SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU's base clock is 1900.00 MHz, but it can boost up to 5.10 GHz, which is a substantial frequency range that allows for both power efficiency at idle and high performance under load.

The core configuration is noteworthy. The 16 cores with 24 threads suggest a hybrid design typical of Raptor Lake, though the FACT PACK does not break down performance versus efficiency cores. What the data does show is a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This 30 MB L3 pool is critical for workloads that repeatedly access the same data, as it reduces the need to fetch from system memory. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, which gives builders flexibility in platform cost versus bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, a feature often sought after for workstation stability.

Benchmark results place this CPU in a specific performance tier. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 27941 and single-core score of 3944 indicate strong all-core throughput and respectable single-thread responsiveness. The Geekbench scores of 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core corroborate this positioning. The average benchmark score across all tests is 7957, which places the CPU at the 64th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a mid-to-upper tier placement, but the nearest rivals reveal an interesting picture. The AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7952, a delta of just 0.1%, meaning these two processors are effectively identical in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7910, 0.6% lower. The Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8071, 1.4% higher, and the Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8110, 1.9% higher. This cluster of scores, all within roughly 2% of each other, suggests that the i7-13700E is competing with server-class silicon from a few generations back, which is notable for a desktop part.

The implication for real workloads is that this CPU is not a top-tier extreme performer, but rather a very capable high-end desktop chip that punches near enterprise-class levels in multi-threaded tasks. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is particularly relevant for lightly-threaded workloads like gaming or application launch times, where single-core performance dominates. The 65W TDP is surprisingly low for this core count, suggesting that power efficiency was a design goal. This combination of high boost clocks, substantial L3 cache, and a modest TDP makes the 13700E a versatile processor for both productivity and interactive workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700E compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7551P?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the i7-13700E scoring 7957 and the EPYC 7551P scoring 7952. The delta is just 0.1%, meaning the two processors deliver essentially the same aggregate performance, despite the EPYC being a server-class part.

Q: What is the maximum single-core performance of this CPU?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3944, and the Geekbench single-core score is 2437. These scores, combined with the 5.10 GHz boost clock, indicate strong single-thread responsiveness suitable for everyday tasks and gaming.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates that ECC memory support is present. This is a significant feature for users who require data integrity in workstation or small server environments.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The i7-13700E sits at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. This means it outperforms the majority of processors in the database, but it is not in the top tier. The nearest rivals are all within 1.9% performance delta, indicating a crowded field around this performance level.

Q: Is the integrated GPU sufficient for basic display output?

A: The CPU includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. While the FACT PACK does not provide specific benchmark scores for the iGPU, its presence means the system can output video without a discrete GPU, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic office tasks.

Q: What memory types can this processor use?

A: The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 memory or higher-bandwidth DDR5, depending on platform budget and performance needs.

Q: What is the performance gap to the fastest rival listed?

A: The Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M has an average score of 8110, which is 1.9% higher than the i7-13700E's 7957. This is a very small margin, well within run-to-run variance for most benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, which places the system above the majority of builds in the database. However, the individual components tell a more nuanced story. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 73rd percentile. This 9-percentage-point gap suggests that the GPU is the slightly stronger component in this pairing.

For gaming workloads, this imbalance matters. The RTX 3090 is a high-end GPU, and at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance and frame pacing become more critical. The 13700E's 5.10 GHz boost clock and strong Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3944 suggest it can feed frames adequately, but the 64th percentile CPU ranking means it is not a top-tier gaming chip. At higher resolutions like 4K, the bottleneck shifts almost entirely to the GPU, where the RTX 3090's 73rd percentile ranking will be the limiting factor.

For productivity workloads, the balance is different. The CPU's multi-core score of 27941 in Cinebench R23 indicates robust all-core throughput, but the GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by a Passmark GPU compute score of 15356, can accelerate certain tasks like rendering or machine learning inference. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates. The benchmark scores suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor will be the limiting factor, while in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will dominate.

The 65W CPU TDP versus the 350W GPU TDP highlights the imbalance in power draw. The CPU is very power-efficient, while the GPU is a power-hungry beast. This means the system's overall performance in heavy workloads will be dictated by the GPU's thermal and power headroom, not the CPU's. For mixed workloads, the CPU and GPU can complement each other well, but users should expect the GPU to be the primary driver of performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i7-13700E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and high-end GPU acceleration. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking and the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking combine to create a system that excels in tasks that leverage both components.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's multi-core score of 27941 in Cinebench R23, which handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and Passmark G3D score of 26645 accelerate effects rendering and playback. 3D artists and architects using rendering engines that support GPU acceleration will find the RTX 3090's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 82 RT cores valuable for real-time viewport and final frame rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads, which show up in the Geekbench multi-core score of 12728. The support for ECC memory adds a layer of reliability for long-running build servers or data processing tasks. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage this system for both coursework and personal projects, given its balance of CPU and GPU horsepower.

Small business workstations running virtualization, database management, or complex financial modeling will find the CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support sufficient for moderate multi-tasking. The GPU's 24 GB memory is particularly useful for machine learning experimentation or large dataset visualization, tasks that often exceed the VRAM capacity of lower-tier cards.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution who also engage in content creation or streaming will find this pairing compelling. The CPU's single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth gameplay in most titles, while the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking handles high resolutions and detail settings.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a system that is slightly above average but not extreme. The CPU's average benchmark score is 7957, placing it at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD EPYC 7551P at 7952 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-10980XE at 7910 (0.6% lower), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 at 8071 (1.4% higher), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M at 8110 (1.9% higher). This clustering means the 13700E is performing at a level comparable to older enterprise processors, which is a strong result for a desktop chip.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 27565, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile at 27435 (0.5% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 27425 (0.5% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 at 27839 (1.0% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M at 27883 (1.1% higher). The RTX 3090 is thus in a performance tier that includes both mobile and desktop parts, with very small margins separating them.

Specific GPU benchmarks show strength in different areas. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 demonstrates excellent compute throughput for GPU-accelerated workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 26645 is the primary graphics performance indicator, while the Passmark GPU compute score of 15356 shows the card's compute potential is lower relative to its graphics performance.

The combined percentile of 69 is slightly below the GPU's individual percentile but above the CPU's, reflecting the balance of the pairing. The CPU is the weaker link in this system, but the gap is not so large as to cause significant bottlenecks in most workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3944 provide strong frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking ensures high frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The 24 GB VRAM is overkill for current games but future-proofs for high-resolution textures.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously, with the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 27941 ensuring minimal frame drops while streaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder, implied by the Ampere architecture, offloads streaming work from the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core throughput accelerates timeline operations and export rendering, while the GPU's 24 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers and GPU-accelerated effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 indicates strong compute performance for tasks like color grading or motion tracking.

3D rendering: The GPU's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 82 RT cores accelerate both rasterization and ray tracing workloads. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 24 threads handle scene preparation and physics simulations, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 providing a solid baseline.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads speed up compilation times, as indicated by the Geekbench multi-core score of 12728. The support for ECC memory adds stability for long-running build processes, while the GPU's compute capabilities can be used for local testing of machine learning models.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive basic displays without a discrete GPU. The system's overall 69th percentile ranking means it will handle spreadsheet, document, and web-based workloads with ease.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 64th percentile and the GPU's 73rd percentile provide a general indication of performance, but actual FPS will vary by title and resolution.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 suggests strong DirectX 12 game performance, which is important for modern titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 indicates that it can keep up with the GPU in most scenarios, though at 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in esports titles that rely heavily on single-thread performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking indicates it will be the primary driver of frame rates, with the CPU providing adequate support. At 4K, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck, given the high pixel count that stresses the GPU's 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 10496 shading units.

For competitive shooters at 1080p, the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and high single-core score should deliver high frame rates, though users should temper expectations given the CPU's 64th percentile ranking. For AAA titles at 1440p or 4K, the GPU's performance will dominate, and users can expect high settings to be playable, based on the GPU's strong Passmark G3D score of 26645.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 13th-generation Core i7 part with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is a 30-series Ampere architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 69 places this system above the majority of builds in the database, though not in the top tier.

The pairing is a high-end desktop workstation that leans toward GPU-heavy workloads. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking is respectable, but the GPU's 73rd percentile is stronger, making this a system where the graphics card is the primary performance driver. The 65W CPU TDP and 350W GPU TDP create a power imbalance, but the system as a whole is designed for demanding tasks.

The desktop class means this is a stationary system, not a laptop. The RTX 3090 is a triple-slot card that requires a 750 W power supply unit, as suggested in the FACT PACK. The overall tier is upper-midrange, with the GPU providing the majority of the performance headroom.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, which is forward-looking for fast NVMe storage or future GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots.

Memory support is flexible, with both DDR4 and DDR5 supported. This allows for a cost-effective build with DDR4 or a higher-bandwidth build with DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for this class of processor.

The system's power requirements are dictated by the GPU. The RTX 3090 has a TDP of 350 W and requires a 750 W power supply, according to the suggestedPsu field. The CPU's 65W TDP is modest, so the PSU headroom is primarily for the GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation GPU, as the RTX 3090 is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40-series as its successor. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, which means overclocking is possible, though the 65W TDP may limit headroom.

For storage, the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support means that the fastest NVMe drives are compatible, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0. This platform is well-suited for a high-performance workstation that may need to be upgraded over time.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is a high-end Ampere architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process node. The die is large at 628 mm², containing 28,300 million transistors, which translates to a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The GPU's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory runs on a 384-bit bus, delivering 936.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, a figure that is crucial for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The core configuration is substantial: 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. The 328 tensor cores and 82 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI and ray tracing workloads, respectively. The boost clock is 1695 MHz, with a base clock of 1395 MHz. The memory operates at 1219 MHz, which translates to 19.5 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 35.58 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which is a strong figure for a card of this class.

The benchmark data shows the GPU at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 27565. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 indicates solid DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 shows excellent compute throughput, which is valuable for rendering and scientific computing. The Passmark G3D score of 26645 is the primary graphics performance metric, while the Passmark GPU compute score of 15356 is notably lower, suggesting that compute performance is not the card's strongest aspect.

The nearest rivals are all within 1.1% performance delta, including the RTX 4070 Mobile, RX 6700 XT, Radeon Pro Vega 20, and RX 7800M. This indicates that the RTX 3090, despite being end-of-life, is still competitive with newer parts. The 24 GB VRAM is a key differentiator, as it exceeds the capacity of most rivals, making this card particularly suited for large model training, high-resolution rendering, and heavy texture workloads.