SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combine a high-core-count desktop processor with an entry-level 50-series GPU, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound productivity tasks. The data confirms a desktop-class build, with the processor performing at the 85th percentile among all CPUs and the graphics card at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the two components is stark. The Core i7-13700 posts an average benchmark score of 37,135, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 5050 achieves an average score of 21,035, sitting in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This 16-percentile gap indicates that the CPU is the dominant component, capable of feeding data far faster than the GPU can render it in most scenarios.

The CPU’s strength is its multi-threaded throughput. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 25,369 in multi-core and 2,008.5 in single-core, a ratio of roughly 12.6:1. This suggests that heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding will scale exceptionally well across the 16 cores and 24 threads. Conversely, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 17,326 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,502 indicate a card that is positioned for 1080p gaming rather than high-resolution or high-refresh-rate workloads.

In gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the RTX 5050. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark and 2,329 in Geekbench is more than sufficient for modern game logic, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates at 1080p. For esports titles at high refresh rates, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,101 suggests it can push high frame counts, but the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 12 score of 66 indicate it will struggle to maintain those rates at higher settings.

The bottleneck is reversed in compute workloads. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS and 80 tensor cores provide acceleration for AI tasks, but the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 138,974 and floating-point math score of 97,723 show it can handle data processing without GPU assistance. The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 443,900 further reinforces its role as the primary workhorse, with the GPU acting as a supplementary accelerator.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 5050 suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU scores 2,502 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 66 in Passmark DirectX 12, which are low scores for 4K rendering. Its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth would be a severe constraint at that resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37,135, which is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37,117) and Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112). It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093) and 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37,161).

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025 indicate strong rendering performance. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 90,334 can assist with effects and encoding, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex timelines.

Q: What is the GPU’s position relative to its rivals?

A: The RTX 5050’s average score of 21,035 is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713), 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153), 1% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237), and 1.6% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379).

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, and the base clock is 2.10 GHz, but the processor cannot be manually overclocked beyond these factory settings.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip.

Q: Is the GPU VRAM sufficient for modern games?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p gaming, but it may be limiting for texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions. The Passmark G3D score of 17,326 suggests it is a mid-range performer, not a high-end card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5050 is the limiting factor. Its Passmark DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 12 score of 66 are low, but the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,101 can drive high frame rates in lightweight esports titles at 1080p. Expect playable frame rates in competitive shooters, but not in demanding AAA games at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 indicates it can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming software. The GPU’s NVENC (tensor cores) offers hardware acceleration, but the 80 tensor cores are modest compared to higher-tier cards.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025 and Passmark multithread score of 36,387 show excellent rendering performance. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 90,334 can accelerate effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause issues with 4K timelines or heavy color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12,806 and R15 multi-core score of 3,692 indicate fast CPU-based rendering. For GPU rendering, the RTX 5050’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 RT cores can handle basic workloads, but the 8 GB VRAM is a bottleneck for complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 443,900 and data encryption score of 25,653 make it excellent for compilation, compression, and encryption tasks. The 16 cores are well-suited for parallel builds, and the 24 threads handle concurrent virtual machines or containers.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,101 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1,113 ensure snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle these tasks alone, making the discrete GPU unnecessary for this use case.

Who Should Build It

This build targets power users who need significant CPU throughput but have modest graphics requirements. The Core i7-13700’s 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs makes it ideal for content creators, developers, and small business workstations handling data-heavy tasks like compilation, compression, or multi-threaded office applications. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025 demonstrate capability for video editing and 3D modeling, though the GPU will limit final render quality.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 5050 adequate for medium settings. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking and Passmark G3D score of 17,326 place it in the mid-range category, suitable for esports titles and older games. However, gamers targeting high-refresh 1440p or 4K should look to higher-tier GPUs, as the 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for those resolutions.

Small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support and 16 cores, which provide reliable multi-threaded performance. The 65W TDP allows for lower power consumption in office environments, and the UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU fails. Developers working with large codebases will appreciate the Passmark data compression score of 443,900 and integer math score of 138,974, which speed up build times and data processing.

Students and general users would be better served by a lower-tier CPU and integrated graphics, as the performance of this build is wasted on basic tasks. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $384 and the GPU is 249 USD, but the combined cost is justified only for users who consistently push multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13700 delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance across all major benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,135. The 3DMark scores show strong scaling: 2,176 for 2 threads, 4,279 for 4 threads, 7,649 for 8 threads, 10,075 for 16 threads, and 11,737 for max threads. This scaling pattern indicates that the 16 cores are efficiently utilized, with minimal performance degradation as thread count increases.

The GPU’s performance is more modest. The RTX 5050 achieves an average benchmark score of 21,035, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its best result is in Geekbench OpenCL with 90,334, followed by Geekbench Vulkan with 89,381. The Passmark G3D score of 17,326 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,502 are consistent with an entry-level card. The GPU is 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713) but 1.6% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379).

The combined picture is a system that is CPU-bound in almost every scenario. The CPU’s performance is roughly 76% higher than the GPU’s average score (37,135 vs 21,035), and the combined percentile of 76 reflects the GPU pulling the overall score down. In gaming, this means the RTX 5050 will be the limiting factor, while in productivity tasks, the CPU will dominate. The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are drawn from synthetic benchmarks, but the scores are consistent across multiple test suites.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5nm process at TSMC, with a chip size of 149 mm² and 16,900 million transistors. It features 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2317 MHz with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and memory runs at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective).

The benchmark scores reveal a card that is positioned for 1080p gaming. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 186 and DirectX 10 score of 103 are relatively high, indicating good legacy API performance, but the DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 12 score of 66 are low, suggesting weaker performance in modern games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,502 is a more modern benchmark and confirms the card’s mid-range status. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 89,381 shows better performance in compute-heavy workloads.

For rendering, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS (1:1) are adequate for basic 3D tasks, but the 8 GB VRAM is a significant limitation. The pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are modest, and the 20 RT cores are insufficient for heavy ray-traced workloads. The GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 9,184 indicates it can accelerate some compute tasks, but it is not a professional-grade rendering card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 130W TDP of the GPU suggest a system that can be powered by a 300W PSU, as indicated by the GPU’s suggested PSU rating. The motherboard must support Intel Socket 1700 and the 13th Gen Raptor Lake architecture.

The upgrade path is limited by the socket. Intel Socket 1700 is not forward-compatible with newer generations, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. However, the CPU’s performance is strong enough that it does not need an immediate upgrade. The GPU, on the other hand, can be upgraded to a higher-tier card within the PCIe 5.0 slot. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth, as the RTX 5050’s 8 GB and 320.0 GB/s are the primary bottlenecks.

Memory upgrades are also possible. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose based on motherboard compatibility. Dual-channel configuration is required for optimal performance. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per core L2 cache are already generous, so cache upgrades are not applicable. The system’s overall bottleneck is the GPU, and upgrading it would provide the most significant performance improvement for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is a 13th Gen Raptor Lake processor with 16 cores and 24 threads, running at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU is a 50-series card based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile rank is 76, indicating that this system outperforms 76% of all builds in the database.

The build is characterized by a significant performance imbalance. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This makes the system ideal for CPU-intensive workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, but less suitable for high-end gaming. The GPU’s performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (1.6% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (0.6% slower), placing it in the mid-range category.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong performance. The system is well-suited for a professional workstation or a gaming PC at 1080p with medium settings. The lack of measured FPS data is a notable gap, but the synthetic benchmark scores provide a clear picture of the system’s capabilities. For users who need multi-threaded CPU power and only modest graphics performance, this is a balanced choice within its constraints.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10nm process at Intel. It has a die size of 257 mm² and features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is 65W. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as a notable feature.

The benchmark scores show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 is strong, as is the Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025. The Passmark multithread score of 36,387 and 3DMark max threads score of 11,737 confirm the CPU’s ability to handle heavily parallel workloads. The single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,008.5 and Passmark single-thread at 4,101.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.1% of its average score of 37,135, indicating a highly competitive segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37,117) and Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112) are essentially tied, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37,161) is marginally faster. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs reflects its strong position, though it is not at the very top of the performance hierarchy.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at data-intensive tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 443,900 and integer math score of 138,974 indicate excellent performance for compilation, encryption, and compression. The floating-point math score of 97,723 and extended instructions score of 26,578 show strong scientific computing capabilities. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample parallelism for video encoding, 3D rendering, and virtualization, making this a versatile workstation processor.