SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-13700E pairs a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with the Radeon RX 6600, a 1080p-oriented RDNA 2 GPU. This desktop combination sits at the 64th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings. The data shows a strong processor carrying a mid-range graphics card, a balance that favors productivity workloads over extreme frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using Intel's 10 nm process node. Its base clock runs at 1900 MHz, boosting up to 5.10 GHz when needed. The 65 W TDP classifies it as a power-efficient part for its core count, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. ECC memory support is present, a feature typically found in workstation-class setups. The chip includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, offering a fallback display output. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking potential.

Cache organization is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 helps with multi-threaded workloads where data sharing between cores is frequent. The die size is 257 mm². Benchmark results place this CPU in the 64th percentile among all processors, a solid mid-to-upper tier position. Its average benchmark score of 7957 puts it in close competition with several enterprise-class chips. The nearest rivals show tight margins: the AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7952 (a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7910 (0.6% behind), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8071 (1.4% ahead), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8110 (1.9% ahead). These results indicate the i7-13700E competes directly with older high-end server and HEDT processors, despite being a mainstream 65 W part.

For real workloads, the high boost clock of 5.10 GHz drives strong single-thread performance, while the 16 cores and 24 threads handle heavy parallel tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 shows substantial rendering capability, and the single-core score of 3944 indicates snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 and single-core score of 2437 corroborate this position. The architecture's efficiency allows it to deliver near-HEDT performance without the power draw of those older parts, making it a practical choice for sustained workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2816 and single-core is 397. Moving to R20, the multi-core score jumps to 11735 with a single-core score of 1656. The R23 results show 27941 multi-core and 3944 single-core. Geekbench adds another perspective: 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core. These numbers place the CPU firmly in the upper mid-range, with the 64th percentile ranking confirming it beats most processors but trails the true flagship parts.

The GPU benchmarks for the Radeon RX 6600 show a card designed for 1080p gaming with some 1440p capability. Its average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are remarkably close: the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030 (0% difference), the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049 (0.1% behind), the Tesla K20m scores 19089 (0.3% behind), and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954 (0.4% ahead). This clustering indicates the RX 6600 sits at a performance level where minor architectural differences determine the ranking.

Looking at specific GPU tests, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 reflects modern API performance. PassMark G3D shows 15096, while the G2D score is 889. Compute performance is notable: PassMark GPU Compute scores 6554, and Geekbench OpenCL scores 28850. The Vulkan score of 67623 and Metal score of 88398 (the latter more relevant for Apple platforms) show strong API versatility. The DirectX tests are more modest: DX9 at 197, DX11 at 152, DX12 at 51, and DX10 at 95. These varied numbers suggest the card performs better in compute and modern API workloads than in legacy DX12 titles.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU. The processor ranks at the 64th percentile while the GPU sits at the 63rd, but the CPU's absolute scores indicate it can drive far more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking. This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like rendering or compilation while maintaining decent gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6600 is capable of high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means estimates must come from benchmark scores. The PassMark G3D score of 15096 and DirectX 11 score of 152 suggest solid performance in API-friendly games. Expect playable frame rates at 1080p, with the CPU's strong single-core score of 3944 in Cinebench R23 ensuring minimal frame pacing issues.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 27941 indicates it can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets without impacting game performance. The GPU lacks dedicated hardware encoders that rival NVIDIA's NVENC, so CPU-based streaming is the practical route. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable during long streams.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this pairing. The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth handle effects and color grading at 1080p. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large media files. Expect smooth scrubbing in 1080p timelines and reasonable 4K export times, though not flagship-tier speed.

3D rendering: The CPU dominates here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 puts it ahead of many older HEDT parts, making CPU-based rendering (like Blender Cycles or V-Ray) very viable. The GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 performance assists with GPU-accelerated renders, though its 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. Dual rendering pipelines (CPU and GPU) can significantly reduce render times.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit greatly from the 24 threads. The high boost clock of 5.10 GHz speeds up single-threaded build steps, while the multi-core performance handles parallel compilation. The Geekbench single-core score of 2437 ensures responsive IDE interactions. ECC memory support is a plus for long-running test suites where data integrity matters.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical office tasks, but that means zero performance concerns. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is under load. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps system noise and heat low. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking ensures smooth 4K video playback and accelerated browser rendering, though office work rarely stresses either component.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need serious CPU horsepower without a flagship GPU. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit most, as the CPU's 27941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score directly translates to faster exports and renders. The GPU handles preview and real-time effects adequately at 1080p.

Software developers running builds, tests, and virtual machines will appreciate the 24 threads and ECC support. The high single-core boost helps with interactive tools. Students in engineering or computer science fields get a workstation-class CPU for heavy simulations or compilation, with the GPU covering gaming needs.

Small business workstations running data analysis, financial modeling, or CAD software will find the CPU's multi-core performance valuable. The 64th percentile CPU ranking ensures headroom for demanding professional applications. The GPU is less critical for these workloads but still supports acceleration in supported software.

Gamers at 1080p with a preference for CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or simulators will find this pairing balanced. The CPU ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU delivers acceptable average frame rates. Those playing at 1440p should expect to adjust settings down, as the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking suggests mid-range capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU ranks at the 64th percentile with an average score of 7957, while the GPU also sits at the 63rd percentile with an average score of 19036. However, the CPU's absolute performance far exceeds what the GPU can utilize in gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads like rendering or compilation, the CPU performs near its full potential. The GPU plays a supporting role, accelerating effects or previews but not bottlenecking the CPU. In gaming, the GPU becomes the constraint at higher resolutions or quality settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth limit texture-heavy scenes at 1440p and above.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, but the percentile gap suggests the CPU could drive a significantly faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Users upgrading the GPU later will see substantial performance gains, especially at 1440p. Conversely, upgrading the CPU while keeping the RX 6600 would yield minimal gaming improvements, as the GPU would remain the limiter.

Power delivery favors the CPU: a 65 W TDP for the processor versus 132 W for the GPU. The system's total draw remains moderate, allowing for smaller power supplies. The GPU requires a 300 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin connector, while the CPU runs efficiently within its 65 W envelope.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700E compare to the AMD EPYC 7551P?

A: The i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7957, while the EPYC 7551P scores 7952. The difference is 0.1%, making them statistically equivalent in overall performance, though the architectures differ significantly.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The base clock is 1900 MHz with a boost of 5.10 GHz, so there is headroom for manual tuning if cooling allows.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 64, meaning this pairing outperforms 64% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory. This is a notable feature for workstation users who need data integrity in long-running computations.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 has 28 ray tracing cores based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features, though performance is modest given the card's mid-range positioning.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA Quadro K6000?

A: The RX 6600 has an average benchmark score of 19036, while the Quadro K6000 scores 19030. The difference is 0%, making them essentially tied in overall GPU performance, despite very different architectures and release dates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Using the GPU's benchmark numbers, the RX 6600's PassMark G3D score of 15096 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1492 indicate solid 1080p gaming capability. The CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3944) ensures stable frame delivery in CPU-bound titles. In esports games like Valorant or CS2, expect frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. In AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth should deliver 60-90 FPS in most games, with drops below 60 in the most demanding titles.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 63rd percentile GPU ranking suggests users will need to lower settings to high or medium to maintain 60 FPS in modern games. The CPU's performance ensures that frame rate drops come from GPU limitations, not processor bottlenecks. For users targeting 1440p high refresh, this pairing will require careful settings management. The 8 GB VRAM may also cause texture quality reductions in some newer titles at 1440p.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700E with the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The overall tier sits at the 64th combined percentile, placing it in the upper mid-range of all tracked systems. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 2.0 part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 132 W TDP.

This pairing represents a CPU-first configuration, where the processor's capabilities exceed the GPU's. The result is a system that excels in productivity and multi-threaded workloads while providing respectable 1080p gaming. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking positions it competitively against older HEDT and server chips, while the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking keeps it relevant for current 1080p gaming. The 65 W CPU TDP allows for compact cooling solutions, while the GPU's 190 mm length fits most cases. This is a balanced desktop workstation for users who prioritize compute performance over raw gaming frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 uses the Navi 23 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The die contains 11,060 million transistors across a 237 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm². The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. Ray tracing is supported through 28 dedicated RT cores. The base clock runs at 1626 MHz, with a boost clock of 2491 MHz and a game clock of 2044 MHz.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. The GPU's compute capabilities include 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.86 TFLOPS FP16 (at 2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s. Power draw is 132 W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 300 W PSU. The card measures 190 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot form factor. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, connected via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 63rd percentile, with an average score of 19036. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 demonstrates modern API proficiency. Geekbench scores are strong for compute: OpenCL at 28850, Vulkan at 67623, and Metal at 88398. PassMark G3D scores 15096, with GPU compute at 6554. The DirectX legacy tests show lower numbers (DX9 at 197, DX10 at 95, DX11 at 152, DX12 at 51), indicating the card is optimized for modern workloads rather than older APIs.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 8.928 TFLOPS provides decent GPU acceleration in Blender or similar software, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 63rd percentile ranking suggests modest ray tracing performance compared to higher-tier cards. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may hinder 1440p performance in texture-heavy titles. The GPU is production status end-of-life, having been succeeded by Navi III architecture, but its benchmark scores remain competitive with current mid-range parts.