SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 represents a significant mismatch in class and capability. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with 16 cores and a top-tier 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete graphics card sitting at just the 17th percentile. This pairing places the overall build at the 52nd combined percentile, meaning it is squarely in the middle of all system benchmarks, but the data suggests the GPU will be the primary constraint in graphics-heavy tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all performance projections are estimated directly from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process, featuring a die size of 257 mm². This is a 16-core, 24-thread processor, indicating a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores, though the architecture does not include integrated graphics, making a discrete GPU mandatory. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the processor has a 65 W TDP, which is notably efficient for the core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from large data pools.

Benchmark data shows exceptional scaling from low to high thread counts. The 3DMark scores start at 1092 for single-thread and climb to 8994 for 16 threads, reaching 10716 at maximum threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threading efficiency, with the CPU being able to utilize its full 24-thread capacity effectively. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 4532 in single-core and 32101 in multi-core, a ratio that demonstrates excellent performance in both lightly-threaded tasks like gaming and heavily-threaded tasks like rendering. The Geekbench scores of 2225 single-core and 15058 multi-core reinforce this, showing the i7-13700F is not just a multi-threaded workhorse but also has strong per-core performance.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload types. Integer math scores 141370, floating-point math scores 100422, and extended instructions score 28295, indicating strong number-crunching abilities. Data encryption scores 26956 and data compression scores 471838, showing the CPU can handle security and archival tasks with ease. The processor sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39009. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4245P with a score of 39215 (a -0.5% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 39325 (-0.8%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T at 38561 (+1.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 at 39485 (-1.2%). This places the i7-13700F in a competitive position, essentially neck-and-neck with several modern server and mobile processors, which is impressive for a desktop part. For real-world workloads, this CPU will not be the limiting factor in most systems; it provides ample headroom for gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks, with the 30 MB L3 cache being particularly beneficial for gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23 indicates excellent per-core performance that can drive high frame rates. However, the GPU's 17th percentile ranking will severely limit the actual FPS output, meaning the CPU's power will largely go unused at high resolutions. The data suggests this CPU can handle any gaming workload, but the RX 7400 will cap the experience at lower settings and resolutions.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the 24 threads and high multi-core scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark multithread score of 38369 show that the CPU can handle simultaneous game encoding and streaming without breaking a sweat. The PassMark data encryption score of 26956 also indicates solid performance for stream encryption.

Video editing software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage the 16 cores and 24 threads effectively. The 3DMark max threads score of 10716 and Cinebench R20 multi-core of 13482 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, though the GPU's weak compute score of 5152 in PassMark will slow down GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D is a strong suit for this CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark floating-point math of 100422 indicate the processor can chew through ray tracing and physics simulations. The 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier rendering chip, and the low TDP of 65 W means it can sustain high clocks under load without excessive cooling requirements.

Software development tasks like compiling and debugging benefit from the high multi-core throughput. The PassMark integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 indicate fast build times and quick test suite execution. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility for developers building on different platforms.

For student and office work, this CPU is overkill but not unwieldy. The single-thread PassMark score of 4121 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The 65 W TDP means it can run in a modest desktop build without requiring a large cooler or high-wattage power supply, making it a practical choice for a dual-purpose workstation, though the entry-level GPU is more than sufficient for document editing and web browsing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700F compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile. It is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 4245P (39215, -0.5%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39325, -0.8%), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (39485, -1.2%), while being about 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38561).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it stack up against its closest competitors?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 2467. It is roughly 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon 8040S (2440), 1.4% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433), 1.8% faster than the Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425), and 1.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422).

Q: What are the key specifications of the Radeon RX 7400's memory subsystem?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, which is modest by modern standards but adequate for the GPU's target performance class.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, as indicated by the "multiplierUnlocked" field being false. This means users cannot manually overclock the processor via the clock multiplier, though boost behavior is still dynamic up to 5.20 GHz.

Q: What is the power consumption and cooling requirement for the GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 7400 has a TDP of 43 W and requires a single 6-pin power connector. The suggested PSU rating is 200 W, which is very low, meaning it can be powered by a basic budget power supply.

Q: What video outputs does the Radeon RX 7400 provide?

A: The card offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. This allows for multi-monitor setups with modern display standards, supporting high refresh rates and high resolutions on compatible monitors.

Q: What is the release date and launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $359. The GPU has a release date of 2025-08-07 but does not have a listed launch MSRP.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or entry-level 1440p with low graphics settings are the primary audience, but the GPU's 17th percentile ranking will cap frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1092 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures no CPU bottleneck in most titles, but the RX 7400's PassMark G3D score of 11897 indicates it will struggle with modern AAA games at high presets. This build is not suitable for gamers seeking high or ultra settings at 1440p or 4K.

Content creators focused on CPU-intensive workloads will find value in the processor's 86th percentile performance. Video editors and 3D renderers who rely on software encoding and multi-threaded renderers will see strong performance, but GPU-accelerated tasks like effects rendering will be slow due to the GPU's weak compute score of 5152. Software developers and data scientists who need fast compilation and data processing will benefit from the 24 threads and high math scores.

Students and office workers building a basic desktop for coursework and productivity will be more than served by this combination. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 43 W TDP mean the entire system can run on a 200 W PSU, keeping the build compact and quiet. Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or light CAD will find the CPU's integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 sufficient for smooth operation, though the GPU will limit any advanced visualization.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39009, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. This is a high-end score, just 0.5% below the AMD EPYC 4245P and 1.2% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T. Specific scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32101 and a single-core of 4532, a Geekbench multi-core of 15058 and single-core of 2225, and a PassMark multithread score of 38369. The 3DMark suite shows 4-thread performance of 4258, 8-thread of 7136, 16-thread of 8994, and max-thread of 10716.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 2467, which places it in the 17th percentile, just 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8040S and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M. The GPU scores 1103 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 11897 in PassMark G3D, and 5152 in PassMark GPU Compute. The combined system percentile is 52, indicating the build is average overall. The high CPU score is dragged down significantly by the low GPU score, resulting in a system that is neither a high-end gaming rig nor a low-end office PC, but rather a hybrid with a strong processor and a weak graphics card. This creates a situation where the system excels at CPU-bound tasks but falls behind in any GPU-accelerated workload. The data clearly shows the CPU is at the 86th percentile while the GPU is at the 17th, a 69-point gap that defines the system's unbalanced nature.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a transistor count of 13,300 million on a 204 mm² die. The chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, has a base clock of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores, indicating a modest amount of compute hardware for rasterization and some RT capability.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These specs place the GPU in the entry-level segment, which is reflected in its 17th percentile ranking. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 is low, and the PassMark scores are telling: DirectX 9 scores 176, DirectX 10 scores 59, DirectX 11 scores 97, and DirectX 12 scores 44. This shows the GPU scales poorly with newer API versions, and its DirectX 12 performance is particularly weak at just 44.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the hardware is not powerful enough to take full advantage of these APIs. The 28 RT cores are present but will struggle with ray-traced effects due to the low overall compute throughput. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming with modest textures, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may be a limiting factor in bandwidth-heavy scenes. For rendering tasks, the GPU compute score of 5152 is far below what is needed for smooth GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar applications. This GPU is best suited for basic display output, light gaming at 1080p with low settings, and tasks that do not require significant parallel processing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is ample for a single high-end GPU, though the current RX 7400 only uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for professional workstation users.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 16-core processor, meaning most LGA 1700 coolers will handle it adequately. The GPU has a TDP of 43 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, so the entire system can run on a low-wattage power supply. The GPU uses a single 6-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card, making it easy to fit in most cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 86th percentile performance means it can drive much stronger graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Users could upgrade to a mid-range or even high-end GPU and still see performance gains, as the CPU will not hold back the system. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures future GPUs will have full bandwidth available. The platform is mature, with a wide range of compatible motherboards from budget to premium, though the 1700 socket is at the end of its lifecycle, meaning future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F, a high-end 16-core CPU from the Raptor Lake generation, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 discrete GPU. The CPU is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads and high-performance gaming, while the GPU is intended for basic graphics output and light gaming. The combined percentile of 52 indicates this system is average compared to all other builds, but this is misleading because the components are at opposite ends of the performance spectrum.

The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 17th percentile create a significant gap. In CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compiling, or data processing, this system will perform like a high-end workstation. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming or GPU rendering, it will perform like a low-end entry-level system. The build is not balanced, but it is functional for users who prioritize CPU performance and do not require high-end graphics. The low power draw of both components (65 W CPU and 43 W GPU) makes this an energy-efficient system that is easy to cool and power.

This pairing makes more sense for a professional who needs a powerful CPU for work and only needs a discrete GPU for basic display output or occasional light gaming. It is less sensible for a gamer who wants to play modern titles at high settings, as the GPU will be a severe bottleneck. The system's overall tier is "mid-range" due to the 52nd percentile, but this is a synthetic average that masks the extreme difference between the two components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a severe imbalance, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 17th percentile. This 69-point gap means the GPU will be the limiting factor in nearly every graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's low PassMark G3D score of 11897 will cap FPS at low levels. The estimated FPS scaling suggests that in 1080p gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck, preventing the system from achieving high frame rates even at low settings.

In CPU-bound workloads like video rendering or software compilation, the GPU's weakness is irrelevant. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark integer math score of 141370 will dominate these tasks, and the system will perform at a level consistent with its 86th percentile CPU ranking. However, in workloads that offload processing to the GPU, such as GPU-accelerated effects in video editing or ray tracing, the GPU's low compute score of 5152 and DirectX 12 score of 44 will cause significant slowdowns.

The bottleneck is clear: the GPU limits the system in all graphics tasks. The CPU is never the limiting factor except in the most extreme CPU-bound scenarios, which are rare for typical users. For a balanced system, users would need a GPU in a similar percentile range as the CPU, which would mean a mid-range or high-end graphics card. The current GPU is only suitable for basic tasks, and any attempt to run modern games or GPU-accelerated applications will result in the GPU being fully utilized while the CPU remains idle, creating a frustrating experience for users expecting high performance from the 16-core processor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds