SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. Its configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The chip carries 30 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, which supports the high single-thread throughput observed in testing.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 85th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 37135. The multi-threaded performance is substantial: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 25369 points, while the 3DMark max-threads score is 11737. Single-thread performance is equally notable, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 2008.5 and 3DMark single-thread scoring 1092. The scaling from 2 threads (2176) to 4 threads (4279) to 8 threads (7649) shows strong linear gains, suggesting the core architecture efficiently utilizes additional threads without significant contention.

The nearest rivals in the database highlight how tightly clustered the competition is. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 sits at an average score of 37117, a 0% delta from the i7-13700. The Intel Core i9-12900T trails by just 0.1% at 37112, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is ahead by 0.1% at 37161. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 also comes in at 37093, a 0.1% deficit. This indicates the i7-13700 is positioned in an extremely competitive segment where a few points separate leaders, and real-world differences will be driven more by workload-specific optimizations than raw aggregate scores.

PassMark tests reveal workload characteristics. Integer math scores 138974, floating-point math scores 97723, and extended instructions score 26578. Data compression hits 443900, while data encryption reaches 25653. The find-prime-numbers test scores 147, which is comparatively low and suggests the processor's strength lies in parallel integer and floating-point tasks rather than latency-sensitive prime enumeration. The multithread score of 36387 and physics score of 2053 reinforce the picture of a balanced desktop chip that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded scenarios.

The 65 W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, indicating efficient power management. This allows the chip to sustain high boost clocks without excessive thermal demands, which is reflected in the strong single-thread scores. The architecture supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC memory capability as an option. This broad memory compatibility makes the platform flexible for various build budgets.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The single-thread score of 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 indicate strong per-core performance that drives high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7649 shows that even moderate multi-threading is handled well, which matters for modern game engines that span multiple cores. The 85th percentile CPU ranking positions this chip to avoid bottlenecking a high-end GPU in most scenarios.

Streaming: The 24 threads and 16 cores provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcast tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 suggests the processor can handle x264 encoding at high presets while gameplay continues. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 also indicates fast handling of stream data overhead.

Video editing: Multi-threaded workloads scale effectively, as shown by the 3DMark max-threads score of 11737 and Geekbench multicore score of 17025. Timeline rendering, effects processing, and export tasks benefit from the 16-core configuration. The floating-point math score of 97723 supports complex color grading and filter operations. The 30 MB L3 cache helps keep working sets resident during edits.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multicore scores 12806, while R15 multicore reaches 3692. These numbers indicate strong performance in CPU-based render engines. The 16 cores will accelerate ray tracing workloads that rely on CPU geometry processing. The 85th percentile standing confirms this chip ranks among the top 15% of all CPUs for such tasks.

Software development: Compilation tasks that parallelize across cores will see strong gains from the 24 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 138974 is particularly relevant for code compilation, which is heavily integer-bound. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 shows sustained performance under full load, which is typical during large builds. The ECC memory support is a plus for developers working on critical systems.

Student and office work: The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2176 and single-thread score of 1092 handle everyday productivity applications with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 4101 ensures responsive interaction in document editing and web browsing. The 65 W TDP means lower heat output and quieter operation in office environments, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display solution without a discrete GPU.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform. This socket supports the 13th Gen Core series, and the processor is listed as production status "Active" with a release date of January 2023. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders the choice between older, more affordable memory and newer, higher-bandwidth options. ECC memory support is listed as available.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This provides high bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage devices. The CPU itself has a 65 W TDP, which is modest, but the GPU paired with it has a 285 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The combination of a 65 W CPU and a 285 W GPU means a 600 W power supply provides comfortable headroom for the entire system, including motherboard, storage, and peripherals.

Since the multiplier is not unlocked, overclocking is limited, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz already delivers high single-thread performance. The platform's upgrade path within the same socket is constrained to 13th Gen parts, as the socket is not forward-compatible with later generations. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible and will work with newer platforms if the builder chooses to migrate the GPU to a future build.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or move from DDR4 to DDR5 if starting with DDR4, as the memory controller supports both. For storage, the Gen 5 PCIe lanes allow for the fastest NVMe drives. The PSU headroom from the 600 W suggestion means adding more drives or upgrading to a higher-TDP GPU later would require a PSU reevaluation, but the current configuration is well within limits.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU both sit at similar percentile positions — the CPU at 85th and the GPU at 84th — which indicates a well-balanced pairing. The combined percentile is 85, suggesting neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37135 and the GPU's average of 44795 reflect different measurement scales but similar relative standing among their respective peers.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 for the CPU shows it can sustain high throughput in gaming-related workloads that use multiple threads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 1092 (3DMark) is likely sufficient to feed the GPU at high frame rates, but at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU could become the limiting factor. The PassMark single-thread score of 4101 reinforces that the CPU's per-core performance is above average but not class-leading.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 31624 versus the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36387 shows that in compute-heavy tasks, the CPU can hold its own, but in graphics-specific workloads, the GPU dominates. The passmark GPU compute score of 18396 indicates the GPU's compute capability is roughly half its graphics score, suggesting that for general-purpose GPU compute, the CPU might be more balanced. The 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores on the GPU provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, which shifts the balance in those tasks decisively to the GPU.

The 192-bit memory bus on the GPU with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, but the CPU's memory support for dual-channel DDR5 may offer lower bandwidth depending on the memory kit used. This could create a bottleneck in data-intensive workloads that stream large datasets between CPU and GPU. The 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for most games at high resolutions, but texture-heavy mods or professional workloads could exceed this, shifting the bottleneck to GPU memory capacity.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 2008.5, while the multicore score is 25369, which is roughly 12.6 times higher. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 rises to 11737 at max threads, a similar ratio. This indicates the CPU scales well across all 16 cores without significant diminishing returns.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals in aggregate?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, which is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117), Intel Core i9-12900T (37112), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093). The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is slightly ahead at 37161, a 0.1% edge. These are effectively tied scores.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU has 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth from a 192-bit bus using GDDR6X memory. This bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes without stuttering, though the 12 GB capacity is the more likely limiting factor in extreme cases.

Q: Is the GPU's production status a concern?

A: The GPU is listed as "End-of-life" with a release date of January 2023. This means it is no longer in active production, but it remains a capable part in the database with an 84th percentile ranking. Availability will decline over time.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, which places this pairing in the top 15% of all builds in the database. The CPU is at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile, so neither component drags the other down significantly.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this GPU, and what does that imply for the build?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W. With a CPU TDP of 65 W and a GPU TDP of 285 W, the total component draw is 350 W, leaving 250 W of headroom for the rest of the system. This is comfortable for most configurations.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers playing at 1440p or 4K resolutions where the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth can be fully utilized. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking ensures it won't hold back the GPU at these resolutions, and the GPU's 84th percentile standing means high frame rates in demanding titles. The 60 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, while the 240 tensor cores accelerate DLSS, which is beneficial for high-refresh gaming.

Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 25369 handling export tasks, while the GPU's CUDA cores (7680 shading units) accelerate effects and rendering in GPU-accelerated software. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance for 3D applications. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 4K video timelines and moderate 3D scenes.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math performance of 138974 in PassMark, which speeds up compilation, and the ECC memory support for reliability. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 18396) can be used for machine learning inference tasks, though the 12 GB VRAM limits model sizes.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the 65 W CPU TDP, which keeps power and cooling costs low, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output. The dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) allows for flexible budgeting. The 85th percentile CPU ranking ensures the system remains responsive for years. The GPU, while end-of-life, still ranks at the 84th percentile, so it will handle demanding software without issue.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The chip, codenamed AD104, operates at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth over a 192-bit GDDR6X interface.

The GPU has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It also features 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI acceleration respectively. The pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 40.09 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio), which is notable for compute tasks that can use reduced precision.

Benchmark performance places this GPU at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44795. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5024, which reflects strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 176953, and Vulkan scores 213808, suggesting robust compute and graphics API support. PassMark G3D scores 31624, while GPU compute scores 18396. The DirectX 11 score of 288 and DirectX 12 score of 116 in PassMark show the GPU's strength in modern APIs compared to legacy ones.

The nearest rivals in the database show the competitive positioning. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, which is 0.8% higher than the 4070 Ti. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384, a 1.3% advantage. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, which is 1.6% lower. The Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, a 1.7% edge. These are all within 2% of the 4070 Ti, indicating a tight cluster of performance at this tier.

The 285 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU indicate the power draw is significant but manageable with a quality power supply. The dual-slot design and 285 mm length (11.2 inches) require a case with adequate clearance. The 1x 16-pin power connector is the modern standard. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest games and software.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in a desktop configuration, as classified by the buildClass field. The combined percentile is 85, placing this system in the top 15% of all builds in the database. The CPU is at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile, so the system is balanced with no single component dominating the other.

The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. Both components were released in early January 2023, with the CPU having a launch MSRP of $384 and the GPU at $799 USD. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life.

This pairing represents a high-end desktop system suitable for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP and 285 W GPU TDP combine for a total of 350 W, which is well within the 600 W suggested PSU. The system uses the LGA 1700 platform with DDR4 or DDR5 memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 for the GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700 achieves an average benchmark score of 37135, ranking at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 25369, and single-core is 2008.5. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 10075, max-threads is 11737, and single-thread is 1092. Geekbench multicore scores 17025, single-core 2329. PassMark multithread scores 36387, single-thread 4101.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 44795, ranking at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5024. Geekbench OpenCL scores 176953, Vulkan 213808. PassMark G3D scores 31624, GPU compute 18396.

The combined picture shows a system where both components are within one percentile point of each other (85th CPU, 84th GPU), resulting in a combined percentile of 85. This indicates no significant bottleneck in either direction. The CPU's nearest rivals are within 0.1% in average score, while the GPU's nearest rivals are within 1.7%, showing the GPU is in a slightly more competitive cluster.

The data shows the CPU's multi-threaded performance is its strength, with the max-threads score of 11737 being 10.7 times the single-thread score of 1092. The GPU's compute performance (18396) is lower than its graphics performance (31624), suggesting it is optimized for rendering rather than general compute. Together, the system offers strong performance across a wide range of applications, from gaming to professional workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i7-13700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. All frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations rather than measured results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 suggests strong performance in modern DirectX 12 games. The 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs implies this card will handle most titles at high settings. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth should support high texture quality without memory pressure. At 4K, the 12 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in the most demanding titles, but the 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides ample compute headroom.

The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 2008.5) is sufficient to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the 16 cores handle background tasks without impacting gaming performance. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7649 indicates that games using up to eight threads will see strong performance. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, but the 85th percentile ranking means it will still deliver high frame rates.

For esports titles that are lightly threaded, the CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2176 and single-thread score of 1092 suggest frame rates in the hundreds. For AAA games, the GPU will be the primary driver, and the 5024 Steel Nomad score indicates smooth gameplay at high settings in most titles. Ray tracing workloads will benefit from the 60 RT cores, while DLSS acceleration from the 240 tensor cores can boost frame rates in supported games.

Since no measured FPS data is available, these are qualitative expectations. The system's combined percentile of 85, however, puts it in the top 15% of builds, which historically corresponds to high frame rates at 1440p and playable frame rates at 4K in most titles. Users seeking definitive FPS numbers for specific games should consult direct benchmarks for this pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds