SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010: A Desktop Build Analysis

This desktop build pairs Intel's 16-core Core i7-13700F with NVIDIA's entry-level GeForce RTX 4010, a combination that sits at the 52nd percentile when ranked against all possible CPU-GPU pairings. The processor is a high-end Raptor Lake part with strong multi-threaded credentials, while the graphics card is a low-power Ampere-based solution with a 4 GB frame buffer. The result is an unbalanced system where the CPU's capabilities far outstrip the GPU's, making it suitable for productivity-heavy workloads but limited for modern gaming at high settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or higher resolutions. The RTX 4010's benchmark score of 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, meaning roughly 82% of graphics cards perform better. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth are limiting factors for modern titles, so frame rates at high refresh rates (144 Hz or above) would be unattainable in demanding games. Estimated frame rates would fall well below 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings in most recent releases.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The Core i7-13700F scores 32101 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 38369 in PassMark multithread, both strong results that indicate smooth handling of simultaneous gameplay capture, encoding, and broadcast tasks. However, the GPU's limited rendering power means the gameplay feed itself would need to run at modest settings and resolutions. The presence of 24 tensor cores on the GPU could assist with AI-based encoding features, but the overall gaming experience would constrain the stream quality.

Video editing: The processor excels in this scenario. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 suggest that timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks would be responsive. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 24 tensor cores provide some acceleration for effects and AI tools, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of projects that can be handled smoothly. For 1080p editing with light effects, this build is workable; for 4K or heavy color grading, the GPU becomes a bottleneck.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13482 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 10716. CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray would perform respectably. However, GPU-accelerated rendering would be constrained by the RTX 4010's 6 RT cores and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 4 GB VRAM is a severe limitation for texture-heavy scenes. This build is better suited for CPU rendering workflows than GPU-accelerated ones.

Software development: The 16 cores and 24 threads handle compilation, testing, and virtualization well. A PassMark data compression score of 471838 indicates fast build artifact handling, while the integer math score of 141370 suggests strong performance in logic-heavy code. The single-thread score of 4121 in PassMark means interactive responsiveness in IDEs and terminal tools is good. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this pairing works well for programmers.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical student and office tasks, but it handles them effortlessly. The Core i7-13700F's single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application launches and document processing. Multitasking across spreadsheets, browsers, video conferencing, and note-taking apps would never stress the CPU. The GPU's low power draw (50 W TDP) and single-slot design make this a quiet, efficient workstation, though its 4 GB VRAM is irrelevant for productivity applications.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 4010 a fast GPU?

A: No. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. It is roughly 0.5% slower than an RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and about 1% slower than a Quadro P600 in the same benchmark.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 39009, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4245P (39215) and 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39325). It is 1.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38561).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4010 have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. This is a small amount for modern gaming at high settings.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The pairing sits at the 52nd percentile among all CPU-GPU combinations, meaning it performs better than about half of all builds.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Core i7-13700F has no integrated graphics (the "F" suffix indicates this). A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. The suggested power supply rating is 250 W.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, its raw performance is so low that ray tracing would be impractical at playable frame rates.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

The RTX 4010's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 is a very low result, placing it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. In practical terms, this GPU is suited for esports titles at 1080p with medium-to-low settings, where frame rates could reach 60-100 FPS. For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, estimated frame rates would typically fall in the 20-40 FPS range, depending on the title's optimization. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96 GB/s bandwidth would cause severe stuttering and texture pop-in, making these resolutions effectively unplayable.

The CPU's strength does not help gaming performance when the GPU is the bottleneck. At 1080p, the Core i7-13700F could push high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., esports titles), but the GPU would still cap the output. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2178 and single-thread score of 1092 indicate strong per-core performance, which is good for game logic and physics, but the GPU remains the limiting factor in virtually all gaming scenarios.

For ray tracing, the 6 RT cores are present, but the GPU's overall compute throughput (2.706 TFLOPS FP32) is too low to render ray-traced scenes at acceptable frame rates. DLSS and other upscaling technologies could mitigate this somewhat, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the headroom for such features.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a pronounced CPU-favored imbalance. The Core i7-13700F scores at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile among GPUs. This 68-percentage-point gap is the defining characteristic of this build.

In CPU-intensive workloads—software compilation, 3D rendering (CPU-based), data compression, and multi-threaded productivity—the CPU operates at its full potential, and the GPU's limitations are irrelevant. The 3DMark max-threads score of 10716 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 demonstrate that the processor handles heavy parallel loads without issue.

In GPU-intensive workloads—gaming, GPU rendering, video encoding with hardware acceleration—the GPU becomes the absolute bottleneck. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 is the only GPU benchmark available, and its 18th percentile ranking means the GPU holds back the entire system. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads would be idle or underutilized while waiting for the GPU to render frames.

The FPS scaling evidence (though estimated) confirms this: even if the CPU could deliver 200+ FPS in a given title, the GPU's compute ceiling would cap output at a fraction of that. This build is balanced only for workloads that are exclusively CPU-bound. Any task that offloads to the GPU will expose the severe performance mismatch.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Key results include:

  • Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32101
  • Cinebench R23 single-core: 4532
  • Geekbench multi-core: 15058
  • Geekbench single-core: 2225
  • PassMark multithread: 38369
  • PassMark single-thread: 4121
  • 3DMark max-threads: 10716
  • 3DMark single-thread: 1092

These scores indicate a processor that is competitive with server-class parts (the nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4245P at 39215, only 0.5% higher) and mobile workstation chips (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 39325, 0.8% higher). The single-thread performance is also strong, with the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4532 being particularly notable for a 65 W part.

The GPU's only benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad, yields a score of 2893, at the 18th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within 1%: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, 0.5% faster), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, 0.6% faster), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, 0.7% faster), and Quadro P600 (2923, 1% faster). This clustering suggests the RTX 4010 is at the very bottom of the performance spectrum, just barely below other entry-level parts.

The combined percentile is 52, which is the average of the CPU's strong showing and the GPU's weak one. The build's overall tier is "mid-range" in terms of total system capability, but the components are wildly mismatched.

Who Should Build It

This system is appropriate for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who need only basic display output. Specific target users include:

Software developers: The 24 threads and strong single-thread performance (single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23) handle compilation, testing, and virtual machines efficiently. The GPU is adequate for basic desktop rendering and multiple monitors.

Students and office workers: For document processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and light multitasking, this build is far more powerful than necessary. The low power draw (65 W CPU + 50 W GPU = 115 W total) keeps electricity costs and heat output low.

CPU-based 3D renderers: Artists using CPU rendering engines (e.g., Blender Cycles on CPU) would benefit from the 16 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache. The GPU is not a factor in these workloads.

Data analysts and scientists: The PassMark floating-point math score of 100422 and integer math score of 141370 indicate strong number-crunching abilities for simulation and statistical workloads.

Not suitable for: Gamers at any resolution above 1080p low-to-medium settings, GPU-accelerated renderers, or anyone needing more than 4 GB of VRAM.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S, 10 nm process). It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a well-rounded, high-end desktop CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 is particularly strong, indicating excellent sustained multi-threaded performance despite the 65 W TDP. The single-core score of 4532 is also impressive, showing that the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is effective in lightly-threaded workloads.

The 3DMark thread-scaling results show good scaling from 2 threads (2178) to 8 threads (7136) to max threads (10716), though the scaling from 8 to 24 threads is less linear (a 50% increase in threads yields only a 50% increase in score, suggesting some memory bandwidth or thermal constraints).

The PassMark scores reveal specific strengths: data compression (471838), integer math (141370), and floating-point math (100422) are all strong. The find prime numbers score of 156 is lower, indicating that the processor's branch prediction and integer-heavy random access workloads are not its best suit.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39009, places it in the upper tier of processors. The nearest rivals are all within 1.2% in either direction, confirming that this CPU is competitively positioned at the top of the mid-range to upper-mid-range segment.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a top-tier 13th-gen Intel Core i7 processor with an entry-level NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 50 W Ampere-based card with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 52, is mid-range. This means the build outperforms roughly half of all possible CPU-GPU combinations. However, this percentile is misleading because the CPU and GPU are at opposite ends of the performance spectrum: the CPU is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 18th.

The build's class and components suggest it is intended as a workstation or productivity machine, not a gaming rig. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's minimal power draw (50 W TDP, no power connectors required) make it an efficient choice for always-on systems or small form factor cases. The single-slot GPU, measuring 163 mm in length, further supports compact builds.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and while no specific bandwidth is listed, the dual-channel configuration is standard. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The suggested power supply is 250 W, which is quite low. This means the current build has significant PSU headroom for upgrades. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 50 W, leaving ample room for a more powerful GPU within the existing power budget.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU is already at the 86th percentile, so replacing the RTX 4010 with a higher-performing card would dramatically improve the system's balance and overall percentile. A GPU in the 50th-70th percentile would better match the CPU's capabilities. However, any new GPU must fit within the existing PSU headroom or require a PSU upgrade.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked (no overclocking), and it does not support ECC memory. The platform is at end-of-life for new CPU releases (Raptor Lake is the last generation on Socket 1700), so future CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the user can choose between cheaper DDR4 or faster DDR5, depending on motherboard selection.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is based on the GA107 chip (Ampere architecture, 8 nm process from Samsung). It has 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. It also includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores.

The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The memory clock is 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost clock of 1762 MHz. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio).

The GPU's TDP is 50 W, which is remarkably low. It is a single-slot card, 163 mm long, with no power connectors required. The display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The only benchmark score is 3DMark Steel Nomad at 2893, which places the GPU at the 18th percentile. The nearest rivals are all within 1%: RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), and Quadro P600 (2923). This indicates that the RTX 4010 is at the absolute bottom of modern GPU performance, even below the Quadro P600, a professional card from a previous generation.

For rendering, the 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is low by modern standards. The 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide ray tracing and AI acceleration, but the overall throughput is insufficient for real-time ray tracing at acceptable frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for modern game textures, and the 96 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for any memory-intensive workload. This GPU is best suited for basic display output, light 2D work, and very old or esports titles at low settings.