SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

76 Score

Top 24% Ranking

76 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 24% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-13700E pairs with a dual NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU setup in this desktop-class configuration. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct testing data. This analysis relies solely on the provided specifications and synthetic benchmark results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 1900.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features an 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes ECC memory support, and integrates UHD Graphics 770. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 and a single-core score of 3944. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 7957, placing the i7-13700E at the 64th percentile among all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, this processor is 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7551P (avg score 7952), 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910), 1.4% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071), and 1.9% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (8110). The data shows a tightly clustered performance group, meaning the i7-13700E trades blows with high-end server and workstation chips from previous generations.

For real workloads, the R23 multi-core score of 27941 indicates strong parallel throughput for video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 3944 is more relevant for lightly threaded applications like office productivity, web browsing, and legacy software. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 16-core part, suggesting efficient power management under sustained loads, though boost clocks reaching 5.10 GHz will draw more under burst conditions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13700E uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory enabled—a feature not common on consumer desktop chips. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, adequate for a single high-bandwidth GPU or storage device, while the GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The 65 W TDP for the CPU is modest, and the GPU has a 150 W TDP, so the combined thermal envelope is manageable for a standard desktop power supply, though the suggested PSU field is not provided in the data. The processor is listed with an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking potential on compatible Z-series motherboards.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake or newer generation part on the same socket, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it. The ECC memory support is a notable advantage for workstation reliability, and the dual-channel memory bus means adding faster DDR5 modules could improve memory-bound workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are forward-looking for next-generation storage, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface will not bottleneck current graphics cards. The 150 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP together suggest a system that can run on a mid-range PSU, but higher-quality units with strong 12V rails are recommended for stability under combined load.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 64th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 50th percentile among all GPUs indicate a mid-to-upper tier pairing. The GPU, an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, is based on the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors and a die size of 379 mm². It features 9728 shading units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, with a boost clock of 1680 MHz and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU’s single-core score of 3944 in Geekbench and R23 single-core of 3944 suggest strong frame pacing in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance should handle most modern games at high settings. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy scenes, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking means it will not outperform top-tier consumer cards like the RTX 4080 or 4090. At 4K, the GPU’s 1680 MHz boost clock and 112 ROPs will likely become the limiting factor, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in demanding titles unless settings are reduced. The dual GPU configuration (X2) implies SLI or multi-GPU scaling, but the data does not provide multi-GPU benchmark scores, so real-world scaling is unknown. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s high boost clock should deliver 144+ FPS at 1080p, but for AAA games, expect 60-90 FPS at 1440p with medium-high settings.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a balanced workstation and gaming hybrid. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with ECC memory support, make it suitable for content creators who render videos or 3D models while also gaming. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 76 RT cores position it for professionals working with ray-traced visualizations, though its 50th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution will find the CPU’s single-core strength (Geekbench single-core 2437) and GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS sufficient for high-refresh-rate play in most titles, but 4K enthusiasts should look elsewhere. Software developers benefit from the 24 threads for parallel builds and the ECC memory for long-running test suites. Students and small business workstations gain from the modest 65 W CPU TDP, which allows for compact cooling solutions, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is disabled. The production status for both components is listed as Active, indicating ongoing availability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and Geekbench single-core score of 2437 should sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 delivers enough rasterization power for 144 Hz monitors in esports games. The 16 GB VRAM prevents texture thrashing in modern shooters.

Streaming: The 24 threads handle encoding overhead without stealing gaming performance, and the GPU’s tensor cores (304) could accelerate AI-based stream enhancements. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions, though the GPU’s 150 W TDP will contribute to system heat.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 accelerates timeline rendering and export in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 4K timeline scrubbing, and 16 GB VRAM handles large color-grade LUTs. The ECC memory reduces corruption risk during long renders.

3D rendering: In Blender or Maya, the CPU’s 27941 R23 multi-core score handles physics simulation and scene assembly, while the GPU’s 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced final renders. The 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 is modest for production rendering, so expect slower output than dedicated render nodes.

Software development: The 24 threads compile large codebases quickly, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces lookup latency. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes enable fast NVMe builds, and the ECC memory prevents silent data corruption in long test runs.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output for spreadsheets and documents, while the CPU’s single-core score of 2437 in Geekbench handles office suites with ease. The 65 W TDP allows for quiet, low-power operation in dorm rooms or small offices.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a dual-GPU configuration based on the AD103 chip, Ada Lovelace architecture, and TSMC’s 5 nm process. It has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU runs at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The compute resources include 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 150 W, and it uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Display outputs are portable device dependent, and the power connectors are listed as None, indicating an embedded design.

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places this card in the middle of the performance spectrum. For rendering, the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 is adequate for real-time previews but not for heavy offline renders. The 76 RT cores support ray tracing at a moderate level—expect playable ray-traced frame rates at 1080p with DLSS enabled, but 1440p ray tracing will strain the GPU. The 304 tensor cores enable DLSS 3 frame generation, which could boost effective FPS in supported games. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for 1440p textures and some 4K content, but the 256-bit bus and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth cap memory-intensive workloads. The dual GPU setup (X2) theoretically doubles compute resources, but the benchmark data does not include multi-GPU scores, so scaling efficiency is unknown. The 150 W TDP per GPU suggests a total of 300 W for both, which is manageable but requires adequate cooling.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this configuration, the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The i7-13700E sits at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This imbalance means the CPU can outpace the GPU in many workloads, particularly those that are lightly threaded or rely on single-core performance. For gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at resolutions above 1080p, as the CPU’s single-core score of 2437 in Geekbench is sufficient for high frame rates, but the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS will cap FPS in demanding titles. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or AI inference, the CPU’s 16 cores will dominate, but the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate specific tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP versus 150 W GPU TDP means the GPU draws more power, so thermal throttling is more likely on the GPU side under sustained load. The PCIe Gen 5 on the CPU versus PCIe 4.0 on the GPU creates a mismatch, but current GPUs do not saturate PCIe 4.0, so this is not a practical bottleneck. Memory bandwidth is balanced: the CPU’s dual-channel DDR5 (or DDR4) support is modest, but the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s is sufficient for its 16 GB frame buffer.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7957 and sits at the 64th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7551P?

A: The i7-13700E is 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7551P in average benchmark score (7957 vs 7952).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 576.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does this configuration have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this build?

A: The combined percentile is 57, indicating this pairing outperforms 57% of all recorded system configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s individual benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2816 and single-core 397; Cinebench R20 multi-core 11735 and single-core 1656; Cinebench R23 multi-core 27941 and single-core 3944; Geekbench multi-core 12728 and single-core 2437. The average benchmark score is 7957, with a percentile ranking of 64 among all CPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly grouped: AMD EPYC 7551P (7952, +0.1% for i7), Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910, +0.6%), Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071, -1.4%), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (8110, -1.9%). The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0, with a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs. The GPU’s nearest rivals are empty, so no direct comparisons are available. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 57, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all system configurations.

The combined picture shows a CPU that performs near the top of its 13th-gen class, with multi-core scores rivaling enterprise Xeons and EPYC chips from previous generations. The GPU, while mid-pack, offers 16 GB VRAM and Ada Lovelace features like DLSS 3, making it suitable for 1440p gaming and professional visualization. The CPU’s 64th percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 50th, so this build leans CPU-heavy. For users prioritizing multi-threaded workloads, the i7-13700E delivers excellent value in its performance tier, but for gaming, the GPU will limit frame rates to mid-range levels. The 57th combined percentile means this system is above average but not a top-tier performer. The lack of measured FPS data is a limitation, and users should treat all gaming estimates as approximations based on synthetic benchmarks. The build is best suited for a workstation that occasionally games, rather than a dedicated gaming rig.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds