SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop combination that leans heavily on CPU muscle while settling into the upper-middle of the GPU field. The combined percentile of 72 across all tracked builds places it in the top third of systems, and that figure is largely pulled along by a processor sitting at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, contrasted with a graphics card at the 58th percentile of all GPUs. One important caveat up front: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so every frame-rate discussion on this page is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a directly measured result. launch MSRP for the CPU is listed as $359.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. It combines a 2.10 base clock with a 5.20 boost clock, a wide range that lets the chip idle efficiently and then push hard under load. The TDP is listed at 65, which is the rated figure rather than a real-world peak under sustained multi-core load, but it remains the number the platform is specified around. The "F" suffix means no integrated graphics — the fact pack lists integratedGraphics as null — so this processor requires a discrete card, which the RX 7700 supplies.

Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 pool. That last figure matters for gaming, because a large shared cache keeps game working sets close to the cores and reduces latency to main memory. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, giving builders platform flexibility, and the platform exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. ECC is not supported, which correctly frames this as a consumer workstation part rather than a mission-critical one.

The benchmark scores describe a chip that scales exceptionally well with threads. In 3DMark CPU tests, single-thread performance is 1092, rising to 2178 at two threads, 4258 at four, 7136 at eight, 8994 at sixteen, and 10716 at maximum threads. The jump from 8994 at sixteen threads to 10716 at twenty-four shows the additional logical threads still contribute meaningful throughput — roughly a fifth again on top of the sixteen-thread result. The scaling from one to eight threads is nearly linear, which is where most games and interactive applications live.

Cinebench tells the same story across generations of the test: R15 scores 3235 multi and 456 single; R20 scores 13482 multi and 1903 single; R23 scores 32101 multi and 4532 single. Geekbench returns 15058 multi-core and 2225 single-core. PassMark's multithread score of 38369 is accompanied by strong sub-scores: 141370 in integer math, 100422 in floating point, 471838 in data compression, and 26956 in data encryption. The 49974 random string sorting score and 2236 physics score round out a profile that handles both sustained all-core rendering and bursty single-threaded work.

What does this mean for real workloads? A Cinebench R23 multi score above 32000 places the chip comfortably in territory suited to video encoding, code compilation, and 3D rendering. The single-core figure of 4532 keeps interactive latency low — application launches, editor responsiveness, and game simulation threads all benefit. Against its nearest rivals, the i7-13700F sits within roughly a point and a half of everything around it: the AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39215 (the i7 trails by 0.5%), the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS averages 39325 (-0.8%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T averages 38561 (the i7 leads by 1.2%), and the Ryzen AI 7 450 averages 39485 (-1.2%). With an average benchmark score of 39009, this processor effectively defines its own performance bracket.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 7700 is a Navi 32 chip on AMD's RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 346 mm² and packs 28,100 million transistors at a density of 81.2 million per square millimeter — a modern, dense design that delivers strong throughput per millimetre. Clocks run from a 1900 MHz base to a 2459 MHz boost, with a game clock of 2041 MHz and 2438 MHz memory clock delivering 19.5 Gbps effective.

Memory is the headline spec: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, producing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering and texture-heavy gaming, that capacity and bandwidth combination means high-resolution assets, large scene files, and modern texture packs fit without spilling to system memory. In GPU compute contexts, the bandwidth supports the throughput figures below.

The shader array consists of 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 throughput is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same rate in a 1:1 configuration. Ray tracing is handled by 40 RT cores; tensor-style hardware is not present on this design — the tensorCores field is null — so AI-accelerated workflows that rely on dedicated matrix hardware are not this card's strength. The card is a dual-slot design drawing 200 W, fed by two 8-pin connectors, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. Interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and outputs include one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results frame the card's class. 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) returns 2865; PassMark G3D scores 20974; Geekbench OpenCL scores 106028; and PassMark GPU Compute scores 10963. The DirectX sub-tests (261 on DX9, 186 on DX11, 96 on DX12, 92 on DX10) and a G2D score of 1206 fill out the legacy picture. The percentile versus all GPUs is 58, and its average benchmark score of 15852 puts it within touching distance of the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, -0.1%), the RX 9060 (16014, -1%), and the Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, +1.1%), while trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129) by 1.7%. In short: a mid-range performer whose 16 GB buffer outclasses its compute tier.

Benchmark Performance

Pulling the numbers together: the CPU sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 39009; the GPU sits at the 58th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 15852; and the pairing scores a combined percentile of 72. The buildClass is desktop.

The combined picture is one of deliberate imbalance. The processor's PassMark multithread score of 38369 and Geekbench multi score of 15058 sit near the top of the chart, while the GPU's G3D score of 20974 defines a mid-tier graphics experience. For any workload that is CPU-bound — compilation, encoding, simulation — this system performs like a top-quartile machine. For GPU-bound rendering and gaming at high settings, the RX 7700's 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 and 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth deliver a solid mid-range result benchmarked within two percent of the RTX 3060 Ti on aggregate average score. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 is the most forward-looking of the GPU results and indicates competent DirectX 12 Ultimate-class throughput.

Who Should Build It

High-refresh 1080p and 1440p gamers. With the CPU at the 86th percentile and single-thread scores of 4532 in Cinebench R23 and 2225 in Geekbench, simulation-heavy and competitive titles will not be limited by the processor. The GPU's 58th-percentile position with a G3D score of 20974 points to strong ultra-settings performance at 1080p and capable 1440p play — estimated, since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Content creators. Video editors benefit from 24 threads, a 32101 Cinebench R23 multi score, and the 471838 PassMark data compression score for timeline scrubbing and export pipelines. The 16 GB of VRAM provides room for GPU-accelerated effects and higher-bitrate footage. 3D artists get solid viewport performance from the 393.4 GTexel/s texture rate and ray-traced previews via the 40 RT cores.

Software developers. Compilation is a classic all-core workload, and the near-linear thread scaling shown by the 3DMark thread tests (7136 at eight threads, 10716 at max) plus PassMark multithread at 38369 make this a strong build-machine candidate. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes supports fast storage.

Students and office users. The single-core figures — 4121 PassMark single-thread, 1903 Cinebench R20 single — mean everyday applications stay snappy. This pairing is more than sufficient, arguably overspecified, for document work and browsing.

Small business workstations. The lack of ECC rules out data-integrity-critical roles, but rendering, light CAD, and media workstations fit the measured profile well.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data identifies the GPU as the limiter in graphics-heavy workloads. A 58th-percentile GPU paired with an 86th-percentile CPU produces an asymmetric system: at 1080p, where the CPU matters more, the i7-13700F's 86th-percentile standing ensures headroom; as resolution climbs to 1440p and the GPU becomes the constraint, the RX 7700's scores — 20974 G3D, 2865 Steel Nomad — become the ceiling. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this combination, the FPS scaling evidence must be inferred from the percentiles rather than observed directly: the gap of 28 percentile points between CPU and GPU is the clearest quantitative indicator of where the bottleneck lies.

The flip side is positive: this pairing has essentially no CPU bottleneck. The processor's rivals cluster within 1.2% of its average score, meaning that in any GPU-bound scenario the CPU will not be the component waiting. For CPU-bound scenarios the GPU is largely idle, and the 16 GB VRAM buffer plus 624.1 GB/s bandwidth simply go unused — a reasonable trade for a system intended to keep both types of workload responsive.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core i7-13700F have?

A: 16 cores and 24 threads, on the Raptor Lake-S architecture with a 30 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7700 have, and how fast is it?

A: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth at 19.5 Gbps effective.

Q: Does this build have measured frame rates?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame-rate expectations on this page are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component here?

A: The CPU, by a clear margin — 86th percentile versus the GPU's 58th percentile, a 28-point gap.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: By average benchmark score, the RX 7700 trails the RTX 3060 Ti by 1.7% (15852 versus 16129), placing them in the same performance bracket.

Q: What PSU is suggested?

A: A 550 W unit, per the GPU's suggested rating; the GPU draws 200 W and the CPU is rated at 65 TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the figures below are estimates framed from the benchmark scores — 20974 PassMark G3D, 2865 Steel Nomad, and the 58th GPU percentile — rather than database measurements.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated expectation is high-refresh gameplay in most titles: the card's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 236.1 GPixel/s pixel rate are comfortably matched to that resolution, and the 86th-percentile CPU removes simulation-side limits. At 1440p ultra, estimates point to smooth play in the majority of modern games, with the 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth preventing texture-memory pressure that would otherwise degrade frame pacing. At 4K ultra, the GPU's mid-tier position becomes the constraint, and settings reductions are likely needed for consistently smooth output. Ray tracing is supported through 40 RT cores under DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the card's overall tier suggests RT-heavy effects at high resolutions will carry a measurable cost.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's 13th-generation Core i7 with AMD's RDNA 3.0 mid-range. The pairing lands at a combined percentile of 72 — a top-third system overall, composed of a top-quartile CPU (86th percentile) and a mid-tier GPU (58th percentile). The CPU carries no integrated graphics, so the RX 7700 is mandatory, and its dual-slot, 267 mm-long form factor fits standard desktop enclosures. Both components are listed as Active in production, making this a currently purchasable configuration rather than a legacy pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The 86th-percentile CPU with a 5.20 boost clock keeps frame delivery steady in fast titles, while the GPU's G3D score of 20974 and 58th percentile indicate the ultra-settings sweet spot sits at 1080p with high refresh, extending to 1440p — estimates, as no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming. Game streaming splits load between a few fast game threads and several encoder threads. Single-thread scores of 1092 (3DMark) and 4532 (R23) plus the multithread score of 32101 in R23 indicate both halves are covered without frame drops from CPU saturation.

Video editing. Twenty-four threads, a PassMark data compression score of 471838, and 16 GB of GPU VRAM support timeline work with high-resolution footage; the OpenCL score of 106028 covers GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi score of 32101 demonstrates sustained all-core rendering throughput, while the RX 7700's 25.18 TFLOPS and 40 RT cores handle GPU render engines and ray-traced previews; the 346 mm², 28.1-billion-transistor die delivers this at a 200 W board power.

Software development. PassMark multithread at 38369 and integer math at 141370 point to fast compilation, and PCIe Gen 5 storage support keeps builds and version control responsive.

Student and office work. The Geekbench single-core score of 2225 and PassMark single-thread of 4121 ensure everyday applications launch and respond quickly; this build exceeds office requirements by a wide margin, with the CPU headroom useful for occasional creative coursework.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, supporting the platform's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x16, and a suggested PSU of 550 W covers the 200 W graphics card alongside the processor's 65 TDP rating with headroom to spare.

The upgrade path writes itself from the percentile data. Because the GPU sits 28 percentile points below the CPU, the sensible next step is a graphics upgrade — the CPU's 86th percentile and rival-adjacent average score of 39009 mean it can feed a substantially faster card without becoming the limiter. A next GPU on the same dual-slot footprint, using the same two 8-pin connectors and staying within the 550 W suggested PSU envelope, would lift the combined percentile meaningfully while leaving the rest of the platform untouched. Conversely, upgrading the CPU first would yield little: the nearest rivals differ by at most 1.2% in average score, so a lateral CPU move buys almost nothing. Platform memory has a clear lever too — DDR5 on the dual-channel bus is the forward-looking choice for this socket, and the 30 MB L3 already minimizes the frequency sensitivity of most workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds