SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti combination?

A: The build sits at the 90th combined percentile across all desktop configurations, placing it in the top decile of systems. The CPU alone ranks in the 85th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 95th percentile versus all GPUs, making this a high-end desktop pairing.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the Core i7-13700 scores 37,135 while the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37,117, resulting in a delta of 0%. The Intel chip also sits within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-12900T and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, indicating a tightly clustered mid-to-high CPU performance band.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. It runs at a base clock of 1560 MHz with a boost clock of 1860 MHz, and memory at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory and what memory types are compatible?

A: Yes, the Core i7-13700 supports ECC memory. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes an integrated UHD Graphics 770 unit for basic display output.

Q: What is the socket and PCIe configuration for this CPU?

A: The Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). It has a 10 nm process node from Intel, a die size of 257 mm², and a 65 W TDP.

Q: What are the closest GPU rivals and how do they compare?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti's average benchmark score is 131,938. The NVIDIA L4 scores 131,072 (0.7% lower), the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135,218 (2.4% higher), the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (2.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (2.6% higher). The 3090 Ti is effectively within a 3% window of these professional-grade cards.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a desktop build operating at the 90th percentile, with the GPU carrying the heavier load in raw compute. The RTX 3090 Ti's average benchmark score of 131,938 places it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, a dominant position that only a small fraction of graphics cards exceed. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741, Geekbench OpenCL score of 174,441, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633 collectively indicate strong rasterization and compute throughput.

The CPU, Intel Core i7-13700, delivers an average benchmark score of 37,135, which lands it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 25,369 in multi-core and 2,008.5 in single-core; in Geekbench, it scores 17,025 multi-core and 2,329 single-core. The 3DMark thread-scaling results show a clear progression: 2,176 for 2 threads, 4,279 for 4 threads, 7,649 for 8 threads, 10,075 for 16 threads, and 11,737 for max threads, demonstrating that the 16-core, 24-thread configuration scales effectively as workload parallelism increases.

The raw compute metrics reinforce this. PassMark multi-thread score sits at 36,387, while integer math reaches 138,974 and floating-point math hits 97,723. Data compression scores 443,900 and data encryption scores 25,653, indicating strong throughput for memory-bound operations. Single-thread PassMark is 4,101, which is respectable but not class-leading, consistent with the CPU's 85th percentile position.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals underscores how tightly grouped this segment is: the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37,117 average, 0% delta), Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112, 0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37,161, -0.1% delta), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093, 0.1% delta) all sit within a 0.2% band. The i7-13700 is not meaningfully faster or slower than these alternatives; it is a solidly average performer within its peer group.

For the GPU, the rival comparison is similarly tight but with slightly larger spreads. The NVIDIA L4 trails by 0.7%, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, A10M, and Radeon PRO W6800 lead by 2.4% to 2.6%. This places the 3090 Ti in a competitive position against professional workstation cards, though it is not the absolute top performer in its immediate class.

The combined picture is one of an asymmetric pairing: a 95th-percentile GPU paired with an 85th-percentile CPU. The system's 90th combined percentile reflects that the GPU is the dominant contributor to overall performance, while the CPU provides sufficient but not exceptional compute headroom.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver, and in most GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. The RTX 3090 Ti's 95th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 85th percentile means that for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the graphics card will saturate first, leaving the CPU with headroom.

However, the CPU's thread-scaling results reveal where it can become a constraint. The 3DMark scores show that from 2 threads (2,176) to 8 threads (7,649), scaling is nearly linear, but from 16 threads (10,075) to max threads (11,737), the gain is only 16.5%. This suggests that the 16-core, 24-thread configuration hits diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, which could matter in heavily multi-threaded CPU tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering where all cores are stressed.

In CPU-bound workloads, the i7-13700's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,008.5, Geekbench single-core of 2,329) will set the ceiling. These scores are competitive but not top-tier, meaning that at very high frame rates in esports titles or in lightly-threaded productivity apps, the CPU could limit performance. The GPU will be waiting on the CPU to feed it frames, and the FPS will plateau at whatever the CPU can generate.

The PassMark physics score of 2,053 and find prime numbers score of 147 are relatively modest, indicating that certain integer-heavy and physics simulation workloads will not be this CPU's strongest suit. In contrast, the floating-point math score of 97,723 and extended instructions score of 26,578 are strong, suggesting that scientific computing and SIMD-optimized code will run well.

For FPS scaling, the absence of measured data means we must rely on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,741 and Vulkan score of 215,633 suggest strong rasterization and API efficiency, which typically translates to high frame rates at any resolution. But the CPU's 85th percentile ranking means that at 1080p, where CPU overhead is more prominent, the system will be more balanced; at 4K, the GPU will dominate and the CPU will rarely bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct observations. The RTX 3090 Ti's 95th percentile GPU ranking and the i7-13700's 85th percentile CPU ranking provide the basis for these expectations.

At 1080p, the system should deliver very high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,008.5, multi-core 25,369) being sufficient to keep up with the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth mean texture-heavy scenes will not cause memory bottlenecks. Expect frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive shooters and esports titles, and 100+ FPS in most AAA games at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, and the system should deliver high refresh rate performance in most games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 and Vulkan score of 215,633 indicate strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, so modern titles using these APIs should see excellent scaling. The GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 625.0 GTexel/s texture rate will handle demanding geometry and shading workloads without issue.

At 4K, the system remains viable for high-refresh gaming, though the CPU's 85th percentile ranking may become less relevant as the GPU takes over. The 24 GB VRAM buffer and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are ample for 4K textures and high-resolution assets. Frame rates will be lower than at 1440p, but the GPU's 95th percentile position suggests that 60+ FPS in most AAA titles at ultra settings is a reasonable expectation, with higher frame rates in less demanding games.

The key caveat is that these are estimates, not measurements. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact pairing means that actual performance could vary by 10-20% depending on the game engine, driver optimization, and system configuration. The benchmark scores provide a solid foundation, but they cannot capture every game-specific nuance.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need maximum GPU compute without sacrificing CPU versatility. The 95th percentile GPU ranking makes it ideal for gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions who want to run ultra settings with high refresh rates, as the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth will handle any modern game at these resolutions. The 85th percentile CPU ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, though it is not the absolute fastest processor available.

Content creators and 3D rendering professionals will benefit from the GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) compute, which accelerates rendering, video encoding, and simulation workloads. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based tasks, making this suitable for architectural visualization, product design, and machine learning inference.

Software developers working on compute-heavy applications will find the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads valuable for compilation and parallel workloads, while the GPU's 174,441 OpenCL score indicates strong general-purpose compute for prototyping and testing. The CPU's ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in long-running computations.

Students and small business workstations are also viable use cases, but this is overkill for basic productivity. The system's 90th combined percentile means it is a high-end build, and the cost of the components suggests it is aimed at users who need serious performance, not casual users. The CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide some flexibility for office work when the discrete GPU is not needed.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the GA102 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It features 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, delivering a pixel rate of 208.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 625.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute of 40.00 TFLOPS and FP16 compute of 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) provide balanced performance for both single-precision and half-precision workloads.

The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory operates at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) across a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a massive memory pool and bandwidth figure, sufficient for 4K gaming with high-resolution textures, large 3D scenes, and data-intensive compute tasks. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI workloads respectively, making this GPU capable of real-time ray tracing and DLSS-based upscaling.

The benchmark scores confirm the GPU's high-end positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 reflects strong DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 174,441 and Vulkan score of 215,633 show robust compute and cross-API compatibility. The 95th percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it among the top 5% of graphics cards, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA L4 (0.7% lower), RTX 4000 Ada Generation (2.4% higher), and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (2.6% higher).

For rendering, the 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth mean that GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane will see strong performance, especially with the 24 GB VRAM allowing large scenes to fit entirely in memory. The 336 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI-accelerated features, while the 84 RT cores handle ray-traced effects without significant performance penalties.

The GPU's 450 W TDP, triple-slot design, and 850 W suggested PSU indicate it is a power-hungry component that requires a robust cooling solution and a high-capacity power supply. The 1x 16-pin power connector is a modern standard, but older PSUs may need adapters.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support available.

The architecture is Raptor Lake, which is a hybrid design combining performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The 3DMark thread-scaling results show that the CPU scales well from 2 threads (2,176) to 16 threads (10,075), but the jump to max threads (11,737) is only 16.5% higher, suggesting that the 24-thread configuration offers diminishing returns beyond 16 threads.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 25,369 and single-core score of 2,008.5 place it in a competitive position for both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores of 17,025 multi-core and 2,329 single-core confirm this pattern. The PassMark results show strong integer math (138,974), floating-point math (97,723), and data compression (443,900), but weaker physics (2,053) and prime number finding (147) scores.

The 85th percentile ranking versus all CPUs means it is in the top 15% of processors, but its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (0% delta), Intel Core i9-12900T (0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (-0.1% delta), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (0.1% delta) — are all within a rounding error of its average score of 37,135. This indicates that the i7-13700 is not a standout performer in its class, but rather a solid mid-to-high-end option that competes closely with several alternatives.

For real workloads, the CPU handles multi-threaded productivity tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score and PassMark multi-thread score of 36,387. Single-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light gaming will also perform well, given the single-core scores. The 5.20 GHz boost clock provides strong burst performance for latency-sensitive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The combined percentile of 90 places it in the top 10% of all desktop configurations, making it a high-end system. The GPU's 95th percentile is the standout feature, while the CPU's 85th percentile is good but not exceptional.

The pairing is asymmetric: the GPU is a top-5% component, while the CPU is a top-15% component. This means the system is best suited for workloads that are GPU-heavy, such as high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering, and AI inference. CPU-heavy workloads will still perform well, but they will not be the system's primary strength.

The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary system with room for the GPU's triple-slot design and 336 mm length. The GPU's 450 W TDP and 850 W suggested PSU requirement mean the system needs a substantial power supply and adequate cooling. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, so the overall thermal load is dominated by the GPU.

The overall tier is high-end, driven primarily by the GPU. The system's 90th combined percentile reflects that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop builds, but it is not at the absolute top tier, which would require a higher-performing CPU to match the GPU's 95th percentile ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p and 4K, the RTX 3090 Ti's 95th percentile ranking and 24 GB VRAM will deliver high frame rates at ultra settings, with the CPU's 85th percentile ranking providing sufficient headroom. Estimated FPS should exceed 144 at 1440p in most titles and remain above 60 at 4K in AAA games.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the 336 tensor cores and 12 Ultimate support) and the CPU's 16 cores/24 threads provide ample resources for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The multi-thread score of 11,737 in 3DMark max threads indicates the CPU can handle the overhead of streaming software while the GPU handles the game rendering.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 and PassMark data compression score of 443,900 support fast timeline operations and export encoding. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated rendering in editors like DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro.

3D rendering: The GPU's 95th percentile score, 84 RT cores, and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth make it excellent for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 24 GB VRAM allows large scenes to fit entirely in memory, avoiding out-of-core spills. The CPU's multi-thread score of 25,369 in Cinebench R23 will also handle CPU-based rendering tasks competently.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 36,387, will speed up compilation of large codebases. The 5.20 GHz boost clock provides fast single-threaded execution for IDE responsiveness, while the ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4,101 in PassMark and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide smooth performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The GPU will sit idle during such tasks, but the system will handle them effortlessly.