SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation pairing represents a high-end desktop workstation configuration, combining a 16-core Raptor Lake processor with a professional-grade Ada Lovelace GPU. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than empirical game testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the GPU is the dominant performance driver in most workloads, but the CPU provides substantial headroom that prevents significant bottlenecking in multi-threaded scenarios. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the Core i7-13700F ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, creating a combined percentile of 92. This 12-point gap suggests the GPU is the more exceptional component, but the CPU is far from a weak link.

Examining the CPU’s scaling across thread counts reveals a clear pattern: the 3DMark scores progress from 1092 single-thread to 2178 at 2 threads, 4258 at 4 threads, 7136 at 8 threads, 8994 at 16 threads, and 10716 at max threads. The scaling efficiency from 8 to 16 threads is roughly 26%, and from 16 to max threads only about 19%, indicating that the processor leverages its hybrid architecture well but hits diminishing returns beyond 16 threads. For a GPU as powerful as the RTX 5000 Ada, this means the CPU can feed frames adequately at high resolutions where GPU load dominates, but at lower resolutions or esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread performance of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23 single-core becomes the limiting factor.

The PassMark physics score of 2236 and integer math score of 141370 further illustrate the CPU’s capabilities. The physics score is relatively modest compared to the multi-threaded throughput, suggesting that game physics calculations, which often rely on fewer threads, may not scale perfectly with this processor. In contrast, the floating-point math score of 100422 and data compression score of 471838 indicate strong computational throughput for tasks that can utilize the full 24-thread count. The bottleneck analysis points to CPU limitations primarily in lightly-threaded gaming scenarios, while GPU limitations emerge only in compute-heavy professional workloads where the 32 GB VRAM capacity is exhausted.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39009 places it in the 86th percentile of all processors, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 4245P (39215, -0.5% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39325, -0.8%), Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38561, +1.2%), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (39485, -1.2%). The margin between the i7-13700F and these competitors is remarkably tight, with the largest delta being just 1.2% against the Core Ultra 5 235T. This indicates that in aggregate multi-threaded performance, the i7-13700F is essentially equivalent to these alternatives, despite differences in architecture and core counts.

Delving into individual benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 is a strong indicator of sustained all-core workload performance, while the single-core score of 4532 shows competitive lightly-threaded performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 15058 and single-core score of 2225 corroborate this balanced profile. The PassMark multithread score of 38369 and singlethread score of 4121 confirm that the CPU handles both heavily parallel and single-threaded tasks effectively. The encryption score of 26956 and extended instructions score of 28295 demonstrate solid cryptographic and SIMD throughput, relevant for security applications and scientific computing.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 184664 places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725, +0.5% delta), NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147, -1.3%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182109, +1.4%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178050, +3.7%). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 show that the GPU excels in both compute and graphics API performance. The combined picture is a system where the GPU outperforms even the A100 in some metrics, while the CPU provides sufficient throughput to avoid major bottlenecks in most professional scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, the CPU’s single-thread 3DMark score of 1092 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4532 may struggle to keep pace with the GPU’s capabilities, potentially creating a CPU bottleneck in esports titles. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking suggests it can output frames well beyond what the CPU can process at lower resolutions, making this pairing better suited for 4K gaming where GPU load is higher.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample resources for encoding and streaming while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 38369 and data encryption score of 26956 indicate that simultaneous encoding and gaming workloads can be handled, though the lack of integrated graphics on the F-series chip means encoding relies on the GPU’s NVENC or CPU-based encoding.

Video editing: The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are exceptional for timeline playback and effects rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 supports GPU-accelerated effects, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore of 32101 handles export encoding efficiently. This combination excels in 4K and 8K video projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 100 RT cores provide massive acceleration for ray-traced rendering. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 100422 supports viewport interactivity and scene preparation. Together, they form a formidable rendering workstation for applications like Blender or Maya.

Software development: The CPU’s compile times benefit from the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13482, while the GPU’s Vulkan score of 194041 supports GPU compute for tasks like machine learning model training. The data compression score of 471838 aids in handling large codebases and build artifacts.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for such tasks. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4121 and the GPU’s capabilities are far beyond what spreadsheets or document processing require, making this build impractical for purely academic or office environments.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 86th percentile position suggest that at 4K resolution with ultra settings, most modern titles would run well above 60 FPS, as the GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate are dominant factors. At 1440p ultra, frame rates would likely be significantly higher, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in many titles, limited more by the CPU’s ability to feed draw calls. At 1080p ultra, the CPU’s single-thread 3DMark score of 1092 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4532 would likely cap frame rates around 120-150 FPS in CPU-intensive titles, while GPU-bound games could still push higher. The RTX 5000 Ada’s 32 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and ray tracing, with the 100 RT cores enabling significant ray-traced effects at playable frame rates. The system’s 92nd combined percentile indicates it would outperform the vast majority of gaming rigs, though the professional GPU focus means gaming drivers may not be as optimized as consumer GeForce counterparts.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals and enthusiasts requiring workstation-class GPU compute with strong CPU throughput. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and 32 GB VRAM make it ideal for 3D artists, video editors working with 8K footage, and engineers running CAD or simulation software. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101, suit content creators who render videos or compile large codebases. Game developers at 4K resolution would benefit from the GPU’s high pixel rate and RT cores, though the CPU’s lightly-threaded performance may limit esports titles. Small business workstations handling data analysis, scientific computing, or machine learning would leverage the PassMark data compression score of 471838 and the GPU’s OpenCL performance of 175286. Students in graphics-intensive programs could justify the cost, but general office workers would find this system severely underutilized. The build class is desktop, confirming this is intended as a stationary workstation rather than a portable solution.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the AD102 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, containing 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU has 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, delivering a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, with FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS and FP16 at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1). The base clock of 1155 MHz boosts to 2550 MHz, and the 250 W TDP requires a 600 W suggested PSU with a single 16-pin power connector. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 place it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with performance rivaling the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725, +0.5%) and exceeding the RTX 4090 D (178050, +3.7%). For rendering, the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1,020 GTexel/s texture rate suggest exceptional performance in viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated effects.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F features 16 cores and 24 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The base clock of 2.10 GHz boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. The 3DMark scores show strong scaling from 1092 single-thread to 10716 max threads, while Cinebench R23 results of 32101 multicore and 4532 single-core indicate excellent multi-threaded throughput with competitive single-thread performance. The PassMark scores reveal specific strengths: data compression at 471838, integer math at 141370, floating-point math at 100422, and extended instructions at 28295. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 CPU lanes. The 86th percentile ranking places it just below the AMD EPYC 4245P (39215, -0.5%) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39325, -0.8%), but above the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38561, +1.2%). For real workloads, the 16-core configuration excels in video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and software compilation, while the 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal headroom for potential cooling upgrades, though the processor is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 5000 Ada’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU indicate a power supply upgrade may be necessary for those building with lower-wattage units. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing flexibility in memory choice. The 30 MB L3 cache is generous, but future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard due to the Socket 1700 platform. For the GPU, the successor is the Blackwell PRO W, suggesting that professional users may eventually want to upgrade to that architecture for newer features. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, and the dual-slot design with a 267 mm length fits most mid-tower cases. The lack of ECC memory support on the CPU may be a consideration for mission-critical compute workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 92, placing this system in the top 8% of all desktop configurations based on the benchmark data.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada has an average benchmark score of 184664, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB’s score of 183725, making them essentially equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score and how does it rank?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 32101, and the CPU ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival the AMD EPYC 4245P being only 0.5% faster.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada delivers 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: Are there measured FPS values for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination; all gaming performance discussed is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has a launch MSRP of $359.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the Intel Core i7-13700F, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor in the 86th CPU percentile, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a workstation GPU in the 98th GPU percentile. The combined percentile of 92 indicates a high-end system that excels in professional graphics and compute workloads. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 together provide exceptional throughput for rendering, simulation, and AI tasks. The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth support massive datasets, while the CPU’s 24 threads handle complex multi-threaded workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU make this a power-efficient high-performance pairing. This is not a typical gaming rig, but rather a professional workstation capable of handling the most demanding creative and scientific applications, with gaming performance as a secondary benefit. The system’s class is desktop, and its overall tier is near the top of the performance spectrum, suitable for users who require the best available GPU compute with a capable, balanced CPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds