SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This desktop build pairs Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake processor with AMD's RDNA 2 mid-range graphics card, landing at the 76th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is a strong performer in its own right, sitting at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile against all GPUs, creating an asymmetric pairing where the processor has considerably more headroom than the graphics card in most scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the LGA 1700 ecosystem. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The CPU itself does not support ECC memory, which narrows its appeal for certain workstation use cases that require error-correcting memory.

Memory bandwidth figures are not provided in the data, but the dual-channel bus with DDR4/DDR5 support means the platform can accommodate a range of memory speeds depending on the motherboard and modules selected. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, which is notable for future storage expansions and GPU connectivity, though the paired GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the higher-bandwidth Gen 5 lanes remain available for other devices.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 16-core part, and the GPU has a 176 W TDP with a suggested power supply of 450 W. The combined power draw of this pairing is therefore manageable for a wide range of power supplies, and the 450 W suggestion for the GPU alone suggests that a system with both components would fit comfortably within a mid-range PSU. The CPU's 65 W TDP also means that a capable air cooler should suffice, though the boost clock of 5.20 GHz suggests that thermal headroom will be important under sustained loads.

The production status of the CPU is listed as Active, meaning it remains in production, while the GPU is End-of-life. This has implications for upgrade paths: the CPU can still be sourced new, while the GPU may require finding remaining stock or used units. The socket 1700 platform has been superseded in Intel's lineup, so a sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a newer platform entirely, though the current CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it still has substantial performance headroom before a platform change becomes necessary.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39009, placing it at the 86th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tightly packed group: the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485 (1.2% higher). The i7-13700F sits essentially in the middle of this cluster, with all rivals within roughly a percentage point, indicating that performance differences between these parts are negligible in aggregate terms.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19765, placing it at the 65th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are similarly close: the NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19885 (0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D300 scores 19637 (0.7% lower), the AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19905 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19602 (0.8% lower). The RX 6650 XT thus sits in a tight cluster of professional and workstation-class GPUs from an earlier era, though its gaming-oriented architecture differentiates it in real-world usage.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 76, which reflects the CPU's stronger relative position pulling up the overall ranking. The CPU outperforms the GPU by a significant margin in percentile terms (86 vs 65), and this imbalance is a recurring theme in the analysis. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 10716 in 3dmark_max_threads and 32101 in cinebench_r23_multicore, while the GPU delivers 17166 in passmark_g3d and 1859 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12. These figures show a processor that can handle compute-heavy tasks well ahead of the graphics card's capability to keep up in gaming scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F features 16 cores and 24 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the die size is 257 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported.

Single-thread performance is strong, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1092 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4121. The cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 4532 further confirms that the high boost clock translates into excellent per-core performance. Multi-threaded scores scale well with the core count: 3dmark_16_threads scores 8994, and 3dmark_max_threads scores 10716, indicating that the additional threads beyond 16 provide a modest but meaningful boost.

The passmark suite reveals workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 141370, floating point math scores 100422, and extended instructions score 28295. Data compression scores 471838, while data encryption scores 26956. The find prime numbers test scores only 156, which is a notably weak result. Random string sorting scores 49974. These figures suggest the CPU is well-suited to general-purpose computing, scientific calculations, and compression workloads, but the prime number test indicates a relative weakness in that specific type of integer operation.

The 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs places this processor in the upper tier of available parts. Its nearest rivals include both server-class (EPYC) and mobile (Ryzen 7 PRO, Ryzen AI 7) processors, all within a narrow band of aggregate scores, which demonstrates that the i7-13700F competes effectively across form factors and market segments.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-13700F use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does that imply for cooling?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP. This is a modest figure for a 16-core processor, suggesting that a capable air cooler should be sufficient for most usage.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself.

Q: How does the i7-13700F compare to its nearest rivals in aggregate score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 39009, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4245P, 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, 1.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, and 1.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU production status is listed as End-of-life, while the CPU is listed as Active.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile against all GPUs. The combined percentile of 76 is closer to the GPU's position than the CPU's, which indicates that the graphics card is the limiting factor in most scenarios.

In CPU-heavy workloads, the processor's strengths are evident. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 32101 and the 3dmark_max_threads score of 10716 show that the CPU can sustain high throughput across all 24 threads. The passmark_multithread score of 38369 reinforces this. For gaming, however, the GPU's passmark_g3d score of 17166 and 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1859 indicate that frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM on a 128-bit bus with 280.3 GB/s bandwidth is a mid-range configuration. In games that are sensitive to memory bandwidth or capacity, the GPU will be the bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1092 and passmark_single_thread score of 4121, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles. The data suggests that lowering graphical settings or resolution will yield frame rate improvements because the GPU is the constraining component, while CPU-bound scenarios would only appear at very low resolutions or in highly threaded simulation games.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread scores suggest that the processor can keep up with the graphics card's output. The GPU's passmark_directx_12 score of 62 and passmark_directx_11 score of 169 indicate competent DirectX performance, but the mid-range position of the GPU means that achieving very high frame rates will require tuning settings.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU's 24 threads and strong multi-threaded scores, including a passmark_multithread score of 38369 and a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 32101, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores and its position at the 65th percentile mean that hardware encoding capabilities will be limited compared to higher-tier cards.

Video editing benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 10716 and the passmark_extended_instructions score of 28295 indicate solid performance for rendering and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, though the 65th percentile position means it will not accelerate GPU-heavy effects as quickly as higher-end cards.

3D rendering workloads are CPU-bound in many engines, and the i7-13700F's cinebench_r20_multicore score of 13482 and cinebench_r15_multicore score of 3235 demonstrate strong rendering throughput. The GPU's compute performance, measured at 7532 in passmark_gpu_compute, provides acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development tasks such as compilation benefit from the CPU's core count and clock speed. The passmark_integer_math score of 141370 and the passmark_data_compression score of 471838 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The GPU's role in development is minimal, so its 65th percentile position is less relevant.

For student and office work, this pairing is overqualified. The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's capabilities far exceed the requirements of document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable, and the system would be responsive across all typical office applications.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a desktop builder who prioritizes CPU performance and does not require top-tier graphics. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with medium to high settings will find the GPU's 65th percentile performance adequate, while the CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures that no CPU-related stutters or bottlenecks will occur in most titles.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded strength, as evidenced by the cinebench_r23_multicore score of 32101 and the passmark_multithread score of 38369. The GPU provides enough compute power for hardware acceleration, but its 8 GB VRAM and mid-range position mean it is not suited for heavy GPU rendering workloads.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 141370 and its 24 threads. Students and office workers will find the system far more capable than needed, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring snappy application response. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity applications would benefit from the CPU's strong aggregate scores, though the GPU's gaming-oriented design means it is not optimized for professional graphics workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is a Navi 23-based RDNA 2.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 76 places this pairing in the upper-mid tier of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs indicates a high-performance processor, while the GPU's 65th percentile ranking indicates a mid-range graphics solution. The asymmetry between these two positions is the defining characteristic of this build: the processor has substantially more performance headroom than the graphics card can utilize in most scenarios. The CPU's TDP of 65 W and the GPU's suggested PSU of 450 W indicate a system that is power-efficient for its performance class.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm². The base clock is 2055 MHz, the boost clock is 2635 MHz, and the game clock is 2410 MHz. Memory operates at 2190 MHz with 17.5 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, and the pixel rate is 168.6 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is 10.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU's benchmark scores show a 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1859, a geekbench_opencl score of 10111, and a geekbench_vulkan score of 81306. The passmark_g3d score is 17166, with passmark_directx_11 at 169 and passmark_directx_12 at 62. The passmark_gpu_compute score is 7532. These figures place the GPU at the 65th percentile against all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Tesla K40m, AMD FirePro D300, AMD FirePro W7000, and NVIDIA Quadro K5200, all within a 1.5% band of aggregate scores.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has a TDP of 176 W, uses a dual-slot form factor, and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested power supply is 450 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, and its launch MSRP is 399 USD.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component.

The GPU's 65th percentile ranking and its passmark_g3d score of 17166 suggest that it is a capable 1080p gaming card. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1859 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The CPU's strong single-thread scores, including the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1092 and passmark_single_thread score of 4121, ensure that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth will likely be the limiting factors, with frame rates dropping as resolution and texture quality increase. The GPU's 128-bit memory bus is narrower than higher-tier cards, which may impact performance in memory-intensive titles. At 4K, this pairing would struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding games, as the GPU's mid-range position at the 65th percentile does not provide sufficient rendering power for that resolution class.

The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for gaming while running background tasks, and the 30 MB of L3 cache helps with game data locality. The overall estimate is that this build is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high settings and 1440p gaming with medium settings, but 4K gaming would require significant graphical compromises. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual frame rates will vary by game and settings.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds