SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

31,087 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core i7-13700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 81, placing it in the top quintile of all CPU+GPU combinations tracked in the database. This is a high-tier pairing, though it sits below the very top echelon of enthusiast configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39009. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39215, which is 0.5% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T trails at 38561, which is 1.2% lower than the i7-13700F.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds a percentile of 76 versus all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 31087, which places it just slightly behind the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (score 31676, 1.9% higher) and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (score 31532, 1.4% higher).

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-13700F has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false). This means users cannot manually overclock the processor through the multiplier; performance must come from its stock boost clock of 5.20 GHz and any motherboard-level power or thermal tuning.

Q: What are the memory and PCIe specifications for this platform?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it does not support ECC memory. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU, however, interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ships with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. All frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined profile of this build is defined by two strong but not class-leading components. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile among all processors. The GPU, meanwhile, posts an average benchmark score of 31087, which sits at the 76th percentile among all graphics cards. Together, they form a pairing with a combined percentile of 81, indicating a system that is well above the median but not at the absolute peak of performance.

The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles is notable. The processor is 10 percentile points higher than the graphics card, suggesting that the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does. In practical terms, this means the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more likely to be the limiting factor in heavily GPU-bound scenarios, while the i7-13700F can comfortably feed the graphics card in most workloads.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster. The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215, just 0.5% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39325, 0.8% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is 1.2% higher at 39485. On the lower side, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561, which is 1.2% lower. This grouping indicates that the i7-13700F is competitive with a range of recent desktop and mobile processors, with no single rival holding a decisive advantage.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all NVIDIA products. The Quadro M5000 scores 31206, 0.4% higher; the GRID M60-1Q scores 31220, 0.4% higher; the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, 1.4% higher; and the TITAN RTX scores 31676, 1.9% higher. The margins are small, but the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER trails all four of these cards in raw average benchmark score. This suggests that while the GPU is capable, it is not outpacing its immediate competition by any meaningful margin.

The combined picture is one of balance with a slight CPU lean. The system is well-suited for tasks that benefit from the processor's strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU provides solid rasterization and compute capabilities that are roughly 5% behind the TITAN RTX, a previous enthusiast flagship. For a desktop build, this is a sensible middle-to-upper tier configuration.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed to feed the 16 cores efficiently, particularly in workloads that exhibit high data locality or moderate thread contention.

Benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern from single-threaded to multi-threaded performance. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1092, while the 2-thread score is 2178, the 4-thread score is 4258, the 8-thread score is 7136, and the max-thread score is 10716. This progression indicates strong thread scaling, with the 8-thread score being roughly 6.5 times the single-thread score, and the max-thread score being nearly 10 times the single-thread score. For a 24-thread processor, this suggests that the core and thread architecture is well-utilized.

In Cinebench, the multi-core scores are particularly telling. The R23 multi-core score is 32101, which is a strong result for a 65 W TDP processor. The single-core R23 score is 4532, indicating that the boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivers competitive per-thread performance. The R20 multi-core score of 13482 and R15 multi-core score of 3235 follow the expected scaling pattern.

Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 15058 and a single-core score of 2225. The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload types. The multi-thread score is 38369, with integer math at 141370, floating point math at 100422, and extended instructions (SIMD) at 28295. Data compression scores 471838, while data encryption scores 26956. These numbers indicate that the CPU is particularly strong in integer-heavy and compression workloads, while encryption performance is comparatively moderate.

With a percentile of 86 among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 39009, the i7-13700F is positioned as a high-end desktop processor. Its nearest rivals, which include both server (EPYC 4245P) and mobile (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, Ryzen AI 7 450) parts, show that it competes well across market segments. The locked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, but the stock performance is sufficient for most demanding workloads, including content creation, software compilation, and complex simulations.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more affordable memory and newer, faster DDR5 modules. ECC memory is not supported, which limits the platform's appeal for certain server or workstation applications where error correction is critical.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and expansion cards. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This is not a bottleneck in practice, as the GPU's bandwidth requirements are well-served by PCIe 4.0, but it does mean the system does not fully utilize the CPU's Gen 5 capability for the primary graphics card.

The GPU has a TDP of 285 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This leaves significant headroom for a 600 W power supply, as the combined TDP of 350 W is well below the 600 W suggestion. This suggests that the system can accommodate additional components, such as multiple storage drives or additional expansion cards, without requiring a larger PSU. However, transient power spikes from the GPU may still warrant a quality power supply with adequate headroom.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to focus on the GPU, as the CPU has a higher percentile (86) compared to the GPU (76). An upgrade to a higher-tier graphics card would better balance the system. Alternatively, adding more or faster DDR5 memory could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel configuration and 30 MB L3 cache already provide a solid foundation. The socket and PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU mean that future storage upgrades to Gen 5 NVMe drives are possible without changing the platform.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build is targeted at users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance alongside capable GPU compute. The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 76th percentile make it suitable for a range of demanding applications.

For gamers, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER with 16 GB of VRAM and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can handle modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means specific resolution targets must be estimated. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 suggests it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Content creators and video editors will benefit from the CPU's high multi-core scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 38369 indicate strong performance in rendering and encoding tasks. The GPU's compute score of 18372 in PassMark GPU Compute, along with its 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, provides acceleration for AI-assisted workflows and ray-traced rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 16 cores and 24 threads useful. The PassMark integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 suggest efficient handling of compilation and data processing tasks. Students and small business workstations can leverage the platform's DDR4/DDR5 memory flexibility to build cost-effective systems without sacrificing performance, though pricing details are not part of this analysis.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The database contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, meaning all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 31811 and the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1092, Cinebench R23 single-core of 4532), this system is expected to handle most modern games at high refresh rates. At 1080p, the CPU's performance is likely sufficient to push high frame rates, as the 86th percentile CPU percentile suggests it can feed the GPU effectively. At 1440p, the GPU's 76th percentile becomes more relevant, and the system should deliver smooth gameplay in most titles.

At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's performance, estimated from its average benchmark score of 31087, suggests it can handle 4K gaming but may require settings adjustments in the most demanding titles. The CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck at this resolution, given its high multi-threaded and single-threaded scores.

The estimated FPS figures are just that — estimates. Without measured data, it is not possible to provide exact frame rates. However, the combination of a top-quintile CPU and a top-quartile GPU indicates a system well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with capable 4K performance for less demanding titles.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is based on the AD103 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors and a die size of 379 mm². It features 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines. The GPU has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, which is 21 Gbps effective. This configuration is well-suited for high-resolution textures and large datasets, which is a significant advantage over 8 GB and 12 GB cards in memory-heavy workloads.

The GPU's clock speeds are 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. This results in a pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 44.10 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the card does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration beyond what the shader cores provide.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 31811, which places the GPU at the 76th percentile among all graphics cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5569, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 199267 and Vulkan scores 53683. The PassMark GPU Compute score is 18372, indicating solid compute performance for non-gaming workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all NVIDIA products. The Quadro M5000 (31206, 0.4% higher) and GRID M60-1Q (31220, 0.4% higher) are essentially tied with it, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31532, 1.4% higher) and TITAN RTX (31676, 1.9% higher) are slightly ahead. This suggests that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a strong performer, but it is not the top card in its class. For rendering workloads, the 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration that should outperform the older TITAN RTX in ray-traced scenes, despite the slightly lower average benchmark score.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with a 285 W TDP and a suggested 600 W power supply.

The combined percentile of this pairing is 81, placing it in the top quintile of all tracked builds. The CPU's individual percentile is 86, while the GPU's is 76. This indicates a system that is well above average but not at the very top of the performance hierarchy.

The build is best described as a high-end mainstream configuration. It is not an extreme enthusiast setup with flagship components, but it offers substantial performance across both CPU and GPU workloads. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores make it suitable for productivity tasks, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance handle demanding graphics and compute workloads.

Given the production status of the GPU (end-of-life) and the CPU (active), this is a pairing that can still be assembled new for the CPU, but the GPU may require finding existing stock. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $359, and for the GPU it is 799 USD. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU relative to their respective peer groups.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is tilted slightly toward the CPU. The processor's 86th percentile is 10 points higher than the GPU's 76th percentile, indicating that the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers. In most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the graphics card's rendering throughput becomes the constraint.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 31811 is strong, but its nearest rivals are all within 2% of its score, suggesting it is not a dominant performer. In contrast, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 is a decisive result that places it well ahead of many competitors.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (PassMark score 471838) or integer math (141370), the i7-13700F will be the primary driver. The GPU's compute score of 18372 in PassMark GPU Compute is respectable but not exceptional, meaning that tasks like 3D rendering that rely on both CPU and GPU will see the GPU as the more likely bottleneck.

For gaming, the bottleneck will shift based on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4532) should keep frame rates high, but the GPU may still be the limit in poorly optimized titles. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck, as the 16 GB VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth become the primary constraints. The system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where both components are likely to be utilized effectively.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 76th percentile, combined with 16 GB of VRAM, should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The lack of measured FPS data means exact numbers are estimates, but the benchmark scores suggest a capable gaming rig.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38369 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 indicate that the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the 3DMark max-thread score of 10716 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15058, makes it suitable for video editing. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerate effects and rendering tasks.

3D rendering: The GPU's 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering. The CPU's high multi-core scores complement this, making the system suitable for both CPU-based and GPU-based renderers.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 suggest efficient compilation and data processing. The 24 threads can handle parallel builds, while the 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but its flexibility in memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) and strong multi-threaded performance make it a future-proof option for students in engineering or computer science programs. The 65 W CPU TDP and 285 W GPU TDP are manageable for a desktop workstation.