a high tier, so replacing it is not feasible due to the BGA socket. The GPU, being a mobile part, is also soldered, so the only practical upgrades are memory, storage, and possibly the wireless card. The platform is built for a high-performance laptop, so the next upgrade path is more about maximizing the existing components rather than swapping them out.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end graphics processor based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The GPU has 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores, making it well-equipped for both real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, which is a high-speed configuration for mobile graphics.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is strong but with some caveats. The PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it in the 81st percentile among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 38135 is competitive. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 indicate robust compute and graphics capabilities. The FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS is substantial, and the FP16 performance is identical at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1), which is beneficial for workloads that use mixed precision. The texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s are high, suggesting strong performance in fill-rate-limited scenarios.

However, the nearest rivals list reveals an interesting anomaly. The RTX 4080 Mobile's average score of 38135 is only 0.4% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and 0.6% higher than the RTX 5080 Mobile, which seems counterintuitive given the generational gap. This is likely due to the average benchmark score being skewed by the PassMark DirectX tests, where the scores are low (e.g., DirectX 12 score of 96, DirectX 11 score of 244). These low DirectX scores drag down the average, making the comparison to lower-tier cards misleading. The G3D score of 24926 is a more reliable indicator of overall graphics performance, and the compute score of 11191 is also solid.

The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores are critical for modern gaming features like DLSS and ray tracing. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensure compatibility with the latest games and applications. The GPU’s TDP of 110 W is relatively high for a mobile part, which means it requires adequate cooling and power delivery. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for this GPU’s bandwidth needs. Display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the specific ports vary by laptop model.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is a key consideration for this build. The CPU is in the 84th percentile, while the GPU is in the 81st percentile, indicating they are closely matched in relative performance. The combined percentile of 83 suggests that neither component drastically outclasses the other, which is generally good for avoiding severe bottlenecks. However, the specific workloads will determine which component becomes the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or data compression, the Core i7-13700HX will be the primary driver. The PassMark physics score of 1908 and the data compression score of 392725 indicate strong performance, but the GPU will still handle graphics rendering. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming with ray tracing, the RTX 4080 Mobile will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s G3D score of 24926 is high, but the low DirectX 12 score of 96 suggests that some synthetic tests may not fully utilize the GPU’s capabilities, which could translate to inconsistent performance in certain API-heavy workloads.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available in the FACT PACK, so the bottleneck analysis must rely on the percentile positions. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1024 in 3DMark and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS suggest that for most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the bottleneck at high resolutions, while the CPU will be sufficient to feed it. For productivity tasks, the CPU’s 24 threads will be the workhorse, and the GPU will accelerate specific tasks like rendering or AI inference. The system is well-balanced for a high-end laptop, with no single component holding the other back in a way that would cause significant performance loss.

Benchmark Performance

The exact benchmark scores for this combination are derived from the individual CPU and GPU tests. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 and single-core score of 1875 demonstrate its capability in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8051 and max-threads score of 8988 highlight its multi-core scaling. The PassMark multithread score of 32637 and single-thread score of 3819 provide additional context, showing that the CPU is roughly 10 times faster in multi-threaded tests than single-threaded, which is typical for a 16-core part.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 is its most representative benchmark, placing it in the 81st percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 are also strong, indicating good compute performance. The FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS is a key metric for raw graphics power. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are notably low, with DirectX 10 at 157, DirectX 11 at 244, and DirectX 12 at 96. These scores are anomalous compared to the G3D score, and they suggest that the GPU’s performance in legacy or specific API tests is not representative of its overall capability.

The combined picture is one of a high-performance laptop that excels in both CPU and GPU-intensive tasks. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile, with a combined 83rd percentile, indicate that this is a top-tier configuration. The average benchmark scores of 34554 for the CPU and 38135 for the GPU are close to the nearest rivals, with deltas ranging from -0.9% to 1.3%, showing that this pairing is competitive but not the absolute fastest in every scenario. The data suggests that the system will perform admirably in gaming at high settings, content creation, and professional workloads, though the lack of measured FPS means these conclusions are based on synthetic benchmarks.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is targeted at power users who need a mobile workstation with strong gaming and compute capabilities. Gamers who play at high resolutions, such as 1440p or 4K, will benefit from the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which are sufficient for modern titles with high texture quality. The CPU’s 24 threads ensure that game physics and AI calculations are handled smoothly, and the 5 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-thread performance for game logic.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 and the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance to be a powerful combination for rendering and effects. The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores enable accelerated ray tracing and AI-based denoising, which are increasingly common in professional software. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s high multi-threaded performance for compiling large codebases, with the PassMark integer math score of 116617 indicating strong arithmetic throughput.

Students and small business workstations may find this configuration overkill for basic tasks, but it can handle any workload they throw at it, from data analysis to virtual machines. The ECC memory support on the CPU is a boon for those who need data integrity in scientific or financial computing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future-proofing for high-speed storage. This is not a budget-oriented build; it is for users who prioritize performance and are willing to invest in a high-end laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance, and how does it compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU’s single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 1875, while the multi-core score is 20479. This indicates that the CPU is roughly 10.9 times faster in multi-threaded workloads, which is expected for a 16-core, 24-thread processor.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700HX supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in professional or server-grade platforms.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 81st percentile among all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 38135.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size?

A: The CPU has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is available to all cores.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this pairing is 83, placing it in the top 17% of all systems in the database.

Q: Are there any measured frame rates for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i7-13700HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass. The CPU is a 16-core Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with a 110 W TDP. The combined percentile of 83 places this configuration in the upper tier of systems, with the CPU in the 84th percentile and the GPU in the 81st percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 34554, and the GPU’s is 38135, making this a well-matched pair for high-performance tasks.

The system is designed for users who need both substantial CPU compute and GPU acceleration. The CPU’s 24 threads and 5 GHz boost clock handle demanding multi-threaded applications, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance deliver high-end graphics. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, making it a forward-looking design. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $485, which reflects its premium positioning. This is a top-tier laptop configuration, not a mid-range or budget option.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 and the CPU’s single-thread score of 1024 in 3DMark suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and it can handle 4K at playable frame rates in most titles.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the CPU’s 5 GHz boost clock and 3DMark 2-thread score of 1990 should provide very high frame rates, likely exceeding 200 FPS at 1080p with low settings. For AAA games at 1440p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM will be the limiting factor, but the FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS suggests that frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range are achievable. At 4K, the GPU will be stressed more, and the RT cores will be engaged for ray tracing, potentially dropping frame rates to 30-60 FPS depending on the title.

The CPU’s multi-threaded performance will help in games that use multiple cores for physics and AI, ensuring consistent frame pacing. The tensor cores are useful for DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games. Overall, this system is estimated to provide a high-quality gaming experience, but the lack of measured data means these figures should be treated as rough estimates rather than precise predictions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3819 PassMark single-thread) and the GPU’s high FP32 throughput (24.72 TFLOPS) make this system capable of driving 144Hz+ monitors at 1080p or 1440p in most games, though the exact frame rates are estimated due to the lack of measured FPS data.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 20479) can handle game encoding via x264 while the GPU handles rendering, and the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate NVENC-based encoding, providing a smooth streaming experience.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core score of 20479 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM are well-suited for 4K video editing, with the GPU accelerating effects and the CPU handling timeline scrubbing and export.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache and 24 threads, combined with the GPU’s 58 RT cores and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32, make this a capable system for CPU and GPU-based rendering, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 85863 indicating strong arithmetic throughput.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 116617 and data compression score of 392725 are ideal for compiling large codebases and handling version control operations, while the 16 cores and 24 threads allow for parallel builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3819 in PassMark and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide more than enough performance for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, though this configuration is overkill for such tasks, offering headroom for future demands.