SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700E and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT form a high-performance desktop pairing that sits at the 76th percentile overall, placing it well above the median gaming and workstation setups. The CPU, a 16-core Raptor Lake-S part, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a 64th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU, a RDNA 2.0 flagship, achieves an 88th percentile rank among all GPUs. This combination is designed for users who need both substantial compute power for productivity and high frame rates for gaming, though the data shows a notable imbalance in raw capability between the two components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors the system to the Raptor Lake generation of processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to choose between older, more widely available memory or newer, higher-bandwidth modules. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation users who require data integrity in compute-heavy tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, ensuring that current and future high-speed storage devices and expansion cards have ample bandwidth.

The CPU has a 65-watt TDP, which is notably modest for a 16-core part, but this figure represents the base power draw; the boost clock of 5.10 GHz will draw more under load. The GPU, by contrast, is a power-hungry component with a 335-watt TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 700 watts, so any build must account for the combined power draw of both components plus the rest of the system. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a triple-slot width, meaning the case must have sufficient physical clearance and the PSU must have the appropriate cables.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize memory bandwidth by moving from DDR4 to DDR5, assuming the motherboard supports it, as the CPU’s dual-channel controller can take advantage of the newer standard. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU allow for the fastest NVMe drives available, which would reduce load times in games and improve data-heavy workflows. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, so users with adequate cooling can push the 5.10 GHz boost clock further, though the 65-watt TDP suggests that the stock cooler may be sufficient for base operation, with a more capable air or liquid cooler recommended for sustained all-core workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a CPU that performs strongly in multi-threaded tasks but is less impressive in single-threaded workloads relative to its core count. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 27,941 in multi-core and 3,944 in single-core. The multi-core score is competitive, as the CPU’s average benchmark score of 7,957 places it nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 7551P, which scores 7,952, a delta of just 0.1 percent. It also edges out the Intel Core i9-10980XE by 0.6 percent, with the latter scoring 7,910. However, it trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 by 1.4 percent and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M by 1.9 percent, indicating that while it is a strong performer, it is not at the very top of the CPU hierarchy for all workloads.

The GPU delivers exceptional raw graphics performance. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4,235, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 165,212. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 58,392, which places it just 0.2 percent behind the NVIDIA P102-100 and 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Arc A570M. It is also 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 0.5 percent behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710. The GPU’s 88th percentile rank confirms that it is a top-tier part, significantly outperforming the CPU’s 64th percentile rank. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that the overall system is strong, but the GPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s 64th percentile rank means it is better than the majority of CPUs, but the GPU’s 88th percentile rank means it is near the top of the GPU hierarchy. In CPU-bound workloads, such as single-threaded applications or lightly-threaded games, the CPU may limit the GPU’s potential. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,944 in Cinebench R23 is respectable, but it is not a leader, so in scenarios where frame rates are limited by the CPU, the GPU’s high FPS potential may not be fully realized.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads, such as 4K gaming or heavy rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare. The CPU’s multi-core score of 27,941 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks without bottlenecking the GPU, but the GPU’s 16 GB of memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth mean it can push frame rates high enough that the CPU’s lower percentile rank becomes relevant. The FPS scaling data is not measured for this combination, so estimates must be drawn from the benchmark scores, which indicate that at lower resolutions, the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, while at higher resolutions, the GPU will dominate the performance equation.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-13700E use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for Raptor Lake processors.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-10980XE?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 7,957 is 0.6 percent higher than the Core i9-10980XE’s score of 7,910.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 watts, which should also cover the CPU’s 65-watt TDP and the rest of the system.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 80 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a base clock of 1900 MHz.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm², and it features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is well-suited for multi-threaded workloads, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 demonstrates. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 7,957 places it in the 64th percentile among all CPUs, which means it outperforms a majority of processors but is not in the top tier.

The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3,944, is adequate for everyday tasks and gaming, but it is not a standout. The CPU’s base clock of 1900 MHz is low, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock compensates for this in bursty workloads. The 65-watt TDP is low for a 16-core part, suggesting that the CPU is designed for efficiency, but the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking if the cooling solution can handle the increased heat. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, but the dedicated GPU will handle all graphics duties. The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, along with ECC, makes it versatile for both gaming and professional workstations, though the 30 MB L3 cache is smaller than some rivals, which may impact performance in cache-sensitive applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The GPU’s high percentile rank and strong 3DMark scores suggest it is capable of very high frame rates in most games. The CPU’s single-core performance, while not top-tier, is sufficient to drive the GPU at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU’s lower percentile rank may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s raw power will still deliver playable performance.

Given the GPU’s 16 GB of memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, it is well-suited for high-resolution textures and modern game engines. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 80 RT cores enable ray tracing, though the performance impact will vary by game. The GPU’s boost clock of 2310 MHz and 23.65 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are strong indicators of high rasterization performance. For competitive gamers, the GPU’s high pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s will deliver high frame rates in esports titles. For AAA games, the GPU’s performance will be excellent at 1440p and strong at 4K, with the CPU providing adequate support.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolutions, as the GPU’s 88th percentile rank ensures high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads also make it suitable for content creators who need to edit video or render 3D scenes, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 indicates strong performance in these tasks. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threading for compiling code and running virtual machines, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Students and small business users will find this system overkill for basic office work, but the CPU’s integrated graphics provide a fallback if the GPU fails. The GPU’s 16 GB of memory is beneficial for machine learning and data science workloads, though the lack of tensor cores means it is not optimized for all AI tasks. The system’s combined percentile of 76 places it in the upper quartile of all builds, making it a strong choice for users who want a single system for both work and play without compromising on either.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700E, a 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a RDNA 2.0 flagship GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is a 5120-shader unit behemoth with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that this system outperforms the majority of builds, but the GPU’s 88th percentile rank is significantly higher than the CPU’s 64th percentile rank, highlighting an imbalance where the GPU is the star of the show.

The system’s performance tier is high-midrange to high-end, with the GPU being the primary driver of its ranking. The CPU is capable but not exceptional, making this build a strong choice for users who prioritize graphics performance over CPU-bound tasks. The platform’s support for PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 memory ensures that it is not immediately outdated, though the CPU’s lower percentile rank may become a bottleneck in future CPU-intensive applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is based on the Navi 21 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines, along with 80 RT cores for ray tracing. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1860 MHz, with a game clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2310 MHz.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are impressive, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,235 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 205,998. The average benchmark score of 58,392 places it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, making it a top-tier part. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, scores 58,528, a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the RX 6950 XT is statistically tied with it. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s indicate excellent rasterization capabilities, while the texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s ensures high fidelity in texture-heavy scenes.

For rendering and compute workloads, the GPU’s 16 GB of memory is ample for large scenes and datasets. The lack of tensor cores means it does not have dedicated hardware for AI acceleration, but the high FP32 throughput can still handle some compute tasks. The GPU’s 700-watt suggested PSU requirement and triple-slot design mean it is not suitable for small form factor builds, but for a full tower, it offers near-flagship performance. The GPU is end-of-life, but its performance remains competitive, as shown by its 88th percentile rank.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 88th percentile rank and 23.65 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will deliver high frame rates at 1440p, likely exceeding 144 FPS in many titles. The CPU’s single-core performance is adequate, but at 1080p, the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming, though the lack of dedicated encoding hardware on the GPU means the CPU will handle the load. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 indicates that the CPU can handle both tasks simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 27,941, which will reduce render times in software like Premiere Pro. The GPU’s 16 GB of memory and high texture rate will accelerate effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 5120 shading units and 23.65 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are well-suited for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB of memory allows for complex scenes, and the CPU’s multi-threading will handle scene preparation and physics.

Software development: The CPU’s 24 threads will speed up compilation times, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long builds. The GPU is overkill for development, but it can handle any graphics or compute tasks for game development.

Student and office work: This system is massively overpowered for word processing and spreadsheets, but the CPU’s integrated graphics provide a backup if the GPU is not needed. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU keeps idle power consumption low, though the GPU’s 335-watt TDP will draw significant power under load.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds