SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 — Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with a workstation-class Turing GPU, targeting a desktop build that sits at the 74th percentile overall against all CPU+GPU combinations. The data for this exact configuration contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component, not direct frame-rate measurements. The CPU is a strong modern performer, while the GPU is an older workstation card whose benchmark percentile lags significantly behind the processor, creating an asymmetric pairing that favors compute-heavy and professional workloads over high-refresh gaming.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, frame rates must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, which suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, but the picture changes quickly at higher resolutions. The processor is not the limiting factor here — its 86th percentile rank among all CPUs indicates ample headroom for gaming workloads, but the Quadro RTX 4000's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates well before the CPU becomes stressed.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated performance would likely land in the 60-90 FPS range for esports and moderately demanding titles, based on the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 12 score of 52 in PassMark. The DirectX 12 result is notably weaker, indicating that newer API-based games may struggle more than older titles. For 1440p ultra, expect a significant drop, likely into the 40-60 FPS range for many games, as the bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s and the 8 GB VRAM capacity become constraining. At 4K ultra, the GPU would likely fall below 30 FPS in most AAA titles, making this pairing unsuitable for high-resolution gaming without substantial settings reductions.

The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 provides some additional context: Vulkan-based games may perform slightly better than DirectX 12 titles, but the overall capability remains capped by the Turing architecture's age. The RTX 4000 is a workstation card from 2018, and its gaming pedigree is secondary to its professional compute focus. The CPU's single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong per-core performance that would drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will bottleneck well before those CPU capabilities are fully utilized in gaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture with a TU104 chip manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process, containing 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, with a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth at a memory clock of 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective).

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are present: 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS, though the RTX 4000 predates the more refined RT implementations in later cards. The FP32 throughput is 7.119 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 14.24 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, making the card reasonably capable for compute tasks that leverage half-precision arithmetic.

The benchmark scores tell a mixed story. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 places the card at the 61st percentile, and its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17666 — only 0.7% higher. This is a striking comparison: the Quadro RTX 4000's average benchmark score of 17789 is essentially tied with a much older, lower-tier GPU, indicating that its raw gaming rasterization performance is modest by modern standards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 are more respectable for compute workloads, aligning with the card's workstation positioning.

For rendering and professional applications, the 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide capabilities that many consumer cards lack, even if the absolute performance is not class-leading. The 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 8 GB VRAM, but texture-heavy scenes at high resolutions will hit memory capacity limits quickly. The card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) means it can run modern API features, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is the lowest of all its API benchmarks, suggesting poor optimization or driver maturity for DX12 workloads specifically.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39215, putting the i7-13700F 0.5% behind; the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39325 (0.8% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561 (1.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485 (1.2% ahead). These are tight margins, indicating the i7-13700F sits in a competitive mid-range-to-high-end CPU tier where small percentage differences separate models.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with an average score of 17666 (0.7% behind), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639 (0.9% behind), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (1.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (1.4% behind). The fact that the RTX 4000 is essentially tied with an integrated GPU like the Radeon 780M in average benchmark score underscores the GPU's age and limited raw performance relative to its professional feature set.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, which reflects the CPU's strength pulling the overall score up while the GPU drags it down. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 and PassMark multithread score of 38369 indicate exceptional parallel processing capability. The single-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 4532 and 3DMark single-thread at 1092. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 is comparatively weak, suggesting that any workload heavily reliant on GPU compute will see the system's overall performance capped by this component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above. The GPU's 61st percentile rank and DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate it would struggle to maintain 144 FPS in most modern titles even at 1080p, though the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1092, Cinebench R23 single-core 4532) would not be the bottleneck in such scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 38369, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 288 tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding features, but the overall gaming performance would limit the quality of gameplay being streamed.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13482 and PassMark floating-point math score of 100422 indicate strong performance for video encoding and effects processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p timelines with multiple layers, though 4K editing may strain memory capacity.

3D rendering: The GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI denoising, making this pairing viable for professional 3D work. The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 10716 ensures geometry processing and scene preparation keep pace with the GPU's render output.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 471838 and data encryption score of 26956 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic operations. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, so the CPU's 86th percentile rank dominates this scenario.

Student and office work: This pairing far exceeds the requirements for typical productivity applications. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4121 ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites and web browsing, while the GPU's 61st percentile rank is more than adequate for spreadsheet, document, and presentation workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The benchmark scores reveal strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The 3DMark results show 2178 for 2 threads, 4258 for 4 threads, 7136 for 8 threads, 8994 for 16 threads, and 10716 for max threads. This near-linear scaling up to 8 threads and continued gains through 16 threads indicates excellent multi-threading efficiency, which is confirmed by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 versus the single-core score of 4532 — a ratio of roughly 7:1 across 16 cores.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into real-world workload performance. The integer math score of 141370 and floating-point math score of 100422 show strong arithmetic capability, while the extended instructions score of 28295 indicates good SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 156 is notably low, which could indicate weaker performance in certain integer-heavy algorithms. The random string sorting score of 49974 suggests solid memory access patterns and cache efficiency. The data compression score of 471838 is exceptional, making this CPU well-suited for archiving, backup, and database workloads.

The 86th percentile ranking places this CPU ahead of the majority of all processors, with nearest rivals within 1.2% either way. This means the i7-13700F is competitive with recent mid-range and high-end CPUs from both AMD and Intel, though it is not a top-tier halo product. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 16-core chip, suggesting efficient power management, and the lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not supported, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock already provides strong single-thread performance.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals and prosumers who prioritize CPU compute power and GPU workstation features over gaming frame rates. The CPU's 86th percentile rank and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts processing large datasets (PassMark data compression 471838), and engineers running multi-threaded simulations. The GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores appeal to 3D artists and architects who need hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based rendering features in professional applications.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings could find this pairing acceptable, but the GPU's 61st percentile rank and DirectX 12 score of 52 mean that high-refresh and high-detail gaming are not realistic expectations. Content creators working in video editing would benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (PassMark multithread 38369) for export and encoding, while the GPU handles GPU-accelerated effects within its 8 GB VRAM limit. Students in engineering or computer science programs would find the CPU's compute power valuable for coursework, and small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads would leverage the CPU's 24 threads effectively.

The GPU's workstation pedigree — single-slot design, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a plus USB Type-C outputs, and 160 W TDP — makes it suitable for multi-monitor professional setups where display connectivity and driver stability matter more than raw gaming performance. The 450 W suggested PSU keeps system power requirements modest, and the GPU's end-of-life production status means it is likely available at reduced prices, though the launch MSRP was 899 USD.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing exhibits a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile — a 25-point gap that clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting component in most workloads. In gaming, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 and PassMark G3D score of 15117 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1092) could support. The CPU would likely sit idle waiting for the GPU to render frames, making this a GPU-bound system in gaming scenarios.

In compute-heavy professional workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 38369 and the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 mean that CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, and encryption will see the CPU fully utilized while the GPU contributes little. For GPU-accelerated rendering or AI inference, the GPU's 288 tensor cores provide specialized capability, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest, so the GPU would still be the bottleneck for raw compute throughput.

The memory subsystem also plays a role. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel, and the GPU has 8 GB GDDR6 with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth. For workloads that require large data sets to be resident in GPU memory, the 8 GB capacity will be a limiting factor, forcing data transfers over the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is older and slower than the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support. This mismatch means the CPU's fast memory bandwidth potential cannot be fully leveraged by the GPU.

FAQ

Q: Does this pairing support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 includes 36 RT cores specifically for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall GPU performance is modest by modern standards.

Q: What is the CPU's thread count and how does it affect multitasking?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has 16 cores and 24 threads, and its 3DMark max-threads score of 10716 indicates strong parallel performance for multitasking and multi-threaded applications.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's benchmark scores — 61st percentile, PassMark G3D 15117, DirectX 12 score of 52 — 4K gaming at ultra settings would likely fall below 30 FPS in most titles, making it unsuitable for that resolution.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate professional workloads but may limit high-resolution textures.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz provides the maximum single-thread performance out of the box.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 74, reflecting the CPU's 86th percentile rank pulling the average up against the GPU's 61st percentile rank.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Intel Core i7-13700F, which may be relevant for certain workstation applications that require error-correcting memory.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $359. The GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 8 GB GDDR6, released in November 2018 with a launch MSRP of 899 USD, and is now end-of-life. The combined percentile of 74 indicates this system sits above the majority of all CPU+GPU pairings, driven primarily by the CPU's strong 86th percentile performance.

The overall tier of this build is best described as a professional workstation CPU married to an entry-level professional GPU. The CPU's benchmark scores — Cinebench R23 multicore 32101, PassMark multithread 38369, Geekbench multicore 15058 — place it firmly in the high-performance desktop segment. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 and 61st percentile rank place it in the lower-middle tier of all GPUs, comparable to integrated graphics like the AMD Radeon 780M. This pairing makes sense only if the user's primary workloads are CPU-intensive and the GPU's workstation features (RT cores, tensor cores, single-slot design) are specifically required.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, creating a generational mismatch that limits the GPU's bandwidth to the older standard. The system's PSU requirement is 450 W based on the GPU's suggested PSU, and the combined TDP of the CPU (65 W) and GPU (160 W) totals 225 W, leaving headroom for other components.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 86th percentile rank provides substantial headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The nearest GPU rivals in benchmark score — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and AMD Radeon 780M — are within 1.1% of the Quadro RTX 4000, suggesting that even a modest consumer GPU upgrade would provide a meaningful performance boost for gaming. However, the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support means a newer GPU with Gen 4 or Gen 5 interface would be fully supported. The platform also supports DDR5 memory, so upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 would improve memory bandwidth for CPU-bound workloads, though the current cache hierarchy (30 MB L3) already mitigates memory latency concerns. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 160 W TDP of the GPU leave ample PSU headroom, so a GPU upgrade to a higher-TDP card would not necessarily require a new power supply.