SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing represents a desktop configuration that sits in the upper-midrange of the benchmark database, with a combined percentile of 61. The CPU, a 16-core Raptor Lake-S part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, an Ampere-based entry-level card, offers solid 1080p-class capabilities. However, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than empirical results.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700E compare to its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 7551P?

A: The i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7957, which is 0.1% higher than the EPYC 7551P’s 7952. This makes the two effectively identical in overall synthetic performance, despite the EPYC being a server-class chip.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM sits at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199. This places it slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 7600, which scores 15171 (0.2% lower), but just below the AMD Radeon 680M, which scores 15270 (0.5% higher).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the i7-13700E?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This large delta between base and boost is typical of Raptor Lake parts, allowing for significant single-thread bursts when needed.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM perform in DirectX 11 versus DirectX 12?

A: In Passmark tests, the GPU scores 86 in DirectX 11 and 58 in DirectX 12. The DirectX 11 score is notably higher, suggesting that legacy APIs may run relatively better on this card, while newer DX12 titles might not scale as efficiently.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This is a modest figure that aligns with its entry-level positioning.

Q: Is the CPU’s integrated graphics capable of basic display output?

A: Yes, the i7-13700E includes UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU. This allows for basic display output and light tasks without a discrete card, though gaming performance would rely on the RTX 3050 OEM.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing is workable but not optimal. The i7-13700E’s single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong per-thread performance that can drive high frame rates, but the RTX 3050 OEM’s 57th percentile GPU ranking indicates it will likely be the limiting factor in most titles. Users targeting 144 Hz or higher should expect to lower settings, as the GPU’s 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 compute is modest by modern standards.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding workloads, with a multi-core score of 27941 in Cinebench R23 that dwarfs the GPU’s capabilities. However, the RTX 3050 OEM lacks the raw horsepower for simultaneous high-fidelity gaming and encoding without compromises, though NVIDIA’s NVENC (implied by the Ampere architecture) could offload some work.

Video editing benefits significantly from the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess. The i7-13700E scores 11735 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, which is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE, a former high-end desktop part. The GPU’s 60740 Geekbench OpenCL score can assist with effects and rendering, but the CPU will carry the bulk of timeline processing and export tasks.

3D rendering workloads favor the CPU heavily. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941, the i7-13700E outperforms the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 by 1.4%, making it a capable workstation CPU. The RTX 3050 OEM’s 5779 Passmark GPU compute score is functional for GPU-accelerated renders, but its 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores are entry-level, so complex scenes will take longer than on higher-tier cards.

Software development is a strong use case for this build. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, and the CPU’s 12728 Geekbench multi-core score indicates solid parallel performance. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic prototyping, though developers working on graphics-heavy applications may find the 8 GB VRAM limiting.

Student and office work is well-served by this configuration, though it may be overkill. The CPU’s single-core score of 2437 in Geekbench ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications, while the GPU’s 973 Passmark G2D score indicates acceptable 2D performance. Power consumption is reasonable, with the CPU at 65 W TDP and the GPU at 130 W, making it a manageable desktop setup.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than empirical results. The RTX 3050 OEM’s 57th percentile ranking and 15199 average benchmark score suggest it aligns closely with cards like the RX 7600 and RTX 2060, which are known for 1080p gaming.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would likely deliver playable frame rates in esports titles, but demanding AAA games may struggle to maintain 60 FPS. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by a 3944 Cinebench R23 single-core score, would prevent most CPU bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to operate near its limits.

For 1440p gaming, the RTX 3050 OEM’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become more restrictive. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fraction of what higher-tier cards offer, so frame rates would likely drop significantly from 1080p figures. Users would need to reduce settings to medium or high to maintain smooth gameplay, as the GPU’s pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s is modest.

At 4K, this pairing is not recommended for modern gaming. The GPU’s compute and memory resources are insufficient for consistent 4K performance, and even the CPU’s strong multi-threading cannot compensate. The 57th percentile GPU ranking places it below the threshold where 4K gaming becomes viable, so users should stick to 1080p or lower resolutions.

The DirectX 11 score of 86 versus DirectX 12’s 58 in Passmark suggests that older games may run relatively better, potentially offering higher frame rates in legacy titles. However, modern games utilizing DX12 and ray tracing would tax the GPU’s 18 RT cores, likely resulting in significant performance hits if those features are enabled.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The i7-13700E sits at the 64th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 3050 OEM is at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. This 7-point gap suggests the CPU is the stronger component, meaning the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most gaming and graphics-intensive workloads.

In multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 27941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score dominates, leaving the GPU as a secondary accelerator. The CPU’s 0.1% advantage over the EPYC 7551P and 0.6% over the i9-10980XE shows it competes with server and HEDT parts, far exceeding the GPU’s relative standing.

For gaming, the bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU. The CPU’s single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, so frame rates will be dictated by the RTX 3050 OEM’s 8.087 TFLOPS and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is evident from the GPU’s 0.2% delta with the RX 7600, which is a comparable midrange card.

In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU has enough headroom to handle both tasks without bottlenecking the GPU. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide parallel capacity, but the GPU’s modest compute means users must balance quality settings to avoid overwhelming it.

The combined percentile of 61 reflects this balance, with the CPU pulling the overall score up and the GPU holding it back. Users upgrading from weaker CPUs would see significant gains in productivity, while those from stronger GPUs would notice the GPU’s limitations in gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock of 1900 MHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide a wide operating range, allowing for efficient low-load operation and high single-thread bursts when needed.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 27941 multi-core and 3944 single-core. The multi-core score places it 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE, a 18-core HEDT chip, while the single-core score is competitive with modern desktop parts. These results indicate strong performance across both parallel and single-threaded workloads.

The Geekbench scores of 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core corroborate the Cinebench findings. The CPU’s 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data locality for demanding applications, while its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers flexibility in system building.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core chip, suggesting efficient power management. This is supported by the 0.1% performance delta with the EPYC 7551P, a server CPU with a much higher power envelope, indicating the i7-13700E achieves comparable performance at a fraction of the power draw.

The CPU’s ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) make it suitable for workstation and small server duties, despite its desktop market segment. Its integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display option, though discrete graphics are recommended for serious workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p who prioritize CPU performance over GPU headroom would find this build suitable. The CPU’s 64th percentile ranking ensures no gaming bottleneck, while the GPU’s 57th percentile delivers acceptable frame rates at medium-to-high settings, though not for competitive high-refresh play.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threading. The 27941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score rivals server chips, making this a cost-effective workstation alternative, though the GPU’s 5779 Passmark compute score limits GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads. The CPU’s 12728 Geekbench multi-core score ensures fast build times, while the GPU is adequate for general desktop use and UI development, though graphics-heavy projects may need more VRAM.

Students and office workers would find this configuration more powerful than necessary. The CPU’s 2437 Geekbench single-core score ensures responsive everyday use, and the GPU’s 973 Passmark G2D score handles 2D tasks easily, but the cost of this hardware exceeds typical student or office needs.

Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support would be a niche fit. The i7-13700E’s ECC capability and PCIe Gen 5 support make it viable for data integrity-sensitive workloads, though the RTX 3050 OEM’s gaming focus is less relevant for such tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 7957, placing it at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7551P, scores 7952 (0.1% lower), while the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8071 (1.4% higher), showing the i7-13700E sits in a competitive midrange-to-high-end CPU tier.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15199, at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171) and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon 680M (15270), indicating the RTX 3050 OEM is positioned at the lower end of midrange graphics.

In specific tests, the CPU’s Cinebench R15 scores are 2816 multi-core and 397 single-core, while R20 scores are 11735 and 1656, respectively. The R23 scores of 27941 and 3944 confirm scaling across benchmark versions, with multi-core performance improving with newer tests.

The GPU’s Geekbench scores are 60740 in OpenCL and 57103 in Vulkan, showing strong compute capabilities relative to its gaming performance. Passmark tests reveal a peak of 137 in DirectX 9 and 86 in DirectX 11, with lower scores of 58 in DirectX 12 and 61 in DirectX 10, suggesting inconsistent API optimization.

The combined percentile of 61 reflects the CPU’s stronger standing relative to the GPU. This pairing is not balanced, but the CPU’s high scores compensate for the GPU’s modest performance, resulting in an overall system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and is adequate for GPU-bound ones.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, targeting entry-level to midrange gaming.

The system’s combined percentile of 61 places it above the median of all builds in the database. The CPU’s 64th percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 57th, indicating the processor is the more capable component and will define the system’s overall tier in productivity tasks.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 130 W TDP suggest a total system draw that is manageable with a 300 W suggested PSU. This makes the build suitable for compact desktop cases, though the GPU’s dual-slot design and 242 mm length require adequate clearance.

As a desktop configuration, this pairing offers flexibility for upgrades. The CPU’s Intel Socket 1700 and PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofing, while the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is compatible with modern motherboards. The overall tier is upper-midrange, with the CPU pushing it higher than the GPU alone would suggest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility in memory selection, though ECC memory support is an unusual feature for this socket class.

The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for high-bandwidth storage and future GPUs. The current RTX 3050 OEM uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it will not saturate the available lanes, leaving headroom for a faster graphics card.

The suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU, combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, indicates a modest power requirement. This allows for a wide range of power supply options, though users upgrading to a more powerful GPU would need to reassess PSU capacity.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 64th percentile ranking provides ample headroom. The RTX 3050 OEM’s 57th percentile is the limiting factor, and replacing it with a card closer to the CPU’s performance tier would balance the system, though no specific GPU recommendations are provided in the data.

The platform’s DDR4 and DDR5 support means users can retain existing memory or upgrade, depending on motherboard compatibility. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes also future-proof the system for next-generation storage and expansion cards, making the CPU a solid foundation for incremental upgrades.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the GA106 chip and Ampere architecture, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads.

The GPU’s memory subsystem includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest figure that limits performance at higher resolutions, though it is sufficient for 1080p gaming with moderate settings.

Clock speeds are 1515 MHz base and 1755 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These clocks yield a pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s, while FP32 compute reaches 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 60740 in Geekbench OpenCL and 57103 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance. Passmark scores are lower, with 11857 in G3D and 5779 in GPU compute, while DirectX tests range from 137 in DX9 to 58 in DX12, showing variable API efficiency.

The RTX 3050 OEM’s 57th percentile and 15199 average score place it near the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% higher) and the RTX 2060 (0.6% higher). This suggests it performs similarly to previous-generation midrange cards, making it suitable for 1080p gaming but not for high-refresh or high-resolution play.