SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050: A Balanced Desktop Pairing

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700E, a 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The combination sits at the 65th percentile among all desktop pairings, with the CPU at the 64th percentile and the GPU at the 66th percentile, indicating a well-matched duo where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The data shows a system aimed at mainstream performance, but the specific strengths and weaknesses of each part reveal a more nuanced picture worth investigating.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, which anchors the system to the 13th generation Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, offering flexibility in memory selection based on availability and user preference. This dual-support feature is notable because it allows builders to reuse existing DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 kits, though the exact performance implications are not quantified in the benchmark data. The processor also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation-class reliability, which broadens its appeal beyond pure consumer gaming.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing substantial bandwidth for modern storage devices and expansion cards. The GPU, however, interfaces through PCIe 5.0 x8, which is half the lane width of the CPU’s maximum, but still a high-bandwidth connection for the RTX 5050. The power delivery situation is straightforward: the CPU has a 65W TDP, while the GPU has a 130W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 300W. This leaves headroom for additional components, but the 300W recommendation suggests the system is not designed for extreme overclocking or multiple high-power peripherals. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing for manual overclocking, but the modest TDP implies that thermal and power constraints would limit aggressive tuning.

Looking at a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the CPU is the stronger long-term asset. Its 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, give it headroom for productivity tasks that the GPU might struggle with at higher resolutions. A future GPU upgrade would be feasible within the 300W PSU budget, but a more powerful card would likely require a PSU bump. Conversely, the RTX 5050’s 8GB VRAM and 128-bit bus could become a bottleneck in VRAM-heavy scenarios, making a GPU swap the more urgent upgrade for gamers targeting 1440p or higher with max textures. The platform’s DDR4/DDR5 flexibility also means a memory upgrade path exists without changing the motherboard, though the exact performance gains are not specified.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RTX 5050’s PassMark G3D score of 17326 and its 66th percentile ranking indicate solid mid-range performance. The CPU’s single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 suggests sufficient processing power to keep frame rates high in CPU-bound titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact refresh rate expectations remain estimates.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941, which places it 64th percentile overall, is nearly 7x its single-core score, indicating strong parallel processing capability for encoding and rendering tasks. The GPU’s tensor cores, numbering 80, could accelerate AI-based streaming features, though the specific impact is not quantified.

Video editing software often relies on both CPU and GPU acceleration. The i7-13700E’s Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 suggests responsive timeline editing, while the RTX 5050’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide adequate GPU acceleration for effects and color grading. The 8GB VRAM may limit working with very high-resolution footage or complex multi-layer compositions.

3D rendering workloads are heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU’s 16 cores shine here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11735 and R15 score of 2816 demonstrate consistent scaling across render benchmark generations. The GPU’s 20 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which would speed up compatible render engines, but the 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 figure is modest compared to higher-tier GPUs, suggesting longer render times for GPU-accelerated scenes.

Software development tasks, such as compiling large codebases, benefit from the CPU’s thread count and boost clock. The Geekbench single-core score of 2437 indicates solid per-thread performance for code analysis tools, while the multi-core score of 12728 handles parallel builds efficiently. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build servers where data integrity is critical.

For student and office work, this build is overkill in raw compute but practical in daily use. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is unavailable, and the CPU’s 65W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a system that may run all day. The dual DDR4/DDR5 support allows budget-conscious configurations without sacrificing future upgradeability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark profile shows a clear multi-core orientation. In Cinebench R23, it scores 27941 multi-core and 3944 single-core, a ratio of approximately 7.1:1, highlighting its strength in parallel workloads. The Geekbench results confirm this trend with a multi-core score of 12728 versus a single-core score of 2437, a ratio of about 5.2:1. The Cinebench R20 scores of 11735 multi-core and 1656 single-core follow the same pattern, while the R15 scores of 2816 and 397 are consistent with earlier-generation benchmarks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 7957 places it at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered closely: the AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7952 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7910 (0.6% lower), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8071 (1.4% higher), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8110 (1.9% higher). This tight grouping suggests the i7-13700E performs in the same tier as these server and HEDT chips, despite being a mainstream desktop part, which is a notable achievement for its 65W TDP.

The GPU’s benchmark suite shows a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2502, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 90334 and 89381, respectively. The PassMark suite reveals interesting variance: DirectX 11 scores 150, DirectX 12 scores 66, DirectX 10 scores 103, and DirectX 9 scores 186. The G3D score is 17326, and the GPU compute score is 9184. The average benchmark score of 21035 places the RTX 5050 at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, 0.6% higher), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, 1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, 1.6% lower), and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, 1.6% higher). The clustering within 1.6% suggests the RTX 5050 delivers performance comparable to these older or mobile parts, which is indicative of its mid-range positioning.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 65, with the CPU at 64 and GPU at 66, suggests a balanced pairing where neither component is a severe bottleneck in most workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The RTX 5050’s 8GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are modest, and its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 66 is notably lower than its DirectX 11 score of 150, which could indicate driver optimization issues or architectural limitations in certain DX12 titles. This could manifest as frame rate drops in modern games that heavily utilize DX12 features.

In contrast, the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for gaming, where most titles use fewer than 8 cores. The single-core performance, while not top-tier at the 64th percentile, is sufficient to avoid being the primary limiter in most games. The bottleneck in gaming would likely be the GPU, particularly in scenarios with high graphical settings or resolution scaling.

For productivity workloads, the CPU becomes the more critical component. The multi-core scores are strong, but the GPU’s compute capabilities, as measured by the PassMark GPU compute score of 9184, could be a limiting factor in GPU-accelerated applications. The 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning inference that rely heavily on GPU compute might see the GPU as the bottleneck, despite the CPU’s ready availability of cores.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. The data is estimated from benchmark scores, so the balance analysis relies on the percentile alignment. The 1-2% delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles indicates a harmonious pairing, but the specific workload determines which component constrains performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5nm process at TSMC, with 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. This transistor density of 113.4M per mm² is high, reflecting the advanced process node. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The clock speeds are 2317 MHz base and 2572 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 2500 MHz, translating to 20 Gbps effective.

The 8GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. This is a modest amount of VRAM for modern games, which increasingly demand more than 8GB at high settings and resolutions. The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 13.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-precision advantage. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The benchmark scores reveal a GPU that performs best in compute-heavy tasks relative to gaming. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 is strong, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 66 is surprisingly low, especially compared to DirectX 11’s 150. This discrepancy could indicate that the RTX 5050 is optimized for older DX11 titles or that driver maturity is lacking for DX12 workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 provides a more standardized measure, but without comparison points, it is difficult to contextualize. The 20 RT cores suggest capable ray tracing performance for a mid-range card, but the 8GB VRAM might limit ray tracing at high resolutions due to memory pressure. The 80 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI features, which could offset raw performance deficits in supported games.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balanced desktop system for both gaming and productivity. Gamers at 1080p resolution would benefit from the GPU’s mid-range performance, as indicated by its 66th percentile ranking, though the lack of measured FPS means exact settings and frame rates are estimates. Those playing at 1440p might find the 8GB VRAM limiting in newer titles, but the CPU’s strong single-core performance would support high frame rates in less demanding games.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would appreciate the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, which deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941. The GPU’s tensor cores and RT cores add acceleration for AI effects and ray-traced rendering, though the 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not class-leading. Software developers and students in computer science would find the ECC memory support and multi-threaded performance valuable for compiling and running virtual machines.

Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications, such as data analysis or engineering simulations, would benefit from the CPU’s parallel capabilities and the GPU’s compute performance. The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP, with a 300W suggested PSU, make this a low-power system suitable for always-on environments. The dual DDR4/DDR5 support also allows businesses to choose memory based on existing inventory or cost considerations. However, users requiring high-end gaming at 4K or heavy GPU compute would need to look at higher-tier options, as the RTX 5050’s 8GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are clear limitations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5050’s PassMark G3D score of 17326 and its 66th percentile ranking suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming GPU, capable of high settings in most titles, but the DirectX 12 score of 66 raises questions about performance in modern, API-heavy games. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core strength should prevent bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rates.

For 1440p gaming, the GPU’s 8GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth could become limiting factors in texture-heavy games, potentially requiring reduced settings to maintain smooth performance. The 130W TDP and dual-slot design suggest adequate cooling for sustained gaming, but the 1x 8-pin power connector limits overclocking headroom. The 20 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but enabling it would likely significantly impact frame rates given the modest FP32 performance.

The absence of measured data means these are projections, not certainties. The benchmark scores indicate a system that could handle esports titles at high refresh rates and AAA games at medium-high settings, but the exact frame rates would depend on game optimization and driver maturity. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 150 suggests better performance in older titles, which could make this a good choice for players with extensive back catalogs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5050 have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its rivals?

A: The CPU scores 27941 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it 0.1% above the AMD EPYC 7551P and 1.9% below the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing, and how many RT cores does it have?

A: Yes, the RTX 5050 has 20 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5050 is 300 W, with the CPU having a 65W TDP and the GPU a 130W TDP.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact pairing; all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 1900 MHz, which boosts to 5.10 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 is particularly strong, as is the Geekbench multi-core score of 12728. However, the single-core scores, such as 3944 in Cinebench R23 and 2437 in Geekbench, are relatively modest, placing the CPU at the 64th percentile overall. This suggests that while the CPU can handle heavy parallel tasks, its per-core performance is not top-tier.

The nearest rivals include server and HEDT chips like the AMD EPYC 7551P and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M, which have similar average scores. This indicates that the i7-13700E is competitive with much more expensive workstation processors in multi-core scenarios, despite its mainstream desktop positioning and 65W TDP. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output and compute fallback, which is useful for troubleshooting or light tasks. The production status is active, with a release date of January 3, 2023, and the part number is SRMG3.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i7-13700E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, representing a mainstream pairing that sits at the 65th combined percentile. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941, while the GPU’s 8GB VRAM and 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance offer mid-range graphical capabilities.

The system is classified as a desktop build, with the CPU on Intel Socket 1700 and the GPU using a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The power requirements are modest, with a 65W CPU TDP, 130W GPU TDP, and a 300W suggested PSU, making it suitable for a variety of case sizes and power supplies. The overall tier, based on the 65th percentile, indicates a system that is above average but not high-end, appealing to users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for gaming and productivity without extreme power consumption.

The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest a capable 1080p machine and a competent productivity workstation. The build’s strengths lie in multi-core CPU tasks and GPU compute, while its weaknesses are the GPU’s limited VRAM and modest DX12 performance. For users seeking a quiet, efficient, and versatile desktop, this pairing offers a compelling option, though enthusiasts requiring maximum gaming performance or 4K capabilities would need to consider higher-tier components.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds