SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

76 Score

Top 24% Ranking

76 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 24% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB form a desktop pairing that targets a balanced mid-range experience, but the data reveals a significant disparity in raw compute capability between the two components. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample headroom for demanding workloads. The GPU, meanwhile, is an Ampere-architecture GA106 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm node, featuring 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a boost clock of 1777 MHz. The combination of a high-core-count CPU with a modest GPU creates a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity but will be constrained in graphics-heavy scenarios. Benchmark results place the CPU at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined system percentile is 57. This indicates a machine that is substantially stronger on the processor side than on the graphics side, a dynamic that will shape every workload analysis below.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a 10 nm process node and a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock of 1900 MHz is conservative, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock allows for substantial single-threaded performance when needed. The cache hierarchy is robust: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both high-frequency gaming and heavy multi-threaded workloads, though the 65 W TDP suggests a power-efficient design that may cap sustained all-core performance compared to higher-TDP parts. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, making it viable for workstation-class builds. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing modern connectivity for storage and expansion.

Benchmark results indicate strong multi-core capability. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 27941 in multi-core and 3944 in single-core. The multi-core score is nearly seven times the single-core score, reflecting the scaling of its 16 cores and 24 threads. Geekbench results show 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core, reinforcing the same pattern. The average benchmark score across all tests is 7957, placing the chip at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Core i7-13700E is effectively tied with the AMD EPYC 7551P, which scores 7952, a delta of just 0.1%. It is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910) and 1.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071) is actually 1.4% slower, meaning the 13700E trails that Xeon by 1.4%. Against the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M, it is 1.9% slower. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the 13700E competes with high-end server and HEDT processors from previous generations, despite its mainstream desktop positioning. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with authority, though its 65 W TDP may lead to thermal throttling under sustained all-core loads if the cooler is insufficient.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, providing entry-level ray tracing and AI acceleration. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1552 MHz and a boost clock of 1777 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 56.86 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 142.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 9.098 TFLOPS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and APIs. Its power draw is 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W, and it requires a single 8-pin power connector.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, but its percentile rank among all GPUs is 50, meaning it sits at the median of the GPU performance distribution. This is a modest position, and the 8 GB VRAM capacity, while adequate for 1080p gaming, may become a limitation at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for its class but not exceptional. The RT and tensor cores enable DLSS and ray tracing, but the relatively low FP32 throughput of 9.098 TFLOPS suggests that ray-traced scenes will require significant upscaling to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, having been succeeded by the GeForce 40 series, but it remains a capable entry-level option for 1080p gaming and light creative work. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a minor bottleneck consideration, as it offers half the bandwidth of a full x16 slot, though this rarely impacts gaming performance at this tier.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers strong benchmark scores across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2816 multi-core and 397 single-core. In R20, the scores are 11735 multi-core and 1656 single-core. The R23 results show 27941 multi-core and 3944 single-core. Geekbench results are 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core. The average benchmark score is 7957, which places the CPU at the 64th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are all within a tight margin: the AMD EPYC 7551P is 0.1% faster, the Intel Core i9-10980XE is 0.6% slower, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 is 1.4% faster, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M is 1.9% faster. This shows the 13700E is a competitive performer against older server-class silicon, though it does not dominate them.

The GPU has no individual benchmark scores, but its percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs indicates median performance. The combined system percentile is 57, which is higher than the GPU’s individual percentile but lower than the CPU’s, reflecting the CPU’s stronger relative standing. The combined picture is a system where the CPU can drive heavy computational tasks, but the GPU will limit graphical fidelity and frame rates in 3D applications. For a user coming from a weaker CPU, the upgrade in multi-core performance will be immediately noticeable in rendering and compilation tasks. For a user upgrading from a stronger GPU, the RTX 3050 will feel like a step back in gaming performance. The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for productivity-focused builds where gaming is a secondary concern.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative performance positions. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank and the CPU’s 64th percentile rank indicate that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming; instead, the GPU will dictate playable settings and resolutions. At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3050 is expected to deliver playable frame rates in most esports titles, but demanding AAA games may require medium or high settings to stay above 60 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but 1440p ultra textures may exceed its capacity in some titles, causing stuttering or reduced texture quality. The CPU’s high single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle high-refresh-rate gaming in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU’s 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates in GPU-bound scenes. Ray tracing is possible via the 20 RT cores, but performance is likely to be poor without DLSS enabled, and even with DLSS, the low FP32 throughput limits the quality settings. Overall, this system is best treated as a 1080p gaming machine that can handle competitive shooters at high frame rates and story-driven games at medium-to-high settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance (3944 in Cinebench R23) is strong enough for 144 Hz gaming in esports titles, but the GPU’s 50th percentile rank will cap frame rates in graphically intensive games. Expect 60+ FPS at 1080p in most titles, but not consistently at 144 Hz on ultra settings.
Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU can handle encoding via x264 while gaming, as its multi-core score of 27941 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (via tensor cores) can offload encoding, but the 8 GB VRAM may be tight when gaming and encoding simultaneously at high bitrates.
Video editing: CPU-heavy tasks like timeline scrubbing and export will benefit from the 24 threads, with Geekbench multi-core of 12728 indicating solid performance. GPU acceleration for effects and rendering will be limited by the RTX 3050’s 9.098 TFLOPS, making 4K exports slower than on higher-tier GPUs.
3D rendering: The CPU excels here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 that rivals older server chips. The GPU can assist with CUDA-accelerated rendering, but its 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit scene complexity and render times.
Software development: Compilation and code analysis will be fast, with the 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache. The CPU’s 64th percentile rank indicates it outperforms most desktop processors, making build times significantly shorter than average.
Student and office work: This system is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic tasks if the discrete GPU is disabled, saving power. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle power low, making it a reasonable, though not minimal, office machine.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older AAA games will find the RTX 3050 adequate, but those seeking 1440p or high-refresh 4K gaming should look elsewhere. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers who rely on CPU-bound workflows, will benefit most from the 16-core i7-13700E. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings, as will data analysts running multi-threaded computations. Students and small business users who need a responsive workstation for general productivity will find the system more than capable, though the discrete GPU is unnecessary for their tasks. The CPU’s 65 W TDP makes it suitable for compact builds with modest cooling, but the GPU’s 130 W draw and dual-slot size require a standard mid-tower case. The system is not ideal for users who want maximum gaming performance per dollar spent, as the GPU is the weakest link, but it offers a balanced platform for a productive desktop that can handle occasional gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series, and the CPU is an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking if the motherboard and cooling permit. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility in memory selection, though DDR5 will offer higher bandwidth for CPU-intensive tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning there is headroom for a faster GPU in the future. The GPU’s TDP is 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, which suggests the power supply has significant headroom for a more powerful GPU upgrade. A sensible next step would be to replace the RTX 3050 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 64th percentile rank indicates it can feed a much faster graphics card without bottlenecking. The CPU’s 65 W TDP also leaves thermal and power headroom for overclocking, though the stock cooler may need to be replaced with a more capable air cooler for sustained loads. The platform is mature, and the production status of the GPU is end-of-life, so upgrades should focus on the graphics card first, followed by memory if using DDR4, and potentially storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3050 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 64th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7957.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3050 has 20 RT cores, supporting ray tracing, though performance will be modest given its 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3050 is 300 W, with the GPU itself drawing 130 W.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile, and the combined system percentile is 57. In CPU-bound tasks like rendering and compilation, the system will perform admirably, but in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or ray-traced rendering, the RTX 3050 will throttle performance. The CPU’s single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient for gaming, but the GPU’s 9.098 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps frame rates. The FPS scaling from the CPU to the GPU is asymmetric: the CPU can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will hold back performance in AAA games. The 8 GB VRAM is also a potential bottleneck at 1440p or with high-resolution texture packs, as the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may not be sufficient to feed the shading units in memory-intensive scenes. For a balanced system, a user would need to either upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier part or accept 1080p gaming with medium-to-high settings. In productivity workloads, the CPU dominates, and the GPU’s role is secondary, meaning the system is well-balanced for content creation but poorly balanced for high-end gaming. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a minor bottleneck, as it offers half the bandwidth of a full x16 slot, but this rarely affects gaming performance at this tier. Overall, the system’s bottleneck is squarely on the GPU, and any upgrade path should prioritize replacing the RTX 3050 first.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds