SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

79 Score

Top 21% Ranking

79 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 21% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 7400 — Performance Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD's entry-level RDNA 3 graphics card, creating a system where CPU capability vastly outweighs GPU throughput. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay data. The combined system sits at the 41st percentile across all desktop builds in the database, indicating a mid-pack overall configuration driven primarily by strong processor performance and held back by the modest graphics adapter.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU pairing, all gaming expectations must be derived from the GPU's synthetic benchmark results. The Radeon RX 7400 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103, placing it at the 17th percentile among all GPUs — a bottom-quartile position that signals 1080p entry-level gaming at best. In PassMark DirectX tests, the card achieves 176 in DX9, 97 in DX11, and 44 in DX12, with the DX12 result being notably weaker than the older API scores; this pattern suggests the architecture handles legacy titles more comfortably than modern heavy-duty workloads.

For competitive esports titles running at 1080p with medium-to-low settings, the RX 7400's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should sustain playable frame rates in lighter games, though the 17th GPU percentile indicates frequent dips below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. At 1440p, the 8 GB GDDR6 buffer on a 128-bit bus becomes a limiting factor; the 2300 MHz boost clock cannot compensate for the narrow memory interface when higher resolutions demand more bandwidth. The card's 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs suggest reasonable fill-rate capabilities for 1080p rasterization, but the 28 RT cores provide only minimal ray tracing acceleration — expect ray-traced effects to be largely unusable at any resolution. Given the CPU's strength and the GPU's weakness, players should target 1080p with reduced settings for modern AAA titles, while esports and older games may allow higher quality presets.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry in this build is extreme. The Core i7-13700E achieves a 64th percentile ranking among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 7957, while the RX 7400 sits at just the 17th GPU percentile. This 47-percentile gap creates a clear CPU-bound configuration in nearly every workload — the processor is capable of feeding frames far faster than the graphics card can render them. In CPU-light gaming scenarios where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, the system will behave like a low-end gaming PC; in productivity tasks that stress the processor, the same system performs like a high-end workstation.

The FPS scaling evidence — though estimated — supports this imbalance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 and single-core score of 3944 indicate headroom for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11897 against the 17th percentile ranking means the graphics card will cap frame rates well before the processor reaches its limits. For 1080p gaming, the CPU can easily maintain frame pacing, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become the limiting factor at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy settings. Conversely, in multi-threaded rendering or compilation workloads, the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads dominate the performance profile, with the GPU contributing only modest compute acceleration via its 5152 PassMark GPU compute score.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results paint a picture of strong multi-threaded capability. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 27941, while single-core reaches 3944 — a ratio of roughly 7:1 that reflects the 16-core/24-thread configuration. Geekbench results show 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core, consistent with the Cinebench pattern. The average benchmark score of 7957 places this CPU at the 64th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 7551P (7952, 0.1% ahead), Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910, 0.6% ahead), Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071, 1.4% behind), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (8110, 1.9% behind). This clustering indicates the i7-13700E performs on par with older high-core-count server processors, though it does so with a 65 W TDP versus the much higher power envelopes of those Xeon and EPYC parts.

The GPU's benchmark results are far more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 places it near the bottom of the database, with PassMark G3D at 11897 and DirectX 11 at 97. The average benchmark score of 2467 puts the RX 7400 at the 17th percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon 8040S (2440, 1.1% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433, 1.4% ahead), Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425, 1.8% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422, 1.9% ahead). The fact that the RX 7400's closest competitors include integrated and decade-old mobile GPUs underscores its entry-level positioning. The combined picture is a system where the CPU contributes roughly 76% of the average benchmark score (7957 vs 2467), making this a processor-centric build with graphics attached as a secondary consideration.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU throughput over graphics performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 27941 indicating strong parallel compilation performance. Students running virtual machines, statistical analysis, or engineering simulations will find the processor's 64th percentile ranking sufficient for demanding academic workloads, while the GPU handles basic display output and light acceleration. Small business workstations handling database queries, spreadsheet processing, or document rendering will see excellent responsiveness from the 5.10 GHz boost clock on single-threaded tasks.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations — esports titles, indie games, or older AAA releases — can build around this system, but should recognize the 17th GPU percentile limits their options. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages Intel Quick Sync via the integrated UHD Graphics 770 may find the iGPU useful for encoding tasks, while the discrete GPU provides additional display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The system is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming, high-refresh competitive play, or GPU-accelerated rendering workloads — those require a more balanced or GPU-centric configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in RAM selection, though the dual-channel memory bus means capacity and speed choices will affect overall performance. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 — meaning the graphics card operates at half the available lane width, though this is unlikely to bottleneck the RX 7400 given its modest bandwidth requirements. The 65 W CPU TDP and 43 W GPU TDP combine for a low total power draw, with the suggested 200 W PSU providing substantial headroom for the current configuration.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series card or a competing NVIDIA option, since the CPU has ample headroom to support much faster graphics. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU can accommodate a high-bandwidth GPU without bottleneck, and the 200 W PSU suggestion would need revisiting with a more powerful card — though the current 43 W GPU TDP leaves enormous power budget available. The socket 1700 platform also supports memory overclocking via the unlocked multiplier, and the 30 MB shared L3 cache benefits from faster DDR5 memory kits if the user chooses that route. Given the CPU's 64th percentile rank and active production status, the processor itself does not need upgrading for several generations; the GPU is the clear bottleneck and first upgrade target.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses the Navi 33 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. The RDNA 3.0 architecture operates at a 1452 MHz base clock and 2300 MHz boost, with a 2200 MHz game clock for sustained performance. Memory consists of 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth — adequate for 1080p textures but limiting for higher resolutions. The 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s, which are modest figures consistent with the entry-level positioning.

The 28 RT cores enable ray tracing but with limited throughput; the 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests the card can handle basic RT effects at low settings, though not at playable frame rates in demanding titles. FP16 performance of 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicates the card can accelerate some compute workloads, reflected in the 5152 PassMark GPU compute score. The 43 W TDP is exceptionally low, requiring only a single 6-pin power connector. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 places it in the bottom tier of discrete GPUs, roughly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 610 — a striking comparison that highlights the RX 7400's position as a basic display adapter with some gaming capability rather than a serious gaming card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's 3944 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures frame pacing for 144 Hz monitors, but the GPU's 17th percentile ranking caps achievable frame rates — expect 60 FPS in esports titles and considerably less in AAA games.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU can handle encoding via x264 software encoding without impacting gaming performance, and the UHD Graphics 770 offers Quick Sync hardware encoding as an alternative; the GPU's limited compute resources mean NVENC-style hardware encoding is not available from the RX 7400, but the CPU's headroom compensates.

Video editing: The 27941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p previews; 4K editing will strain the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth during effects-heavy sequences.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar tools will perform strongly given the 16-core configuration, but GPU-accelerated rendering is limited by the RX 7400's 5152 PassMark compute score — expect slow viewport performance and lengthy GPU render times.

Software development: The 64th CPU percentile and 24 threads provide excellent compilation speed, with the 30 MB L3 cache reducing cache misses during large builds; the GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks beyond multi-monitor output.

Student and office work: The 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day operation; the dual-slot GPU with three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs supports multi-monitor productivity setups.

FAQ

Q: Is the RX 7400 capable of ray tracing?

A: The card includes 28 RT cores, but the 17th GPU percentile and 1103 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate minimal ray tracing performance — RT effects are likely limited to very low settings at 1080p.

Q: How much power does this system need?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 43 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 200 W providing sufficient headroom for the entire build.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No — the GPU's 8 GB VRAM on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is inadequate for 4K textures and rendering, and the 17th percentile ranking confirms this is a 1080p-class card.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, allowing builders to choose based on platform and budget.

Q: How does the CPU compare to server processors?

A: The i7-13700E scores within 1.9% of the Xeon Platinum 8180M and Xeon Gold 6326 in average benchmark scores, despite being a lower-power desktop part.

Q: Does the GPU support modern APIs?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current games and applications.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to push beyond the 5.10 GHz boost clock with appropriate cooling and power delivery.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The base clock of 1900.00 MHz is conservative, but the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz — a significant delta that indicates strong single-threaded performance when demand requires it. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with ECC capability enabled, making this suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark results confirm the processor's strengths. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 27941 places it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs, while single-core at 3944 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The Geekbench scores of 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core corroborate this pattern. The 64th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms roughly two-thirds of all processors in the database, and its nearest rivals — EPYC 7551P, i9-10980XE, Xeon Gold 6326, and Xeon Platinum 8180M — are all high-core-count server or HEDT parts, underscoring the i7-13700E's exceptional multi-threaded capability for its class. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for this level of performance, reflecting Raptor Lake's efficiency improvements. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and Quick Sync encoding capabilities. With a release date of January 2023 and active production status, this CPU remains current and well-supported.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines a 64th-percentile CPU with a 17th-percentile GPU, resulting in a 41st-percentile combined ranking — a system that is overwhelmingly processor-centric. The Intel Core i7-13700E delivers server-grade multi-threaded performance within a 65 W envelope, making it an excellent choice for productivity, development, and content creation. The AMD Radeon RX 7400, by contrast, functions as an entry-level display adapter with modest gaming capability, sufficient for 1080p esports and light gaming but not for demanding AAA titles or high resolutions. The pairing is unusual — it combines a high-end workstation processor with a budget graphics card — but it serves a specific niche: users who need maximum CPU throughput for professional workloads while requiring only basic graphics output.

The overall tier, based on the 41st combined percentile, places this build in the mid-range of desktop configurations. The upgrade path is clear and compelling: replacing the GPU with a higher-tier card would transform this into a high-performance system without touching the CPU, which has ample headroom. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 memory, and ECC, ensuring future compatibility. For its intended use cases — software development, academic computing, office productivity, and light gaming — this build offers a balanced cost-to-performance proposition, with the understanding that the GPU is the primary limitation and the first component to upgrade.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds