SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM form a desktop pairing that occupies a distinct position in the performance hierarchy. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture chip with 5888 shading units, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. This combination sits at the 68th percentile overall, indicating a solidly above-average system, though the GPU itself is positioned at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700 delivers a strong multi-threaded showing, with a 3DMark max-threads score of 11737 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369. These figures place it well ahead of many desktop parts, and the data confirms it is not a bottleneck in most workloads. The single-thread performance is equally robust, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2329. This combination of high single-thread and multi-thread scores makes the CPU suitable for both lightly threaded applications and heavily parallel tasks.

The processor’s 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB per-core L2 cache, and 80 KB per-core L1 cache provide ample capacity for demanding workloads. The 16 cores are split between performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact distribution. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is among the highest in the data, which directly contributes to the strong single-thread results. In Passmark tests, the CPU achieves 138974 in integer math and 97723 in floating-point math, demonstrating balanced arithmetic capabilities. The data compression score of 443900 and encryption score of 25653 indicate that the processor handles data-intensive tasks efficiently.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-13700 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i9-12900T (deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (deltaPct -0.1), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (deltaPct 0.1). These deltas are negligible, meaning the i7-13700 sits at the top of its immediate competitive cluster. The average benchmark score of 37135 places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating that only 15 percent of processors in the database outperform it. For real workloads, this translates to smooth performance in office productivity, responsive application launches, and capable handling of compilation tasks where multi-threaded scores matter.

The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12806 and R15 multi-core score of 3692 reinforce the CPU’s position. The single-core R20 score of 1807 and R15 score of 285 show that legacy single-threaded applications will not suffer. The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 confirms this trend. With a TDP of 65 watts, the CPU is relatively power-efficient for its performance class, which matters for system cooling requirements. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility, and it includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, which can serve as a fallback display output.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear asymmetry between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This gap suggests that in most CPU-bound scenarios, the processor will be waiting on the graphics card. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall system score below what the CPU alone would suggest. In gaming workloads, the RTX 3070 TiM is likely to be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. Conversely, in productivity tasks like data compression or encryption, the CPU’s high scores (443900 and 25653 respectively) mean it will dominate the workload, and the GPU will remain largely idle.

The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 versus the 2-thread score of 2176 shows that scaling is nearly linear up to 16 threads, indicating good utilization of all cores. The 8-thread score of 7649 is approximately 76 percent of the 16-thread score, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads but still strong scaling. For gaming, most titles use fewer than 8 threads, so the CPU’s 4-thread score of 4279 and 2-thread score of 2176 are more relevant. These scores are high enough that the GPU will be the bottleneck in most scenarios. The Passmark physics score of 2053 and the floating-point math score of 97723 indicate that the CPU can handle physics calculations in games without issue.

The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a constraint at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy assets. The 50th percentile GPU placement means half of all GPUs in the database are faster, which will cap frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU’s 85th percentile placement means it has headroom to support a faster GPU if the user upgrades later. The data suggests that for a balanced build, the GPU should be upgraded first to better match the CPU’s capability. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU has ample threads to handle encoding, while the GPU handles rendering; this combination is workable, though the GPU’s mid-tier position will limit overall frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13700 produces an average benchmark score of 37135, which places it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are statistically identical. The Intel Core i9-12900T trails by just 0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is behind by 0.1 percent. These margins are within noise, so the i7-13700 is effectively the reference point for this performance tier. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 25369 is particularly notable, as this benchmark is commonly used to gauge rendering performance. The single-core score of 2008.5 is also competitive.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the fact pack, meaning its percentile of 50 is derived from other data sources. The GPU’s average benchmark score is listed as 0, indicating that no direct measurements are available for this specific card. This is a limitation of the data, but the percentile placement still provides a general reference. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1) suggest it is capable of handling modern gaming and some compute tasks. The texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s are mid-range figures.

The combined picture shows a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The 68th combined percentile reflects this mix. For CPU-bound benchmarks like 3DMark physics or Passmark integer math, the system will score near the top. For GPU-bound benchmarks like 3DMark graphics tests, the system will score near the 50th percentile. This split means that users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads will be satisfied, while those who prioritize gaming will see average performance. The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 17025 and single-core score of 2329 confirm its strong showing across different benchmarking suites.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but do not require top-tier graphics performance. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, particularly the Passmark integer math score of 138974 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369, which speed up compilation times. Data analysts working with compression or encryption tasks will see strong results given the 443900 data compression score and 25653 encryption score. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU capable for simulations and coding assignments, though the GPU may limit any machine learning work that relies on CUDA cores.

Small business workstations running virtualization or database servers will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads, along with ECC memory support, which is listed as true. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking means it outperforms most workstation-class processors in the database. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution will find the system adequate, though the GPU’s 50th percentile placement means they should not expect maximum settings at 4K. Content creators who edit video will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core performance for rendering, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may be limiting for effects-heavy projects. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, reducing the need for a discrete GPU in non-gaming builds.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $384, which positions it as a mid-range to upper-mid-range processor. The GPU has no listed launch MSRP, so no pricing information is available for it. The system as a whole is best suited for users who run CPU-intensive applications daily and game occasionally. The high CPU percentile and mid GPU percentile mean that the system will excel in productivity benchmarks but deliver average gaming frame rates. For a workstation that occasionally games, this is a sensible configuration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors. The die size is 392 mm², and the transistor density is 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The base clock is 915 MHz, and the boost clock is 1410 MHz. The GPU includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS respectively.

The FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS is the key figure for traditional rasterization. This places the GPU in the mid-range of the current database, consistent with its 50th percentile ranking. The texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s indicate that the GPU can handle modern game textures at 1080p and 1440p. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most current titles at these resolutions, but may be tight for 4K textures or future releases. The memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is adequate for the GPU’s compute capability, though higher-end cards in the database likely exceed this figure.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s data transfer needs. The TDP of 220 W is moderate, and the suggested PSU of 550 W indicates that the system does not require an excessive power supply. The triple-slot cooling solution and 270 mm length mean that case compatibility should be checked before purchase. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, which is relevant for long-term availability and driver support considerations.

The RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though the performance will be moderate given the GPU’s mid-tier position. The tensor cores support DLSS, which can improve frame rates in supported games. For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS suggests that the GPU can handle basic 3D rendering tasks, but dedicated workstation GPUs would be faster. The 184 TMUs and 96 ROPs provide a balanced texture and pixel throughput. Overall, the GPU is a competent mid-range part that pairs adequately with the high-end CPU, though it will be the limiting factor in GPU-intensive scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4101 in Passmark and 1092 in 3DMark single-thread ensures that frame times are consistent, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means that 144 Hz at 1080p is achievable in esports titles, while demanding AAA games will likely run between 60-100 FPS at high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but not for 4K.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 ensuring that encoding does not impact game performance significantly. The GPU’s NVENC encoder is not detailed in the fact pack, but the presence of tensor cores suggests hardware encoding is available, offloading the CPU further.

Video editing: The CPU’s high multi-core scores, including the Passmark multi-thread score of 36387, speed up video export times. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and color grading, though the mid-tier position means 4K timelines will require proxies for smooth editing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance make this system viable for entry-level 3D rendering. Blender or similar software will use both components, with the CPU handling geometry and the GPU handling shading. The 8 GB VRAM limits texture sizes in complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 138974 and data compression score of 443900 make compilation and code analysis fast. The 16 cores and 24 threads allow parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP means the system can run continuously without excessive heat.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The system handles spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing with ease, and the high multi-thread scores future-proof against more demanding workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU will not bottleneck the CPU’s PCIe capability, but upgrading to a Gen 5 GPU in the future would require a platform change. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is low, and the recommended PSU of 550 W for the GPU suggests that the current power supply has headroom.

A sensible next upgrade would be a faster GPU, as the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking indicates it has significant headroom. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking is the clear bottleneck for gaming. Upgrading to a GPU with higher VRAM and bandwidth would improve 4K performance and allow for higher texture settings. The CPU’s socket supports future 13th-generation and possibly 14th-generation parts, though the fact pack does not specify compatibility beyond the current generation. The DDR5 memory support means that users can upgrade from DDR4 without changing the motherboard.

The 30 MB of L3 cache and 16 cores provide a solid foundation for future workloads. The CPU’s production status is active, meaning it will remain available for purchase. The GPU’s end-of-life status suggests that availability may decline over time. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is adequate for current GPUs, and the 550 W suggested PSU leaves room for a GPU with a higher TDP, as long as the total system power stays within limits. The triple-slot GPU design means that case clearance should be verified before any upgrade.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 is at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37135.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is within 0.1 percent of the AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, meaning they are statistically identical in average score.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is exactly average in the database.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 220 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the fact pack does not contain measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggest that in gaming, the GPU will be the primary limiter. At 1080p, the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with esports games reaching high refresh rates. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-tier compute performance will require reduced settings in demanding titles to maintain 60 FPS. At 4K, the GPU will likely fall below 60 FPS in most AAA games, and the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture popping.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1092, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming workloads. The 4-thread score of 4279 and 8-thread score of 7649 indicate that even older games that use fewer threads will run smoothly. The Passmark physics score of 2053 suggests that physics-heavy games will not strain the CPU. The GPU’s 46 RT cores support ray tracing, but the mid-tier FP32 performance means that enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce frame rates. DLSS via the 184 tensor cores can help recover some performance, but the estimates remain that this is a 1080p and 1440p gaming system, not a 4K one.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700, a desktop-class CPU at the 85th percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, a desktop-class GPU at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 68, indicating that the system is above average overall. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide exceptional multi-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 36387. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it a competent mid-range graphics card, but it is the clear bottleneck in this pairing.

The build class is desktop, and the system is suited for productivity tasks that leverage the CPU’s high core count and memory bandwidth. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means that gaming performance is average, but the CPU ensures that no CPU-bound workload will be constrained. The 68th combined percentile places this system above the majority of builds in the database, though not at the top tier. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W and the GPU’s TDP of 220 W suggest a system that is relatively power-efficient for its performance. The end-of-life status of the GPU and the active status of the CPU indicate that the CPU has a longer expected availability window. Overall, this is a well-balanced build for CPU-heavy workloads with acceptable gaming capability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds