SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing aimed at high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious productivity work. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65W TDP and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 12 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 192-bit memory bus. The data shows a combined percentile of 77 against all builds, indicating a top-quarter system. However, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and uses a 10 nm process node. It packs 16 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that scales well from lightly threaded tasks to heavily parallel workloads. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which boosts up to 5.20 GHz for single-thread performance. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 pool. This cache design helps keep data close to the cores, reducing latency in repeated workloads.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s dual personality. In single-thread tests, the chip scores 1,092 in 3DMark single-thread, 4,532 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 2,225 in Geekbench single-core. These scores place it as a strong performer for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The multi-threaded results are where the 16-core design shines: Cinebench R23 multicore hits 32,101, Geekbench multicore reaches 15,058, and 3DMark max threads scores 10,716. The scaling from 2 threads (2,178) to 4 threads (4,258) to 8 threads (7,136) is nearly linear, showing the efficiency of the core layout.

The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 86 means it outperforms 86% of all tested CPUs. Its avgBenchmarkScore is 39,009. The nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P, scores 39,215, a delta of -0.5%, meaning the i7-13700F is essentially tied with a server-class chip. Compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, the i7-13700F is 0.8% behind (39,325 vs 39,009). Against the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, it is 1.2% ahead (38,561 vs 39,009). This places the i7-13700F in a performance tier that straddles mobile high-end and desktop mainstream.

For real workloads, the PassMark scores provide texture. Integer math hits 141,370, floating point math reaches 100,422, and extended instructions score 28,295. Data encryption is 26,956, while data compression is 471,838. A score of 38,369 in PassMark multithread and 4,121 in PassMark single-thread indicate that the CPU can handle video encoding, software compilation, and database operations without breaking a sweat. The 65W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, suggesting thermal headroom for sustained loads in a well-ventilated case.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so treat any frame rate discussion as a projection, not a lab result.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22,547 and the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,121 suggest this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1440p. The GPU has a boost clock of 2,544 MHz and a game clock of 2,171 MHz, which are high frequencies for the RDNA 3.0 architecture. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the card has enough memory bandwidth for modern textures at 1440p ultra settings, though 4K ultra may strain the 192-bit bus.

The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,178 indicates strong single-core responsiveness, which is critical for frame pacing in multiplayer titles. The 4-thread score of 4,258 and 8-thread score of 7,136 show that the CPU can handle the multi-threaded game engines of recent releases. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck; the GPU’s pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s will drive high frame rates. For AAA games at 1440p ultra, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS is the limiting factor, and the system will likely deliver smooth 60-100 FPS depending on the title, but again, these are estimates.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 39,009, with a percentileVsAllCpus of 86. The GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 22,549, with a percentileVsAllGpus of 67. The combined percentile for this build is 77. This means the CPU is a stronger component relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the i7-13700F is -0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4245P (39,009 vs 39,215), -0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39,009 vs 39,325), and 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (39,009 vs 38,561). This indicates the CPU is right at the top of its performance class, trading blows with server and high-end mobile parts.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a similar pattern. The RX 7700 XT is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22,549 vs 22,435), 0.8% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22,549 vs 22,729), and 1.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22,549 vs 22,895). It is 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22,549 vs 22,170). This places the RX 7700 XT in a competitive mid-range desktop slot, roughly matching a previous-generation flagship like the RTX 2080.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU punches above its weight class, while the GPU is solidly mid-range. In CPU-bound scenarios, this build will outperform many systems with more expensive GPUs. In GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will have plenty of headroom. The platform’s overall tier is high-end mainstream, not extreme enthusiast.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU itself provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, meaning the first x16 slot can run at Gen 5 speeds for future GPUs, though the RX 7700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The memory support is flexible: builders can choose cheaper DDR4 or faster DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify which one yields better results.

The CPU’s TDP is 65W, which is low for a 16-core part. The GPU’s TDP is 245W, and the suggested PSU is 550W. This means a 550W power supply is the baseline recommendation, but the system has headroom for upgrades. The CPU has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not an option. However, the chip’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz already provides strong single-thread performance out of the box.

The GPU is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 135 mm high, and 50 mm wide. It requires two 8-pin power connectors. The display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slot. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has the headroom to feed a faster card. The 65W CPU TDP and 550W suggested PSU leave room for a GPU with a similar or slightly higher power draw without changing the power supply.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 67th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations, data compression (471,838 in PassMark), and integer math (141,370), the i7-13700F will dominate. In GPU-bound workloads, such as rasterized gaming at high resolutions, the RX 7700 XT will be the limiting factor.

The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2,236 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22,547 highlight this split. For gaming, the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,136 is more than enough to drive the GPU’s 244.2 GPixel/s pixel rate at 1440p. At 1080p, the CPU might actually be the bottleneck in very light titles, as the GPU can produce frames faster than the CPU can feed it. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

For productivity, the balance shifts back to the CPU. The GPU’s compute score of 12,912 in PassMark is respectable, but the CPU’s multi-thread scores (32,101 in Cinebench R23) will dominate rendering and compilation tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU is overkill for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 bus, but it future-proofs the platform for storage and next-gen accelerators. Overall, this is a CPU-heavy build that will bottleneck on the GPU in gaming and on the CPU in pure compute tasks, but neither bottleneck is severe enough to cripple performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is based on the Navi 32 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The architecture is RDNA 3.0, codenamed Wheat Nas. The GPU has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It includes 54 RT cores for ray tracing, but no tensor cores are listed, meaning AI acceleration is not a primary feature.

Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2,250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1,435 MHz, the boost clock is 2,544 MHz, and the game clock is 2,171 MHz. The pixel rate is 244.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 35.17 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark scores show the GPU’s capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,316. Geekbench OpenCL scores 138,383, while Vulkan scores 46,443. PassMark G2D is 1,161, and G3D is 22,547. The GPU compute score is 12,912. DirectX 12 and 11 scores in PassMark are 79 and 232, respectively, while DirectX 10 is 119 and DirectX 9 is 294.

For rendering, the FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS is strong for a mid-range card, suitable for Blender viewport work and GPU-accelerated effects. The 12 GB VRAM is enough for 1440p textures and some 4K work, but the 192-bit bus limits bandwidth-heavy tasks. The RT cores allow for ray-traced lighting, but the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI denoising hardware. The 5 nm process keeps power draw reasonable at 245W TDP. The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus of 67 means it beats 67% of all GPUs, placing it in the upper mid-range.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1440p with high refresh rates. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for ultra settings in most titles, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance will keep frame times consistent. For 1080p esports, the system is overkill, but it will run those titles at maximum refresh rates.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads. Video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation will see major gains from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101. The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput helps with GPU-accelerated exports and effects. Developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 141,370 and data compression score of 471,838, which speed up builds and test suites.

Students and small business workstations will find the 65W CPU TDP and 550W suggested PSU easy to cool and power. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows for flexible memory configurations. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support is future-proof for NVMe storage and other high-bandwidth peripherals. However, this is not a budget build; the CPU and GPU are both active products with high performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65W TDP, and the GPU is a 12 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 245W TDP. The combined percentile is 77, meaning this build outperforms 77% of all recorded configurations.

The CPU’s percentile is 86, and the GPU’s is 67, indicating a CPU-first design. This is a high-end mainstream desktop, not an extreme workstation or a budget entry. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $359, and for the GPU it is 449 USD. The system is best suited for 1440p gaming, content creation, and development work. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest a capable and balanced machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all recorded desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The i7-13700F scores 39,009, which is 0.5% behind the EPYC 4245P’s 39,215.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination; all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds