SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700H + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700H

27,355 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a specific tier of laptop computing, combining a high-performance 14-core mobile processor with a modern integrated graphics solution. As the data in this database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, all performance expectations for gaming must be derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of both components. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate a system that is positioned for solid 1080p gaming and demanding productivity tasks, though the integrated nature of the graphics solution defines its ceiling in AAA titles.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i7-13700H paired with the AMD Radeon 860M. Therefore, all frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component, not empirical measurements from game testing. The data clearly shows this is an integrated graphics solution, as the Radeon 860M is classified as an IGP with shared system memory, which fundamentally shapes its gaming capabilities.

The Radeon 860M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, suggesting it should handle competitive esports titles at 1080p with medium to high settings, where frame rates in the range of 60-100 FPS are plausible based on its raw compute throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS. For more demanding AAA games, the GPU’s 512 shading units and 32 texture mapping units will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings, and the lack of dedicated VRAM (using System Shared memory) will further limit performance in texture-heavy scenes. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS indicates it is roughly comparable to entry-level discrete graphics from a few generations ago, meaning users should expect 30-60 FPS in modern titles at 1080p with reduced settings and resolution scaling.

The CPU side of this pairing is exceptionally strong for gaming, with the Core i7-13700H achieving a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1015 and a passmark_single_thread score of 3594. This single-thread performance ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the integrated GPU in most gaming scenarios, as the CPU can feed frames faster than the RDNA 3.5 graphics core can render them. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 5369 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 7502 further confirm that the processor has ample multi-threaded headroom for modern games that utilize more than four cores, though the 860M will likely be the limiting factor in achieving high frame rates. In CPU-light games like esports shooters or indie titles, the system may achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with optimized settings, but for graphically intensive titles, the integrated GPU’s 16 ROPs and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will cap performance well below what the CPU can deliver.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H features 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake-H architecture, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to other GPUs in the database?

A: The Radeon 860M sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26401. It is within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421) and 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331).

Q: What memory types does the Core i7-13700H support?

A: The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with memory bandwidth that is system dependent for the integrated GPU.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 860M uses System Shared memory for both its frame buffer and texture storage, with a system-dependent bandwidth and bus width.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H has a launch MSRP of $502.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for CPU-attached devices.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Core i7-13700H has an average benchmark score of 27355, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166) and 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G (27382).

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13700H delivers a robust benchmark profile that places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27355. Its multi-threaded performance is particularly strong, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 and the Passmark multithread score of 26399. The processor’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 7502 and 3dmark_16_threads score of 6885 indicate that it scales well with thread count, which is expected from a 14-core, 20-thread design. In terms of direct rivals, the CPU is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G (27382, deltaPct -0.1%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (27507, deltaPct -0.6%), while edging out the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166, deltaPct 0.7%).

The AMD Radeon 860M, by contrast, performs well for an integrated GPU but occupies a lower tier than the CPU. Its average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 22759 and 30043, respectively. The GPU’s closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, deltaPct -0.1%), which suggests the 860M offers performance in the range of a modest entry-level discrete GPU. Interestingly, the Radeon 860M is also within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331), though this comparison is likely influenced by the RTX 5060’s early driver maturity or specific benchmark conditions rather than real-world gaming equivalence.

The combined picture is a system with a clear performance hierarchy: the CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a mid-tier integrated solution. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this balance, indicating that the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads like compilation, rendering, and multitasking, but the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive applications. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9231 and single-core score of 1303 further reinforce that the CPU can handle both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks with ease, while the Passmark integer math score of 92811 and floating-point math score of 66322 demonstrate strong general computation capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in memory choice, but the lack of ECC memory support (eccMemory: false) limits its use in error-sensitive workstation scenarios. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for CPU-attached devices, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU or fast NVMe storage, though in this build the primary graphics solution is the integrated Radeon 860M.

The Radeon 860M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, as it is an IGP integrated into the processor package or system chipset. This means the system’s PSU headroom is determined entirely by the CPU and other components; the CPU’s 45 W TDP is modest for a 14-core processor, and a typical laptop power adapter should provide ample headroom for both components. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is narrower than the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support, but this is not a bottleneck for an integrated GPU that shares system memory.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to add a discrete GPU via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though this is not feasible in most laptop designs given the BGA 1744 socket and the integrated nature of the 860M. Alternatively, users could upgrade the system memory to faster DDR5 modules, which would directly benefit the integrated GPU’s System Shared memory bandwidth and potentially improve gaming performance. The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 suggests that the platform can be configured for either cost-effective or higher-bandwidth memory, but the system-dependent bandwidth of the GPU means that memory speed will have a measurable impact on graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W, making it a high-performance mobile chip designed for performance laptops and mobile workstations. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides ample fast memory for both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1015 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1856 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for legacy applications and games that rely on a few fast threads. The Passmark single-thread score of 3594 is competitive with the best desktop processors, confirming that the Raptor Lake architecture delivers high IPC (instructions per clock) at the 5.00 GHz boost clock. For multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9231 show that the processor can sustain high performance across all 20 threads, with the Passmark multithread score of 26399 providing further evidence of its parallel processing capability.

Real-world workloads that benefit from this CPU include software compilation, where the 14 cores can significantly reduce build times, and video encoding, where the 3dmark_16_threads score of 6885 suggests strong performance in threaded codecs. The Passmark data compression score of 307791 and data encryption score of 17971 indicate that the processor is also well-suited for file archiving and security applications. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors in the database, making it a suitable choice for users who need a mobile platform that can handle demanding productivity tasks without the need for a discrete GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming at 1080p in AAA titles, as the Radeon 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will likely cap frame rates below 100 FPS in most modern games. However, in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the GPU may achieve 60-100 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, and the CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 1015 ensures that frame pacing will not be a bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for streaming while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 indicates that the processor can handle x264 encoding at a moderate preset while maintaining game performance. The integrated GPU will limit the game’s graphical fidelity, but the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 26399 suggests that simultaneous encoding and gaming is feasible.

Video editing: The Core i7-13700H is well-suited for video editing, with the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9231 and Passmark floating-point math score of 66322 indicating strong performance in rendering and effects. The Radeon 860M’s OpenCL score of 22759 can accelerate GPU-accelerated effects in editors like DaVinci Resolve, though the System Shared memory will limit the complexity of timelines that can be handled smoothly.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 7502 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 make it capable of handling CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications, with render times that are competitive with desktop processors from a few years ago. The GPU’s RDNA 3.5 architecture with 8 ray tracing cores can accelerate RT-based rendering, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit its usefulness for final frame rendering.

Software development: The processor is excellent for software development, with the Passmark integer math score of 92811 and data compression score of 307791 indicating strong performance in code compilation and package management. The 14 cores will significantly reduce build times for large projects, and the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking ensures that it can handle multiple VMs or containers without significant slowdown.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3594 ensures snappy responsiveness in document editing and web browsing. The integrated GPU’s 512 shading units are more than sufficient for 4K video playback and light photo editing, making this a versatile machine for students who need both productivity and light gaming capability.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who need a high-performance laptop for productivity tasks and are willing to accept integrated graphics for gaming. The Core i7-13700H’s 79th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for professionals in software development, data analysis, and content creation, where the 14 cores and 20 threads can accelerate compilation, rendering, and multitasking. Gamers who primarily play esports titles or older games at 1080p will find the Radeon 860M’s 72nd percentile GPU ranking sufficient, especially if they are willing to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 indicates that render times will be reasonable for a laptop. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 22759 can also accelerate certain effects, though users should not expect discrete GPU-level performance in GPU-accelerated rendering. Students and small business users who need a reliable machine for office work, research, and light gaming will find this system well-balanced, with the CPU providing excellent responsiveness and the GPU handling casual gaming and media playback. However, users who demand high frame rates in AAA games at 1080p or above should look for a system with a discrete GPU, as the 860M’s System Shared memory and 16 ROPs will be a significant limitation.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") featuring the Intel Core i7-13700H as the primary processor and the AMD Radeon 860M as the integrated graphics solution. The system’s combined percentile of 76 places it in the upper quartile of all builds in the database, reflecting the strong CPU performance and above-average GPU performance for an integrated solution. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor from Intel’s Core 13th Gen series, while the GPU is a mid-tier integrated chip from AMD’s RDNA 3.5 architecture, designed for thin and light laptops that prioritize battery life and portability over raw graphics performance.

The overall tier of this build can be described as a “productivity-first” system, where the CPU is the dominant component and the GPU is sufficient for casual gaming and GPU-accelerated productivity. The processor’s 79th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking indicate a system that is well above average for everyday tasks, but the integrated GPU’s 15 W TDP and System Shared memory limit its ability to compete with even entry-level discrete GPUs. This build is best suited for users who need strong CPU performance for work and occasional gaming, rather than those who prioritize high-refresh gaming or GPU-intensive workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU is the dominant component in almost all scenarios. The Radeon 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are significantly lower than what a discrete GPU would offer, meaning that in gaming and 3D rendering, the GPU will limit frame rates and render times. The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 1015 and passmark_single_thread score of 3594 are more than sufficient to feed the GPU in most games, so users will rarely see CPU-bound scenarios except in very low-resolution or CPU-intensive titles.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15474 and Passmark multithread score of 26399 indicating that the processor can handle heavily threaded tasks without issue. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 22759 can accelerate certain tasks like image processing or video effects, but its System Shared memory and 15 W TDP mean that it will not be able to sustain high performance in sustained GPU workloads. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this balance, showing that the system is well-matched for CPU-heavy tasks but will be GPU-limited in graphics-intensive applications. Users who want to improve gaming performance should consider a laptop with a discrete GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a more powerful graphics solution.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units, with 8 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, with a 15 W TDP that fits within the thermal budget of a thin laptop. The memory subsystem is entirely System Shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR4 or DDR5 memory as the CPU, with bandwidth and bus width that are system dependent.

The benchmark scores for the Radeon 860M are respectable for an integrated GPU, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043. These scores place the GPU in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, which is notably high for an IGP, and the average benchmark score of 26401 puts it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, a discrete entry-level GPU. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s indicate that it can handle light to medium graphics workloads, but the 16 ROPs and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will limit fill-rate-bound scenarios. The 8 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the low shading unit count and System Shared memory will make ray tracing performance marginal in most games.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s Vulkan score of 30043 suggests that it can accelerate certain real-time rendering tasks, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with modern game engines. However, the lack of dedicated VRAM and the system-dependent bandwidth mean that texture-heavy scenes will suffer from memory bandwidth bottlenecks. The GPU’s 4 nm process node and 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio (3.072 TFLOPS for both) indicate that it is optimized for power efficiency rather than raw compute performance, making it suitable for laptops where battery life is a priority.