SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 16-core Intel Core i7-13700F with an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in a desktop build. The CPU, part of the Raptor Lake generation, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a 3DMark max-threads score of 10,716 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101. The GPU, built on RDNA 4.0 with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 and a Passmark G3D score of 26,795. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — no game-specific frame data exists, so all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU occupy different performance tiers, which shapes how each workload is handled. The i7-13700F sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39,009. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4245P (avg score 39,215, delta -0.5%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (avg score 39,325, delta -0.8%), placing it within a narrow band of similar performers. The RX 9070 XT, by contrast, sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13,543. Its nearest rivals are much older parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (avg score 13,536, delta 0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (avg score 13,515, delta 0.2%), and the NVIDIA P106-090 (avg score 13,470, delta 0.5%). This indicates the GPU’s average score is heavily weighted by legacy DirectX tests where modern architectures do not excel, while the CPU’s percentile reflects strong sustained multi-core performance.

In CPU-bound workloads, the i7-13700F is unlikely to limit the system. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 indicate robust single-thread performance, which matters for game logic and simulation. The multi-threaded scores are even more decisive: Cinebench R20 multi-core hits 13,482, Geekbench multi-core reaches 15,058, and Passmark multithread scores 38,369. The CPU’s passmark integer math score of 141,370 and floating-point math score of 100,422 show strong computational throughput for rendering and physics. In contrast, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 78 and DirectX 11 score of 292 suggest that modern API performance is not well captured by that particular suite, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 provides a more contemporary measure.

The bottleneck shifts depending on workload. For gaming, the GPU is the primary constraint at high resolutions — the RX 9070 XT’s 16 GB memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom, but its compute throughput (48.66 TFLOPS FP32) is the limiting factor for pixel-heavy scenes. For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads become the dominant resource, with the GPU accelerating specific effects. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,994 versus its 2-thread score of 2,178 shows scaling efficiency: doubling threads from 2 to 16 yields roughly a 4.1x improvement, indicating good multi-core utilization. The combined percentile of 71 suggests the overall system is well-balanced for mixed workloads, though the CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 55th percentile implies the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 9070 XT’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260, combined with a boost clock of 2970 MHz and 4096 shading units, indicates strong rasterization performance. At 1080p or 1440p, the i7-13700F’s single-thread score of 1,092 (3DMark) and Passmark single-thread score of 4,121 will keep frame pacing consistent, but the GPU is the limiting factor. Estimated frame rates at ultra settings would be high, but no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample encoding headroom. Passmark data compression score of 471,838 and data encryption score of 26,956 show strong throughput for real-time encoding overhead. The GPU’s 64 ray accelerators (RT cores) and 128 ROPs can offload some encoding work, but the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 32,101) suggest x264 encoding at high presets is feasible without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The combination of high CPU multi-thread scores and GPU compute is favorable. The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 and Passmark floating-point math score of 100,422 handle timeline edits, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 17,428 accelerates effects and color grading. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth supports large project files, though the GPU’s 55th percentile overall suggests it may not be top-tier for GPU-accelerated rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and 3DMark max-threads score of 10,716 place it well above average for CPU rendering. The GPU’s 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 760.3 GTexel/s texture rate provide additional acceleration for viewport and final-frame rendering in compatible engines. The CPU’s 30 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency in complex scenes.

Software development: The i7-13700F’s Passmark integer math score of 141,370 and random string sorting score of 49,974 indicate strong performance for compilation and code analysis. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, with 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,136 showing good scaling for typical build processes. The GPU is less relevant here, but its Vulkan score of 65,879 (Geekbench) can accelerate certain compute tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,532) ensures snappy response in office applications. The 65W TDP means the system idles efficiently, and the 16 cores handle background tasks without strain. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1,328 covers 2D acceleration for multiple monitors. This pairing is overkill for basic office work, but the headroom ensures no slowdowns.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), allowing for high-bandwidth storage or future GPU upgrades. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though the dual-channel bus limits memory bandwidth compared to quad-channel platforms. The CPU’s 65W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, leaving thermal headroom for a capable air cooler — no specific cooler size is indicated in the data, but the low TDP suggests a mid-range solution suffices.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 700W, and its TDP is 304W. The CPU’s 65W TDP means the total system draw is well within the 700W recommendation, leaving headroom for additional storage or peripherals. The RX 9070 XT uses 2x 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card, fitting most ATX cases. The GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface matches the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck for the graphics card.

A sensible next upgrade would be more memory, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5. Given the CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache, memory bandwidth is not the primary constraint, but adding more RAM benefits multitasking and large datasets. Alternatively, replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile model (the RX 9070 XT sits at 55th percentile) would improve gaming performance, though the CPU’s 86th percentile means it would not bottleneck such an upgrade. The platform itself is end-of-life with Raptor Lake, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard — no additional CPU generations are indicated for Socket 1700.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates. The RX 9070 XT’s 16 GB memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth handle large textures, while the i7-13700F’s single-thread performance prevents CPU-bound frame drops. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures no bottleneck in game logic, and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 indicates strong DX12 performance. However, the GPU’s 55th percentile overall (dragged down by legacy tests) suggests it may not be the absolute top-tier choice for 4K ultra settings in the most demanding titles.

Content creators benefit from the CPU’s multi-core dominance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 make video rendering and batch processing fast. The GPU’s compute performance (Passmark GPU compute 15,864) accelerates effects, though the CPU will handle most rendering tasks. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large 3D scenes without swapping.

Software developers and engineers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 141,370 and data compression score of 471,838, which speed up compilation and testing. The 24 threads handle parallel test runs, and the 65W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development machines. The GPU is less critical here, but its Vulkan score of 65,879 enables GPU compute for scientific workloads.

Students and small business users get a system that handles everything from document editing to light 3D work. The single-thread score of 4,532 (Passmark) ensures fast application launches, while the multi-thread scores handle occasional rendering or analysis tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office work, but it future-proofs the system for AI-accelerated productivity tools. The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 304W TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet in office environments, though the GPU’s dual-slot design requires adequate case airflow.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with no ECC support. It uses the Intel Socket 1700, and its PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark max-threads score of 10,716 and 16-thread score of 8,994 show strong scaling, while the 2-thread score of 2,178 and single-thread score of 1,092 indicate solid single-core performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 is particularly strong, placing it well above average (86th percentile). The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13,482 and R15 multi-core score of 3,235 confirm consistency across versions. Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 and single-core score of 2,225 provide cross-platform comparison.

Passmark scores offer specialized insights. The integer math score of 141,370 and floating-point math score of 100,422 show balanced computational strength. Data compression score of 471,838 is exceptional, indicating strong memory bandwidth utilization. Data encryption score of 26,956 is moderate, while extended instructions score of 28,295 shows good SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 156 is low, which may reflect a specific workload inefficiency. The multithread score of 38,369 and single-thread score of 4,121 (listed twice as passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread) align with the 86th percentile.

The CPU’s nearest rivals provide context. The AMD EPYC 4245P (avg score 39,215, delta -0.5%) is slightly ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (avg score 39,325, delta -0.8%) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (avg score 39,485, delta -1.2%) are also marginally faster. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (avg score 38,561, delta 1.2%) is slightly slower. These deltas are all within 1.2%, indicating the i7-13700F is competitively positioned. For real workloads, this means the i7-13700F is not the absolute fastest in its class, but it is within a few percent of top rivals, making it a reliable choice for multi-threaded tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The RX 9070 XT’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 suggests strong performance in modern DirectX 12 titles. Its 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, combined with a boost clock of 2970 MHz, point to high fill rates (pixel rate 380.2 GPixel/s, texture rate 760.3 GTexel/s). The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for high-resolution textures. The 64 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though their performance is not directly benchmarked.

The i7-13700F’s gaming-relevant scores include a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and 2-thread score of 2,178. For most games, the CPU will not be the bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 2,236 provides a measure of physics simulation performance, which affects game physics. The L3 cache of 30 MB helps with game data locality.

Estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings would be high, with the GPU likely achieving triple-digit frame rates in esports titles and 60+ FPS in AAA games, based on the Steel Nomad score. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB memory and bandwidth become more relevant, with frame rates dropping but still playable. At 4K, the GPU may struggle in the most demanding titles, as its 55th percentile suggests it is not top-tier. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Passmark score of 78 is anomalously low and should be disregarded as a metric for gaming, given the Steel Nomad score is a more modern benchmark. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures frame pacing remains consistent, but the GPU is the primary determinant of FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and the GPU’s suggested PSU?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP, while the GPU has a 304W TDP and a suggested PSU of 700W.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700F provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The RX 9070 XT scores 7,260 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The i7-13700F scores 32,101 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 4,532 in single-core.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile among all CPUs?

A: The i7-13700F is at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39,009.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile among all GPUs?

A: The RX 9070 XT is at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13,543.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU’s launch MSRP is $359, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 599 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F (Raptor Lake, 16 cores, 24 threads) with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4.0, 16 GB GDDR6). The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 71. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of desktop performance, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its class. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39,009 is well above the GPU’s average of 13,543, reflecting the CPU’s dominance in multi-threaded workloads. The GPU’s lower percentile is partly due to legacy benchmark tests where modern architectures underperform, but its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 shows contemporary DX12 capability. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity tasks while still wanting solid gaming performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong across multiple suites. In 3DMark, it scores 8,994 (16 threads), 2,178 (2 threads), 4,258 (4 threads), 7,136 (8 threads), 10,716 (max threads), and 1,092 (single thread). In Cinebench, it scores 3,235 (R15 multi-core), 456 (R15 single-core), 13,482 (R20 multi-core), 1,903 (R20 single-core), 32,101 (R23 multi-core), and 4,532 (R23 single-core). Geekbench scores are 15,058 (multi-core) and 2,225 (single-core). Passmark scores include 471,838 (data compression), 26,956 (data encryption), 28,295 (extended instructions), 156 (find prime numbers), 100,422 (floating-point math), 141,370 (integer math), 38,369 (multithread), 2,236 (physics), 49,974 (random string sorting), and 4,121 (single-thread, listed twice). The CPU’s average benchmark score is 39,009, with a percentile of 86. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 4245P (avg 39,215, delta -0.5%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (avg 39,325, delta -0.8%), Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (avg 38,561, delta 1.2%), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (avg 39,485, delta -1.2%). All deltas are within 1.2%, indicating tight competition.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more mixed. It scores 7,260 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 17,428 in Geekbench OpenCL, 65,879 in Geekbench Vulkan, 154 in Passmark DirectX 10, 292 in Passmark DirectX 11, 78 in Passmark DirectX 12, 353 in Passmark DirectX 9, 1,328 in Passmark G2D, 26,795 in Passmark G3D, and 15,864 in Passmark GPU compute. The average benchmark score is 13,543, with a percentile of 55. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (avg 13,536, delta 0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (avg 13,515, delta 0.2%), NVIDIA P106-090 (avg 13,470, delta 0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 555 (avg 13,407, delta 1%). The GPU’s average score is heavily influenced by the low DirectX 9/10/11/12 Passmark scores, which are not representative of modern gaming performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 is a more accurate indicator, suggesting the GPU is capable of strong DX12 performance despite the low overall percentile. The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its class more decisively than the GPU, making the GPU the limiting factor for graphics-heavy applications.