SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop build that combines an 86th-percentile CPU with a 98th-percentile GPU, producing a combined percentile of 92 across the database. That gap between the two components defines this pairing: the GPU is the star, the processor is a capable and balanced support act, and the data shows the configuration is heavily GPU-weighted rather than evenly matched. What follows is an analysis of where that balance works, where it strains, and who it suits.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core tension in this build is the percentile spread. The RTX 4090 D sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 178050, while the i7-13700F sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 39009. A twelve-point percentile gap means that in graphically demanding workloads the graphics card will rarely be the limiting factor — the processor will run out of throughput first in any scenario where the CPU must feed frames, draw calls, or physics calculations to the GPU at high rates.

The CPU benchmark spread tells you exactly where that ceiling sits. In 3DMark CPU tests, the i7-13700F scores 1092 single-thread, 2178 at 2 threads, 4258 at 4 threads, 7136 at 8 threads, and 10716 at maximum threads. Notice the pattern: going from 8 threads to all 24 threads yields only about half again the score, while 4-to-8 threads nearly doubles it. Scaling tapers in the upper thread counts, which is typical for a hybrid architecture where not all threads are equal. In practice this means games and applications that lean on six to eight strong threads will extract most of this chip's real performance, and workloads that saturate all 24 threads still gain, but with diminishing returns per thread.

Where does this leave the RTX 4090 D? At 4K resolution and maximum settings, the rendering load is heavy enough that the GPU becomes the limiter, and its 73.54 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus with 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, and 98th-percentile standing carry the experience. At 1080p, the situation inverts: the frame-rate demands of a GPU this fast at a low resolution shift the bottleneck squarely onto the CPU, and an 86th-percentile processor — even with a 4532 Cinebench R23 single-core score and a 2225 Geekbench single-core score — will cap frame rates in CPU-bound titles. This is a build that makes sense at 4K and high-refresh 1440p; at 1080p the graphics card is substantially underutilized.

The R23 multi-core score of 32101 confirms the CPU can pull real weight in sustained threaded loads, but the rivals list shows its overall standing precisely: the AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39215 against the Intel chip's 39009, a delta of -0.5 percent, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 averages 39485, -1.2 percent. The i7-13700F trades blows within roughly one percent of these competitors — competitive, but not a class leader. The GPU, by contrast, is only 2.2 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and 3.1 percent behind the A100 SXM4 80 GB. The GPU competes at the very top; the CPU competes in a crowded upper-middle band.

Benchmark Performance

The numbers, laid out plainly. On the CPU side: Cinebench R23 multi-core 32101, single-core 4532; Cinebench R20 multi-core 13482, single-core 1903; Cinebench R15 multi-core 3235, single-core 456; Geekbench multi-core 15058, single-core 2225; PassMark multithread 38369, single-thread 4121. On the GPU side: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8587, Geekbench OpenCL 278621, Geekbench Vulkan 246941.

Interpreting these, the single-core figures are strong for the CPU's class. A 4532 in R23 single-core keeps pace with the multi-core-heavy profile — the multi-to-single ratio is roughly 7:1, which reflects the hybrid 16-core, 24-thread design where the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz on the strongest cores. The PassMark suite adds texture: 141370 in integer math, 100422 in floating point math, 471838 in data compression, 26956 in encryption, and 2236 in physics show a processor that is well-rounded rather than specialized. The physics score of 2236 matters for gaming readers — it is a direct indicator of CPU-side game simulation capability, and it is solid but not exceptional next to the GPU's capability.

The GPU's Geekbench compute results are the headline. An OpenCL score of 278621 and a Vulkan score of 246941 place the RTX 4090 D in professional-compute territory — its nearest rivals are data-center and workstation parts, not gaming cards. The Steel Nomad score of 8587 anchors the gaming picture, and the 98th percentile versus all GPUs says the card outranks all but a sliver of the database. The combined build percentile of 92 is the honest summary: excellent overall, dragged slightly from GPU-only heights by a CPU that is very good rather than elite.

Against its nearest rivals, the GPU loses by small margins — -2.2 percent to the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, -3.1 percent to the A100 SXM4 80 GB, -3.6 percent to the RTX 5000 Ada, -4.9 percent to the A100 SXM4 40 GB. Those deltas are close enough that in real gaming and content work the RTX 4090 D behaves as a peer of parts positioned far above typical desktop cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh 4K gaming. This is the build's center of gravity. The GPU's 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth, 176 ROPs delivering 443.5 GPixel/s, and 98th-percentile standing mean 4K at ultra settings is comfortably within range. The CPU's 2236 physics score and strong single-thread results will sustain high frame rates in most titles, though the most CPU-bound competitive games will hit the processor's ceiling before the GPU's.

Streaming. The i7-13700F's 24 threads and 32101 R23 multi-core score leave headroom for encoding alongside gameplay. With the GPU carrying rendering, the CPU's 8-thread 3DMark score of 7136 and max-thread score of 10716 indicate enough threaded throughput to handle a stream workload without starving the game.

Video editing. The GPU's 24 GB of GDDR6X and OpenCL score of 278621 accelerate timeline effects, color grading, and export in GPU-aware NLEs, while the CPU's multi-core scores handle timeline scrubbing and CPU-side codecs. This pairing is genuinely strong for 4K editing workflows.

3D rendering. GPU renderers benefit directly from the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 456 tensor cores; CPU renderers get a 32101 R23 multi-core score. Both sides are competent, with the GPU side exceptional.

Software development. Compiling, containerized workloads, and virtualization scale with threads, and 24 threads with a 38369 PassMark multithread score make this a comfortable developer machine. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps in large-codebase compilation.

Student and office work. Frankly, this pairing is overkill for documents and browsing — the single-thread scores of 4121 (PassMark) and 2225 (Geekbench) make it snappy, but the hardware is wasted. A student in a technical or design program, however, gets a machine that handles coursework rendering, simulation, and ML assignments via the 456 tensor cores.

Who Should Build It

The ideal builder here is a 4K or high-refresh 1440p gamer who wants top-tier graphics performance paired with a CPU that is strong but not flagship-priced. Content creators fit well: video editors who want the 24 GB frame buffer for 4K timelines and high-resolution assets, and 3D artists who benefit from a GPU ranked in the 98th percentile alongside workstation parts like the RTX 5000 Ada. Developers working with parallel builds or GPU compute — the Vulkan score of 246941 is relevant here — get a machine that doubles as a serious dev box. Small businesses building a workstation for visualization, light simulation, or media production will find the combined 92nd percentile more than sufficient. Students in engineering, film, or machine-learning programs are also well served. What this build is not: a balanced 1080p esports rig, where the CPU's 86th percentile would bottleneck the GPU in fast titles, and a pure CPU-rendering workstation, where the i7-13700F's rivals sit within a percent of it rather than behind it.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: The CPU. The RTX 4090 D sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs while the i7-13700F sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. At high resolutions the GPU takes over as the limiter, which is where this build is designed to operate.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700F fast for gaming?

A: Yes. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4532, Geekbench single-core of 2225, and PassMark physics score of 2236 put it comfortably in the upper tier, though below true flagship CPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 D compare to workstation cards?

A: Very closely. Its average benchmark score of 178050 is just 2.2 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and 3.1 percent behind the A100 SXM4 80 GB.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?

A: It trades within about one percent: -0.5 percent versus the AMD EPYC 4245P, -0.8 percent versus the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, +1.2 percent versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, and -1.2 percent versus the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked on the i7-13700F, so performance tuning is limited to other platform levers.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: NVIDIA suggests an 800 W unit for the RTX 4090 D. The GPU carries a 425 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector, and the CPU adds a 65 W TDP.

Q: Can this build handle video editing and rendering?

A: Yes, emphatically. The GPU brings 24 GB of GDDR6X, 73.54 TFLOPS FP32, 456 tensor cores, and an OpenCL score of 278621, while the CPU contributes a 32101 R23 multi-core score and 24 threads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact combination — every frame-rate figure below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a recorded result.

With that caveat stated, the estimates are still grounded. The RTX 4090 D's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8587, its 98th-percentile ranking, 443.5 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, and 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth point to 4K ultra gaming at high frame rates in modern AAA titles — this class of GPU exists precisely to make 4K max-settings play smooth. Ray tracing is a strength given the 114 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and DLSS-class upscaling leverage from the 456 tensor cores should push enabled frame rates well beyond native raster performance at 4K.

At 1440p, expect the GPU to be capable of very high frame rates, with the CPU increasingly becoming the limiting factor — the i7-13700F's tapered thread scaling (7136 at 8 threads versus 10716 at maximum) means the strongest per-core throughput, not thread count, determines the ceiling in fast-paced titles. At 1080p the CPU will bottleneck clearly in competitive games; the GPU's headroom is largely unusable there. Esports titles at lower settings will still run at very high frame rates given the 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores, but buyers paying for 98th-percentile graphics should be playing at 1440p or 4K. Treat all of this as score-derived expectation, not measurement.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on Intel's 10 nm process, built on the Socket 1700 platform with a 257 mm² die. It runs a 2.10 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP rating. The cache hierarchy — 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 30 MB of shared L3 — gives games and latency-sensitive applications a deep pool to work from. The "F" suffix means no integrated graphics, which is irrelevant in this build given the discrete GPU but worth knowing for troubleshooting.

What do the scores mean in practice? The R23 multi-core result of 32101 and Geekbench multi-core of 15058 describe a chip that completes heavy threaded work — rendering, encoding, compiling — in the same conversation as parts like the AMD EPYC 4245P, which it trails by only 0.5 percent on average score. The single-core figures (R23 4532, Geekbench 2225, PassMark 4121) describe snappy everyday responsiveness and strong per-thread game performance. The hybrid 16-core layout explains the benchmark curve: strong scaling through 8 threads, diminishing returns beyond. Real workloads that spawn dozens of threads still finish quickly, but workloads with 4–8 hot threads extract nearly everything the chip offers. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, which matters for platform flexibility — DDR5 extracts more from the memory subsystem in bandwidth-hungry tasks. The locked multiplier caps enthusiast tuning, so the out-of-box performance profile is essentially the final one.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story is straightforward. Socket 1700 supports this chip, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes directly from the processor — enough for the RTX 4090 D at full bandwidth, since the card's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 and runs without compromise on the Gen 5 link. Dual-channel memory with DDR4 and DDR5 support means builders choosing a motherboard can go either route, though DDR5 is the sensible pairing for a GPU of this caliber.

Power is the main planning item. The GPU's 425 W TDP and NVIDIA's suggested 800 W PSU set the requirement; the CPU's 65 W TDP is a minor line item by comparison. The card needs a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a triple-slot footprint at 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 61 mm wide — case clearance matters more than cooling drama on the CPU side, where a capable air cooler suffices for a 65 W-class part. Display connectivity includes one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, supporting multi-monitor arrays.

The sensible upgrade path runs through the CPU. The GPU is already at the 98th percentile with only marginal gaps to workstation-class parts, so the highest-leverage future move is a faster processor on the same Socket 1700 platform, which would raise the build's combined percentile above its current 92 by narrowing the CPU-GPU spread. Note the production statuses: the i7-13700F is Active, while the RTX 4090 D is End-of-life — its successor generation is GeForce 50 — so GPU availability rather than performance may dictate long-term decisions. For now, the pairing as configured is coherent: launch MSRP for the CPU was $359, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 1,599 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class, high-end gaming and creator build. Its identity comes from the pairing: an 86th-percentile, 16-core/24-thread Raptor Lake CPU feeding a 98th-percentile Ada Lovelace flagship with 24 GB of GDDR6X. The combined percentile of 92 places it in the top tier of the database — not the absolute summit, because the CPU sits a step below elite, but comfortably within high-end territory. The GPU competes within a few percent of workstation parts like the RTX 5000 Ada and the A100 SXM4 80 GB, which tells you this build can moonlight as a compute and content machine, not just a gaming rig. The verdict for a practical builder: run it at 4K or high-refresh 1440p, feed it an 800 W-class power supply per the GPU's suggestion, and enjoy a configuration where the graphics card — the most expensive and highest-ranked component — is doing exactly the work it was bought to do.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds