SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

This desktop build pairs Intel’s 16-core Raptor Lake i7-13700F with NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace RTX 4070 AD103, combining a strong multi-threaded CPU with a mid-range GPU that still carries the RTX 4070 name. The combined percentile of 68 places this system above the majority of tracked desktop configurations, though the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning half of the GPUs in the database outperform it. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It runs with a 2.10 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.20 GHz, while drawing a 65 W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Notably, it has no integrated graphics, so the discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a CPU that scales strongly with thread count. The 3DMark results show 2,178 for 2 threads, 4,258 for 4 threads, 7,136 for 8 threads, 8,994 for 16 threads, and 10,716 for max threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is only about 26%, which suggests diminishing returns beyond 8 cores in that particular workload. However, the max-thread score of 10,716 versus the single-thread score of 1,092 indicates roughly 9.8x scaling across all threads — strong evidence that the hybrid core design is effective in heavily threaded scenarios.

Cinebench results reinforce this dual nature. The R23 single-core score of 4,532 is respectable for a 13th-gen part, while the R23 multi-core score of 32,101 is the standout figure. That multi-core result places the i7-13700F in the 86th percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly 86% of all processors. The Geekbench scores of 2,225 single-core and 15,058 multi-core align with this narrative. Passmark results show 38,369 for multi-thread and 4,121 for single-thread, with integer math at 141,370 and floating-point math at 100,422.

The nearest rivals in the database provide useful context. The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215 on average, just 0.5% higher than the i7-13700F’s average benchmark score of 39,009. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325, 0.8% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561, which is 1.2% lower than the i7-13700F. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485, 1.2% higher. These deltas are all within about one percent, meaning the i7-13700F sits in a very tight competitive cluster — it trades blows with server and mobile parts depending on the workload, but none of these rivals decisively beats it.

What does this mean for real workloads? The 16 cores and 24 threads handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads that benefit from larger working sets. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is more than adequate for daily tasks and lightly threaded applications. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core part, which suggests the CPU can be kept cool with a capable air cooler without requiring exotic liquid cooling solutions.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, all gaming frame rates presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than actual gameplay measurements. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this system should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The RTX 4070 AD103’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for texture-heavy scenes at this resolution. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, though some esports titles that are extremely CPU-bound might see the i7-13700F become the limiting factor. Expect triple-digit frame rates in competitive shooters and high refresh-rate experiences in most AAA titles at 1080p ultra.

Moving to 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. The 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is respectable but not top-tier, so frame rates will drop compared to 1080p. Still, the data suggests this system can handle 1440p ultra in the majority of games, with frame rates in the 60-100 range depending on the title’s optimization. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1440p textures, and the 192-bit memory bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth prevents severe bandwidth bottlenecks at this resolution.

At 4K ultra, the RTX 4070 AD103 will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. The 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 455.4 GTexel/s texture rate are the key metrics here — 4K requires significantly more pixel throughput than 1080p or 1440p. The data suggests that 4K gaming would require reduced settings or upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates. The GPU’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores do provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, which can help offset some of the raw performance deficit at 4K.

The CPU’s 16 threads and 30 MB L3 cache are generally sufficient for gaming workloads, which typically use 4-8 threads at most. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,136 is strong, and the single-thread score of 1,092 indicates good per-core performance. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is strong at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring compromises.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, this system should easily push frame rates above 144 FPS in many titles, given the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-refresh gaming at these resolutions, and the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports fast texture streaming. The 65 W CPU TDP means the processor won’t throttle under sustained gaming loads, keeping frame times consistent.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The 3DMark max-thread score of 10,716 indicates that the CPU can handle the encoding workload while the game runs on the GPU. The GPU’s 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores also enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. This is a capable streaming setup for 1080p and 1440p sources.

Video editing: The multi-core performance is the standout here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 38,369 indicate strong performance in video rendering and export tasks. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects processing and GPU-accelerated encoding. This system handles 4K video editing with reasonable export times.

3D rendering: The combination of 16 CPU cores and the GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture makes this a solid entry-level rendering workstation. The CPU’s 32,101 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s 46 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering workloads. The 12 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes, but for most projects this is sufficient.

Software development: The 24 threads handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, with the Passmark integer math score of 141,370 indicating strong performance in compute-intensive tasks. The 30 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated access to code and build artifacts. The DDR5 memory support provides high bandwidth for development workloads that move large data sets. The lack of integrated graphics means developers need the discrete GPU for display output, but this is a non-issue since the RTX 4070 AD103 is included.

Student and office work: This system is significantly overpowered for typical student and office workloads. The single-thread score of 4,121 in Passmark handles document editing and web browsing with ease. The 16 cores are largely idle during office tasks, meaning battery drain (if applicable) and power consumption are higher than necessary. However, for students in engineering or computer science programs that require occasional heavy computation, this system provides ample headroom.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU in this system is fairly even, but there are workload-dependent bottlenecks. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking indicates that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming scenarios, this means the GPU will often be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU’s 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 455.4 GTexel/s texture rate become the binding constraints.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 suggest that the CPU can keep up with the GPU in most games at this resolution. However, in CPU-intensive titles with poor optimization, the i7-13700F could become the bottleneck despite its strong single-thread scores.

The 3DMark scaling data provides insight into CPU scaling behavior. The jump from 2 threads (2,178) to 4 threads (4,258) is nearly linear at 95% scaling, but from 4 to 8 threads (7,136) the scaling drops to 67%, and from 8 to 16 threads (8,994) it drops further to 26%. This indicates that the CPU’s performance gains diminish significantly beyond 8 threads in this benchmark, which is typical for gaming workloads that rarely utilize more than 8 threads effectively.

The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM could become a bottleneck in future games that require more than 12 GB at high settings, particularly at 1440p and 4K with high-resolution textures. The 192-bit memory bus is narrower than higher-tier GPUs, which could limit performance in bandwidth-intensive scenes. However, the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for current games at 1080p and most titles at 1440p.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.2% in either direction, indicating that the i7-13700F is competitively positioned. The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (1.2% higher). This tight cluster suggests that the i7-13700F delivers performance on par with these alternatives, despite being a desktop part competing against server and mobile processors.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK — its avgBenchmarkScore is 0 and its nearestRivals list is empty. The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. This is a crucial data point: while the CPU is in the top 14% of processors, the GPU is in the middle of the pack. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this balance, placing the overall system above average but not in the high-performance tier.

The CPU’s individual benchmark scores are consistently strong across different test suites. Geekbench multi-core of 15,058 and single-core of 2,225 are solid numbers. Passmark results show 38,369 multi-thread, 4,121 single-thread, 141,370 integer math, and 100,422 floating-point math. The Cinebench R20 scores of 13,482 multi-core and 1,903 single-core, along with R15 scores of 3,235 multi-core and 456 single-core, complete the picture of a well-rounded processor. The Passmark data compression score of 471,838 and data encryption score of 26,956 indicate strong performance in these specific workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance but don’t require top-tier GPU power. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find this build well-suited to their needs, with the CPU ensuring high frame rates and the GPU providing adequate graphics performance. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games at these resolutions, and the 46 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates.

Content creators working in video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 100,422 indicate strong performance in rendering and compute-heavy tasks. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and rendering.

Software developers will appreciate the 24 threads for parallel compilation and the 30 MB L3 cache for faster build times. The Passmark integer math score of 141,370 indicates strong performance in compute-intensive development tasks. The DDR5 memory support provides high bandwidth for development workloads.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs will find this system capable of handling their coursework, though it’s more powerful than what typical coursework requires. Small business workstations that need occasional heavy computation — such as data analysis or CAD work — would also benefit from this build’s balanced performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features.

The clock speeds are 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W power supply. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 240 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it performs at the median of all GPUs in the database. This is not a high-end card by any means, but it’s also not a budget option. The 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the 46 RT cores provide reasonable ray tracing performance. The 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-enhanced features that can improve frame rates in supported games.

The 12 GB VRAM is a significant consideration. At 1080p and 1440p, this is generally sufficient for ultra settings in current games. At 4K, some titles may exceed 12 GB with ultra textures, causing texture quality to be reduced or frame rates to drop. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the memory size, though higher-tier GPUs offer more bandwidth for memory-heavy workloads.

The GPU’s End-of-life production status means it’s no longer being manufactured, though it remains available through existing inventory. Its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. The launch MSRP was 599 USD, which places it in the mid-range to upper-mid-range market segment.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, meaning this system outperforms 68% of tracked desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39,009, which is within 1.2% of all four nearest rivals. The AMD EPYC 4245P is 0.5% higher, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is 0.8% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is 1.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is 1.2% higher.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, based on the GPU’s 200 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 is marked as End-of-life, with the GeForce 30 series as its predecessor and GeForce 50 series as its successor.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part from Intel’s 13th generation Raptor Lake series, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 68 places this system above average, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile. The launch MSRP for the CPU was $359 and the GPU was 599 USD.

The system is best characterized as a balanced mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop. The CPU provides excellent multi-threaded performance for productivity workloads, while the GPU delivers solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP keep overall power requirements moderate, with a 550 W PSU recommended.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and some additional devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes (backward compatible).

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 200 W TDP of the GPU mean the suggested 550 W power supply provides reasonable headroom for the current configuration. However, upgrading to a higher-power GPU in the future would likely require a larger PSU. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, which may limit compatibility with older power supplies that lack this connector.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking indicates it has headroom to support faster graphics cards. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads are unlikely to bottleneck even high-end GPUs in most workloads. However, the 12 GB VRAM of the current GPU may become a limiting factor in future games, so upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM would be a consideration.

The Socket 1700 platform does not support newer Intel processors beyond the 13th and 14th generations, so CPU upgrades would be limited to the same generation or the 14th generation. The platform’s DDR5 memory support means upgrading to faster DDR5 modules is possible, though the CPU’s dual-channel memory controller limits the benefit of adding more than two modules. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for storage devices, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds