SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

76 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 24% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB form a desktop pairing that lands in the 57th combined percentile of all builds, with the CPU at the 64th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. The processor is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part running on Intel Socket 1700, while the GPU is an Ampere-architecture chip with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power demands modest for a 16-core part. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides ample fast storage for working sets in multi-threaded applications. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, making the chip suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity matters. The processor also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, which can serve as a fallback display output or accelerate media workloads when the discrete GPU is idle.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 27941 points in multi-core and 3944 points in single-core. The multi-core score of 27941 is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 3944, which indicates excellent scaling across the 16 physical cores — a typical workload that uses all threads, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, will see near-linear gains. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 11735 and single-core is 1656, while Cinebench R15 shows 2816 multi-core and 397 single-core. Geekbench results are 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 7957, placing the chip in the 64th percentile of all CPUs tracked.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i7-13700E sits in a tight cluster. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7551P (average score 7952) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910). It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071) by 1.4% and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (8110) by 1.9%. These deltas are small, meaning the i7-13700E delivers performance comparable to enterprise-class server chips from previous generations, but with a consumer-friendly 65 W TDP and Socket 1700 platform. For real workloads, this translates to snappy single-thread responsiveness in everyday tasks — the 3944 single-core R23 score is competitive — while the multi-threaded results make the processor well-suited for rendering, compiling, and other parallel workloads. The 10 nm process and Raptor Lake efficiency also suggest good sustained performance under load, though the FACT PACK does not include thermal or power measurements to confirm this.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-13700E have?

A: The processor has 16 cores and 24 threads, which includes performance and efficiency core groupings typical of Raptor Lake designs.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the i7-13700E?

A: The boost clock is 5.10 GHz, while the base clock is 1900 MHz.

Q: Does the i7-13700E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, and the chip accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the RTX 3050 4 GB's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the RTX 3050 4 GB support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 16 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing, along with 64 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 57th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 64th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile among their respective categories.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so frame-rate estimates must be inferred from benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores establish it as a mid-to-upper-tier desktop processor. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 27941 places it well above older high-end desktop chips like the Core i9-10980XE, which has an average score of 7910 across all tests — the i7-13700E's R23 multi-core alone is more than 3.5 times that average. The single-core R23 score of 3944 reflects strong per-thread performance, which matters for lightly threaded applications like older games or spreadsheet calculations. Geekbench multi-core of 12728 and single-core of 2437 corroborate this balance: the chip excels in parallel workloads without sacrificing single-thread responsiveness. The 64th percentile ranking means the i7-13700E outperforms roughly two-thirds of all CPUs in the database, putting it in the same league as server processors like the Xeon Gold 6326 and Xeon Platinum 8180M, which it trails by only 1.4% and 1.9% respectively.

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, but its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it sits at the median performance point. The GPU's average benchmark score is listed as 0, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than a true performance figure. Given its hardware configuration — 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores — the RTX 3050 4 GB is positioned as an entry-level Ampere card. Its FP32 performance of 7.127 TFLOPS and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, though the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern titles with high-resolution textures. The pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and boost clock of 1740 MHz round out the rendering capabilities.

Combined, the CPU and GPU present a picture of a balanced system where the processor has headroom to spare. The CPU's multi-threaded scores are roughly 3.5 times higher relative to its percentile position than the GPU's mid-pack ranking, meaning CPU-bound workloads like video editing or software compilation will see strong performance, while GPU-bound gaming at higher resolutions may be limited by the graphics card. The 57th combined percentile confirms this is a mid-range build rather than a high-end enthusiast system, with the CPU carrying more of the performance weight than the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13700E uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which means a modern graphics card or NVMe SSD can take advantage of the latest interface speeds. ECC memory support is a distinguishing feature for this chip, making it viable for small workstation builds where data corruption is a concern.

The GPU, RTX 3050 4 GB, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU's TDP is 90 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W, which is quite low by modern standards — this allows for a compact, efficient power supply in a desktop build. The card is dual-slot and requires a single 6-pin power connector, with dimensions of 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height, so it will fit in most mid-tower cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points toward the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile and outperforms its nearest rivals, so it has years of useful life ahead for most workloads. Replacing the RTX 3050 4 GB with a higher-tier GPU would immediately improve gaming performance and GPU-accelerated rendering, since the CPU has sufficient headroom — its multi-threaded R23 score of 27941 indicates it can feed a more powerful graphics card without creating a CPU bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory could benefit memory-sensitive workloads, though the FACT PACK does not specify the current memory configuration. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 means a future GPU upgrade will not be limited by the slot interface, and the 65 W CPU TDP leaves ample thermal and power headroom for a more demanding graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3050 4 GB's 50th percentile ranking and 7.127 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest it can drive 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but the 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for texture-heavy titles. Estimated frame rates at 1080p would likely fall in the 60-90 FPS range for esports titles, while AAA games may dip below 60 FPS at ultra settings. The CPU's strong single-core score of 3944 in R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The GPU's 64 tensor cores and 16 RT cores support NVENC-based encoding and AI-enhanced features, which offload streaming workloads from the CPU. The i7-13700E's 24 threads provide ample headroom for game encoding and broadcasting software simultaneously, so a single-PC streaming setup is viable. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps system thermals manageable during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded R23 score of 27941 makes it well-suited for timeline rendering, color grading, and export tasks in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU accelerates effects and transitions, though its 4 GB VRAM limits working with high-resolution footage or complex compositions. Export times should be competitive with systems using server-class Xeon processors, which the i7-13700E trails by less than 2% in average benchmark scores.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 27941 translates to strong performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's 2048 shading units and 7.127 TFLOPS can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in supported engines, but the 4 GB VRAM will restrict scene complexity. For architectural visualization or product renders with moderate polygon counts, this build offers a solid workflow.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks benefit directly from the 16 cores and 24 threads, with the R20 multi-core score of 11735 indicating fast parallel compilation. The CPU's ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers or development workstations. The GPU is sufficient for running multiple displays and IDE acceleration, though it is not a primary factor in development workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2437 provides responsive performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle display output when the discrete GPU is not needed, reducing power consumption. The 65 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU keep the system quiet and efficient for a dorm room or shared office space.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without a high-end GPU investment. Gamers at 1080p resolution who prioritize frame rates over maximum visual fidelity will find the RTX 3050 4 GB adequate for esports and older titles, though the 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for current AAA releases. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit most from the CPU's 64th percentile ranking, as the 27941 R23 multi-core score rivals server-class processors like the Xeon Gold 6326 and Xeon Platinum 8180M. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and ECC memory support, which adds stability for long build processes.

Students and small business workstations are also a natural fit, given the low 90 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP that allow for a compact, energy-efficient system. The ECC memory capability makes this build suitable for financial modeling, scientific computing, or database work where data integrity is paramount. The 57th combined percentile indicates this is not a high-end gaming rig or a professional rendering workstation, but rather a balanced mid-range desktop that excels in CPU-bound tasks while offering entry-level GPU acceleration. Users who expect to play the latest games at high settings or render complex 3D scenes should look for a more powerful GPU, while those whose workloads are primarily CPU-intensive will find this a capable and cost-effective platform.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a die size of 200 mm² and 8,700 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). Its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that is adequate for 1080p gaming but will become a bottleneck when textures exceed the VRAM capacity. The memory configuration is the most limiting aspect of this card, as modern games increasingly require more than 4 GB at higher settings.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores. This hardware supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. The FP32 throughput of 7.127 TFLOPS (with FP16 at the same rate, 1:1) and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s indicate the card can handle moderate rendering workloads. The 16 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, though the 4 GB VRAM and mid-range compute power mean ray tracing will be limited to lower resolutions and settings. The 64 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features, which can boost frame rates in supported games and improve image quality.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database, and its average benchmark score of 0 in the FACT PACK reflects the lack of measured data. In practical terms, the RTX 3050 4 GB is positioned as an entry-level card for 1080p gaming at medium settings. The pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and boost clock of 1740 MHz suggest it can handle older titles at high settings, but newer games with demanding effects will require reduced quality presets. The 90 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU make it power-efficient, and the dual-slot design with a single 6-pin connector simplifies installation. The card supports one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, allowing multi-monitor setups, and its 242 mm length fits in most standard PC cases.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, resulting in a 57th combined percentile ranking. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 64th percentile position, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card at the 50th percentile. The pairing creates a system that is clearly CPU-dominant: the processor outperforms two-thirds of all CPUs, while the GPU sits exactly at the median. This means the build is best suited for tasks that leverage the CPU's multi-threading capabilities, such as rendering, compiling, or video encoding, rather than GPU-intensive gaming at high resolutions. The 65 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP keep total system power modest, with a 250 W suggested PSU, making this an efficient desktop platform. The build class is desktop, confirming it is intended as a stationary workstation or gaming rig rather than a portable solution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between this CPU and GPU heavily favors the processor. The i7-13700E's average benchmark score of 7957 places it at the 64th percentile, while the RTX 3050 4 GB's 50th percentile ranking is a full 14 points lower. This disparity means the CPU is the stronger component in most scenarios, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU's single-core R23 score of 3944 ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 7.127 TFLOPS will cap frame rates at 1080p medium-to-high settings. Estimated FPS, derived from the GPU's percentile position and compute specs, would likely hover around 60-80 FPS in modern AAA titles at 1080p, while esports games could exceed 100 FPS. The CPU will not bottleneck these frame rates — its multi-threaded performance is more than sufficient for game logic and physics.

In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or software compilation, the GPU becomes secondary. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 will drive render times that are competitive with the Xeon Gold 6326 and Xeon Platinum 8180M, which it trails by only 1.4% and 1.9% respectively. The GPU's 2048 shading units can accelerate GPU-accelerated rendering in supported applications, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. For video editing, the CPU handles timeline processing and export efficiently, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading — but again, the VRAM constraint may force lower-resolution previews or proxy workflows. The bottleneck shifts between components depending on the workload: the GPU limits gaming and GPU rendering, while the CPU is the primary driver in multi-threaded compute tasks. The 57th combined percentile reflects this balance, indicating a system that is stronger than the median but not exceptional in any single area. Users seeking to eliminate the GPU bottleneck should upgrade to a card with more VRAM and higher compute throughput, while those prioritizing CPU tasks already have a capable processor that outperforms many server-class chips.