SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700H

27,355 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile represent a high-end laptop pairing aimed at users who need both strong CPU throughput and top-tier GPU acceleration. The processor, built on Raptor Lake-H architecture, delivers a 14-core, 20-thread configuration with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, provides 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus. Data indicates this combination sits at the 82nd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 79th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile among all parts. The following analysis relies solely on the provided benchmark scores and specifications to outline usage scenarios, performance expectations, and system balance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is exceptionally well-suited. The RTX 4090 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 27212 places it in the 84th percentile, indicating it can drive frame rates well above standard 60 FPS targets at high settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and 1856 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures that game logic and physics calculations keep pace with the GPU’s output. The combined percentile of 82 supports the notion that this system will not bottleneck typical gaming workloads, making it a strong candidate for 144Hz or faster displays.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities and the GPU’s dedicated hardware. The Core i7-13700H scores 15474 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 7502 in 3DMark max threads, providing ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The GPU’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI-based encoding tasks, respectively. PassMark GPU compute score of 12347 further confirms that the GPU can handle parallel processing workloads, which is critical for real-time streaming overlays and rendering previews.

Video editing workflows rely heavily on both CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26399 and floating point math score of 66322 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export tasks. The GPU’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance allow for fast preview rendering and GPU-accelerated effects in applications that support them. The 16 GB VRAM capacity ensures that large 4K or 8K projects can reside in GPU memory without spilling over to system RAM.

3D rendering is a primary strength of this combination. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9231 and R15 multicore score of 2496 demonstrate solid performance for CPU-based rendering engines. Meanwhile, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 27212 and its 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 throughput make it a formidable option for GPU-accelerated renderers like those using CUDA or OptiX. The 304 tensor cores also support denoising and AI-enhanced rendering features, which can reduce iteration times in production environments.

Software development tasks benefit from the CPU’s balanced performance across thread counts. The 3DMark scores show a linear progression from 1947 at 2 threads to 5369 at 8 threads, indicating good scaling for compilation and testing workloads. The PassMark integer math score of 92811 and data encryption score of 17971 suggest strong performance for code compilation, cryptographic operations, and database queries. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce latency for frequently accessed code and data structures.

Student and office work are far beyond the needs of this hardware, but the system handles them effortlessly. The CPU’s PassMark single thread score of 3594 and 3DMark single thread score of 1015 ensure snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides basic display output for office tasks, though the discrete GPU will handle any graphics acceleration. The 45 W TDP of the CPU and 120 W TDP of the GPU indicate this is a performance-focused system, not an ultra-portable, but for users who need a single machine for both work and play, this pairing excels.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27355, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, scores 27382, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Intel part is essentially tied with that chip. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27507, a delta of -0.6%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, a delta of -0.7%. On the other side, the Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166, with the i7-13700H leading by 0.7%. These tight deltas indicate the CPU is competitive with mid-range desktop and high-end mobile parts, though not a standout leader in its class.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU shows strong multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 highlights its capability for heavy workloads, while the single-core score of 1856 is respectable for gaming and lightly threaded tasks. PassMark multithread score of 26399 and data compression score of 307791 demonstrate robust throughput for file archiving and parallel processing. The extended instructions score of 18303 suggests good support for modern SIMD workloads, which is useful for scientific computing and media encoding.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43667, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000, scores 43301, with the RTX 4090 Mobile leading by 0.8%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, a delta of 0.9%, and the Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, also a delta of 0.9%. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, with the RTX 4090 Mobile trailing by -0.9%. These comparisons show the mobile 4090 sits in the upper echelon of GPUs, comparable to professional workstation cards, though it is not the absolute fastest.

Geekbench results for the GPU are strong: OpenCL score of 180831 and Vulkan score of 170774 indicate excellent compute performance across different APIs. PassMark G3D score of 27212 confirms high graphical throughput, while the G2D score of 984 is modest, reflecting that 2D tasks are not the primary strength. The DirectX 12 score of 107 and DirectX 11 score of 262 from PassMark show modern API support, though these scores are lower on a relative basis than the G3D score, likely due to different test methodologies.

The combined percentile of 82 indicates that this CPU-GPU pairing is well matched, with neither component dramatically outperforming the other in a way that would create a significant bottleneck. The CPU’s 79th percentile and GPU’s 84th percentile are close enough that for most workloads, both components will be utilized effectively.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard, and upgrades would require replacing the entire laptop or motherboard assembly. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing users to choose between older and newer memory technologies depending on the motherboard design. PCIe support is limited to Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and NVMe storage, though it does not offer the full 16 lanes that desktop platforms provide.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W and uses an IGP slot width with no power connectors, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard and draws power through the system’s power delivery. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and together these components require a robust power supply, though the suggested PSU field is null in the data. Users upgrading from lower-power laptops should ensure their system has adequate cooling and power delivery, as the combined thermal load of a 45 W CPU and 120 W GPU is substantial for a mobile form factor.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows for bandwidth improvements that can benefit both CPU and GPU workloads. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also be viable, given the 8 lanes available. However, the soldered nature of both the CPU and GPU means that the laptop’s core components are not upgradable, and users should consider this a fixed configuration for the life of the system.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 27212 and 84th percentile ranking suggest it can handle modern games at high settings with ease. The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single thread score of 1015 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1856, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

For 1080p gaming, this combination should deliver frame rates well above 100 FPS in most titles, with esports games potentially exceeding 200 FPS. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that texture-heavy scenes do not cause stuttering, and the CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame pacing. At 1440p, performance remains strong, with the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 32.98 TFLOPS handling increased resolution demands, though frame rates will be lower than at 1080p.

At 4K resolution, the GPU is still capable, but the CPU may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 84th percentile ranking suggests it can push 60 FPS in many AAA games at 4K with settings adjusted, but the CPU’s 79th percentile might cause dips in scenarios with heavy physics or AI simulations. Ray tracing performance is supported by the 76 RT cores, though enabling it will reduce frame rates significantly. Overall, this system is best suited for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming, with 4K being playable but not optimal for maximum frame rates.

Who Should Build It

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p performance are the primary target for this pairing. The GPU’s 84th percentile and CPU’s 79th percentile ensure that most games will run smoothly at high settings, and the 16 GB VRAM future-proofs against increasingly demanding textures. Content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or work with large datasets will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded scores and the GPU’s compute performance, as evidenced by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 180831.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 92811 and data encryption score of 17971, which indicate strong performance for build tasks. Students in engineering or computer science fields can use this system for both coursework and personal projects, though the high-performance components are more than necessary for typical academic workloads. Small business workstations that handle data processing, virtualization, or CAD applications would also benefit, as the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26399 and GPU’s compute capabilities cover a wide range of professional tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on the AD103 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, providing a balanced configuration for rasterization and compute. It includes 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI workloads, making it a versatile part for modern gaming and professional applications.

Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is ample for 4K textures and large compute datasets. The base clock is 1335 MHz with a boost of 1695 MHz, and memory runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. Pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 515.3 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering.

FP32 performance is 32.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate due to 1:1 support, which is beneficial for AI inference and certain rendering techniques. The PassMark G3D score of 27212 puts it at the 84th percentile, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 180831 confirms its compute prowess. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 304 tensor cores accelerate denoising and upscaling features, while the 76 RT cores handle ray-traced effects. The GPU’s performance is comparable to professional cards like the RTX A6000, which it trails by 0.9% in average score, making it a viable option for workstation tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are reasonably balanced, with percentiles of 79 and 84, respectively. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates, and its higher percentile means it is less likely to be the limiting factor. However, in CPU-intensive games with heavy physics or AI, the CPU’s lower percentile could cause frame rate dips, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not fully taxed.

The 3DMark scores show the CPU scales well from 2 to 8 threads, with scores of 1947, 3616, and 5369, but the jump to max threads yields 7502, indicating diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. This suggests that games utilizing more than 8 threads will see less benefit, which could create a bottleneck in heavily threaded titles. Conversely, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 27212 versus the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26399 shows the GPU has a slight edge in raw throughput, supporting the notion that the GPU is the stronger component.

For content creation, the balance shifts depending on the task. Video encoding uses both CPU and GPU, and the CPU’s data compression score of 307791 indicates strong parallel performance, while the GPU’s compute score of 12347 supports hardware encoding. In 3D rendering, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 32.98 TFLOPS will dominate CPU rendering throughput, but the CPU’s Cinebench scores ensure it can handle tasks that cannot be GPU-accelerated. Overall, the system is well matched, with the GPU leading in graphics and compute and the CPU holding its own in general-purpose tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1015 in 3DMark single thread and 1856 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while scoring 7502 in 3DMark max threads and 15474 in Cinebench R23 multicore. This indicates strong multi-thread scaling, with the multicore score being roughly 8.3 times the single-core score in Cinebench.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 Mobile compare to professional workstation GPUs?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43667, which is 0.9% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro M6000’s 43301 and 0.8% higher than the Quadro M6000 24 GB’s 43262. It trails the RTX A6000’s 44075 by 0.9%, placing it in the same performance tier as these professional cards.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the system does not support ECC memory.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is the maximum achievable under normal operating conditions.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination in the database. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, which indicates that this pairing outperforms 82% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is at the 79th percentile, and the GPU is at the 84th percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile package. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is 45 W. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has PCIe Gen 5 support with 8 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that access large datasets, as it reduces memory latency. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, which provide basic display output and hardware acceleration for video playback. The CPU was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $502.

Benchmark results show the CPU performs well across thread counts. The 3DMark scores range from 1015 in single thread to 7502 in max threads, with intermediate scores of 1947 at 2 threads, 3616 at 4 threads, and 5369 at 8 threads. This scaling indicates that the CPU is effective for both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. Cinebench scores confirm this, with R15 multicore at 2496, R20 multicore at 9231, and R23 multicore at 15474. Single-core scores are 269 in R15, 1303 in R20, and 1856 in R23.

PassMark results provide additional insight into specific workload performance. The multithread score is 26399, which is strong for a mobile processor. Data compression scores 307791, indicating excellent performance for file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 17971, and extended instructions score 18303, both showing good support for modern instruction sets. Integer math scores 92811, and floating point math scores 66322, with prime number finding at 103 and random string sorting at 33595. The single thread score is 3594, which is competitive with desktop processors.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27355, placing it at the 79th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, scores 27382, a delta of -0.1%. This means the i7-13700H is essentially tied with that chip, despite having more cores and threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27507, a delta of -0.6%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, a delta of -0.7%. The Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166, with the i7-13700H leading by 0.7%. These tight margins show that while the CPU is competitive, it does not decisively outperform its rivals in average benchmark scores.

For real workloads, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads handle multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-thread performance for gaming and lightly threaded tasks. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives system builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking indicates it is a solid performer, though not a top-tier part, and it pairs well with the high-end RTX 4090 Mobile GPU.