SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Desktop Workstation Benchmark Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake processor with NVIDIA's professional Ada Lovelace GPU, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile against all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 98th percentile against all graphics cards — a lopsided pairing where the graphics card clearly dominates the performance envelope. The data shows a system built for compute-heavy professional workloads rather than balanced gaming, with the GPU contributing nearly 23 times more raw benchmark score than the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation GPU, with an average benchmark score of 184,664 and a 98th percentile ranking, is theoretically capable of driving very high frame rates, but this is not its primary design intent. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 and OpenCL score of 175,286 indicate strong compute throughput that would translate to excellent gaming performance, though the workstation-class drivers and 32 GB GDDR6 memory are optimized for professional tasks. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,944 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,437 suggest adequate gaming responsiveness, but the 65 W TDP and 1.90 GHz base clock point toward efficiency-focused operation rather than maximum gaming boost.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 27,941 and Geekbench multi-core score of 12,728 indicate the processor can handle encoding tasks alongside other responsibilities. The GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores add hardware acceleration capabilities that would offload streaming overhead, though the lack of measured FPS data means streaming performance must be inferred from these compute scores.

Video editing: The combination of 32 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and the CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support creates a robust memory environment for timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s suggest rapid processing of video filters and transitions. The CPU's 30 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide sufficient data locality for multi-stream editing workflows.

3D rendering: This is where the pairing excels most clearly. The GPU's 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs deliver compute capabilities that rival the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which trails by only 0.5% in average benchmark score. The CPU's multi-core performance, while only at the 64th percentile overall, still provides 27,941 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is within 1.4% of the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 and 1.9% of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M. For viewport rendering and final frame output, the GPU carries the workload; for scene preparation and simulation, the CPU provides competent support.

Software development: The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel compilation tasks effectively, with the CPU's multi-core scores showing it outperforms the Intel Core i9-10980XE by 0.6% in average benchmark score. The ECC memory support is a notable advantage for long-running build servers or development workstations requiring data integrity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the RTX 5000 Ada Generation would be the primary display adapter in most configurations.

Student and office work: This configuration dramatically overshoots the requirements for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2,437 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,656 are more than sufficient for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. However, the 250 W GPU TDP and 600 W suggested PSU make this an impractical choice for energy-conscious student builds. The dual-slot GPU length of 267 mm also requires a full-size desktop chassis.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 modules, though the lack of a memory bandwidth figure in the data prevents precise performance comparison. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — meaning the graphics card operates at one generation behind the CPU's maximum capability, though this is backward-compatible.

The 65 W CPU TDP paired with the 250 W GPU TDP yields a combined thermal envelope that a 600 W suggested PSU can comfortably handle. This leaves upgrade headroom for additional storage drives, capture cards, or other PCIe devices without necessitating a power supply change. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the data does not specify achievable clocks — the 5.10 GHz boost clock represents the stock maximum.

A sensible next upgrade within this platform would be adding more of the 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes to high-speed NVMe storage, as the CPU-only lane allocation suggests the chipset provides additional connectivity. The GPU's 32 GB memory capacity is already substantial, so memory upgrades would focus on the system RAM side, where the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows capacity expansion. For users seeking more CPU performance without changing motherboards, the Socket 1700 platform supports other Raptor Lake processors, though the data does not specify which ones.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake architecture, with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a 1.90 GHz base clock and reaches 5.10 GHz at boost, with a 65 W TDP — the "E" suffix indicating an embedded-focused variant that prioritizes power efficiency over raw clock speed. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3, providing 16 cores with substantial local and shared data storage.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 7,957 places it at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, which is a mid-pack position. The nearest rival data shows remarkable clustering: the AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7,952 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7,910 (0.6% slower), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8,071 (1.4% faster), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8,110 (1.9% faster). This places the i7-13700E within a tight band of enterprise and high-end desktop processors, though those rivals are older architectures — the data suggests the i7-13700E achieves comparable multi-threaded performance with significantly lower power consumption.

In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 27,941 demonstrates strong parallel processing capability, though it trails the Xeon Gold 6326 by 1.4% in the average benchmark. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,944 indicates solid per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications like legacy software or certain simulation tools. The Geekbench scores of 12,728 multi-core and 2,437 single-core corroborate the Cinebench results, showing a consistent performance profile across different benchmark methodologies.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the database contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i7-13700E paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 184,664 suggest frame rates that would place this system among the top 2% of all GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 indicates strong graphics API performance, while the OpenCL score of 175,286 shows compute capability that benefits modern game engines using GPU-accelerated physics or ray tracing. The 32 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's single-core performance would likely become the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenes, though the 3,944 Cinebench R23 single-core score suggests this is not a weak processor. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's massive compute resources would dominate, delivering frame rates that scale with the 98th percentile positioning. The 400 tensor cores enable DLSS-style upscaling, which could extend playable frame rates at higher resolutions, though the professional workstation drivers may not prioritize gaming optimizations.

Given the CPU's 64th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 98th percentile, gaming at lower resolutions would expose the CPU as the bottleneck, while higher resolutions would shift the balance toward the GPU. The estimated FPS figures would vary dramatically by game title and settings, but the hardware capability for high-refresh 1440p or smooth 4K gaming is present based on the compute scores.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals who need workstation-class GPU compute with a competent but not top-tier CPU. The primary audience is 3D artists and animators working with large scenes, where the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 32 GB memory and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handle complex geometry and textures without swapping. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking against all GPUs means it outperforms the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% and the GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%, making it a top-tier compute device.

Video editors working with 8K or multi-stream timelines would benefit from the 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and the CPU's 16 cores for export encoding. The ECC memory support on the CPU side adds reliability for long rendering jobs where data corruption is unacceptable. Developers building large codebases or running virtual machines would appreciate the 24 threads, though the 64th CPU percentile indicates faster options exist if CPU-bound tasks dominate.

Students in engineering or data science programs would find the GPU's compute capability valuable for machine learning workloads, though the 250 W TDP and 600 W PSU requirement make this an expensive system to run. Small business workstations performing CAD, simulation, or financial modeling would benefit from the professional GPU drivers and the CPU's stable embedded-focused design. Gamers seeking maximum FPS would be better served by a consumer GPU, as the professional workstation features add cost without gaming-specific optimizations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation combination ranks at the 81st percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU at the 64th percentile and the GPU at the 98th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 7,957, placing it 0.1% faster than the AMD EPYC 7551P, 0.6% faster than the Intel Core i9-10980XE, 1.4% slower than the Intel Xeon Gold 6326, and 1.9% slower than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory for error-correcting workloads.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's closest competitor based on benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB is 0.5% slower in average benchmark score, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1.4% faster and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is 3.7% slower.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 600 W, which accommodates the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP along with other system components.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 98th percentile means that in any workload where both components are active, the CPU will reach its limit first. This is most evident in gaming at lower resolutions, where the CPU must feed frames to the GPU — the 3,944 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 2,437 Geekbench single-core score would constrain frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or simulation, the balance shifts favorably toward the GPU. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS and 100 RT cores handle the heavy lifting, while the CPU's 16 cores prepare scene data. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 27,941 is sufficient to keep the GPU fed in most professional applications, but the 1.4% performance gap to the Xeon Gold 6326 suggests that heavily multi-threaded CPU simulation would expose the CPU as the limiting factor.

The memory subsystem shows a different bottleneck pattern. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantially higher than what the CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory bus can provide, meaning data transfers between system memory and GPU memory could become a constraint in workflows that stream large datasets. The 32 GB GPU memory mitigates this by allowing large datasets to reside entirely on the GPU, reducing the frequency of PCIe transfers.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated due to missing measured data, reinforces the CPU-bottleneck conclusion — the 98th percentile GPU would produce diminishing FPS returns at lower resolutions where the CPU's 64th percentile becomes the constraint.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a mid-tier 13th Gen Core processor with a top-tier workstation GPU. The Intel Core i7-13700E is an embedded-focused Raptor Lake chip with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a professional workstation GPU based on the AD102 chip with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined 81st percentile ranking places this system above most consumer configurations, but the component imbalance is notable.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary workstation use rather than portable or all-in-one form factors. The GPU's dual-slot design, 267 mm length, and 1x 16-pin power connector require a full-size ATX chassis with adequate clearance and power delivery. The CPU's Socket 1700 platform supports a range of motherboards from entry-level to high-end, with the DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allowing builders to choose their memory platform.

The overall tier from the percentiles is upper-midrange, driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU's 64th percentile is below the 81st combined percentile, meaning the GPU boosts the entire system's ranking. This is a GPU-first build where the CPU serves as a capable but not exceptional companion.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows consistent mid-pack performance across all tests. Cinebench R15 scores are 2,816 multi-core and 397 single-core; Cinebench R20 scores are 11,735 multi-core and 1,656 single-core; Cinebench R23 scores are 27,941 multi-core and 3,944 single-core; Geekbench scores are 12,728 multi-core and 2,437 single-core. The average benchmark score of 7,957 places the CPU at the 64th percentile, with rival comparisons showing it within 1.9% of much older enterprise processors.

The GPU's benchmark results are dramatically stronger. Geekbench OpenCL scores 175,286 and Geekbench Vulkan scores 194,041, producing an average benchmark score of 184,664 that ranks at the 98th percentile. The nearest rival comparisons show the GPU outperforming the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5%, trailing the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%, leading the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4%, and beating the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU contributes roughly 96% of the total benchmark score (184,664 GPU average versus 7,957 CPU average). This extreme imbalance means the system's overall 81st percentile ranking is essentially the GPU's ranking pulled down slightly by the CPU. For workloads that leverage the GPU's compute capabilities, this system performs near the top of the database; for CPU-bound tasks, it performs solidly but unremarkably. The data supports a verdict: this is a workstation designed for GPU-accelerated professional workloads, not a balanced general-purpose system.