SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: Desktop Workstation Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Turing-based Quadro RTX 5000 professional graphics card, targeting a desktop workstation configuration. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combined platform a 66th percentile ranking. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct frame-rate measurements.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance statements are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,309 indicate a GPU that can handle modern titles at high settings, though its professional Quadro drivers are optimized for workstation applications rather than gaming. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 140, suggesting that this GPU's older Turing architecture may not scale as well in titles that heavily utilize DX12 features.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated gaming performance would be strong for esports and mid-range titles, with the CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2,437 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,944 providing adequate headroom for high-refresh-rate gaming in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth should prevent VRAM-related bottlenecks at this resolution, even in texture-heavy titles. However, the 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores are first-generation Turing hardware, so ray-traced workloads would likely run at significantly lower frame rates compared to modern GPUs.

At 1440p, the estimated frame rates would be moderate, with the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor in most titles. The Quadro RTX 5000's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is competitive for its era, but the 12 nm process and older architecture place it well behind current-generation gaming GPUs in the same performance class. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 puts this GPU roughly on par with a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (which scores 21,856, a 1% delta), indicating that users should expect mainstream-level gaming performance rather than enthusiast-tier frame rates.

At 4K resolution, the estimated gaming experience would be limited, as the GPU's 256-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding AAA titles. The PassMark DirectX 10 score of 113 and DirectX 9 score of 195 suggest that older titles and lighter esports games would run well, but modern games with advanced rendering techniques would likely require significant settings reductions to achieve smooth gameplay. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads would not be the bottleneck here; the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth constraints would dominate.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 66, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all recorded desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700E compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7,957, placing it 0.1% above the AMD EPYC 7551P (7,952), 0.6% above the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7,910), 1.4% below the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8,071), and 1.9% below the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (8,110).

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 had a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. It was released on 2018-08-12 and is now end-of-life, with the Workstation Ampere series as its successor.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU's power connector requirement and suggested PSU?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 230 W.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 5000 compare to the RTX A4000 Mobile?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21,629, which is 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile's score of 21,379.

Q: What API support does the GPU provide?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 modules or higher-bandwidth DDR5 kits depending on their workload requirements. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for discrete graphics, which offers substantial bandwidth headroom even for future GPU upgrades, though the current Quadro RTX 5000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The platform also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest for a 16-core processor, meaning most Socket 1700 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it without issue. This leaves power headroom for GPU upgrades, as the Quadro RTX 5000's suggested PSU of 550 W is well within the range of typical mid-range power supplies. The GPU's dual-slot design and 267 mm length (10.5 inches) require a case with sufficient clearance, but the single 6-pin and 8-pin connectors are standard for most power supplies.

For a sensible next upgrade path, users could consider replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a more modern workstation GPU, as the PCIe Gen 5 CPU interface would not bottleneck even the fastest current graphics cards. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to push performance further, though the modest 65 W TDP suggests limited thermal headroom for sustained all-core overclocks. The platform supports up to 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which benefits multi-threaded workloads that rely on data locality. However, with the GPU being end-of-life since its 2018 release, the most impactful upgrade would be swapping the graphics card for a newer model that supports more recent rendering features and higher memory bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the i7-13700E and Quadro RTX 5000 depends heavily on the workload type. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 and Geekbench multi-core score of 12,728 indicate strong multi-threaded capability, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 show moderate compute performance. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data processing, or spreadsheet-heavy office tasks, the processor would be the primary driver, and the GPU would sit largely idle. Conversely, GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, or scientific simulations that leverage CUDA cores would see the Quadro RTX 5000 as the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated rather than measured, suggests that at lower resolutions the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,944) would keep frame rates high in games that don't heavily utilize multiple cores. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would cap performance well below what the CPU could feed. The 1% delta between the Quadro RTX 5000 and the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in average benchmark scores reinforces that this GPU is a mid-range performer by modern standards, creating a noticeable imbalance with the high-end CPU.

For professional rendering workloads, the balance shifts more favorably. The GPU's 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs provide solid rasterization throughput, while the 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores enable AI-accelerated and ray-traced rendering tasks, though at a performance level that has since been surpassed. The CPU's 16 cores would feed the GPU effectively in most rendering pipelines, meaning the bottleneck would primarily be GPU compute rather than CPU preparation of geometry and scene data. The 2.3% delta above the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and 1.8% above the AMD Radeon HD 8970M in benchmark scores places this GPU in a specific performance envelope that users should consider carefully for their target applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a base clock of 1900 MHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that belies its multi-threaded capability. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial data locality for demanding workloads. This processor also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display adapter or accelerate media encoding tasks.

In Cinebench benchmarks, the CPU scores 2,816 in R15 multi-core, 397 in R15 single-core, 11,735 in R20 multi-core, 1,656 in R20 single-core, 27,941 in R23 multi-core, and 3,944 in R23 single-core. These scores reveal a processor with balanced multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, though the multi-core scores are particularly strong for a 65 W part. The Geekbench scores of 12,728 multi-core and 2,437 single-core further confirm this pattern. The average benchmark score of 7,957 places it at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, with the closest rivals being the AMD EPYC 7551P (0.1% higher), Intel Core i9-10980XE (0.6% lower), Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (1.4% higher), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (1.9% higher).

For real workloads, this CPU excels in multi-threaded applications such as video rendering, 3D modeling, data analysis, and software compilation, where the 24 threads provide substantial parallel throughput. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for responsive daily use and lightly-threaded applications. The unlocked multiplier allows enthusiasts to push clocks higher, though the 65 W TDP may require careful power management to avoid thermal throttling. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for system builders, while ECC memory support makes this CPU suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination targets professionals who need a desktop workstation for compute-heavy tasks rather than gaming. The 64th percentile CPU ranking and 67th percentile GPU ranking indicate a balanced mid-to-upper-tier system suitable for users who require both strong multi-threaded processing and dedicated graphics acceleration. Content creators working with video editing software would benefit from the CPU's 16 cores for timeline rendering and export tasks, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides ample space for large textures and complex compositions in 3D applications.

Software developers and data analysts would find value in the CPU's multi-threaded performance for code compilation and data processing, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 indicating strong parallel throughput. Students and small business users running office applications, web development tools, or database management would experience smooth multitasking, though the GPU's professional features may be underutilized in these scenarios. The ECC memory support makes this platform suitable for financial modeling or scientific computing where memory errors are unacceptable.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p would find this system adequate for mainstream titles, but the GPU's age and professional focus mean frame rates would lag behind dedicated gaming GPUs in the same price class. The estimated gaming performance, based on the PassMark G3D score of 15,616, would be comparable to a mid-range gaming card from several generations ago. Users who prioritize high-refresh-rate gaming or ray-traced effects should look elsewhere, as the Turing architecture's 48 RT cores deliver limited ray-tracing performance. The target audience is therefore professionals who need a reliable workstation GPU with 16 GB VRAM and a powerful CPU for compute workloads, not gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 545 mm² containing 13,600 million transistors. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is connected via a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute performance is rated at 11.15 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 22.30 TFLOPS for FP16 operations (2:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 78,999 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92,309 in Geekbench Vulkan, demonstrating strong compute capability for workstation tasks. However, the PassMark scores tell a more nuanced story: DirectX 10 scores 113, DirectX 11 scores 140, DirectX 12 scores 59, and DirectX 9 scores 195. The significant drop in DX12 performance relative to DX11 suggests that this architecture's driver optimization and hardware features are better suited to older graphics APIs.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is a substantial advantage over consumer cards with 8 GB or less, allowing larger scenes and higher-resolution textures to be processed without swapping to system memory. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports complex shading and post-processing effects, while the tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and upscaling in compatible applications. The average benchmark score of 21,629 places this GPU 1% below the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, 1.2% above the RTX A4000 Mobile, 1.8% above the Radeon HD 8970M, and 2.3% above the Radeon RX Vega M GL, indicating that raw performance is modest by current standards but adequate for professional workloads that prioritize stability and VRAM capacity over raw speed.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700E (Raptor Lake, 16 cores, 24 threads) with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Turing, 16 GB GDDR6) to create a professional workstation configuration. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 230 W TDP combine for a system that requires a 550 W power supply, which is moderate for a desktop workstation. The combined percentile ranking of 66 indicates that this system outperforms most desktop configurations in the benchmark database, though it does not reach the top tier of performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 7,957 and the GPU's average score of 21,629 highlight a configuration where the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, especially considering that the GPU's nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, is a mainstream consumer card. This is a workstation-class build designed for compute, rendering, and professional applications rather than gaming, and the component choices reflect that focus. The CPU's ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 interface, and integrated UHD Graphics 770 complement the GPU's professional feature set, including 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs.

The production status of the components differs significantly: the CPU is active and was released in January 2023, while the GPU is end-of-life and was released in August 2018. This mismatch suggests that the build may represent a system that was assembled with a newer processor and an older workstation GPU, possibly as a budget-conscious upgrade path or a specialized configuration for legacy software compatibility. The GPU's successor, Workstation Ampere, offers newer features, but the Turing architecture's 12 nm process and 230 W TDP remain serviceable for many professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700E achieves an average benchmark score of 7,957, placing it at the 64th percentile among all CPUs. Its strongest results are in multi-threaded tests, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 27,941 and Geekbench multi-core scoring 12,728. Single-threaded performance is also respectable, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3,944 and Geekbench single-core at 2,437. The closest CPU rival is the AMD EPYC 7551P at 7,952 (0.1% higher), followed by the Intel Core i9-10980XE at 7,910 (0.6% lower), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 at 8,071 (1.4% higher), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M at 8,110 (1.9% higher).

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 achieves an average benchmark score of 21,629, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its standout results include Geekbench Vulkan at 92,309 and Geekbench OpenCL at 78,999, indicating strong compute performance. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 is the primary gaming-oriented metric, while PassMark GPU compute scores 6,525. The closest GPU rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB at 21,856 (1% higher), followed by the RTX A4000 Mobile at 21,379 (1.2% lower), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M at 21,237 (1.8% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21,153 (2.3% lower).

The combined picture shows a system with balanced CPU and GPU performance, both sitting within a few percentage points of their nearest competitors. The CPU's multi-threaded strength is particularly notable, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 indicating strong capability for rendering and compilation tasks. The GPU's compute scores suggest it handles OpenCL and Vulkan workloads well, though its DirectX 12 performance (PassMark score of 59) lags behind its DirectX 11 result (140), which could impact gaming performance in modern titles. At the 66th combined percentile, this build represents a solid mid-to-upper-tier workstation configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build delivers estimated moderate frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates limitations in modern titles. The CPU's single-core performance would keep frame rates stable, but the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps overall gaming performance below enthusiast levels.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle encoding workloads effectively, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 providing ample parallel throughput for software encoding. The GPU's NVENC-like tensor cores (384 total) can assist with AI-based tasks, though the Turing architecture may lack the latest encoding features.

Video editing: The combination of strong CPU multi-threaded performance and 16 GB GPU VRAM supports timeline editing, color grading, and export tasks. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K footage, while the CPU's compute capability accelerates effects rendering and final export.

3D rendering: The Quadro RTX 5000's 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 16 GB VRAM allows large scenes to fit in GPU memory. The CPU's 24 threads feed geometry and scene data efficiently, creating a balanced rendering pipeline.

Software development: The CPU's multi-core scores (Geekbench multi-core of 12,728) accelerate code compilation and test execution, while the GPU's compute capability supports CUDA-based development. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running builds or simulations.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's 16 cores ensure smooth multitasking with many applications open. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback, and the GPU's professional drivers offer stability for specialized academic software, though the 230 W GPU TDP and dual-slot design may be unnecessary for light workloads.