SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM represent a pairing of a high-end 13th Gen desktop processor with an entry-level Ampere graphics card. Benchmark data shows a significant performance disparity between the two components, with the CPU ranking in the 86th percentile among all processors and the GPU sitting at the 57th percentile. While no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, the benchmark scores allow for a clear projection of its capabilities, positioning this as a workstation-oriented build where processor-heavy tasks take precedence over high-end gaming.

Who Should Build It

This combination serves users whose workloads prioritize CPU throughput. The i7-13700F excels in multi-threaded environments, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101, placing it far above the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This makes it a strong candidate for software developers compiling large codebases, students running engineering simulations, and small business workstations handling database management or complex spreadsheet calculations. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38369 reinforces this, indicating robust parallel processing capability.

For content creators, the pairing is viable for video editing and 3D rendering, though with a caveat. The GPU will limit GPU-accelerated tasks, but the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13482 suggests it can handle CPU-based rendering tasks like those in Blender’s Cycles engine or Adobe Media Encoder with relative ease. Gamers targeting 1080p resolution will find the system capable, but the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile ranking means it is not built for high-refresh or ultra-high-fidelity gaming. This is a desktop build for professionals and prosumers who need a fast, responsive system for compute-heavy work and play games as a secondary activity.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-13700F compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39009. This puts it 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38561), and 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4245P (39215). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.8% (39325) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 by 1.2% (39485).

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of this desktop build is 72. This positions the system as a whole above average, but indicates that the CPU is the dominant contributor to its overall performance tier.

Q: Is the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM capable of 4K gaming?

A: Benchmark scores do not support 4K gaming capability. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 is moderate. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p, but the data suggests this card is not designed for the pixel throughput required at higher resolutions.

Q: Can this CPU handle heavy multi-tasking?

A: Yes. With 16 cores and 24 threads, the i7-13700F demonstrates exceptional multi-threading. The 3DMark Max Threads score of 10716 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 indicate it can handle demanding workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and running multiple virtual machines concurrently without significant performance degradation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a 128-bit memory bus with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This is a limiting factor for the GPU, especially at higher resolutions and with demanding textures. The data indicates this bandwidth is sufficient for entry-level 1080p gaming, but it will constrain performance in VR or with high-resolution texture packs.

Q: What is the process node and architecture of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node. This architecture supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing builders flexibility in platform choice.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3050 OEM is based on the Ampere architecture and includes 18 RT cores and 72 Tensor cores. This hardware enables DirectX 12 Ultimate features, but raw performance from its 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 rating suggests ray tracing will be limited to lower resolutions and settings.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 3050 OEM’s PassMark G3D score of 11857 and its 57th percentile ranking provide the baseline for its gaming potential. This is a card designed for 1080p gaming, where it can likely achieve playable frame rates in most modern titles with medium-to-high settings, but it is not suited for high-refresh-rate monitors or demanding games at higher resolutions.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the strong single-threaded performance of the i7-13700F (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4532) will help drive high frame rates, potentially exceeding the GPU's rendering limit. However, the GPU will become the bottleneck in visually intensive AAA titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will be adequate for 1080p textures, but the card's overall compute power, as measured by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740, is too low to maintain high frame rates with ultra settings in recent releases. The data suggests that for a smooth gaming experience, users should target 1080p with adjusted settings rather than pushing the GPU to its limits.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39009 is roughly 2.5 times higher than the GPU’s average score of 15199. This asymmetry defines the system's character. In workloads that are heavily parallel, such as 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the primary driver. The i7-13700F’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3235 and PassMark Integer Math score of 141370 indicate it will process these tasks effectively, leaving the GPU idle or underutilized.

Conversely, in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, the RTX 3050 OEM will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s performance headroom means it will rarely be the bottleneck in a game; instead, the GPU's 57th percentile score will cap frame rates. For example, while the CPU can handle the game logic and physics calculations with ease, the GPU will struggle to render frames at a pace matching the CPU's output. This is a "GPU-bound" scenario in the most common gaming workloads. The system is well-balanced for non-gaming, multi-threaded productivity, but for gaming, the GPU is the definitive constraint.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a suitable build for high-refresh gaming. The RTX 3050 OEM lacks the raw compute power to generate the high frame rates needed for 144Hz or higher monitors. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will prevent the system from achieving the necessary performance in most modern titles.

Streaming: The i7-13700F is a capable streaming CPU. Its high multi-core scores, such as the 10716 in 3DMark Max Threads, can handle the encoding workload. However, the GPU's moderate performance will limit the game's frame rate, which could make the stream less visually smooth. Users might need to rely on the CPU's x264 encoding preset to maintain stream quality.

Video Editing: This is a strong workload for this system. The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 will accelerate timeline scrubbing, exporting, and effects processing. The GPU can assist with effects, but its 8 GB VRAM and 57th percentile score mean it is not ideal for heavy motion graphics or 4K color grading.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers, this system excels. The i7-13700F will render final frames quickly. For GPU-based renderers, the RTX 3050 OEM's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 18 RT cores will produce results, but slower than a higher-tier GPU. The CPU’s performance is the key advantage here.

Software Development: The i7-13700F is a developer's dream. The PassMark Data Compression score of 471838 and high multi-thread scores indicate fast compilation times and responsive builds. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, making this pairing a cost-effective way to get top-tier CPU performance without spending on a high-end GPU.

Student and Office Work: This system is vastly overpowered for standard office tasks like word processing and web browsing. The CPU’s PassMark Single Thread score of 4121 ensures snappy application responsiveness, but the system's potential is wasted on such light loads. It is better suited for engineering students or those in technical programs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700F, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, an Ampere-based graphics card. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 57th percentile. This results in a combined percentile of 72, indicating a system that is above average overall, but with a significant performance gap between the processor and graphics card. The i7-13700F is a locked processor (multiplier unlocked: false) on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an end-of-life product with a 130 W TDP, requiring a dual-slot cooler and a 300 W suggested PSU. This is a pairing that prioritizes CPU compute power for productivity over gaming balance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture and features the GA106 chip on an 8 nm process. It includes 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 18 RT cores and 72 Tensor cores. The card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock is 1755 MHz, and it delivers a pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 8.087 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show this GPU performing at a modest level. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, roughly on par with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% slower) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% faster). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 reflect its compute capabilities. For rendering in real-time applications, the data indicates this card is an entry-level solution. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming, but the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance with high-resolution textures or in VR. The RT and Tensor cores are present, but the overall compute power is too low to leverage them effectively for high-fidelity ray tracing in modern games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

This processor is a multi-threaded powerhouse. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 is exceptional, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The 3DMark Max Threads score of 10716 and PassMark Multithread score of 38369 corroborate its strength in heavily parallel workloads. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4532 and a PassMark Single Thread score of 4121, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The data shows it outperforms its nearest rivals like the AMD EPYC 4245P in multi-core tests but is slightly behind in the average benchmark score. This CPU is designed to handle demanding productivity tasks, from video encoding (PassMark Data Encryption score of 26956) to complex calculations (PassMark Floating Point Math score of 100422) without breaking a sweat.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a high-performance CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 39009, which is 1.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T and 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4245P. This places the i7-13700F in a competitive position among high-end desktop processors, firmly in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 15199, sits in the 57th percentile. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% faster) and the AMD Radeon 680M (0.5% slower). The combined percentile of the build is 72, reflecting the CPU's dominance in the overall score. The data shows that in synthetic benchmarks like Cinebench and Geekbench, the CPU will deliver top-tier results, while the GPU will deliver average results. This disparity is the defining characteristic of the build: a system with the compute power of a professional workstation, held back only by its graphics card in graphics-intensive tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds