SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S) and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The chip runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts up to 5.20 GHz, which explains its strong single-threaded showing across multiple benchmark suites. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 16-core part, making it a practical choice for systems where cooling and power delivery are not extreme.

Cache layout is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. This hierarchy supports both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though it lacks ECC support. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which pairs well with modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The processor is unlocked? No — the multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is limited, but boost behavior is still strong out of the box.

Benchmark data shows a balanced profile. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 32,101 in multi-core and 4,532 in single-core. The single-core result is particularly telling: it indicates excellent per-thread performance, which benefits everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The multi-core score of 32,101 is high enough for serious productivity work, including video encoding and 3D rendering, without requiring a flagship HEDT platform.

Geekbench results reinforce this: 15,058 multi-core and 2,225 single-core. These numbers place the i7-13700F in the upper tier of desktop CPUs, though not at the absolute top. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear progression: 2,178 for 2 threads, 4,258 for 4 threads, 7,136 for 8 threads, 8,994 for 16 threads, and 10,716 for max threads. This scaling curve is nearly linear up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that — typical of a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores.

Passmark results add another perspective. The multi-thread score is 38,369, with integer math at 141,370 and floating-point math at 100,422. Data compression hits 471,838 and encryption 26,956. These numbers suggest strong performance in compression tasks, but relatively modest encryption throughput. The single-thread Passmark score of 4,121 is competitive, and the processor ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39,009.

Compared to nearest rivals, the i7-13700F sits within a narrow band. It trails the AMD EPYC 4245P by 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.8%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 by 1.2%. It leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T by 1.2%. These deltas are small — under two percent in all cases — meaning the i7-13700F is effectively at parity with these competing parts in aggregate performance, despite differences in core counts and architecture.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, achieves an average benchmark score of 79,842, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 89. This means both components sit comfortably in the upper echelon of their respective categories, with the GPU slightly ahead of the CPU in relative standing.

For the GPU, specific benchmark scores are as follows: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 18,355. Geekbench OpenCL scores 334,370 and Vulkan scores 376,728. Passmark G3D scores 39,650, with G2D at 1,413. Passmark GPU compute scores 26,756. The DirectX 10, 11, 12, and 9 scores are 226, 341, 185, and 395, respectively. These numbers indicate a GPU that excels in modern API workloads, with the Vulkan and OpenCL scores being particularly strong.

The RTX 5090's nearest rivals in the database are not consumer gaming cards but rather professional and mobile parts: the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% ahead), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (0.6% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (1.4% behind). These deltas are all within 1.5%, showing that the RTX 5090's aggregate benchmark score is in a tightly contested band, though its architecture and feature set are entirely different from those older parts.

The combined picture is one of a high-end desktop build where the GPU is the more dominant component relative to its peers. The CPU is strong but not class-leading; the GPU is also not the outright leader in aggregate scores, but its 92nd percentile ranking and 79,842 average score make it a top-tier choice for demanding graphical workloads. For gaming, the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 92nd percentile suggest that the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates at higher resolutions, while the CPU will handle physics, AI, and game logic without becoming a bottleneck in most titles.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i7-13700F's single-core score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 and 2,225 in Geekbench single-core indicate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. The RTX 5090's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and 92nd percentile ranking suggest it can push very high frame rates. This pairing is well-suited for 1440p and 4K high-refresh displays, though the CPU may limit frame rates at lower resolutions where GPU headroom is abundant.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a multi-thread score of 32,101 in Cinebench R23, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The RTX 5090's 680 tensor cores and NVENC-class hardware would offload encoding tasks, leaving the CPU free for game logic. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38,369 reinforces that simultaneous gaming and streaming is feasible without severe frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance — 32,101 in Cinebench R23, 38,369 in Passmark multi-thread, and 15,058 in Geekbench multi-core — handles timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. This is a capable video editing workstation, though not the absolute fastest for CPU-only renders.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores deliver solid CPU-based rendering performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101. The GPU's 21,760 shading units and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 make it excellent for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The 32 GB VRAM is particularly useful for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The combined percentile of 89 confirms this build can handle professional rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's fast single-thread performance (4,532 Cinebench R23 single-core) speeds up compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 24 threads accelerate parallel compilation. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but the overall system responsiveness will be excellent. Passmark integer math at 141,370 indicates strong general computation throughput.

Student and office work: This build is massively overqualified for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,121 in Passmark single-thread ensures snappy UI response. The GPU's 1,413 Passmark G2D score handles 2D desktop acceleration effortlessly. The 65 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet under light loads, making it a practical, if expensive, daily driver.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 92nd percentile, this pairing is expected to deliver very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with strong 4K performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed the GPU adequately in most titles, though at 1080p with a GPU this powerful, some CPU-bound scenarios may emerge. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 indicates excellent DX12 performance, which is the most common API in modern games.

At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor — not because it is weak, but because the pixel workload is massive. The RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM ensures that even the most demanding textures and resolutions will not exceed memory capacity. At 1440p, the balance shifts: the GPU still leads, but the CPU's 16 cores and high boost clock keep frame times consistent. At 1080p, the CPU may hold back the GPU in titles with heavy AI or physics simulation, though the 86th percentile CPU ranking means this will be rare.

For esports titles, the CPU's single-thread performance is more than adequate for 300+ FPS targets. For AAA single-player games, the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS and 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth will drive ultra settings at high frame rates. Ray tracing performance is expected to be strong given the 170 RT cores, and DLSS-class upscaling would further boost frame rates. These figures are estimates; actual performance will vary by title, driver, and system configuration.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets enthusiasts and professionals who need both strong CPU throughput and extreme GPU performance. Gamers at 1440p or 4K with high-refresh monitors will benefit most, as the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures high frame rates at those resolutions. The CPU's 86th percentile prevents it from being a weak link in most titles.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and animators — will find the 16-core CPU and 32 GB GPU VRAM useful for timeline editing, rendering, and texture-heavy workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 make this a viable workstation for both CPU and GPU rendering pipelines.

Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 24 threads and high single-thread speed for compilation and testing. Students and office workers will find the system exceptionally responsive, though the components are far beyond the requirements of typical academic or administrative tasks. Small business workstations that need to handle occasional video rendering or 3D visualization alongside standard productivity apps would also be well served.

The 65 W CPU TDP and dual-slot GPU make this build feasible in a standard desktop chassis with a capable air cooler and a 950 W suggested PSU. The CPU's locked multiplier means no overclocking, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock is already high.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die contains 92,200 million transistors across a 750 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². This is a massive chip, and the 575 W TDP reflects its power appetite.

Memory configuration is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth is critical for 4K gaming, high-resolution textures, and GPU-accelerated compute tasks. The 512-bit bus width ensures that the memory subsystem is not a bottleneck, even with the GPU's high compute throughput.

Compute resources are extensive: 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. The GPU also includes 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not trade off FP16 for FP32 throughput — a feature that benefits certain compute workloads.

The GPU's clock speeds are 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost. These are high for such a large chip, and the boost behavior is consistent across workloads. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which matches the CPU's Gen 5 support, ensuring full bandwidth between CPU and GPU. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-refresh displays.

Benchmark results reflect the GPU's strengths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance. Geekbench Vulkan at 376,728 and OpenCL at 334,370 show excellent compute throughput. Passmark G3D at 39,650 and GPU compute at 26,756 reinforce this. The 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79,842, places it in the top tier. The nearest rivals — Tesla P100 variants and Radeon RX 6850M XT — are within 1.5%, but those are older or mobile parts, so the comparison is more about aggregate scores than real-world equivalence.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700F support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration without ECC.

Q: What is the power draw of the RTX 5090?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 575 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 950 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How does the i7-13700F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The i7-13700F trails the EPYC 4245P by 0.5% in average benchmark score (39,009 vs 39,215), making them effectively equal in aggregate performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have?

A: It has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile.

Q: Does the RTX 5090 support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), as well as OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What socket does the i7-13700F use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 13th Gen Core desktop motherboards.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 32 GB GDDR7 memory and a 575 W TDP. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $359, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 1,999 USD.

The combined percentile of 89 places this build in the upper tier of desktop systems. The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 92nd percentile indicate that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This is a balanced high-end build, though the GPU's dominance means it will drive most of the performance differentiation in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 39,009 and the GPU's 79,842 combine for a system that excels in both CPU-bound and GPU-bound tasks. The CPU handles multithreaded productivity with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101, while the GPU delivers 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This pairing is appropriate for enthusiasts who want top-tier gaming and serious content creation capability in one system.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows an asymmetric pairing: the GPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the CPU sits at the 86th percentile. This 6-point gap indicates that the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in frame rate, as its single-thread performance — though strong — is not sufficient to fully saturate a GPU with 104.8 TFLOPS of compute. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck, which is the intended balance for high-resolution gaming.

For productivity workloads, the balance depends on the application. In multi-threaded rendering, the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads will be fully utilized, and the GPU's 21,760 shading units will accelerate GPU-rendered frames. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 38,369 and the GPU's 26,756 GPU compute score suggest that the CPU is not a bottleneck in CPU-only tasks, but the GPU is far more capable in parallel compute.

The FPS scaling picture is estimated, not measured. Given the GPU's 92nd percentile and the CPU's 86th percentile, frame rates will scale with resolution: highest at 1080p (potentially CPU-limited), strong at 1440p, and GPU-bound at 4K. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 5.20 GHz boost clock help maintain consistent frame times, but the GPU's 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM mean it will not be starved for data in most scenarios.

The practical bottleneck analysis: at lower resolutions, the CPU limits maximum FPS; at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the constraint. For productivity, the CPU is the more balanced component, while the GPU is disproportionately strong for compute-heavy tasks. This is a well-matched build for high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated work, with the CPU being the more likely upgrade target for future performance gains.