SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700F with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 lands at the 73rd combined percentile across all desktop builds, which puts it in a solidly upper-midrange position. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU rests at only the 59th percentile among all GPUs — a clear indicator that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In practical terms, the CPU has substantially more headroom than the GPU can fully exploit in most workloads.

The 3DMark thread scaling data reveals the shape of this imbalance. The CPU scores 2,178 in the 2-thread test, 4,258 in 4-thread, 7,136 in 8-thread, 8,994 in 16-thread, and 10,716 at max threads. Scaling from 8 to 16 threads shows only a 26% improvement, and from 16 to max threads just 19% more — indicating that the 16-core, 24-thread processor is already near its practical limit in heavily threaded synthetic workloads. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17,631 versus the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 38,369 reinforces that the GPU is the limiting factor when both are pushed simultaneously.

For gaming, this means the RX 9060 will be the bottleneck in most scenarios — the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU overhead matters less. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the limiting factor, since pixel throughput demands scale with resolution while CPU workload stays relatively flat. For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 will carry the load, while the GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 9,919) become relevant only in GPU-accelerated workflows.

The memory support situation adds a nuance: the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so the platform choice can influence whether memory bandwidth becomes a secondary bottleneck. With DDR4, the CPU's performance in memory-sensitive tasks may trail what the benchmark scores suggest, since those scores are likely generated on DDR5 platforms. This is worth considering for builders who already own DDR4 modules.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13700F delivers strong synthetic benchmark numbers across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 4,532 single-core and 32,101 multi-core — the multi-core figure places it comfortably ahead of several recent rivals. Its nearest rival comparisons show the CPU within 1.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (which scores 39,325 average, 0.8% higher) and within 0.5% of the AMD EPYC 4245P (39,215 average). The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T trails by 1.2% with an average score of 38,561, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 leads by 1.2% at 39,485. The CPU's average benchmark score of 39,009 puts it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmark results are more modest. Its PassMark G3D score of 17,631 and average benchmark score of 16,014 place it at the 59th percentile — a mid-pack position. The nearest rivals tell a tight story: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15,862 (1.0% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15,852 (1.0% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15,679 (2.1% lower). The RX 9060 is essentially performance-identical to a last-generation RTX 3060 Ti in aggregate benchmarks.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3,322, which is a modest result for a current-generation card. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 and Vulkan score of 39,476 show that compute workloads perform significantly better in OpenCL than in Vulkan — a 2.2x gap that suggests driver or architecture optimization differences. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its class peers slightly, paired with a GPU that matches but does not exceed mid-range competitors from previous generations. This is a balanced system for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, with substantial CPU headroom for productivity tasks.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S) using Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The 3DMark thread scaling results show strong performance in lightly threaded tasks: single-thread score of 1,092, 2-thread score of 2,178, and 4-thread score of 4,258. The 8-thread score of 7,136 shows near-linear scaling from 4 to 8 threads (67% improvement for doubling cores), but scaling to 16 threads (8,994) and max threads (10,716) is less efficient. The Cinebench R23 scores of 4,532 single-core and 32,101 multi-core represent excellent single-threaded performance that will handle everyday tasks and older games with ease, while the multi-core score indicates serious throughput for rendering and compilation workloads.

The PassMark suite provides additional color: integer math scores 141,370, floating-point math 100,422, and extended instructions 28,295. Data compression scores 471,838 — a very high number that suggests the CPU excels in archiving, database, and file-server workloads. Data encryption scores 26,956, and random string sorting scores 49,974. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,121 and multithread score of 38,369 reinforce the strong overall performance picture. The CPU's percentile rank of 86 means it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors currently in the database.

The 65W TDP is notable — this is a power-efficient chip despite its high core count and boost clock. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited to what the motherboard allows via BCLK or other methods. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache is generous and should help in gaming and database workloads where cache hits reduce memory latency penalties.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking will cap performance. Expect 1080p gaming to be GPU-limited in most titles, with the RX 9060 performing at a level comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti (within 0.7% in average benchmarks). For 1440p high-refresh, the GPU will struggle to maintain very high frame rates in demanding titles, but the CPU will not be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 means the CPU can handle both game logic and encoding workloads simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores (none listed) means hardware encoding will rely on AMD's standard encoders rather than AI-accelerated features.

Video Editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 38,369 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 make this a capable editing workstation for 1080p and 1440p timelines. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for previewing effects and GPU-accelerated exports, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance in very high-resolution or multi-stream projects.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong — the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13,482 and R15 multicore score of 3,235 demonstrate solid throughput for Blender or similar CPU renderers. GPU rendering will be limited by the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM, which is adequate for smaller scenes but restrictive for large, texture-heavy projects.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 471,838 and integer math score of 141,370 indicate excellent performance for compilation, code analysis, and database operations. The 16 cores will handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code modules.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for typical student tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,532) handles spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1,002 shows adequate 2D performance for office applications. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a desktop that runs all day.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture (Navi 44 chip, codename Strix Point) using a 4 nm TSMC process. It packs 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 28 ray-tracing cores. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest memory configuration that will be a limiting factor in high-resolution texture-heavy games.

Clock speeds are respectable: 1700 MHz base, 2400 MHz game clock, and 2990 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated tensor or AI acceleration hardware (tensor cores are listed as null). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the mid-range tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 is the headline gaming metric. PassMark DirectX scores are inconsistent — DirectX 9 scores 280, DirectX 10 scores 104, DirectX 11 scores 182, and DirectX 12 scores 44 — suggesting that the GPU's performance varies significantly across API generations. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 versus Vulkan score of 39,476 indicates OpenCL is the stronger compute path. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9,919 is modest, reinforcing that this is not a compute-focused card.

The 132W TDP with a suggested 300W PSU means this GPU is power-efficient and easy to cool. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a ports. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface is current-generation, though the GPU's bandwidth requirements are unlikely to saturate even PCIe 4.0.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 13th Gen (and some 12th Gen and 14th Gen) processors. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility depending on their motherboard choice. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 16 CPU lanes, which future-proofs the platform for NVMe storage and current-generation GPUs.

The 65W CPU TDP and 132W GPU TDP together suggest a total system draw that a 300W PSU can handle (the GPU's suggested PSU is 300W), leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited — but the 5.20 GHz boost clock is already high, and the 65W TDP means thermal headroom is available if the motherboard allows power limit increases.

The GPU uses a standard 1x 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card, making it compatible with most ATX cases and mid-range power supplies. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is backward compatible with older slots, so it can be dropped into an existing system with a PCIe 3.0 or 4.0 slot without issue, though bandwidth may be slightly constrained.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom — its 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile means the CPU can handle a significantly faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores/24 threads will remain competitive for several more years. Memory upgrade to DDR5 (if not already used) could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, and adding more storage via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe is supported by the platform.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who want strong multi-threaded CPU performance without sacrificing gaming capability entirely. The Core i7-13700F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 and PassMark multithread score of 38,369 make it ideal for content creators who render video or 3D scenes, software developers who compile large codebases, and data analysts who process large datasets. The GPU's performance at the RTX 3060 Ti level (within 0.7% in average benchmarks) means it handles 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium-to-high settings in most titles.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this a capable system, with the CPU ensuring high minimum frame rates and the GPU delivering playable frame rates in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor — users should expect to adjust settings for demanding games. Students and office workers will find the system more powerful than needed for daily tasks, but the 65W CPU TDP keeps it relatively power-efficient for an always-on desktop.

Small business workstations that run accounting software, database applications, or virtual machines will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 471,838 and integer math score of 141,370. The 8 GB GPU VRAM is sufficient for multi-monitor setups and 2D design work. The lack of ECC memory support (listed as false) may be a consideration for mission-critical server-like workloads, but for standard office use it is not a concern.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700F good for gaming?

A: Yes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 indicate excellent gaming performance. It ranks at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, so it will not bottleneck most modern GPUs.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16,014, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's average score of 16,129. They are effectively performance-equivalent in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What memory types does the Core i7-13700F support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The choice depends on the motherboard selected.

Q: Does the RX 9060 have ray-tracing hardware?

A: Yes, it has 28 ray-tracing cores based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray-tracing features.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is 300 W. The GPU itself has a 132W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Can this CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high, so manual overclocking headroom is limited.

Q: Is the RX 9060 good for compute workloads?

A: It has 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance and a PassMark GPU compute score of 9,919, which is modest. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 is stronger than its Vulkan score of 39,476, so OpenCL-optimized workloads will perform better.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured frames-per-second rows. All gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 16,014 (59th percentile) and its proximity to the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% difference), expect 1080p gaming performance at ultra settings to average around 60-100 FPS in most modern titles, depending on the game's optimization. Esports titles and older games will run significantly higher, often exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, since the CPU's single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,178 and single-thread score of 1,092 indicate it can feed frames quickly in lightly threaded game engines.

At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios. Expect 40-70 FPS at ultra settings in demanding AAA titles, with settings adjustments needed to maintain 60+ FPS consistently. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will be adequate for 1440p textures in most games, but may struggle with future titles that require more than 8 GB of VRAM at high texture quality. Ray-tracing workloads will be constrained by the 28 RT cores and the modest raster performance — expect to use ray tracing at reduced resolutions or with lower quality settings.

The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores/24 threads provide a solid foundation for gaming, ensuring consistent frame pacing. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,121 indicates strong performance in games that rely heavily on single-core performance. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming (144Hz) and 1440p at 60Hz with settings tuned to medium-high for demanding titles.