SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It runs with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and features a 257 mm² die size. Its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It does not include integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The CPU is unlocked? No — the multiplier is locked, which means overclocking headroom is limited compared to K-series parts.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39009. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 32101 and the single-core score is 4532. These are strong numbers for a 65 W part. The multi-core result indicates that heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be handled with ease. The single-core score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 is equally important for everyday responsiveness, gaming, and applications that rely on a few fast threads. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 15058 multi-core and 2225 single-core, reinforcing the same story: this chip is balanced, with no glaring weakness in either single-threaded or multi-threaded performance.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests are revealing. The CPU scores 8994 in the 16-thread test, 7136 in the 8-thread test, 4258 in the 4-thread test, and 2178 in the 2-thread test. The single-thread score in 3DMark is 1092. The jump from 2 threads to 4 threads is nearly double (2178 to 4258), showing good scaling in lightly threaded workloads. From 8 threads to 16 threads, the gain is from 7136 to 8994, which is about a 26% improvement — the scaling is still positive but diminishing returns set in beyond 8 threads. The max-threads score of 10716 is only 19% higher than the 16-thread score, indicating that the additional threads beyond 16 provide modest gains for most workloads. This is typical of a hybrid architecture where performance cores handle the heavy lifting and efficiency cores fill in.

PassMark results add more texture. The multi-thread score is 38369, while the single-thread score is 4121. Integer math scores 141370, floating-point math scores 100422, and extended instructions score 28295. Data compression scores 471838, data encryption scores 26956, and random string sorting scores 49974. The physics score is 2236, and the find-prime-numbers test scores 156. These numbers suggest the CPU is particularly strong in integer-heavy tasks like code compilation and database operations, while floating-point and encryption performance is solid but not class-leading. For real-world use, this means the i7-13700F is a capable all-rounder: it will not bottleneck a modern GPU in gaming, and it will chew through productivity tasks without breaking a sweat.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-13700F sits within a tight band. It is 0.5% slower than the AMD EPYC 4245P, 0.8% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, 1.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, and 1.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. These differences are negligible in practice — less than 2% separates this CPU from its closest competitors. The data shows that the i7-13700F holds its own against a mix of server, mobile, and desktop chips, which reflects its balanced design.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket family used by 12th Gen Alder Lake and 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors. This means that users on an older 12th Gen board can potentially drop in this CPU with a BIOS update, though the exact compatibility depends on the motherboard vendor and chipset. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility: those on a budget can reuse DDR4 modules, while those building fresh can opt for DDR5 for higher bandwidth. Memory is dual-channel, and the CPU does not support ECC memory.

PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is important for future-proofing. A Gen 5 NVMe SSD or a Gen 5 GPU will run at full bandwidth, though most current GPUs use PCIe 4.0 and will not saturate Gen 5. The GPU in this build, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it will run at full speed on any Socket 1700 board with a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 slot.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 16-core part. This means a capable air cooler is sufficient for stock operation, and power consumption is not a concern for most mid-range power supplies. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU rating of 600 W. When pairing the 65 W CPU with the 250 W GPU, the total system draw will be well within the 600 W recommendation, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector, so the PSU must have those connectors available.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier 13th Gen CPU, such as an unlocked K-series part, if the motherboard supports overclocking and has adequate VRM cooling. Alternatively, a future 14th Gen CPU that uses the same Socket 1700 might be a drop-in option, though the data does not confirm this. For users who need more GPU compute, upgrading to a higher-end Radeon or GeForce card would be straightforward, as long as the PSU and case can accommodate the additional power and length. The RX 6750 XT is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm (10.5 inches) long, 110 mm (4.3 inches) tall, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide, so most mid-tower cases will fit it without issue.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the Navi 22 chip and uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It packs 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.3 million per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 40 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but it has no tensor cores — this is not a GPU aimed at AI inference workloads that rely on tensor operations.

Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This memory configuration is well-suited for 1440p gaming and lighter 4K workloads, as 12 GB is sufficient for most modern titles at high settings without running out of frame buffer. The base clock is 2150 MHz, the game clock is 2495 MHz, and the boost clock is 2600 MHz. Pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 71st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 2548. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 16360, the Vulkan score is 98089, and the Metal score is 137249. PassMark G3D score is 20700, and the G2D score is 972. DirectX 12 performance in PassMark is 80, DirectX 11 is 180, DirectX 10 is 125, and DirectX 9 is 263. GPU compute in PassMark is 9550. These numbers indicate a GPU that is capable of smooth 1080p and solid 1440p gaming, with enough compute power for moderate rendering and compute workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6750 XT is 0.5% faster than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, 0.6% faster than the AMD FirePro W7100, 0.7% faster than the AMD FirePro D700, and 1.1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. These are all within a 1.1% band, meaning the RX 6750 XT is statistically tied with these competing parts. The practical takeaway is that this GPU delivers consistent performance across a range of workloads, with no single benchmark revealing a severe weakness.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, which is sufficient for multi-monitor setups and high refresh rate displays. The GPU is dual-slot, uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector, and requires a 600 W PSU. It is marked as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, but it remains a viable option for builds where performance per dollar is a priority.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i7-13700F plus AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing targets users who need a balanced desktop system for gaming and productivity. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 71st percentile ranking mean this combo sits above average in both processing and graphics, making it a strong choice for mainstream enthusiasts.

Gamers at 1440p resolution will find this pairing well-suited. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures without stuttering, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound titles. At 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU becomes more important, and its 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU. At 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but the combination can still deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark multi-thread score of 38369 indicate that rendering and encoding tasks will complete in reasonable time. The GPU's compute score of 9550 in PassMark and FP32 of 13.31 TFLOPS provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects in editing software.

Students and small business users who run a mix of office applications, web browsing, and light creative work will find this system more than adequate. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches, and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM can handle large spreadsheets or virtualization workloads without issue. Small business workstations that need to run CAD or basic simulation software will benefit from the combination of CPU and GPU compute power.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with a high refresh rate monitor, the CPU's single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20700 combine to deliver high frame rates in esports titles and competitive shooters. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2178 shows strong performance in lightly threaded game logic, which is critical for maintaining high FPS in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: Streaming while gaming requires both CPU and GPU resources. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle the encoding workload when using x264, while the GPU's 2560 shading units and 40 RT cores can handle the rendering side. The PassMark data encryption score of 26956 suggests that the CPU can manage stream encryption overhead without impacting game performance significantly.

Video editing: In applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for smooth scrubbing of high-resolution footage and GPU-accelerated effects. The OpenCL score of 16360 in Geekbench indicates decent compute performance for effects processing.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar tools, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark floating-point score of 100422 ensure that scenes render in a reasonable timeframe. For GPU rendering, the RX 6750 XT's FP32 of 13.31 TFLOPS provides acceleration, though it will not match higher-end cards.

Software development: Compilation is a multi-threaded workload, and the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 141370 and data compression score of 471838 indicate strong performance in code compilation and packaging. The 16 cores and 24 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing iteration times.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's single-thread score of 4121 in PassMark and Geekbench single-core score of 2225 provide snappy performance. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but it enables light gaming or creative work during downtime.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, which places this build above the majority of desktop systems in the benchmark database.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-13700F does not include integrated graphics. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6750 XT is 600 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the total system draw stays well within that recommendation.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 40 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P?

A: The i7-13700F is 0.5% slower than the AMD EPYC 4245P in average benchmark score, a negligible difference in real-world usage.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-13700F and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is tilted toward the CPU in most gaming scenarios. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 71st percentile. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor has more headroom relative to the GPU. In practice, at 1080p resolution, the CPU's single-thread performance will often be the limiting factor for achieving maximum frame rates, especially in esports titles where the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can feed them. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and 2-thread score of 2178 are strong, but they will cap FPS in games that rely heavily on a few threads.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The RX 6750 XT's PassMark G3D score of 20700 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548 indicate that the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K in demanding titles, while the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads will remain underutilized. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p, but at 4K with high-resolution textures, the 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a limiting factor.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark multi-thread score of 38369 are far above average, meaning the CPU will not bottleneck rendering or compilation tasks. The GPU's compute score of 9550 in PassMark is decent but not exceptional, so GPU-accelerated workloads will be limited by the graphics card.

The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The FPS scaling between the CPU and GPU suggests that gamers should target 1080p or 1440p for the best balance, while content creators should rely on the CPU for heavy lifting and the GPU for acceleration where applicable.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700F, a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, a 12 GB graphics card based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile ranking is 79, indicating that this system outperforms the majority of desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

The CPU is a mainstream desktop part with a 65 W TDP, making it efficient for its core count. The GPU is a mid-range to upper-mid-range card with a 250 W TDP, requiring a 600 W PSU. The pairing is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as productivity workloads like video editing and software development. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 71st percentile ranking mean that the CPU has more relative headroom, which is beneficial for workloads that scale with core count.

This build is not a top-tier enthusiast system, but it sits comfortably in the upper-middle tier of desktop performance. It is suitable for users who want a reliable, balanced system without the cost or power draw of flagship components.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700F has an average benchmark score of 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 4245P (avg score 39215, 0.5% faster), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (avg score 39325, 0.8% faster), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (avg score 38561, 1.2% slower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (avg score 39485, 1.2% faster). The CPU's best results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101, a Geekbench multi-core score of 15058, and a PassMark multi-thread score of 38369.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011, placing it at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (avg score 25891, 0.5% slower), the AMD FirePro W7100 (avg score 25856, 0.6% slower), the AMD FirePro D700 (avg score 25842, 0.7% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (avg score 25740, 1.1% slower). The GPU's notable scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089, and a PassMark G3D score of 20700.

The combined picture is a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity and holds its own in gaming. The CPU is statistically tied with its nearest rivals, while the GPU is also statistically tied with its nearest rivals. The combined percentile of 79 means that this build is better than roughly four out of five desktop systems in the database. For users seeking a balanced desktop PC for gaming and work, this pairing delivers consistent performance without a single obvious weak point.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds