SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700E and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing that targets a broad performance window, landing at the 65th percentile for the combined build. The CPU, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, offers a substantial rasterization performance baseline. This is a system that leans on the processor for heavy computational work and the graphics card for high-resolution visual output, with neither component dramatically overshadowing the other in the aggregate benchmark data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 1900 MHz and can boost up to 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration, with its high thread count and large cache pool, is engineered for workloads that scale with parallel processing, such as video encoding and software compilation. The CPU's 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 16-core part, indicating efficient power management under standard loads, though boost behavior will draw beyond that figure.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's strong multi-threaded credentials. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 27941 points in the multi-core test, a figure that dwarfs its 3944-point single-core result. This suggests a significant scaling efficiency across its 24 threads. The Geekbench scores mirror this trend, with a multi-core score of 12728 versus 2437 for single-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 64th percentile among all processors, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of its peers in the database. The average benchmark score of 7957 places it in close competition with the Intel Core i9-10980XE, which scores 7910, and the AMD EPYC 7551P, which scores 7952, with the i7-13700E holding a 0.6% advantage over the former and a 0.1% lead over the latter. It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8071) by 1.4% and the Xeon Platinum 8180M (8110) by 1.9%.

For real-world workloads, the high multi-core scores translate to faster rendering times and smoother multitasking. The single-core performance, while lower in absolute terms, is still competitive for daily tasks and gaming logic, where clock speed often matters more than core count. The 24 threads ensure that background processes, such as streaming software or a web browser, will not starve an active workload. The architecture supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexibility in platform configuration, and includes UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback for basic display output, though a discrete GPU is present in this build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the i7-13700E with the RX 6650 XT shows a balanced profile, with the combined percentile at 65. The CPU's average benchmark score of 7957 is high, but the GPU's average score of 19765 is also substantial, indicating that neither component is severely limiting the other in synthetic aggregate tests. However, the data suggests a workload-dependent balance. In multi-threaded CPU tasks, the processor will be the primary bottleneck, as the GPU's role is minimal. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like heavy 3D rendering, the graphics card will dictate the frame output speed.

The CPU's 64th percentile versus the GPU's 65th percentile is remarkably close, suggesting that in a mixed workload, the system will not exhibit a severe imbalance. The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals are small, with the closest competitor (EPYC 7551P) being nearly identical in average score, meaning the processor is performing right at its expected tier. For gaming, the balance depends on resolution; at lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance and frame pacing become more critical, while at higher resolutions, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth take precedence. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the CPU's 24 threads ensure that even the most demanding game logic engines have headroom. The data indicates that this is not a bottleneck-heavy system; rather, it is a pair of components that will each reach their limits in different test scenarios, with the FPS scaling in games likely showing a more pronounced GPU limitation at higher detail settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6650 XT, with its 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a boost clock of 2635 MHz, is built for 1080p high-refresh play. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 will prevent frame pacing issues, allowing the GPU to push high frame rates in esports titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in the latest AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads are a significant asset here. The multi-core score of 27941 in Cinebench R23 indicates that the processor can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without a major performance hit, a task that would strain a lower-core-count part.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's high multi-threaded throughput and the GPU's hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities makes this a competent setup. The 16 cores will speed up timeline rendering, while the 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs assist with effects and color grading. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with large media files.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will favor the i7-13700E, given its 27941-point score in Cinebench R23. GPU-based renderers will use the RX 6650 XT's 32 RT cores and 10.79 TFLOPS of compute, which, while not leading-edge, is serviceable for preview renders and smaller projects.

Software development: Compilation tasks are heavily parallel. The CPU's 24 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache will reduce build times, and the ECC memory support provides stability for long-running builds. The single-core performance ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This setup is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU's single-core score of 2437 in Geekbench handles document processing and spreadsheets effortlessly, while the GPU's 918 Passmark G2D score indicates solid 2D acceleration. The system will be silent and cool under these light loads, given the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a gamer or content creator who needs a single system for both work and play. For gamers at 1080p, the RX 6650 XT is a strong performer, as indicated by its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The CPU ensures no bottleneck in this resolution, allowing the GPU to deliver its maximum frame rate. Content creators working with video or 3D models will benefit from the CPU's multi-core muscle; the 27941 Cinebench R23 score is a strong indicator of rendering capability. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or handle database queries will also find the 24 threads and ECC memory support valuable. For students, this is a future-proof system that can handle engineering software, programming IDEs, and occasional gaming without compromise. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, so builders should be aware of availability, but the performance data shows it remains competitive.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 7957, placing it at the 64th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7551P, scores 7952, a 0.1% difference, showing the i7-13700E is precisely at its performance tier. The Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7910, putting the i7-13700E 0.6% ahead. The GPU's average benchmark score is 19765, at the 65th percentile. Its closest rival, the AMD FirePro D300, scores 19637, meaning the RX 6650 XT is 0.7% faster. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19885, putting the RX 6650 XT 0.6% behind. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1859, and its Passmark G3D score is 17166. In compute tasks, the GPU scores 7532 in Passmark GPU Compute and 10111 in Geekbench OpenCL. The combined percentile for this build is 65, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median in overall performance. The CPU's strong Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11735 and single-core score of 1656 further validate its position, while the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 81306 shows its API efficiency. This is a pairing where both parts contribute equally to the final score, with no single component dragging the other down.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high bandwidth for a future graphics card. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slots, though it will run at the lower spec. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, but the GPU's 176 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W mean the system has modest power requirements. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has headroom to drive higher-tier graphics cards given its strong multi-core and single-core scores. The CPU's ECC memory support allows for a workstation-class RAM upgrade, and the 30 MB of L3 cache is already generous. The socket is shared with other 13th-gen parts, allowing for a drop-in CPU upgrade to a higher-core model if needed. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests a future upgrade is likely, and the CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes will accommodate the next generation of graphics cards without a platform change. Memory bandwidth is not listed, but the dual-channel support for DDR5 indicates a path to higher throughput than what DDR4 offers.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. It packs 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. Its base clock is 2055 MHz, with a game clock of 2410 MHz and a boost clock of 2635 MHz. The memory runs at an effective speed of 17.5 Gbps. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 32 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

The benchmark scores show a mixed picture across different API tests. The Passmark DirectX 12 score is 62, which is significantly lower than the DirectX 11 score of 169 and DirectX 9 score of 215. This suggests that the GPU's performance is highly dependent on the API and driver optimization, with older APIs showing better relative performance in these specific tests. The Geekbench scores are more consistent, with a Metal score of 97969 and a Vulkan score of 81306, indicating strong cross-platform compute potential. The OpenCL score of 10111 is lower, which may reflect a driver-specific limitation. The FP32 performance is 10.79 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 21.59 TFLOPS, giving a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 168.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 337.3 GTexel/s. These figures indicate that the GPU is well-suited for traditional rasterization, with the RT cores providing a modest boost in ray-traced scenes. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking and average score of 19765 place it just above the AMD FirePro D300 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200, but slightly below the NVIDIA Tesla K40m. For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for high-resolution texture sets, but the 280.3 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data is fed to the cores efficiently. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern game and application requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E scores 7957 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD EPYC 7551P (7952) and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7910).

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT features 32 RT cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible Intel Socket 1700 motherboards.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the pair is 65, indicating it performs better than 65% of all systems in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation stability.

Q: What is the GPU's power connector requirement?

A: The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU wattage is 450 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-13700E and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The following frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 60 FPS in esports and achieving 60 FPS in many AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth will become more stressed, and players may need to lower settings to maintain 60 FPS. The CPU's single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to prevent bottlenecks at these resolutions. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 is low, which could indicate poor performance in DX12 titles, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 suggests a more capable outcome. The CPU's 24 threads ensure that game engines using multiple threads will not be limited, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential. For high-refresh 1080p monitors, the system should provide a smooth experience, while 4K gaming is not recommended due to the VRAM capacity and bandwidth constraints. These estimates are derived from the aggregate benchmark scores and should be treated as general guidance rather than precise measurements.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds