SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². This is a substantial GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2438 MHz, which translates to 19.5 Gbps effective. For a card in this performance tier, the 16 GB frame buffer is a decisive advantage — it provides headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets that 8 GB or even 12 GB cards would struggle with.

Clock speeds are respectable: the base clock is 1900 MHz, the game clock is 2041 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2459 MHz. The compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s. The FP32 throughput is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at exactly the same 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable because many competing architectures cut FP16 performance in half — here, the data shows no such penalty.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 40 RT cores. The card does not list tensor cores, which means AI-accelerated workloads that rely on dedicated tensor hardware will not have those specific acceleration paths available. However, the GPU does support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is fully modern in terms of API coverage. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 provides a direct measure of rasterization performance in a modern DirectX 12 workload. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 indicates strong general-purpose compute capability. Passmark scores show 20974 for G3D, 1206 for G2D, and 10963 for GPU compute — the G2D score is comparatively low, which suggests the card is not primarily optimized for 2D desktop workloads but rather for 3D rendering and compute.

For rendering tasks specifically, the combination of 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth means the card can handle large scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex shaders without spilling to system memory. The 96 ROPs ensure that pixel-heavy workloads at high resolutions are not bottlenecked at the rasterization stage. The FP32 and FP16 performance being identical is a significant asset for compute-heavy rendering pipelines that use FP16 for speed where precision allows. The 40 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall RT performance tier should be assessed against the card's 58th percentile position among all GPUs — it is solidly mid-pack, not a top-tier RT performer.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 61st among all desktop builds, which places it above the median but not in enthusiast territory. The CPU alone sits at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This is a balanced pairing where both components are in the same general performance band, with a slight edge toward the CPU side.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 7957. Its nearest rivals are instructive: the AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7952 (a delta of 0.1% — essentially identical), the Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7910 (0.6% behind), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8071 (1.4% ahead), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8110 (1.9% ahead). This means the i7-13700E lands in a performance cluster with several workstation and server-class chips from previous generations. The deltas are all within 2%, so this is a tightly contested performance zone.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the i7-13700E shows strong multi-core capability: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 27941, while single-core scores 3944. Cinebench R20 multi-core is 11735, single-core 1656. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 2816, single-core 397. Geekbench multi-core is 12728, single-core 2437. The multi-core to single-core ratios are substantial — for example, the R23 multi-core score is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score, which indicates good scaling across the 16 cores and 24 threads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15852. Its nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862 (0.1% ahead — effectively a tie), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014 (1.0% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129 (1.7% ahead). The RX 7700 is thus bracketed by older and newer cards alike, all within a 2% performance window. The RTX 3060 Ti being only 1.7% ahead is notable — the RX 7700 competes directly with that very popular card.

The combined picture is a system that performs above average in both CPU and GPU terms, with neither component dragging the other down. The 61st combined percentile is a reasonable reflection of this pairing — it is a solid mid-to-upper-mid-range desktop that will handle most workloads competently.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 13th Gen Raptor Lake desktop processor with 16 cores and 24 threads. It uses the Raptor Lake-S architecture on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The base clock is 1900 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz — a significant boost headroom. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The 16 cores and 24 threads indicate a hybrid configuration — 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, with the efficiency cores not adding to the thread count equally (hence 16 cores but 24 threads, not 32). This is typical of Raptor Lake design, where the efficiency cores do not support hyper-threading. The multiplier is unlocked, which means overclocking is possible, though the 65 W TDP suggests this is primarily a power-efficient part rather than a high-overclocking enthusiast chip.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus. This is a dual-format platform, allowing builders to choose between cheaper DDR4 or faster DDR5 depending on their budget and motherboard. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstation use where data integrity matters. The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770, which provides basic display output and hardware video decode without requiring a discrete GPU.

The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This is forward-looking — Gen 5 storage and GPUs are supported, though the RX 7700 GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU is not bottlenecking the GPU in terms of bus bandwidth.

Benchmark scores place this CPU firmly in the 64th percentile of all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 is strong for a 65 W part — this is a chip that can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation without breaking a sweat. The single-core score of 3944 in the same test indicates excellent per-thread performance, which matters for games and lightly-threaded applications.

The nearest rivals list shows this CPU performing in the same league as server and HEDT (high-end desktop) chips from a few years ago. The AMD EPYC 7551P is a server CPU with many more cores, yet the i7-13700E matches its average score. The Intel Core i9-10980XE was a flagship HEDT chip with 18 cores, and the i7-13700E beats it by 0.6%. The Xeon Gold 6326 and Xeon Platinum 8180M are server chips that edge ahead by 1.4% and 1.9% respectively. This tells a clear story: the i7-13700E delivers workstation-class multi-threaded performance in a mainstream desktop package.

For real workloads, this translates to fast compile times, efficient video rendering, responsive virtual machine hosting, and fluid multitasking across many applications simultaneously. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads that benefit from large caches. The 65 W TDP means cooling is manageable — a capable air cooler is sufficient, and the system will not require exotic liquid cooling.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing, but the bottleneck direction depends on the workload. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile, the GPU at the 58th — the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its competition than the GPU is. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, compilation, or multi-tasking, the RX 7700 will generally keep up with what the CPU demands. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the RX 7700 will be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence comes from the benchmark scores themselves. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 indicate that for gaming, the GPU will typically be the constraint at higher resolutions, while at lower resolutions the CPU's single-core performance (R23 single-core 3944) becomes more relevant. The CPU's single-core score is strong enough to avoid being a bottleneck in most games.

The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals show that the i7-13700E is within 2% of several server-class chips, which means the CPU has substantial headroom. Meanwhile, the GPU's rivals are also within 2%, but the GPU's absolute percentile is lower. The practical interpretation: in a gaming scenario at 1080p with a fast GPU, the CPU might occasionally limit frame rates in CPU-heavy titles, but the i7-13700E's single-core performance is robust enough that this will be rare. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor.

For productivity workloads, the balance is more favorable. The CPU's multi-core performance is strong relative to its peers, and the GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 106028, Passmark GPU compute 10963) are respectable. In a rendering task that uses both CPU and GPU (hybrid rendering), this system can keep both components busy. The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores point clearly to a system where neither component is a glaring weak link.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a capable desktop for mixed workloads — gaming, content creation, and productivity — without stepping into high-end enthusiast pricing territory. The 16-core CPU with 24 threads and the 16 GB GPU make this a versatile machine.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system well-suited. The GPU's performance is competitive with the RTX 3060 Ti (only 1.7% behind in average benchmark score), which is a well-known 1440p-capable card. With 16 GB of VRAM, modern games at high texture settings will fit comfortably in memory. The CPU's single-core performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking at high frame rates.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and graphic designers — will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength (R23 multi-core 27941) and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM for large textures and complex scenes. The ECC memory support is a plus for anyone doing long renders or working with critical data. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache helps with working sets that exceed smaller caches.

Developers will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads for parallel compilation, and the GPU's compute capability (25.18 TFLOPS FP32) is useful for local testing of GPU-accelerated code. The PCIe Gen 5 support means future storage upgrades will not be limited by the platform.

Students and small business workstations are also in scope. The system handles office productivity, coding, and moderate creative work with ease. The 65 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is suitable for shared spaces. The GPU's dual-slot form factor (267 mm length, 135 mm height, 50 mm width) fits in most mid-tower cases.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and its competitive position relative to the RTX 3060 Ti (1.7% behind) provide a reference point. The RTX 3060 Ti is widely regarded as a solid 1440p card, so the RX 7700 should deliver playable frame rates at 1440p in most titles.

At 1080p, the system should excel — the CPU's single-core performance (R23 single-core 3944) is strong enough to push high frame rates, and the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is more than sufficient for 1080p rasterization. The 16 GB VRAM is overkill for 1080p now, but it provides future-proofing for games that become more memory-hungry.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of performance. With 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth and 96 ROPs, the card should handle most games at high to ultra settings with acceptable frame rates. The 40 RT cores enable ray tracing, though the card's mid-pack GPU percentile (58th) suggests ray tracing will require compromises in settings or resolution.

At 4K, the system will struggle in demanding titles. The GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS is not enough for consistent 4K ultra gaming in most modern releases. However, for esports titles or older games, 4K at moderate settings is feasible. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the raw compute throughput will be the limiting factor.

The CPU should not bottleneck the GPU in gaming. The i7-13700E's single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 is competitive with newer CPUs, and its 64th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it is above average for gaming workloads. In CPU-intensive games at 1080p, the CPU might occasionally limit frame rates, but this will be game-dependent and not a systemic issue.

# FAQ

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation use where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 624.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-10980XE?

A: The i7-13700E scores 7957 on average, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-10980XE's 7910. The i7 achieves this with a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a base clock of 1900 MHz.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 40 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the i7-13700E has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking if the user chooses to do so.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 13th Gen Raptor Lake series. The CPU uses DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, so the motherboard choice determines which memory type is used. ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation builds.

PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for future GPUs and storage devices. The system is not limited by the current GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface — a future PCIe 5.0 GPU would run at full bandwidth. The 16 lanes are sufficient for a single high-end GPU.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the total system power draw is modest. This leaves headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals without requiring an oversized power supply. A quality 650 W PSU would provide comfortable margin, and 750 W would allow for future GPU upgrades that might draw more power.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 64th percentile ranking indicates it has headroom to feed a faster graphics card. The CPU's multi-core performance (R23 multi-core 27941) is strong enough to pair with a GPU in the 70th-80th percentile without creating a significant CPU bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory (if the motherboard supports it) would benefit memory-heavy workloads. The 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores are already substantial, so a CPU upgrade would be lower priority than a GPU upgrade for most users.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700E with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The combined percentile is 61st among all desktop builds, placing it in the upper-middle tier of system performance. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP and a 5.10 GHz boost clock, ranking at the 64th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 card with 2560 shading units and 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, ranking at the 58th percentile among all GPUs.

The system is well-balanced, with the CPU slightly stronger than the GPU relative to their respective competition. It is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, software development, and workstation tasks. The ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 capability add future-proofing, while the 65 W CPU TDP and 550 W suggested PSU keep power requirements modest. This is a practical, versatile desktop that handles a wide range of workloads competently without reaching for the extremes of performance or price.