SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 — Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core Intel Raptor Lake processor with an 8 GB RDNA 2 mid-range graphics card, targeting a 1080p gaming and productivity desktop. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 63rd percentile, creating a configuration where the processor has substantial headroom over the graphics subsystem. The combined percentile for this desktop build is 75, indicating a system that is firmly above average but not at the enthusiast tier. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database — all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W thermal design power. The chip uses a hybrid core layout typical of 13th-gen Core parts, combining performance and efficiency cores to reach 24 threads from 16 physical cores. Cache is distributed as 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales strongly with thread count. The 3DMark suite reveals a clear progression: 2,178 points with 2 threads, 4,258 with 4 threads, 7,136 with 8 threads, 8,994 with 16 threads, and 10,716 with maximum threads. This scaling pattern indicates that the CPU can effectively utilize all available cores, though the gains diminish beyond 8 threads — the jump from 8 to 16 threads adds about 26% performance, while going from 16 to max threads adds roughly 19% more.

Cinebench scores reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore result of 32,101 points is exceptionally strong for a 65 W part, while the single-core score of 4,532 shows that the 5.20 GHz boost clock delivers competitive per-thread performance. The R20 multicore score of 13,482 and R15 multicore score of 3,235 follow the same pattern. Geekbench reports 15,058 multicore and 2,225 single-core points.

PassMark results provide further workload-specific insight. Integer math scores 141,370, floating-point math hits 100,422, and extended instructions reach 28,295. Data compression scores 471,838, while data encryption manages 26,956. The multithread score of 38,369 and single-thread score of 4,121 indicate balanced performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded scenarios. Physics processing scores 2,236, and prime number finding scores 156.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered closely: the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (1.2% higher). This tight grouping means the i7-13700F is statistically indistinguishable from its nearest competition in overall CPU performance, despite being a desktop part in a field that includes mobile and workstation chips.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The die contains 11,060 million transistors across a 237 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 46.7 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1,626 MHz, a game clock of 2,044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2,491 MHz. Memory runs at 1,750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed across a 128-bit bus.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory provides 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards but adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures. The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 28 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall compute throughput is limited. Pixel rate is 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 8.928 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 17.86 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The RX 6600's average benchmark score is 19,036, placing it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19,030 (0% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19,049 (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19,089 (0.3% lower), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18,954 (0.4% higher). This means the RX 6600 sits in a performance band where several competing architectures from different generations and market segments converge.

Specific benchmark scores show varied strengths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 1,492 points, which is a modern workload result. PassMark G3D scores 15,096, while G2D scores 889. Compute-oriented tests show 6,554 in GPU compute, with DirectX 10 at 95, DirectX 11 at 152, DirectX 12 at 51, and DirectX 9 at 197. Geekbench results are 88,398 in Metal, 28,850 in OpenCL, and 67,623 in Vulkan. The DirectX 12 score being lower than DirectX 11 is notable and suggests the card's driver or hardware handles legacy DX11 paths more efficiently in that specific test.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance delta between the CPU and GPU is substantial. The i7-13700F sits at the 86th percentile among CPUs, while the RX 6600 sits at the 63rd percentile among GPUs. This 23-point gap indicates that the processor is capable of driving significantly more graphics horsepower than this GPU can utilize. In CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression, encryption, or heavily threaded productivity tasks — the GPU will not be the limiting factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the RX 6600 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 10,716 and R23 multicore score of 32,101 suggest it can feed even high-end graphics cards in most scenarios. The RX 6600's PassMark G3D score of 15,096 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,492 indicate a mid-range GPU that will become the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. For 1080p gaming, the CPU has enough headroom to handle frame pacing and background tasks without compromising GPU utilization. For 1440p or higher resolutions, the GPU will be the clear limiter, with CPU usage potentially dropping below 60% in many titles.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance — the system is better than the GPU alone would suggest but worse than the CPU alone would indicate. The practical implication is that users upgrading the GPU later will see significant gains without needing to replace the processor. Conversely, upgrading the CPU while keeping the RX 6600 would yield minimal gaming improvements.

FAQ

Q: Does the i7-13700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the "F" designation means the processor does not include integrated graphics. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6600 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the RX 6600 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 28 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the power consumption of each component?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 132 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RX 6600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the maximum attainable frequency.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P, scores 39,215 (0.5% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (0.8% higher) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (1.2% higher). The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (1.2% lower). This puts the i7-13700F in a tightly contested band where no single rival holds a meaningful advantage.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19,036, placing it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19,030 (0% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile at 19,049 (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19,089 (0.3% lower), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18,954 (0.4% higher). The RX 6600 is effectively tied with all of these, making it a mid-tier performer that neither excels nor lags in its immediate competitive set.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer while the GPU is solidly mid-range. The 86th vs 63rd percentile split means the overall system percentile of 75 is a compromise between the two. In CPU-heavy applications like video encoding, software compilation, or scientific computing, this system will perform near the level of much more expensive configurations. In GPU-heavy workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, it will perform at a strictly mid-range level.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,096, this system should deliver playable 1080p performance in most modern titles. The RX 6600's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p high settings, though texture-heavy games may require adjustments. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,492 suggests it can handle DirectX 12 games at 1080p with medium-to-high settings.

At 1440p, the system will face more challenges. The GPU's compute throughput of 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 and pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s are limiting factors. Expect lower frame rates and reduced settings at this resolution. The CPU will not be the constraint — its 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,136 and max-thread score of 10,716 provide ample processing power for game logic and physics at any resolution.

Ray tracing performance will be modest. The 28 ray accelerators provide hardware support, but the overall RT throughput is limited by the card's mid-range positioning. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 51 indicates that DX12 workloads are not this GPU's strongest area. For competitive or esports titles, the high CPU single-thread performance and the GPU's raw rasterization capabilities should yield high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings.

Who Should Build It

This desktop system suits users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without the cost of a high-end GPU. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find a capable machine, though those seeking maximum frame rates in the latest AAA titles may want more GPU power. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with the RX 6600 providing hardware acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and encoding workflows.

Developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 141,370 and multithread score of 38,369. Students and small business users running office productivity, web development, or data analysis workloads will find the system more than adequate, with the CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensuring smooth multitasking. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means it is not a workstation-class card, but it handles GPU-accelerated tasks in creative applications at a reasonable level.

Users who plan to upgrade the GPU in the future will find this a solid foundation. The CPU's headroom means a future GPU upgrade could substantially improve gaming and rendering performance without requiring a new processor. Those building a system for 1440p or 4K gaming should consider a stronger GPU than the RX 6600, as the current pairing is best suited to 1080p.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor on the LGA 1700 socket, with the AMD Radeon RX 6600, an RDNA 2.0 GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU is a 65 W part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 132 W dual-slot card requiring a 300 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin power connector.

The system sits at the 75th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 63rd percentile. This places the overall build in the upper-mid tier — better than a typical office or budget gaming PC, but below enthusiast configurations with higher-end GPUs. The CPU's performance rivals workstation and high-end mobile processors, while the GPU competes with older workstation cards and mid-range mobile GPUs.

The architecture is current-generation for both components: Raptor Lake for the CPU and RDNA 2.0 for the GPU. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The system supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, but the CPU remains active.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 compute should deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles at medium-to-high settings. The GPU's 159.4 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high refresh rates at this resolution, though esports titles will be more comfortable than AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 38,369 indicates the CPU can handle game logic, streaming software, and chat applications simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means game capture at high settings may require some compromises.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 accelerates timeline rendering and export in most editing suites. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 63rd percentile ranking means complex GPU-accelerated effects may be slower than on higher-end cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, with the R23 multicore score of 32,101 and PassMark floating-point math score of 100,422 providing substantial compute throughput. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the RX 6600's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM, which is adequate for moderate scenes but not large production work.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, with PassMark integer math at 141,370 and data compression at 471,838 supporting build tools and version control operations. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic testing, though game development targeting high-end graphics may require a stronger GPU.

Student and office work: This system is significantly overprovisioned for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking, while the GPU's 63rd percentile is more than enough for office applications. The 65 W CPU TDP and 132 W GPU TDP keep power consumption reasonable for a workstation used throughout the day.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through different motherboard chipsets. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Memory is dual-channel, and ECC is not supported. The CPU has a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not available, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock provides high single-thread performance out of the box.

The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 190 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. It requires a 300 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin power connector. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production, but it remains a viable mid-range option for 1080p gaming. Its successor, Navi III, represents the next generation of RDNA architecture.

A sensible next upgrade for this system is a stronger GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for a higher-end graphics card. The 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves thermal and power budget for a more power-hungry GPU, though the PSU may need upgrading depending on the chosen card. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future GPUs, while the LGA 1700 socket limits CPU upgrades to 13th-gen or compatible 14th-gen parts.

The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 memory or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is backward compatible with older motherboards and forward compatible with PCIe 5.0 slots. The system's overall balance — a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU — makes it a strong foundation for a future GPU upgrade, which would shift the system toward higher resolutions and more demanding graphics workloads.