SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

This desktop pairing combines Intel’s Core i7-13700F with NVIDIA’s RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU, and the benchmark data shows a system where the CPU and GPU sit in different performance tiers. The CPU holds an 86th percentile position among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 95th percentile among all GPUs — a 9-point gap that suggests the graphics card is the more dominant component in this pairing.

The CPU’s 16-core, 24-thread configuration with a 2.10 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost clock provides substantial compute headroom. Looking at the 3DMark thread scaling data, the processor scales from 1,092 points in single-thread to 7,136 at 8 threads, then to 10,716 at max threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threaded efficiency, with the 8-thread score representing 66.6% of the max-thread result. The jump from 8 threads to max threads adds roughly 50% more performance, which suggests the hybrid core arrangement delivers diminishing returns beyond 8 threads — a typical pattern for mixed P-core/E-core designs.

For gaming workloads, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark and 4,532 in Cinebench R23 single-core places it well above average, meaning it should not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the limiting factors for high-resolution gaming, not the CPU. The data indicates the CPU can feed frames fast enough at lower resolutions, but at 4K the GPU becomes the primary constraint — this is the expected balance for a workstation-class GPU paired with a high-end consumer CPU.

In productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and PassMark multi-thread score of 38,369 show a processor capable of heavy parallel workloads. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 indicates it can accelerate compute tasks, but for CPU-bound applications like software compilation or data compression, the processor carries the load. The PassMark data compression score of 471,838 and integer math score of 141,370 demonstrate where the CPU excels, while the GPU’s FP32 and tensor core capabilities (192 tensor cores) dominate AI and rendering workloads.

The combined percentile of 91 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop builds. The bottleneck profile is workload-dependent: CPU-limited in lightly threaded tasks like office productivity, GPU-limited in gaming at high resolutions, and balanced in multi-threaded rendering where both components contribute meaningfully.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility is a notable advantage — builders can choose between existing DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits without changing the motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and expansion cards. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 slot and does not bottleneck the card’s 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is rated at 130 W with a suggested power supply of 300 W. This combined power draw is modest for the performance level, meaning most standard ATX power supplies with adequate headroom will suffice. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a single slot, measuring 245 mm in length — compact for a workstation card of this capability.

The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock already provides strong out-of-the-box performance. The production status for both components is listed as Active, indicating ongoing availability. The GPU’s predecessor is Workstation Ampere, and its successor is Blackwell PRO W, so this Ada Lovelace card sits in the current generation.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU, as the CPU still has headroom in most workloads. Swapping to a higher-tier workstation GPU would leverage the CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the platform’s memory flexibility. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory could benefit memory-sensitive tasks, given the dual-channel bus. The platform’s DDR4/DDR5 support means users can incrementally improve memory without a full platform change.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features a hybrid core design typical of 13th-gen parts, though the FACT PACK does not specify the P-core/E-core split. The base clock of 2.10 GHz is conservative, but the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, providing strong single-threaded bursts. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels across the board. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 places it in the top 14% of all CPUs (86th percentile), while the single-core score of 4,532 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The Geekbench scores of 15,058 multi-core and 2,225 single-core reinforce this picture. In 3DMark tests, the processor scales from 2,178 at 2 threads to 10,716 at max threads, showing efficient utilization of its 24 threads.

PassMark results reveal specific strengths: floating-point math at 100,422, integer math at 141,370, and extended instructions at 28,295. The data compression score of 471,838 is particularly strong, indicating good memory subsystem performance. The find prime numbers score of 156 is lower relative to other tests, which is typical for processors without specialized prime-number acceleration. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,121 confirms strong legacy performance.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core processor, suggesting efficient power management. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory but does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for certain workstation use cases. The launch MSRP was $359, positioning it as a mid-range enthusiast part at release. The nearest rival, AMD EPYC 4245P, scores 39,215 versus the i7-13700F’s average benchmark score of 39,009 — a negligible 0.5% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T trails by 1.2%, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Ryzen AI 7 450 lead by 0.8% and 1.2% respectively. These margins are within noise, indicating the i7-13700F competes directly with both consumer and workstation-class chips.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance (1,092 in 3DMark single-thread, 4,532 in Cinebench R23) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking provides ample graphics throughput. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU should keep up with the GPU’s output, though exact FPS figures are not measured for this combination. The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest strong rasterization performance for competitive gaming.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game rendering and video encoding. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 38,369 indicates it can handle encode workloads, while the GPU’s 192 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture include dedicated encoder resources. The 20 GB GDDR6 memory (360.0 GB/s bandwidth) prevents VRAM exhaustion during concurrent gaming and streaming workloads.

Video editing: The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM is substantial for timeline scrubbing and effects processing, and the 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates preview rendering. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 handles export tasks efficiently, while the 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency during large file operations. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows flexible memory configurations for large project files.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 32,101 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 146,593 Geekbench OpenCL score combine for strong render performance. The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising, while the CPU handles scene preparation and geometry processing. The 20 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes without swapping.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 141,370 and data encryption score of 26,956 indicate strong performance for compilation and cryptographic operations. The 16 cores handle parallel build processes efficiently, and the 24 threads allow responsive multitasking during development. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (2,225 Geekbench single-core) handles office productivity applications with ease. The 30 MB L3 cache accelerates repetitive workflows, while the 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements minimal. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but the CPU alone provides more than adequate performance for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both strong CPU throughput and workstation-class GPU compute. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking, though the 20 GB VRAM and workstation drivers are optimized more for professional applications than gaming. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures no bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Content creators working with 4K video, large 3D scenes, or AI models will find the 20 GB VRAM and 192 tensor cores valuable. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS accelerates render previews, while the CPU’s 16 cores handle timeline operations. The combined 91st percentile ranking places this system in the top 9% of desktop builds.

Developers working on large codebases benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded compilation performance (38,369 PassMark multi-thread) and the GPU’s compute capabilities for machine learning workloads. Students in engineering or data science programs will find the system handles coursework and research projects, though the GPU is more powerful than typical student needs. Small business workstations requiring CAD, simulation, or data analysis will appreciate the single-slot GPU footprint and the 300 W suggested PSU, which keeps system integration simple.

The locked multiplier on the CPU means no overclocking, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock provides adequate performance. The DDR4/DDR5 support makes this platform flexible for both new builds and upgrades from older systems with existing DDR4 memory.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 91, meaning it outperforms approximately 91% of desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39,009, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4245P’s 39,215 score. This difference is negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i7-13700F support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 130 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, which is the maximum frequency.

Q: How does the GPU rank compared to all other GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135,218.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component individually.

The GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest strong gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The 20 GB VRAM ensures no memory capacity limitations at any resolution, even with high-resolution textures. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s supports high frame rates at lower resolutions, while the 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate handles detailed scenes.

The CPU’s single-thread performance (4,532 Cinebench R23 single-core) indicates it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the 5.20 GHz boost clock provides responsive gameplay. The 16 cores ensure background tasks do not interfere with gaming performance.

At 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor in esports titles, but its strong single-thread scores should sustain high refresh rates. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more relevant, and the 26.73 TFLOPS should deliver smooth performance in most titles. At 4K, the GPU’s 360.0 GB/s bandwidth and 20 GB VRAM provide sufficient headroom, though the workstation-class drivers may not be optimized for gaming-specific features. These are estimates — actual frame rates depend on specific game optimizations and driver maturity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel’s Core i7-13700F processor with NVIDIA’s RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture workstation card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The GPU’s 130 W TDP and single-slot design make it suitable for compact workstation builds, and the 300 W suggested PSU keeps system power requirements modest.

The combined percentile of 91 places this system in the top 9% of desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 95th percentile indicate a balanced high-end pairing, with the GPU being the stronger component. The system is well-suited for professional workloads that leverage both CPU multi-threading and GPU compute, while also capable of high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (1.2% higher). These margins are within 1.2%, indicating the i7-13700F is competitively positioned against both server and mobile-class processors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 135,218, placing it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are equally close: the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (0.9% higher). The GPU is effectively tied with its nearest competitors, with all deltas under 1%.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU relative to their respective peer groups. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores (32,101 Cinebench R23 multi-core, 38,369 PassMark multi-thread) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (146,593 Geekbench OpenCL, 123,842 Geekbench Vulkan) create a versatile workstation platform. The CPU’s single-thread performance (4,532 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures responsive daily use, while the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 192 tensor cores handle professional rendering and AI workloads. The 91st combined percentile confirms this is a high-tier desktop configuration suitable for demanding professional and enthusiast use cases.