SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

78%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Benchmark Database Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace workstation GPU, both active production parts released in January and August 2023 respectively. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, producing a combined percentile of 80 for the system. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results show a multicore Cinebench R23 score of 27941, with a single-core score of 3944. In Cinebench R20, the processor scores 11735 multicore and 1656 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2816 multicore and 397 single-core. Geekbench results show 12728 multicore and 2437 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 7957, placing it at the 64th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rival comparisons illustrate where this CPU sits in the broader market. The AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7952, a mere 0.1% behind, meaning the 13700E effectively matches a server-class EPYC part in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7910, trailing by 0.6%, showing that a modern mid-range i7 outperforms an older high-end HEDT i9. On the other side, the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8071, which is 1.4% ahead of the 13700E, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8110, 1.9% ahead. These deltas indicate that the 13700E occupies a performance tier comparable to dual-socket server processors from previous generations, despite its 65 W envelope.

The 24-thread configuration with a 5.1 GHz boost clock produces strong multicore throughput for compiled workloads while maintaining excellent single-thread responsiveness. The 30 MB L3 cache is substantial for a desktop part, aiding data-heavy tasks like code compilation and database queries. The combination of high boost clocks and 16 physical cores means the CPU scales well across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded applications, though the 1900 MHz base clock is notably low for sustained all-core loads without adequate cooling.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13700E compare to the AMD EPYC 7551P in benchmark performance?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in aggregate performance, with the 13700E scoring 7957 average versus 7952 for the EPYC 7551P, a difference of just 0.1%. The EPYC is a server-class part, so the i7 matching it in mixed workloads is notable given the i7's 65 W TDP versus the EPYC's server power envelope.

Q: What is the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's memory configuration?

A: The GPU features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. This configuration is modest in bandwidth for a workstation GPU but the large 20 GB capacity supports large datasets.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked according to the specification data. This allows users to adjust the multiplier beyond the 5.1 GHz boost clock, subject to cooling and power delivery limits. The 65 W TDP provides headroom for manual tuning.

Q: What PCIe generation does each component use?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 as its bus interface. The GPU is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slot, so it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds without issue.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark performance compare to the NVIDIA A10M?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135218 average, while the A10M scores 135230, making them effectively identical with a 0% deltaPct. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 146593 and Vulkan score is 123842, showing balanced compute and graphics API performance.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, the Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory. This is unusual for a consumer desktop processor and makes the pairing suitable for workstation uses where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: What is the GPU's transistor count and die size?

A: The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The transistor density is 121.8 million per mm², reflecting a dense modern process node.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 7957 places it at the 64th percentile, which means it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all processors in the database. The nearest rivals show tight clustering: the AMD EPYC 7551P at 7952 (0.1% behind), Intel Core i9-10980XE at 7910 (0.6% behind), Intel Xeon Gold 6326 at 8071 (1.4% ahead), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M at 8110 (1.9% ahead). This clustering within roughly 2% indicates the 13700E delivers performance in a well-established tier dominated by enterprise silicon, but it does not break into higher performance classes.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 135218 places it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, a much stronger relative position than the CPU. The nearest rivals are nearly identical in score: NVIDIA A10M at 135230 (0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135774 (0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 at 136472 (0.9% ahead). The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 show a 18% advantage for OpenCL, suggesting compute-heavy workloads perform better than graphics-API tasks.

The combined percentile of 80 reflects the imbalance between the 64th-percentile CPU and 95th-percentile GPU. The system is GPU-bound in most tasks, with the CPU lagging relative to the GPU's high-end positioning. For workloads that stress both components equally, the CPU will limit overall system performance, while GPU-centric tasks like rendering will see the full benefit of the graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th-percentile GPU performance, with FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS and 48 RT cores, supports high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles. However, the CPU's 64th percentile means it may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions or in esports titles where high CPU clock speeds matter. The 5.1 GHz boost clock helps, but the 1900 MHz base clock indicates potential thermal throttling under sustained loads.

Streaming: The GPU includes 192 tensor cores and dedicated RT hardware, which enables hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based upscaling. The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding, overlays, and chat simultaneously. The 20 GB VRAM allows for high-bitrate streaming at high resolutions without memory pressure, though the 160-bit bus limits bandwidth for simultaneous game and encode workloads.

Video editing: The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate accelerate effects, color grading, and timeline scrubbing. The 20 GB VRAM accommodates large 4K and 8K timelines, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27941 handles export and rendering tasks. The 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional for 8K workflows.

3D rendering: The GPU's 95th-percentile position, with 6144 shading units and 48 RT cores, delivers strong ray-traced and rasterized render performance. The CPU's multicore score of 27941 in Cinebench R23 supports viewport interaction and CPU-based renderers. The combination is well-suited for Blender, Maya, and similar tools, with the GPU handling most render work and the CPU managing scene complexity.

Software development: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide parallel compilation capability, with Geekbench multicore of 12728 indicating solid throughput for build servers. The 30 MB L3 cache and DDR5 memory support speed up large codebase compilation and testing. The GPU's tensor cores can accelerate machine learning workloads, making this suitable for AI development.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide an efficient baseline for document processing, web browsing, and light multitasking. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but it enables future-proofing for more demanding coursework. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running analyses.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and boosts to 2175 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is on the lower side for a workstation GPU, but the generous 20 GB capacity exceeds most competing products in the same class. The GPU delivers 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 26.73 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. Power draw is 130 W TDP, requiring a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 300 W PSU.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842, with an average of 135218. The 95th-percentile ranking places it among the top 5% of GPUs. The nearest rivals — NVIDIA A10M (135230), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135396), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135774), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (136472) — all score within 0.9% of the RTX 4000 Ada, indicating a tightly competitive workstation GPU tier. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display output via 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, measures 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height, and is single-slot.

For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 192 tensor cores enable AI denoising and DLSS-style upscaling. The 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles complex 3D scenes, and the 20 GB VRAM supports large texture sets and high-resolution rendering. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenes, but the capacity compensates for the narrower bus.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay. The GPU's 95th-percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle modern titles at high settings, while the CPU's 64th-percentile ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games.

At 1080p, the CPU is likely the primary bottleneck in most games, with the 5.1 GHz boost clock helping but the 1900 MHz base clock potentially causing frame dips in heavy scenes. Estimated frame rates for competitive titles like esports shooters could exceed 200 FPS, while AAA games might range from 120-180 FPS depending on title. At 1440p, the GPU begins to take more load, with estimated frame rates of 100-150 FPS in demanding titles and 150-200+ FPS in lighter games. At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, with estimated frame rates of 60-100 FPS in AAA titles and 100-140 FPS in less demanding games.

The 20 GB VRAM ensures no texture memory limitations at any resolution, even with ultra-quality packs. The 160-bit bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause minor performance drops in games that stream large textures, but this is unlikely to be noticeable in most titles. Ray tracing performance, supported by 48 RT cores, should provide playable frame rates at 1440p with DLSS enabled, though the workstation-class drivers are not optimized for gaming in the same way as GeForce drivers.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need workstation-grade GPU performance with a capable but not extreme CPU. The GPU's 95th-percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing, and machine learning, where the 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle large workloads. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores support ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workflows.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will benefit from the GPU's high pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s, while the CPU's 24 threads handle encoding and multitasking. Developers building AI models can leverage the tensor cores, and the ECC memory support on the CPU ensures data integrity during long training runs. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the combination capable for coursework, though the GPU is over-provisioned for typical student needs. Small business workstations requiring reliability and ECC memory support will appreciate the CPU's feature set, while the GPU handles CAD and visualization tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core i7-13700E with NVIDIA's RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part on Intel Socket 1700, while the GPU is a single-slot Ada Lovelace workstation card with 20 GB GDDR6. The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper fifth of all benchmarked configurations.

The pairing represents an asymmetric tier: the GPU at the 95th percentile is a top-tier workstation component, while the CPU at the 64th percentile is a solid mid-range desktop processor. This creates a system that excels in GPU-accelerated workloads but may feel CPU-limited in general-purpose computing tasks. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP combine for a modest total power draw, making this a relatively efficient high-performance build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear GPU-favorable imbalance. The GPU's 95th-percentile ranking far exceeds the CPU's 64th percentile, meaning the CPU will bottleneck the GPU in most tasks. In gaming, this is most apparent at lower resolutions where the CPU's frame generation limit is reached before the GPU's rendering capacity. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27941 is respectable, but the nearest CPU rivals are server-class parts from older generations, suggesting the i7 is not a top-tier performer by modern standards.

The GPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.9% of each other, indicating a saturated performance tier where the RTX 4000 Ada is at the upper edge. In contrast, the CPU's rivals span a 2.5% range (from 7910 to 8110), showing more variation in CPU performance. This suggests the GPU is more consistently at the top of its class than the CPU is of its class.

For GPU-bound workloads like rendering, ray tracing, and machine learning, the system performs at its full potential. For CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation, AI inference on CPU, or heavily threaded compilation, the CPU will limit overall throughput to roughly the 64th-percentile level. The combined 80th percentile reflects this split — the system is better than the CPU alone but not as strong as the GPU alone.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory available. PCIe Gen 5 is provided via 16 CPU lanes, and the CPU includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated fallback. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slot.

Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for desktop platforms, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency. The 65 W TDP CPU leaves thermal headroom for a larger cooler or overclocking, given the unlocked multiplier.

The GPU requires a 300 W suggested PSU and uses a single 16-pin power connector, with a 130 W TDP. This leaves substantial PSU headroom for additional components. The GPU's predecessor is Workstation Ampere and successor is Blackwell PRO W, indicating an active product lifecycle. The single-slot form factor (245 mm length, 112 mm height) fits in most desktop cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier CPU on the same Socket 1700 platform, such as a Core i9 part with more cores, to better match the GPU's 95th-percentile performance. Alternatively, adding a second GPU for compute workloads is possible given the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the single 16-pin connector limits power options. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so memory upgrades are flexible.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds