SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis covers the pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in a desktop configuration. The FACT PACK contains no measured frame rate data for this specific combination, so all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct gameplay testing. The data indicates a system designed for high-end performance, with both components achieving the 86th percentile relative to their respective categories.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, frame rate expectations must be inferred from the raw compute capabilities of the CPU and GPU. The RTX 4080’s benchmark results, including a Passmark G3D score of 34457 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567, place it firmly in the upper echelon of graphics cards. The i7-13700F complements this with a strong single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23, ensuring that CPU-bound scenarios do not become a limiting factor for frame generation.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the data suggests this pairing would deliver exceptionally high frame rates, likely exceeding the refresh rates of most high-end monitors. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2178 and 4-thread score of 4258 indicate robust performance in lightly-threaded game logic, while the GPU’s 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides ample pixel-pushing power. At 1440p, the balance shifts more toward the GPU, where the RTX 4080’s 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate would maintain high frame rates even with demanding graphical settings.

At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the primary driver of performance. The RTX 4080’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 304 TMUs are well-suited for high-resolution texture workloads. Estimated frame rates in AAA titles at 4K Ultra settings would remain playable, typically staying above 60 FPS in most scenarios, though the exact figures depend on the specific game’s optimization. The lack of measured data means these are projections, but the component benchmarks suggest a system capable of high-refresh 1440p gaming and solid 4K performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more prevalent DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits without changing the motherboard. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), providing headroom for future high-bandwidth storage devices or expansion cards, while the GPU operates on a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The i7-13700F has a TDP of 65 W, a conservative figure for a 16-core processor, which keeps cooling requirements modest. The RTX 4080 has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 700 W. This leaves reasonable headroom for system components like drives, fans, and RGB lighting, but a builder planning heavy overclocking or adding multiple peripherals might consider a higher-wattage unit. The GPU is triple-slot and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, so case clearance and cable compatibility are practical considerations.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the graphics card as the primary candidate for a future refresh. The CPU’s 86th percentile standing among all CPUs means it has significant longevity, while the RTX 4080, marked as end-of-life with its successor already released, will likely become the bottleneck sooner. A future GPU upgrade would not require a platform change, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot remains compatible with newer cards. Memory capacity could also be increased, though the current dual-channel setup is standard for gaming and productivity.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but does not support ECC memory, and it is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1092 single-thread to 10716 max-thread, indicating strong multi-threading efficiency. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 place it in the high-performance desktop tier. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38369 and integer math score of 141370 highlight its capability in compute-heavy tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering.

Single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1903 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4121. This ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in applications that rely on single-threaded code. The data compression score of 471838 and floating-point math score of 100422 further demonstrate its versatility. Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU sits within 1.2% of the AMD EPYC 4245P and Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, showing it is competitive with both server and newer desktop parts.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who demand high performance across both gaming and productivity workloads. Gamers at 1440p resolution will find the combination well-matched, as the RTX 4080 can handle high refresh rates while the i7-13700F prevents CPU bottlenecks in most titles. For 4K gaming, the system remains capable, though the GPU will be the limiting factor more often than the CPU.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101. The GPU’s 20671 Passmark compute score and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 output accelerate rendering tasks in applications that support CUDA or GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded performance, while students and small business users will find the system far more capable than necessary for office tasks, though its power and cooling requirements make it a heavier investment than typical office machines.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 320 W TDP mean this is not a system for compact or low-power builds. It requires a substantial case and adequate airflow. Users who prioritize raw performance over silence or efficiency will find this setup appropriate, but those seeking a quieter or more power-conscious system might consider lower-tier components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i7-13700F and RTX 4080 is generally well-matched, but the data reveals specific workload-dependent bottlenecks. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh 1080p gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance is the limiting factor. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4532 are strong, but games relying heavily on a few cores may not utilize the full potential of the 16-core design.

In GPU-bound workloads, particularly at 4K resolution or with ray tracing enabled, the RTX 4080 becomes the limiting component. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 86 is identical to the CPU’s, but its raw performance in synthetic benchmarks like Passmark G3D (34457) suggests it will be the primary determinant of frame rates in graphically intensive scenarios. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 86th percentile indicate they are evenly matched in their respective categories.

The combined percentile of 86 reflects a system where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. However, the RTX 4080 is end-of-life, while the CPU remains active in production. This suggests that as newer games become more demanding, the GPU will likely become the first bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 24 threads provide headroom for future titles that scale better with multi-core processors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p, the combination of the i7-13700F’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1092) and the RTX 4080’s high pixel rate (280.6 GPixel/s) should sustain frame rates well above 144 Hz in most competitive titles, though exact figures are estimates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, reflected in a Passmark multi-thread score of 38369, can handle game encoding simultaneously with gameplay. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities, implied by its Ada Lovelace architecture, would offload this task effectively, though specific encoding benchmarks are not in the data.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 indicate fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 214739 OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 10716 max-thread 3DMark score and the GPU’s 20671 Passmark compute score provide a dual-path rendering setup. CPU rendering will be swift, while GPU-accelerated renderers will leverage the 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Software development: The Passmark data compression score of 471838 and integer math score of 141370 speed up code compilation and data processing tasks. The 24 threads allow for parallel build processes.

Student and office work: This system is significantly overpowered for standard office applications. The Passmark single-thread score of 4121 ensures fast application loading, but the power draw and physical size make it impractical for typical student or office environments.

FAQ

Q: Does the i7-13700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists no integrated graphics for this CPU, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, operating on a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life," with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

Q: What is the suggested PSU rating for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4080 is 700 W, and it requires a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the i7-13700F compare to the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39009, which is 0.5% lower than the EPYC 4245P’s score of 39215.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the i7-13700F?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4080?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, using 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system combining the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. Both components rank at the 86th percentile in their respective categories, giving the overall system a combined percentile of 86. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 320 W TDP. The pairing is intended for high-end gaming and productivity, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU delivering high-resolution graphics capability.

The system requires a substantial power supply (700 W suggested) and a case that can accommodate a triple-slot, 310 mm long graphics card. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in component selection. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life, indicating a potential future upgrade path focused on the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39215, a 0.5% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 39325, 0.8% higher. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 54247, also at the 86th percentile. Its closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54209, just 0.1% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828, which is 1.1% higher.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 38369. The GPU shows strength in DirectX workloads with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 and a Passmark G3D score of 34457. Combined, the picture is one of a balanced high-end system: the CPU’s 86th percentile standing ensures it will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios, while the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking confirms it is a top-tier graphics solution. The absence of measured FPS data means these scores serve as the primary basis for performance expectations, and they indicate a system capable of handling demanding games and applications with ease.