SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700HX

34,554 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700HX + AMD Radeon RX 7600M: A High-Tier Mobile Pairing

This build pairs Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake-HX flagship mobile processor with AMD's Radeon RX 7600M, a Navi 33-based graphics solution. The combination sits at the 87th percentile overall among all builds, placing it firmly in the upper tier of laptop configurations. The CPU alone ranks at the 84th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU reaches the 89th percentile against all GPUs. This is a desktop-class processing core in a mobile chassis, matched with a modern RDNA 3 graphics engine that delivers strong compute throughput. The data shows a system designed for demanding multitasking, content creation, and high-refresh gaming at mainstream resolutions, though the lack of measured frame rates means performance expectations must be derived from component-level benchmarks.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 13,300 million transistors spread across a 204 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. This is a mobile-first design with a 90 W TDP, but it maintains substantial compute resources: 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2410 MHz. These clock speeds allow for a pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s.

Memory configuration is a critical factor for rendering workloads. The RX 7600M comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This produces a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. For a mobile GPU in this class, 8 GB is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high detail settings, though texture-heavy scenes at 4K could approach capacity limits. The 256 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the compute throughput, but it is not excessive; memory-bound workloads such as large dataset rendering or heavy post-processing filters may see bandwidth constraints. The 128-bit bus width is a limiting factor compared to wider buses found in higher-tier desktop parts, but it is consistent with the mobile power envelope.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 28 RT cores. This is a dedicated ray tracing accelerator, and with RDNA 3's second-generation RT implementation, the RX 7600M can handle ray-traced effects in supported titles. However, the FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate that rasterization remains the primary strength. The GPU does not list tensor cores, as AMD relies on shader-based AI acceleration rather than dedicated tensor hardware. The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering engines and upcoming titles. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for data transfer between CPU and GPU.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 places the RX 7600M at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. This is a strong showing for a mobile part. Its nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP with a score of 63830 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63842 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64212 (0.7% higher). The delta percentages are minimal—all rivals sit within 0.7% of the RX 7600M's score. This indicates that the GPU is positioned in a very tight performance band where small architectural differences determine leaderboard position. For rendering, this means the RX 7600M is competitive with workstation-class GPUs from previous generations, making it suitable for 3D modeling, animation, and GPU-accelerated compositing tasks that leverage OpenCL compute.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i7-13700HX reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score is 1024, while the 2-thread score reaches 1990, the 4-thread score is 3738, the 8-thread score is 6416, the 16-thread score is 8051, and the max-thread score is 8988. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads is nearly linear, indicating strong multi-core efficiency. The max-thread score is only about 12% higher than the 16-thread score, suggesting that the 16-core configuration is nearing its performance ceiling with 24 threads. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 3277, R20 multicore scores 11290, and R23 multicore scores 20479. The single-core R23 score of 1875 is competitive for a mobile processor at 5.00 GHz boost.

PassMark tests provide additional context for real-world workloads. The multithread score is 32637, while the single-thread score is 3819. Integer math reaches 116617, floating-point math reaches 85863, and extended instructions score 24127. Data compression scores 392725, while data encryption hits 22386. Random string sorting scores 41717, and find prime numbers scores 124. Physics simulation scores 1908. These numbers indicate a processor that can handle both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks with ease, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and software compilation. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 34554, placing it at the 84th percentile against all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals show tight competition. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has an average score of 34485, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, 0.6% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34260, 0.9% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 scores 34881, which is 0.9% higher. These deltas are all under 1%, meaning the i7-13700HX is essentially tied with these rivals in aggregate performance. However, the i7-13700HX has a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz and more cores (16 vs. the typical 6-8 in the rival list), which gives it an edge in heavily threaded workloads even if the aggregate scores are similar.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 is the sole graphics benchmark in the data. Combined with the CPU's average score of 34554, the overall system percentile is 87. This combined percentile is higher than either component's individual percentile (84 for CPU, 89 for GPU), indicating that the pairing is well-matched. The GPU does not drag down the system, and the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU's compute capabilities. The combined picture is a laptop that can handle both processor-intensive tasks like video encoding and GPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering without a clear weak point.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the i7-13700HX and the RX 7600M is characterized by a CPU that ranks at the 84th percentile and a GPU at the 89th percentile. The GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is, but the difference is small enough that neither component dominates the other. In CPU-bound workloads—such as software compilation, spreadsheet calculations, or database operations—the processor's 16 cores and 24 threads will be the primary driver of performance. The PassMark multithread score of 32637 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 8988 indicate that the CPU can sustain heavy parallel workloads without becoming a bottleneck.

In GPU-bound workloads—such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering—the RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking means it will likely be the limiting factor in most graphically intensive scenarios. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and 8 GB VRAM capacity are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K resolution, the VRAM capacity may become a constraint in texture-heavy titles. The FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS is strong for a mobile GPU, but it is not in the same league as desktop flagship parts, so users should expect to adjust settings for the most demanding games.

There is no measured FPS data for this specific combination, so FPS scaling cannot be directly observed. However, the benchmark scores provide indirect evidence. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 8051 suggests it can feed the GPU with enough draw calls and physics calculations to keep it busy in most scenarios. The GPU's OpenCL score of 63775 indicates it can process compute shaders efficiently. The combined percentile of 87 is higher than both individual percentiles, which implies that the two components complement each other well rather than one holding the other back. In practice, this means the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, and the GPU will not be underutilized in multi-threaded productivity tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing is suited for users who need a single laptop to handle both demanding productivity and gaming workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20479 makes it ideal for video editors who work with 4K footage, as rendering and exporting timelines benefit from high multi-threaded performance. The PassMark data compression score of 392725 indicates strong performance in file archiving and backup tasks, which is relevant for developers managing large code repositories or database administrators handling big exports.

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking sufficient for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth support modern game engines at these resolutions with high detail settings. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1024 ensures that game logic and physics simulations run smoothly, while the 16 cores handle background tasks like streaming or recording without impacting frame rates. Content creators working in 3D applications like Blender or Maya will benefit from the GPU's 28 RT cores and 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which accelerate both viewport rendering and final image output.

Students and small business workstations are also a fit, provided the workload involves more than basic office tasks. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 116617 and floating-point math score of 85863 indicate strong performance in engineering simulations, financial modeling, and data analysis tools like MATLAB or Excel with large datasets. The ECC memory support (true) is an additional advantage for users who require data integrity in scientific or financial applications. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, extending battery life for mobile productivity.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node (though the exact node is listed as 10 nm, Raptor Lake commonly uses Intel 7, but the pack states 10 nm). The die size is 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on supported platforms. The TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a 16-core part, but mobile thermal constraints necessitate this limit.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for multi-threaded workloads where data sharing between cores reduces memory latency. The 3DMark scores show a smooth scaling from single-thread (1024) to max-thread (8988), with the 8-thread score (6416) being 80% of the max-thread score. This indicates that the processor can utilize its cores effectively without significant overhead from thread scheduling or cache contention.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20479 is a strong indicator of sustained multi-threaded performance. This translates to faster video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation times. The single-core R23 score of 1875 is competitive, ensuring that lightly threaded applications like web browsers, office suites, and legacy software run responsively. PassMark scores further illustrate the CPU's versatility: the encryption score of 22386 shows strong AES-NI performance for VPN and disk encryption tasks, while the extended instructions score of 24127 indicates robust SIMD processing for scientific and engineering workloads. The find prime numbers score of 124 is a measure of integer performance under high cache pressure, and while it appears low, it is a specialized test that stresses memory latency rather than raw throughput.

The nearest CPU rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 150, has a higher aggregate score (34881 vs. 34554), but the i7-13700HX offers more cores and a higher boost clock. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H and Core i5-13450HX are within 0.6% of the i7-13700HX's score, making them viable alternatives in the same performance tier. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, a desktop part from a previous generation, is 0.9% slower in aggregate, but it draws more power and lacks the mobile form factor. For laptop users, the i7-13700HX delivers desktop-class multi-threading performance in a 55 W envelope.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Radeon RX 7600M have?

A: The GPU has 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, derived from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus running at 16 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700HX support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed as true in the specifications.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU, and how many cores does it have?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, and the CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What are the nearest GPU rivals to the Radeon RX 7600M in benchmark scores?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (0.1% higher), NVIDIA CMP 30HX (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (0.1% lower), and AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (0.7% lower).

Q: Does this laptop build have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, the data does not include measured FPS rows for this combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the GPU?

A: The GPU is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid array designed for mobile platforms. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the specific memory type depends on the laptop's motherboard design. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which allows for high-bandwidth connections to storage devices and the discrete GPU, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU has a TDP of 90 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 145 W. There is no suggested PSU listed, and the GPU uses no power connectors (slot width is IGP, indicating it draws power from the motherboard). This is a laptop build, so the power delivery is handled by the laptop's adapter, not a desktop PSU. The absence of a suggested PSU means there is no specific headroom figure to report; however, the combined TDP of 145 W suggests that a laptop adapter rated for at least 180-200 W would be typical for this class, though this is not stated in the data.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity and speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 interface can benefit both CPU and GPU workloads. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 lanes (20 lanes) would also be worthwhile, as the CPU can support high-speed NVMe drives. The GPU is soldered and cannot be upgraded, but the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for future eGPU solutions via Thunderbolt or proprietary connectors, though this is speculative. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives laptop manufacturers flexibility, but for users, the memory is typically not user-replaceable in thin-and-light designs. The 55 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP indicate a performance-tier laptop that requires adequate cooling; a laptop cooler or elevated stand could help sustain boost clocks under load.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i7-13700HX, a 16-core Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, a Navi 33-based RDNA 3 mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of all builds in the database. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 89th percentile indicate that both components are well above average, making this a high-performance mobile workstation or gaming laptop.

The system is designed for users who need significant compute power in a portable form factor. The CPU's 24 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock handle heavy multitasking and threaded applications, while the GPU's 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 28 RT cores provide solid graphics and ray tracing capabilities. The 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the 30 MB L3 cache on the CPU reduces memory latency in data-intensive tasks. This is not a budget system; the CPU's launch MSRP is $485, which reflects its position as a high-end mobile processor. The overall tier is that of a premium laptop, suitable for professionals and enthusiasts who require desktop-like performance on the go.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking and 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are sufficient for high frame rates in competitive titles. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1024 ensures low latency in game logic, while the 8 GB VRAM handles modern textures without excessive swapping. Frame rates at 4K will be lower, but the GPU's 154.2 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high-refresh 1440p in many titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads allow for simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant frame drops. The PassMark multithread score of 32637 and data compression score of 392725 indicate that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining game performance. The GPU's hardware encoders (via RDNA 3) provide an alternative for lower-impact streaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20479 accelerates timeline rendering and export in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's OpenCL score of 63775 supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, while the 30 MB L3 cache reduces stutter when scrubbing through high-bitrate footage. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing, though 8K may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 threads and the GPU's 28 RT cores make this a capable combination for Blender or Maya. The FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS handles viewport shading, while the CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 85863 accelerates CPU-based renders. The 256 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU reduces bottlenecks when rendering large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 116617 and data encryption score of 22386 speed up code compilation and secure file operations. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 30 MB L3 cache improves cache locality for large projects. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3819) ensures responsive application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a power-efficient fallback for document editing and web browsing, extending battery life when the discrete GPU is idle.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The RX 7600M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 and 89th percentile ranking suggest it can handle most modern games at 1080p with high or ultra settings, and at 1440p with medium to high settings. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 8988 ensures that CPU-bound titles will not be limited by processor performance.

For esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the combination of a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 17.27 TFLOPS GPU throughput likely delivers frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA single-player games, frame rates at 1080p ultra are expected to be in the 60-100 FPS range, while 1440p ultra may drop to 50-80 FPS depending on the title's optimization. Ray-traced workloads will see lower performance due to the 28 RT cores, but the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern ray tracing effects. These figures are estimates only; the absence of measured data means users should consult independent reviews for exact frame rates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700HX

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds