SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

79 Score

Top 21% Ranking

79 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 21% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a desktop combination that leans heavily on CPU throughput while the GPU anchors the low end of the 40-series lineup. Benchmark data places this pairing at the 41st percentile overall, indicating a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity but is clearly constrained in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 card with a 64-bit memory bus and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is not this build’s strength. The RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893. That score places it within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, -0.5%) and RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, -0.7%) in the same test, which is surprising given the massive VRAM difference, but the 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck high-refresh 1080p in modern titles. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3944 is strong, so frame pacing in eSports titles at lower settings could be acceptable, but ultra settings at high refresh rates are out of reach.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 places the i7-13700E at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, with the nearest rival being the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071 avg, -1.4%). The RTX 4010 has 24 tensor cores and 6 RT cores, which can offload encoding and AI-based features, but the GPU’s low VRAM (4 GB) and 18th percentile standing mean simultaneous game capture and encode will strain the system. The CPU can handle software encoding comfortably given its multi-threaded lead.

Video editing is a mixed bag. The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11735 indicate strong rendering performance for timeline operations and export tasks. However, the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest, so GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will lag. The 4 GB VRAM is also a hard limit for 4K timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering leans entirely on the CPU. The i7-13700E’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2816 and R20 score of 11735 show it can handle CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Blender Cycles with relative ease. The GPU, with only 16 ROPs and 24 TMUs, will not accelerate ray-traced renders meaningfully. For GPU renderers, the RTX 4010’s 6 RT cores are present but the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is a fraction of what dedicated render cards offer.

Software development is a strong use case. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, paired with 30 MB of shared L3 cache, provide ample parallel headroom for compilation and testing. The Geekbench single-core score of 2437 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 397 indicate responsive single-thread performance for code editing and tooling. The 64th percentile CPU ranking means this build outperforms roughly two-thirds of all CPUs in general compute, which is ideal for build servers or local development workstations.

Student and office work is more than sufficient. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the GPU is underutilized, and the 65 W TDP keeps power draw low. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the system’s 41st combined percentile means it is not a top-tier machine for any single task, yet it handles all office workloads without complaint.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a strong multi-threaded showing. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 is the highest single benchmark result in the pack, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 confirms broad parallel capability. The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 7957, placing it at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7551P (7952, +0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910, +0.6%), meaning the i7-13700E essentially matches those server and HEDT parts in aggregate, while beating the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071, -1.4%) and Xeon Platinum 8180M (8110, -1.9%) by roughly 1.4% and 1.9%, respectively.

The GPU’s only benchmark in the pack is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 2893. That number places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, a low position. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, -0.5%), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, -0.6%), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, -0.7%), and Quadro P600 (2923, -1.0%). The deltaPct values show the RTX 4010 is within 1% of all four rivals, meaning the benchmark score alone does not separate it from much faster-looking cards; the real differentiators are the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 41, which reflects the CPU’s above-average compute dragging up a GPU that is in the bottom fifth.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU is a capable mid-high range workstation part, while the GPU is a low-end entry-level card. The avgBenchmarkScore for the CPU is 7957, and the GPU’s only score is 2893, so any workload that scales with GPU compute will see the system fall to the 18th percentile, while CPU-bound tasks rise to the 64th.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a Raptor Lake-S desktop part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 16 cores and 24 threads, which implies a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the core mix. The base clock is 1900.00 MHz, boosting to 5.10 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W. Cache is organized as 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3, which is a generous amount for a 16-core part.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s positioning. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 is a strong result, and the single-core score of 3944 indicates that the 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers solid responsiveness. Geekbench single-core of 2437 and multi-core of 12728 align with the Cinebench results. The average benchmark score of 7957 and 64th percentile ranking put it in the same league as server CPUs like the EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8180M, which have far higher TDPs and core counts in the real world, but the benchmark data shows the i7-13700E matches them on these specific tests.

In real workloads, the CPU’s multi-threaded lead means tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation will see significant throughput. The single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 suggests that daily application responsiveness—browser rendering, office suite operations, and lightweight code editing—will feel brisk. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, and the dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though the FACT PACK does not specify memory bandwidth numbers. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display output even without the discrete GPU, which is a fallback option for troubleshooting or basic tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus; the FACT PACK does not list a memory bandwidth figure, but the dual-channel architecture is standard for desktop. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is current-generation and allows for fast NVMe SSDs or future GPUs. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is possible if the motherboard and cooling allow, though the 65 W TDP suggests the stock power envelope is modest.

The GPU is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a 50 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. This means the entire system, with the CPU at 65 W and GPU at 50 W, draws well under 150 W at peak, making it suitable for small form factor or office builds with modest power supplies. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it will not saturate the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, but the x8 interface is sufficient for a card with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU has headroom to drive a much faster card. The CPU’s 64th percentile ranking and high multi-core scores suggest it will not bottleneck any current GPU in the data, including the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, -0.5%) or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, -0.6%), which score similarly to the RTX 4010 in Steel Nomad but have far more VRAM. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will have bandwidth headroom. Memory-wise, moving from DDR4 to DDR5 would improve bandwidth, but the FACT PACK does not quantify the performance difference.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 18th percentile. The combined percentile is 41, which is almost exactly the midpoint between the two, indicating that neither component fully compensates for the other’s shortcomings. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, or multi-tasking, the system will perform near the 64th percentile, meaning it beats most systems. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, or machine learning inference, the system will fall to the 18th percentile.

The FPS scaling follows this pattern. The RTX 4010’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 is within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, -0.5%), but the RTX 4060 Ti has 16 GB VRAM versus 4 GB, so at higher resolutions or with larger textures, the RTX 4010 will hit VRAM limits long before the 4060 Ti. The CPU’s single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive most games at 1080p, but the GPU’s 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates in any modern title. The bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU is the constraint, and the CPU will remain underutilized in most gaming scenarios.

For productivity, the balance flips. The CPU’s multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 27941, Geekbench multi-core 12728) dominate, and the GPU’s low compute (2.706 TFLOPS FP32) means it will not accelerate most CPU-bound tasks. The system is balanced only if the user’s primary workload is CPU-heavy; any GPU-dependent task will be severely limited.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a 40-series branded card, but its chip is GA107, which is Ampere architecture, not the Ada Lovelace used in other 40-series parts. It is built on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. Clock speeds are a base of 1417 MHz and a boost of 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz, which is 12 Gbps effective on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6, which is the smallest in the 40-series lineup. This is a hard limit for modern games at 1080p ultra, where VRAM usage often exceeds 6 GB. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s, both low figures that reflect the 16 ROPs and 24 TMUs. FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no consumer-focused FP16 acceleration.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 places it at the 18th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, -0.5%) and RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, -0.7%), which score nearly identically but have 4x and 2x the VRAM, respectively. That gap in VRAM will cause the RTX 4010 to fail in scenarios where the 4060 Ti succeeds—specifically, any game or render with high-resolution textures. The RT and tensor cores are present (6 and 24, respectively), so ray tracing and DLSS are technically supported, but the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM mean ray tracing will be impractical at playable frame rates, and DLSS quality modes will be needed to compensate.

Gaming Performance

The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 and 18th percentile position indicate that it is a low-end card for gaming. The CPU’s single-core performance is strong, but the GPU’s 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM will be the primary constraints.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 4010 will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most AAA titles. The 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate are roughly comparable to entry-level cards from prior generations, so expect frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for demanding games. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and stuttering in titles that require more than 4 GB, which includes many recent releases at ultra quality. Lowering settings to medium or high will reduce VRAM pressure, but the 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will still cap performance in scenes with heavy texture streaming.

At 1440p, the RTX 4010 is not viable for ultra settings. The 64-bit bus and 4 GB VRAM will cause severe frame drops, and the 3DMark score relative to the RTX 4060 Ti (which is within 0.5%) suggests the card’s raw compute is adequate for 1440p at low settings, but the VRAM will be the hard stop. eSports titles like CS2 or Valorant could run at high frame rates with reduced settings, as the CPU’s single-core score of 3944 and the GPU’s modest pixel rate are sufficient for those lighter workloads. For any modern single-player game, the estimated FPS at 1080p ultra will be below 60, and at 1440p ultra, below 30.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance bottleneck in this build?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. It sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893, while the CPU is at the 64th percentile with an average benchmark score of 7957. The combined percentile is 41, reflecting the GPU dragging down the system in graphics-intensive workloads.

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 0.5% below the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907). However, the RTX 4010 has 4 GB VRAM versus 16 GB, so real-world performance in VRAM-heavy scenarios will be far worse despite the similar benchmark number.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU can handle it well, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 and Geekbench multi-core of 12728. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K timelines with multiple layers, so 4K editing is possible but will be CPU-bound and may stutter with heavy effects.

Q: What power supply is required for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 50 W TDP, so a 250 W power supply provides sufficient headroom for the entire system under load.

Q: Is the CPU good for software development?

A: Yes. The 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 and 30 MB L3 cache, provide strong parallel performance for compilation and testing. The single-core score of 2437 in Geekbench ensures responsive code editing.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM make ray tracing impractical at playable frame rates in most titles.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E is at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7957. It is within 0.1% of the AMD EPYC 7551P (7952) and within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910).

Who Should Build It

This build targets users whose primary workload is CPU-heavy, not gaming. The i7-13700E’s 16 cores, 24 threads, and 64th percentile CPU ranking make it a strong choice for software developers, data analysts, and students running parallel computations or compiling large codebases. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 27941 indicate that 3D rendering with CPU-based engines, video encoding, and batch processing will all perform well above average.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tools—such as audio production, document processing, or CPU-based renderers—will find the system responsive. The 65 W TDP and 50 W GPU TDP mean the build runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for office environments or small business workstations where noise is a concern. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the 250 W suggested PSU means the system can run on a modest power supply.

Gamers should avoid this build for modern AAA titles at high settings. The RTX 4010’s 18th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM will cause stuttering and low frame rates at 1080p ultra. However, gamers who play eSports titles at lower settings, or who prioritize CPU performance for simulation or strategy games, may find the CPU’s single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 sufficient. The upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU, which has headroom above the 64th percentile, and replace the GPU with a card that has more VRAM and bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures the platform is ready for a future GPU upgrade.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds