SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT represents a specific tier of desktop computing, combining a high-core-count Raptor Lake processor with a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 graphics card. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data to characterize the pairing’s capabilities, its relative standing among rivals, and its suitability for various workloads. The core observation is that this build combines a CPU that sits in the 86th percentile against all processors with a GPU that sits in the 60th percentile against all GPUs, creating a distinct performance profile where processing throughput leads graphics throughput.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock is 2.10 GHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Notably, it has no integrated graphics and its multiplier is locked.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales effectively across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 2178 at 2 threads to 7136 at 8 threads, then to 8994 at 16 threads, and peak at 10716 with max threads. This scaling indicates that the core count is being utilized efficiently, with the 24-thread configuration providing a meaningful uplift over the 16-thread result. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 versus a single-core score of 4532 highlights the multi-threaded strength, while the single-core result of 4532 still represents strong per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications.

In the broader context, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 39009 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485 (1.2% higher). This places the i7-13700F within a 2.4% performance band of these alternatives, meaning that for most multi-threaded workloads, the differences will be negligible in real-world use. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38369 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 corroborate the Cinebench results, confirming that this is a high-throughput chip for rendering, compilation, and other parallel tasks. The single-thread Passmark score of 4121 and Geekbench single-core score of 2225 ensure responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a strong all-rounder. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 13482 and single-core is 1903; in R15, multi-core is 3235 and single-core is 456. The Geekbench results (15058 multi-core, 2225 single-core) and Passmark results (38369 multi-thread, 4121 single-thread) align with the Cinebench data. Specialized Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 141370, floating-point math scores 100422, and extended instructions score 28295. Data compression scores 471838, while data encryption scores 26956. These figures indicate a processor that handles both arithmetic-heavy and memory-intensive workloads with ease.

The GPU’s benchmark scores present a more modest picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7600 XT scores 2348. Geekbench OpenCL scores 92426, while Vulkan scores 48366. Passmark G3D scores 17132, with a GPU compute score of 8987. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17083, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 0.4% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (17208, 0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932, 0.9% higher). The deltaPct values show that the RX 7600 XT is within 1% of the RTX 3070’s score, which is notable given the architectural differences.

The combined percentile for this build is 73. This combined figure, derived from both components’ percentiles, suggests a system that is more capable on the CPU side than the GPU side. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 60th percentile indicates that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, which has implications for workload balance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows an asymmetry: the CPU outperforms the GPU in their respective percentile standings. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 60th percentile. This gap means that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform admirably, but in GPU-bound tasks, the graphics card may limit overall throughput. For instance, in a 3D rendering scenario, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 will allow for fast scene preparation and physics calculations, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2348 will determine the final frame output.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores suggest that the GPU will be the limiting factor in high-resolution gaming or heavy graphical workloads. The CPU’s 3DMark max threads score of 10716 and single-thread score of 1092 indicate that it can feed frames to the GPU efficiently, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 17132 is the ceiling for graphical performance. In productivity tasks that are not GPU-accelerated, such as software compilation or data compression (Passmark data compression score of 471838), the CPU will dominate the experience, and the GPU will remain largely idle.

The memory bandwidth of the GPU is 288.0 GB/s, and the bus width is 128 bit. This is adequate for the 16 GB VRAM, but it may be a constraint in certain 1440p or 4K textures that require high bandwidth. The CPU’s dual-channel memory support, while flexible with DDR4 or DDR5, does not have a listed bandwidth figure, so the memory subsystem’s impact on balance cannot be quantified here.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize multi-threaded CPU performance over raw GPU throughput. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases, as the Passmark integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 will reduce build times. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101, which is a strong indicator of rendering capability, though the GPU’s 60th percentile means GPU-accelerated effects will be less impressive.

Students and small business workstations will find the 16 cores and 24 threads useful for multitasking across office applications, virtual machines, and light development environments. The locked multiplier is not a concern for this demographic, as the 5.20 GHz boost clock provides sufficient performance out of the box. For gamers, the system is viable at 1080p where the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 60th percentile will be more of a constraint at higher resolutions. This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass, and it fits a workstation or serious hobbyist profile rather than a budget-oriented or high-end enthusiast one.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing flexibility in memory choice. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU is forward-looking, though the GPU only uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, while the GPU’s TDP is 190 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This indicates that the system’s power draw is manageable, and a 450 W power supply is the baseline recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU, as the CPU has headroom. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 60th percentile suggests that a more powerful GPU would balance the system better. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 slots, so a newer GPU would drop in without issue. The 16 GB of VRAM on the RX 7600 XT is generous for current games, but the 128-bit bus width limits bandwidth to 288.0 GB/s, which could be a bottleneck for future titles. Upgrading to a GPU with a wider bus or higher bandwidth would be the most impactful change. The CPU’s locked multiplier limits overclocking, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock is already high, so the upgrade path focuses on the GPU and possibly memory speed if using DDR4.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4532 suggest strong per-core performance, which is essential for gaming. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2348 and Passmark G3D score of 17132 indicate mid-range graphical capability.

At 1080p, the system is likely to deliver high frame rates in most titles, as the CPU can handle the draw calls and the GPU has sufficient throughput. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for 1080p textures, but the 128-bit bus width may limit performance in games that are bandwidth-sensitive. At 1440p, the GPU’s 60th percentile ranking suggests that frame rates will drop more significantly, and the CPU will be less of a factor. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, and the system may struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. The RT cores count is 32, which provides some ray tracing capability, but the overall RT performance is not quantified beyond the 3DMark Steel Nomad score, which does not isolate RT effects.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4532) is excellent for driving high frame rates, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most titles, though the 60th percentile GPU ranking means that extreme refresh rates (e.g., 240 Hz) may not be consistently achievable in all games.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads (Passmark multi-thread score of 38369) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance, though the GPU’s lack of a dedicated encoder specification means software encoding is the primary route.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 indicate fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 60th percentile may limit GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU is the star here.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 100422 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 make this a capable CPU-only renderer. For GPU rendering, the RX 7600 XT’s OpenCL score of 92426 is decent but not class-leading, meaning CPU rendering may be faster in some workflows.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 are excellent for compilation and file operations. The 24 threads will handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4121 in Passmark ensures quick IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and 16 cores provide a quiet, efficient system for multitasking across documents, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The CPU’s 86th percentile means it will never feel slow for these tasks, and the GPU is more than adequate for basic graphics.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700F scores 39009 on average. The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39325 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485 (1.2% higher). The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561 (1.2% lower). The differences are within 1.2%, indicating near-parity.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, while the RTX 3070 scores 17208. The deltaPct is -0.7%, meaning the RTX 3070 is only 0.7% faster. This is a negligible difference in real-world terms.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU’s boost clock is 5.20 GHz, which is set at the factory. Overclocking is not possible without adjusting the base clock, which is not recommended.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, using a 128-bit bus with GDDR6 memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this build?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. In most graphical workloads, the GPU will saturate before the CPU does.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W. This is based on the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 190 W TDP, leaving headroom for other components.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i7-13700F has no integrated graphics. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is based on the Navi 33 chip, using the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. It has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 RT cores. The base clock is 1980 MHz, the game clock is 2470 MHz, and the boost clock is 2755 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 176.3 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 22.57 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1).

The benchmark scores show a GPU that performs well in compute tasks but has limitations in certain APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 is a modern benchmark that shows the GPU’s DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 and Vulkan score of 48366 indicate strong compute throughput. Passmark G3D score of 17132 is the basis for its 60th percentile ranking. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 228 and DirectX 10 score of 85 are legacy benchmarks, but they show the architecture handles older APIs well. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 65 is lower than the DirectX 11 score of 167, which may indicate driver overhead or architectural preferences.

The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3070, scores 17208, just 0.7% higher. This puts the RX 7600 XT in the same performance class as a previous-generation high-end card, but with double the VRAM (16 GB vs. the RTX 3070’s unspecified in this pack). The 16 GB VRAM is a key feature for texture-heavy workloads, but the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth to 288.0 GB/s, which may be a constraint at higher resolutions. The 32 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing, but the lack of tensor cores (null in the data) means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700F with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile is 73, reflecting a system that is above average overall but with a clear skew toward CPU performance. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 60th percentile define the system’s character: it is a high-end productivity machine with a mid-range graphics component. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, make it a strong choice for multi-threaded applications like rendering, compilation, and data analysis. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is future-proof for VRAM-hungry tasks, but its 128-bit bus and 60th percentile ranking mean it is not a high-end gaming card.

The system is best described as a workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream GPU. It will excel in CPU-bound workloads, where the i7-13700F’s scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32101, Passmark multi-thread of 38369) put it in the top 14% of all CPUs. In gaming, it is a capable 1080p machine, and it can handle 1440p with settings adjustments, but it is not a 4K powerhouse. The build’s overall tier is solidly mid-to-upper mid-range, with the CPU being the standout component and the GPU providing adequate, but not exceptional, graphical performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds