SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti: Database Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 85th combined percentile across all CPU and GPU combinations tracked in this database. The CPU, a 16-core Raptor Lake-S part with 24 threads, scores 39,009 on average benchmarks, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, an Ampere-based GA102 chip with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, averages 41,187 in benchmark scores, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. This combination targets high-refresh gaming and content creation, though no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact pairing — all FPS figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 85th combined percentile across all tracked CPU and GPU combinations, indicating it outperforms roughly 85% of recorded desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The i7-13700F averages 39,009 in benchmark scores, which is 0.5% below the AMD EPYC 4245P's average score of 39,215. The difference is negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080 Ti?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has 912.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, delivered through a 384-bit bus using 12 GB of GDDR6X memory clocked at 19 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F had a launch MSRP of $359. The RTX 3080 Ti launched at 1,199 USD.

Q: Does the i7-13700F support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more available memory or newer, higher-bandwidth modules.

Q: What is the PCIe support for this CPU?

A: The i7-13700F provides Gen 5, 16 lanes from the CPU only. The RTX 3080 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, meaning the GPU is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slot.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size of the RTX 3080 Ti?

A: The GA102 chip contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process, resulting in a transistor density of 45.1M per mm².

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's 3DMark scores show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. At 2 threads, the i7-13700F scores 2,178; at 4 threads, it reaches 4,258; at 8 threads, 7,136; at 16 threads, 8,994; and at max threads, 10,716. The single-thread score is 1,092. This scaling indicates strong multi-threading efficiency, with the 8-thread score being roughly 3.3 times the 2-thread score, suggesting effective use of the performance cores.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multi-core score is 32,101, while the single-core score is 4,532. The R20 multi-core score is 13,482 with a single-core score of 1,903. The R15 multi-core score is 3,235 with a single-core score of 456. These numbers place the CPU well above the median CPU in the database, consistent with its 86th percentile ranking.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 15,058 multi-core and 2,225 single-core. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 38,369 and a single-thread score of 4,121. Specialized PassMark tests reveal the CPU's strengths: integer math scores 141,370, floating-point math scores 100,422, data compression scores 471,838, data encryption scores 26,956, extended instructions score 28,295, and random string sorting scores 49,974. The physics test scores 2,236, and the prime number finding test scores 156.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,077. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 170,037 and the Vulkan score is 192,697. PassMark results show a G3D score of 26,896 and a GPU compute score of 15,282. DirectX 9 scores 274, DirectX 10 scores 184, DirectX 11 scores 223, and DirectX 12 scores 110. The G2D score is 1,091. These results place the GPU in the 83rd percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 0.8% higher average score.

The combined picture is one of balance: the CPU sits marginally above the GPU in percentile terms (86 vs. 83), meaning neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The 85th combined percentile reflects a pairing where both parts contribute substantial performance without one creating a glaring bottleneck in most workloads.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The GPU contains 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. For ray tracing, it has 80 dedicated RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 320 tensor cores. The FP32 compute throughput is 34.10 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory configuration is a highlight: 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads that stream large datasets. The pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its capabilities across different API levels. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 demonstrates modern DirectX 12 performance. The Vulkan score of 192,697 in Geekbench is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 170,037, suggesting the architecture handles Vulkan's low-level access particularly well. PassMark DirectX scores show older APIs performing relatively better (DirectX 9 at 274, DirectX 11 at 223, DirectX 10 at 184, DirectX 12 at 110), which is typical for an architecture that prioritizes modern rendering paths.

For rendering workloads, the 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 320 tensor cores position the GPU for both traditional rasterization and AI-accelerated tasks. The 80 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the 912.4 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bandwidth from becoming a constraint in high-detail scenes. The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of tracked GPUs, though its nearest rival is the RTX 5070 at 2% lower average score.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 83rd percentile suggests strong potential for high-refresh gaming at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth can drive high frame rates, while the CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,136 and max-thread score of 10,716 ensure adequate backend processing. Estimated FPS figures would need to be validated with measured data, but the component scores align with a system capable of exceeding 100 FPS in most titles at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and 16 cores provide substantial headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38,369 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 indicate the CPU can handle simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding without severe frame drops. The GPU's tensor cores can also accelerate encoding tasks, though the CPU's raw thread count is the primary asset here.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 and PassMark floating-point math score of 100,422 support efficient video processing. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects processing and timeline rendering. The combination suits 4K video editing workflows where both CPU and GPU are utilized.

3D rendering: The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 320 tensor cores accelerate both rasterization and AI-based denoising. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 handles scene preparation and physics simulation. The 80 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, making this a capable pair for architectural visualization and product rendering.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads support parallel compilation, with the PassMark integer math score of 141,370 indicating strong integer performance. The data compression score of 471,838 suggests efficient handling of build artifacts. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capability can assist with testing GPU-accelerated applications.

Student and office work: The CPU's 2-thread score of 2,178 and single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark, along with the PassMark single-thread score of 4,121, handle everyday productivity tasks with ease. The 65W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet during light workloads. This pairing is overkill for typical office tasks but provides headroom for more demanding academic projects.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65W. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 2,178 at 2 threads to 10,716 at max threads, showing a 4.9x improvement from 2 to 24 threads. This scaling is not perfectly linear, which is typical for hybrid architectures that combine performance and efficiency cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 is particularly strong, placing the CPU well above average in the database.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 141,370 is notably higher than the floating-point math score of 100,422, suggesting the architecture favors integer-heavy workloads like database operations and general computation. The data compression score of 471,838 is exceptionally high, indicating strong memory subsystem performance. The data encryption score of 26,956 is moderate, while the extended instructions score of 28,295 shows solid SIMD throughput.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it just below the AMD EPYC 4245P (0.5% lower average score) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (0.8% lower), while it sits above the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (1.2% higher) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (1.2% lower). These delta percentages are all within 1.2%, meaning the i7-13700F is competitively positioned against its closest rivals.

The 65W TDP is notable for a 16-core processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock. This power efficiency makes the CPU suitable for systems where cooling and power delivery are constrained, though the performance-per-watt characteristics suggest it can sustain high multi-threaded workloads without excessive thermal output.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 13th generation Core series. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the RTX 3080 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU operates at its designed interface without any bottleneck from the CPU's newer PCIe generation.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache benefits from either memory type, though DDR5 would provide higher bandwidth for memory-intensive workloads. The lack of ECC memory support means this platform is not suited for mission-critical server applications.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 750W, while the CPU's TDP is 65W. This creates a combined power requirement that a quality 750W power supply can handle, assuming the rest of the system draws within typical ranges. The GPU requires a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter for older power supplies.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU has limited headroom within its own generation. The Socket 1700 platform may support future BIOS updates for newer Raptor Lake variants, but the i7-13700F is already a high-tier part in its generation. The GPU, being end-of-life with its successor being the GeForce 40 series, represents the more likely upgrade target. However, the current pairing's 85th combined percentile suggests that upgrading either component alone would create a larger imbalance unless the other is also replaced.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing with the CPU at the 86th percentile and GPU at the 83rd percentile. The combined percentile of 85th indicates that neither component dramatically limits the other in most workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 39,009 and the GPU's average of 41,187 are within 5% of each other, suggesting matched performance tiers.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data processing, the i7-13700F's 24 threads and 141,370 integer math score provide ample headroom. The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS may be underutilized in these scenarios, but the CPU's performance prevents it from being the limiting factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming with ray tracing, the RTX 3080 Ti's 80 RT cores and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth become the primary driver, with the CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock ensuring it can feed the GPU adequately.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated rather than measured, suggests that at 1080p resolution, the CPU may become the bottleneck in frame generation due to its 86th percentile positioning. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 83rd percentile becomes more relevant, as resolution-dependent rendering tasks dominate the frame time. This is a typical pattern for high-end pairings where the balance shifts with resolution.

Build Overview

This pairing consists of an Intel Core i7-13700F desktop CPU and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti desktop GPU, classified as a desktop build. The CPU is part of the Core 13th Gen series, released on 2023-01-03, and remains in active production. The GPU is from the GeForce 30-series, released on 2021-05-30, and is now end-of-life with the GeForce 40 series as its successor.

The overall tier is high: the 85th combined percentile places this build above the vast majority of tracked systems. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 83rd percentile both indicate top-tier components, and their combination does not significantly compromise either component's standing. The build represents a high-end desktop configuration suitable for demanding applications.

The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with the GPU's 10,240 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, create a system that excels in both compute and graphics workloads. The 65W CPU TDP and 350W GPU TDP make power delivery straightforward with a suggested 750W PSU.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming will find this pairing suitable, given the GPU's 83rd percentile and the CPU's 86th percentile. The estimated FPS figures, while not measured, suggest the system can handle demanding titles at high settings, though users should validate performance for their specific games.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 32,101 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 12 GB VRAM supports large texture sets and complex scenes, while the CPU's 24 threads accelerate export and encoding tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 141,370 integer math score and 471,838 data compression score. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide parallel compilation capability, and the GPU's compute power enables testing of GPU-accelerated applications.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs will find the system capable of handling both coursework and personal projects. The CPU's 65W TDP keeps power costs manageable, and the platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allows budget-conscious memory choices.

Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for office applications, light content creation, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,121 in PassMark single-thread) and the system's overall 85th percentile ranking. The GPU's 83rd percentile ensures graphics-accelerated tasks run smoothly, though for pure office workloads, the GPU is more than sufficient.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, and should be treated as approximations rather than verified performance data.

Based on the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking and its 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, the RTX 3080 Ti is positioned to deliver high frame rates at 1440p and playable frame rates at 4K in most titles. The CPU's 86th percentile and its 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,136 suggest it can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load dominates.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (4,121 in PassMark) and boost clock of 5.20 GHz should prevent significant bottlenecks, but the estimated FPS may be CPU-limited in esports titles that rely heavily on single-core performance. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the 12 GB VRAM with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth becomes a factor in texture-heavy scenes. At 4K, the GPU's 83rd percentile becomes the primary driver, and frame rates will depend on the specific game's optimization for the Ampere architecture.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 80 RT cores, and the 320 tensor cores enable DLSS acceleration. These features combine to maintain playable frame rates in ray-traced titles, though the estimated FPS will be lower than in rasterized rendering. Users seeking specific frame rate expectations should consult measured data from comparable systems, as the estimates presented here lack direct validation.