SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700HX

34,554 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700HX paired with the AMD Radeon 860M represents a distinctive laptop configuration, combining a high-performance 16-core mobile processor with an integrated graphics solution based on AMD’s latest RDNA 3.5 architecture. This pairing sits in the 78th combined percentile of all benchmarked systems, indicating a configuration that is firmly above average but with a significant asymmetry in capability between its two primary components. The CPU is a powerhouse, while the GPU, though impressive for an integrated part, is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to detail the usage scenarios, performance metrics, and system balance of this unique mobile platform.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The AMD Radeon 860M, with its 72nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 26401, is not positioned for high-refresh-rate gaming at demanding settings. While it outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 by 0.1%, its performance class is that of an entry-level discrete GPU. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the data suggests that users would need to rely on lower graphical presets and less demanding titles, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this scenario. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance places it in a range where competitive esports titles may achieve high frame rates, but triple-A releases will likely struggle to maintain high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s robust multi-threaded capabilities are well-suited for streaming workloads. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 8988, the Intel Core i7-13700HX can handle game encoding and broadcasting tasks simultaneously. The 24 threads provide ample headroom for x264 encoding, which is a common software-based approach. However, the Radeon 860M lacks a dedicated hardware encoder of the same caliber as some discrete options, meaning streamers may need to rely on the CPU’s substantial processing power, which the 84th percentile CPU ranking suggests is more than capable of handling.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both strong CPU and GPU components. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 32637 and data compression score of 392725 indicate excellent capability for video decoding, timeline scrubbing, and effect processing. The GPU, with its 8 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, can accelerate certain effects and rendering tasks. However, the 16 ROPs and limited 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance mean that GPU-accelerated exports and complex effects will be slower than on systems with more powerful discrete graphics. The overall experience will be smooth for editing, but final renders will rely heavily on the CPU.

3D Rendering: The Intel Core i7-13700HX is the star of this show for 3D rendering. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11290 and R15 multi-core score of 3277 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance, putting it ahead of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.9%. This makes CPU-based rendering engines, such as those found in Blender or V-Ray, very productive. The GPU can assist with real-time viewport previews, but for final frame rendering, the massive 30 MB of L3 cache and 16 cores will be the primary drivers of performance, making this a competent, if unconventional, mobile rendering workstation.

Software Development: The combination of high single-thread and multi-thread performance makes this platform ideal for software development. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1024 and PassMark single-thread score of 3819 ensure responsive compilation of individual files and snappy IDE performance. For large-scale builds, the multi-threaded scores, such as the 8988 in 3DMark max-threads, will significantly reduce compile times. The support for ECC memory is an additional feature that could appeal to developers working on critical, data-sensitive applications, offering a level of stability not found in all mobile platforms.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity tasks, this configuration is vastly overqualified. The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking ensures that office suites, web browsing, and data analysis run flawlessly. The Radeon 860M is more than sufficient for 4K video playback and general desktop acceleration. The data shows that in single-threaded tasks, the CPU scores 1875 in Cinebench R23, which is excellent for the rapid-fire, low-load operations common in office software. The system’s battery life would be more dependent on the display and other components, but the 55W TDP of the CPU and the 15W TDP of the GPU suggest a platform that can be efficient under light loads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700HX compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700HX has an average benchmark score of 34554, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X’s score of 34260. This indicates the i7-13700HX holds a slight performance lead in overall benchmark results.

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Radeon 860M based on its benchmark scores?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401 and sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, indicating it performs at a level comparable to an entry-level discrete mobile GPU.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile for the Intel Core i7-13700HX and AMD Radeon 860M is 78, placing it above the majority of all benchmarked laptop configurations.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 860M support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 860M is equipped with 8 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). This indicates the hardware is capable of accelerating real-time ray-traced workloads, though the overall performance will be limited by the GPU’s other specifications.

Q: What kind of memory does the Intel Core i7-13700HX support?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found in workstation-class platforms.

Q: Is this laptop configuration suitable for CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering?

A: Yes, the CPU is exceptionally strong for these tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 and 84th percentile ranking place it in the top tier of processors, making it highly capable for 3D rendering and other multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the process node for the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, which contributes to its efficiency and performance for an integrated graphics processor.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a dual-nature system. The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a top-tier mobile processor, evidenced by its 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 34554. Its multi-threaded performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 32637. This places it in a class above its nearest rivals, including a 0.2% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H and a 0.9% lead over the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1875, ensuring snappy system responsiveness.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon 860M, while a capable integrated GPU, occupies a much lower performance tier. Its average benchmark score is 26401, ranking it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a 0.1% deficit to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and a 0.3% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, a comparison that highlights the Radeon 860M’s position as an entry-level solution. Its Geekbench scores are 22759 in OpenCL and 30043 in Vulkan, showing respectable compute performance for its class.

The combined percentile for this package is 78, which is heavily weighted by the CPU’s stellar performance. The picture that emerges from the data is one of a high-performance computing platform where the graphics subsystem is a secondary component. The CPU can handle the most demanding processing tasks, while the GPU provides adequate, but not exceptional, visual output. This asymmetry defines the system’s character, making it a powerful tool for productivity and a modest performer in gaming.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who require a high degree of processing power in a laptop form factor. The 84th percentile CPU performance makes it an excellent choice for developers, engineers, and analysts who compile code, run simulations, or process large datasets. The multi-threaded capabilities, demonstrated by the Cinebench R20 score of 11290, are ideal for video editors who work with high-resolution footage and need fast timeline performance, even if final exports are CPU-limited. Students in STEM fields or small business workstations handling complex spreadsheets and databases will find the processing power to be more than adequate for years to come.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those who prioritize esports titles or are willing to play newer, more demanding games at lower resolutions and graphical settings. The Radeon 860M, given its 72nd percentile ranking, can handle games like “League of Legends” or “Counter-Strike 2” with high frame rates. For content creators, the lack of a powerful discrete GPU means that GPU-accelerated effects in programs like Adobe After Effects will not be as fast as on a dedicated gaming laptop. The target user is someone who needs immense CPU power for their professional or academic work and plays games as a secondary concern, rather than a hardcore gamer seeking a top-tier graphics experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. In any workload that utilizes the graphics processor, the AMD Radeon 860M will be the definitive bottleneck. For example, in gaming, even if the CPU can process game logic at high frame rates, the GPU’s 16 ROPs and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will limit the final output resolution and frame rate. The GPU’s 72nd percentile versus the CPU’s 84th percentile illustrates this imbalance.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU plays a supporting role. The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 22386 and extended instructions score of 24127 indicate a formidable processor that will not be easily bottlenecked by other system components in these tasks. In mixed workloads, such as streaming while gaming, the system can leverage the CPU’s 24 threads to handle the encoding, but the gaming frame rate will still be dictated by the GPU’s capabilities. The bottleneck is situational, but in graphics-centric applications, the GPU is the clear limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 8 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. Its clock speeds are notable, with a base of 600 MHz and a boost of up to 3000 MHz. The memory is system-shared, meaning its bandwidth and size are dependent on the system’s DDR4 or DDR5 memory configuration, as indicated by the "System Dependent" specification.

In terms of performance, the GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is its stronger result, suggesting good driver optimization and compute potential. The OpenCL score of 22759 is also respectable. The data shows it is a close rival to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, with a score difference of only 0.1%. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, limiting its utility for GPU rendering engines. However, the support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern game engines and graphics APIs. The 8 RT cores allow for ray tracing to be enabled, but performance will be low, making it a feature for visual fidelity rather than high frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 55W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, along with a shared 30 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory and offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes, making it a powerful platform for high-speed storage and peripherals.

The benchmark scores for this CPU are outstanding. Its 3DMark max-threads score of 8988 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20479 confirm its high-end desktop-class performance in a mobile package. The PassMark integer math score of 116617 and floating-point math score of 85863 further underscore its computational strength. This performance makes it ideal for heavy multitasking, professional software, and complex simulations. The single-threaded performance, with a 3DMark score of 1024, is also top-tier, ensuring that everyday applications and games that rely on single-core performance run smoothly. The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking confirms its capability, placing it firmly in the high-performance segment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable. The system supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, and the GPU’s performance is directly tied to the memory speed and bandwidth. Therefore, the most impactful upgrade for graphics performance would be to ensure the system is populated with the fastest supported memory, as the Radeon 860M shares this system memory. The CPU supports a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes, allowing for extremely fast NVMe SSDs.

Given that the GPU is an integrated part with a 15W TDP, there is no discrete GPU upgrade path. The system’s power supply is not specified, but the combined 55W CPU TDP and 15W GPU TDP indicate a modest power budget, leaving headroom for other components. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize the amount and speed of system RAM, which would directly benefit the iGPU’s performance. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a unique feature that could be beneficial for data-intensive workstations, but it is a feature that must be supported by the motherboard and BIOS. PCIe Gen 5 support also future-proofs the system for next-generation storage devices.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs a high-end Intel Core i7-13700HX processor with an entry-level AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-HX part, positioned in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, making it a top-tier mobile processor. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution, positioned in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 78, which places this configuration in the upper quartile of all systems, primarily due to the CPU’s strength. It is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level graphics solution, creating a unique imbalance. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $485.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 860M’s 72nd percentile ranking and its benchmark parity with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 suggest a performance level suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in most modern titles. Esports games like “Valorant” or “Rocket League,” which are less GPU-intensive, should run at high frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS at high settings. For more demanding triple-A games, users should expect to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates around 30-60 FPS at 1080p.

The CPU’s immense power means that game physics and AI calculations will never be a bottleneck, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a key indicator of its rasterization capabilities. Games that are well-optimized for AMD hardware may perform better, but the overall experience will be that of an entry-level gaming laptop. Users should not expect to enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, despite the presence of 8 RT cores, as the overall GPU throughput is insufficient for this demanding feature. The system is best considered a high-performance productivity laptop with competent, but not dedicated, gaming capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds