SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking headroom) with a launch MSRP of $359.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales strongly with thread count. The 3DMark suite shows a progression from 1,092 points single-thread, 2,178 points at 2 threads, 4,258 at 4 threads, 7,136 at 8 threads, 8,994 at 16 threads, and 10,716 at max threads. This scaling pattern indicates that the hybrid core arrangement—performance and efficiency cores working together—delivers near-linear gains up to 8 threads, with diminishing but still substantial returns beyond that. For real workloads, this means the chip handles lightly-threaded tasks like everyday desktop use and gaming with ease, while fully utilizing its 24 threads for heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering.

In Cinebench, the multicore scores are particularly telling: 3,235 points in R15, 13,482 in R20, and 32,101 in R23. The single-core scores of 456 (R15), 1,903 (R20), and 4,532 (R23) demonstrate that single-threaded performance is strong enough for responsive application behavior and modern game engines that still rely on a few fast cores. Geekbench results corroborate this with a multicore score of 15,058 and a single-core score of 2,225.

The PassMark suite adds workload-specific insight. The multithread score of 38,369 combined with integer math at 141,370 and floating-point math at 100,422 shows a balanced ALU/FPU design. Data compression scores of 471,838 and encryption at 26,956 indicate that the processor handles archiving, database operations, and encryption tasks competently. The extended instructions score of 28,295 suggests good SIMD throughput for AVX-class workloads. The physics score of 2,236 and prime number finding at 156 are more modest, reflecting that these particular tasks do not benefit as much from the core layout.

The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 39,009. Its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215 (-0.5%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (-0.8%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (+1.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (-1.2%). This places the i7-13700F in a tightly contested mid-to-high tier where performance differences between competing chips are within noise margins.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of this CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 creates a desktop system where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in most scenarios, but the balance shifts depending on workload type. The CPU's 86th percentile standing and the GPU's 82nd percentile standing are close enough that the system operates without a severe bottleneck in either direction. The combined percentile for this build is 84, indicating a harmonious pairing.

For CPU-bound workloads—such as software compilation, data compression, or heavy multitasking—the processor's 24 threads provide ample headroom. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,994 and max-thread score of 10,716 show that the CPU can feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations without becoming the limiting factor in games that are not heavily multithreaded. The single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark suggests that even older game engines that rely on one or two threads will see adequate performance.

For GPU-bound workloads—like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing—the RTX 5070 becomes the primary performance determinant. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29,137 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,077 indicate substantial graphics compute capability. In these scenarios, the CPU's job is to keep up with the GPU's frame generation, and the i7-13700F's strong multi-threaded scores suggest it will not hold back the GPU at mainstream resolutions.

The FPS scaling picture is estimated rather than measured for this exact combination, as no measured FPS rows exist in the data. Given the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 82nd percentile, the expectation is that at 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in lightly-threaded titles, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU will dominate the frame time budget. The CPU's 2-thread score of 2,178 in 3DMark is modest, which could translate to lower minimum frame rates in games that are poorly optimized for many cores.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated qualitatively from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The RTX 5070's GPU compute score of 15,787 in PassMark and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,077 point to strong rasterization and ray tracing performance. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory throughput for modern game assets at high resolutions. The 6,144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units suggest that texture-heavy scenes will render efficiently.

In esports and competitive titles that favor high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 indicate that the processor can maintain high frame pacing. The combination should deliver high-refresh experiences at 1080p in these lighter titles, with the CPU's 24 threads ensuring that background tasks like voice chat or streaming overlays do not cause frame drops.

For AAA single-player games at 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary driver. The RTX 5070's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48 ray tracing cores provide the compute needed for modern game engines with demanding lighting and physics. The 192 ROPs and pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s suggest strong fill-rate performance for high-resolution rendering. The 12 GB VRAM may become a constraint at 4K with maximum texture quality, but at 1440p it should prove sufficient for most titles.

The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency in game scenarios where the same data is accessed repeatedly. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though DDR5 would better feed the GPU's appetite for data. Overall, this pairing appears well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and smooth 1440p gaming, with 4K being possible but potentially limited by VRAM capacity in the most demanding titles.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets desktop PC builders who want strong all-around performance without chasing the absolute top tier. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 82nd percentile place this build in the upper-middle performance bracket, making it suitable for gamers at 1440p who want high settings, content creators who work with video and 3D graphics, and professionals who run multithreaded productivity applications.

Gamers at 1440p are the primary audience. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures, while the CPU's 24 threads ensure that game worlds with heavy physics or AI simulations run smoothly. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will also benefit, as the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates in competitive titles.

Content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or work with large datasets will find the CPU's multicore performance valuable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 and PassMark multithread score of 38,369 show that rendering tasks, video encoding, and batch processing will complete quickly. The GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by the PassMark GPU compute score of 15,787, accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and rendering in compatible software.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 141,370 indicates strong throughput for compilation tasks, and the data compression score of 471,838 suggests that build archives and package management will not be a bottleneck. Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations or compile projects will find this system capable without being excessive.

Small business workstations that run office applications, accounting software, and light database work will benefit from the CPU's responsiveness and the GPU's ability to accelerate spreadsheet rendering and visualization. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power requirements moderate, and the system's performance headroom means it will remain relevant for several years of software updates.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU's single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,077 suggests the system can drive high frame rates at 1080p in competitive titles. The 24 threads ensure that streaming, voice chat, and background apps do not interfere with frame pacing.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and strong multicore scores—32,101 in Cinebench R23 and 38,369 in PassMark multithread—provide ample capacity for encoding video while gaming. The GPU's 192 tensor cores can also accelerate AI-based encoding and upscaling features, reducing the CPU load during broadcasts.

Video editing: The PassMark floating-point math score of 100,422 and the GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects, transitions, and color grading. The CPU's data compression score of 471,838 speeds up project file management and export packaging. Export times for 4K footage will be reasonable given the multicore rendering performance.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 handles CPU-based rendering engines, while the GPU's 48 ray tracing cores and 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate GPU-accelerated ray tracing. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU allows for moderately complex scenes without swapping to system memory.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 141,370 and the 24 threads provide strong compilation throughput. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases that are frequently recompiled. The system can run multiple virtual machines or containers concurrently.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive application switching and document editing. The GPU accelerates spreadsheet rendering and web browsing. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and energy-efficient for daily use.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists integratedGraphics as null, meaning this processor does not include an iGPU. A discrete GPU such as the RTX 5070 is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The choice between the two will affect memory bandwidth, though the FACT PACK does not provide specific bandwidth figures.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the maximum achievable frequency without external clock generator manipulation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 5070 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so the GPU can run at full bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39,009, while the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215, making the EPYC 0.5% faster. This difference is negligible in real-world use.

Q: What is the recommended PSU for this GPU?

A: The FACT PACK lists a suggested PSU of 600 W for the RTX 5070, which has a TDP of 250 W. The CPU's 65 W TDP means a 600 W power supply provides sufficient headroom for the entire system.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700F achieves an average benchmark score of 39,009, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest competitor, the AMD EPYC 4245P, scores 39,215, which is only 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (-0.8%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (+1.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (-1.2%). This clustering indicates the i7-13700F is a well-positioned mid-high tier processor whose performance is statistically indistinguishable from its direct rivals.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 achieves an average benchmark score of 40,377, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 at 40,318 (+0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40,063 (+0.8%), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40,870 (-1.2%), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile at 39,568 (+2.0%). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,077 and PassMark G3D score of 29,137 confirm strong graphics compute capability.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU build is 84, indicating that the pairing performs in the upper tier of desktop systems. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 82nd percentile are close, meaning neither component severely limits the other. The CPU's multicore strength (Cinebench R23 at 32,101) and the GPU's compute throughput (30.87 TFLOPS FP32) create a system that handles both processor-intensive and graphics-intensive workloads with balanced performance.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP and 30 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory, 6,144 shading units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The GPU uses a dual-slot design measuring 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with a 16-pin power connector.

The overall tier of this build, based on the 84th combined percentile, places it in the upper-midrange of desktop systems. It is not a flagship configuration—the CPU lacks the unlocked multiplier of K-series parts, and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM is modest by 2025 standards—but it delivers strong performance across a wide range of workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 82nd percentile indicate that this system outperforms the majority of desktop PCs currently in use.

This build is best characterized as a versatile workhorse. It handles gaming, content creation, development, and office productivity without a clear weakness. The locked CPU multiplier limits overclocking, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock already provides high single-threaded performance. The GPU's 250 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP combine for a system that is power-efficient relative to its performance class.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is fully utilized by the RTX 5070's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU's 65 W TDP means that most Socket 1700 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle this processor without issue.

The RTX 5070 has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU wattage of 600 W. The total system power draw, combining the CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 250 W TDP, leaves ample headroom on a 600 W power supply for drives, fans, and other components. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, so builders should verify their power supply includes this connector or an adapter.

For future upgrades, the CPU's socket and platform limitations are the primary constraint. Socket 1700 is the final generation for this platform, meaning CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change. However, the i7-13700F's 24 threads and 86th percentile standing mean it will remain competitive for several years. The GPU, using PCIe 5.0, is forward-compatible with newer platforms, so the RTX 5070 could be carried over to a future build.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility at build time. Builders with existing DDR4 kits can reuse them, while new builds can opt for DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this platform. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be adding more storage or increasing memory capacity, as the CPU and GPU are well-matched and neither is likely to become a bottleneck before the other in the near term.