SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a high-performance desktop combination that delivers strong 1440p and capable 4K gaming, alongside excellent multi-threaded productivity. The data shows a system with an 80th percentile combined performance ranking, indicating a well-balanced build where the CPU’s substantial core count complements the GPU’s high bandwidth and rendering throughput. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung’s 8 nm process node, featuring a die size of 392 mm² and housing 17,400 million transistors. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, which drives its impressive compute capabilities. The memory subsystem is a critical strength: 8 GB of GDDR6X memory runs at 19 Gbps effective across a 256-bit bus, resulting in a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is substantial for the GPU’s class and is a key factor in maintaining high frame rates at higher resolutions where data throughput becomes a bottleneck.

In terms of raw compute, the RTX 3070 Ti delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 21.75 TFLOPS for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio that is beneficial for workloads that can utilize mixed precision. The GPU contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, with a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it includes 48 RT cores, while 192 Tensor cores handle AI-based tasks like DLSS. The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering pipelines.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s strengths in different workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 and Vulkan score of 139541 highlight its compute and cross-platform rendering abilities. The Passmark G3D score of 23356 and GPU Compute score of 11601 further validate its proficiency in both graphical and general-purpose compute tasks. The GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 29945 places it nearly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1%) and slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (deltaPct -0.5%), while leading the RTX 2080 Ti by a small margin (deltaPct 0.5%). For rendering, this data suggests the 3070 Ti is a highly capable card that can handle demanding rasterization and ray-traced workloads, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor for extremely high-resolution textures or complex 3D scenes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined benchmark picture reveals a system with a strong balance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU, Intel Core i7-13700, achieves a Passmark multithread score of 36387 and a single-thread score of 4101, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37135. The GPU, RTX 3070 Ti, has an average benchmark score of 29945, ranking at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. When combined, the system achieves an overall 80th percentile ranking, indicating that neither component is drastically holding back the other in typical usage.

In specific CPU-heavy benchmarks, the i7-13700 demonstrates exceptional scaling. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 and max-thread score of 11737 show strong multi-threading, while the single-thread score of 1092 confirms capable single-core performance. Cinebench R23 results are particularly telling: a multicore score of 25369 versus a single-core score of 2008.5, showing a 12.6x scaling factor that highlights excellent parallel efficiency. The Geekbench multicore score of 17025 and single-core score of 2329 align with this trend.

The GPU’s benchmark scores complement the CPU’s strengths. The Passmark G3D score of 23356 and DirectX 12 score of 91 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance, while the DirectX 11 score of 192 and DirectX 9 score of 261 show backward compatibility. The GPU’s compute performance in Passmark is 11601, which is lower relative to its G3D score, suggesting that while it excels at graphics rendering, its raw compute throughput is more modest. The combined picture is a system that excels in gaming scenarios where GPU performance is paramount, but also holds its own in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, though the GPU may be the first bottleneck in compute-heavy workloads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides a robust foundation for both latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks and throughput-oriented multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark scores illustrate the CPU’s versatility. The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 is notably high, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly-threaded software. The multi-thread score of 36387 is equally impressive, placing it at the 85th percentile overall. In specialized Passmark tests, the CPU shows specific strengths: data compression at 443900, data encryption at 25653, floating-point math at 97723, and integer math at 138974. The extended instructions score of 26578 and random string sorting at 46418 further demonstrate its capability in varied computational tasks.

The nearest rivals provide context for the performance level. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has an average score of 37117 (deltaPct 0%), meaning the i7-13700 is virtually identical in overall performance. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 (deltaPct 0.1%), while the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161 (deltaPct -0.1%). These near-zero deltas indicate that the i7-13700 sits in a tightly competitive performance bracket. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle demanding tasks like 3D rendering, video editing, and software compilation with ease, while its high single-thread score ensures that gaming and general desktop use remain snappy. The 30 MB L3 cache is substantial for gaming and helps with data-heavy workloads, and the support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in system configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering users a choice between older, more affordable DDR4 modules or faster, newer DDR5 kits. ECC memory is supported, which is a valuable feature for workstation or server-style builds that require data integrity. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is forward-looking for high-speed NVMe SSDs and future graphics cards, although the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The power requirements are well-defined. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 290 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 600 W, which provides headroom for the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU, plus other components. This suggests that a quality 600 W power supply is sufficient for stock operation, though a higher-wattage unit might be preferable for overclocking headroom or future upgrades. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, which should fit in most mid-tower cases.

Looking at a sensible upgrade path, the data suggests a few directions. Since the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments, making a CPU upgrade to a higher-tier 13th-gen part the primary option if more cores are needed. However, the current CPU is already at the 85th percentile, so such an upgrade may yield diminishing returns. The GPU is marked as end-of-life with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, so a future upgrade would logically be to a newer generation card. Given the PCIe 4.0 interface, a modern GPU would still function effectively. The 600 W PSU recommendation provides a baseline, but a user upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would need to re-evaluate their PSU choice. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a platform upgrade could reuse existing DDR4 RAM or move to DDR5 for better bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system’s balance can be assessed by comparing the component percentiles and their performance in various benchmarks. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 75th percentile. This indicates that in a typical gaming scenario, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as it falls lower in the performance distribution. The combined percentile of 80 supports this, showing that the system overall is slightly below the CPU’s individual ranking.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (score of 443900) or integer math (138974), the CPU’s high percentile ensures it is not the bottleneck. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the GPU’s lower percentile relative to the CPU suggests it will be the constraining component. For example, in DirectX 12 gaming, the GPU’s Passmark score of 91 is a modest figure, while the CPU’s strong multi-thread score of 36387 would allow it to feed frames to the GPU without lagging.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (4101 Passmark) would likely keep frame rates high, but the GPU’s 75th percentile ranking might cap maximum FPS in less demanding titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck as resolution increases, due to the finite pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The CPU’s high multi-thread score ensures that it will not be a limiting factor in content creation, but the GPU’s compute score of 11601 might limit certain GPU-accelerated tasks. Ultimately, the system is well-balanced for its intended use, but the GPU is the component that will need upgrading first for users seeking higher frame rates or more demanding visual settings.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is well-suited for a specific range of users based on its measured performance. Gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1440p will find this combination compelling, as the CPU’s high single-thread score and the GPU’s strong G3D score of 23356 support high frame rates in competitive titles. For 4K gaming, the system is still viable, but the GPU’s 75th percentile rank means users may need to adjust settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Content creators and developers will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 and Passmark multithread score of 36387 indicate that video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation will be handled efficiently. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a boon for professionals who require data accuracy. Students and small business users building a workstation will find the system capable of handling office productivity, data analysis, and light development tasks, with the CPU’s single-thread score ensuring snappy application performance.

The GPU’s capabilities in compute benchmarks (OpenCL 119718, Vulkan 139541) suggest it can accelerate certain professional applications like CAD or machine learning inference, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the size of datasets. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU provides a fallback for troubleshooting or for tasks that do not require the discrete GPU, saving power. Ultimately, this build targets users who need a versatile machine that excels in both gaming and productivity, without the need for extreme multi-GPU setups or massive VRAM capacities.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: For gamers seeking high frame rates at 1440p, this system is a strong contender. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4101 ensures that game logic and physics are processed quickly, while the GPU’s G3D score of 23356 and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s can push high frame rates in most titles. The 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth helps prevent stuttering in texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads are well-suited for handling both game encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously. With a multi-thread score of 36387, the i7-13700 can handle x264 encoding without severely impacting game performance, while the GPU’s 192 Tensor cores could offload encoding via NVENC, though this is not explicitly measured.

Video Editing: In applications like Premiere Pro, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 will accelerate timeline rendering and export times. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 119718 also assists in effects and playback, making this a capable editing workstation for 1080p and 1440p footage.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s high multi-thread performance, evidenced by the 16-thread 3DMark score of 10075, will handle CPU-based rendering engines well. The GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48 RT cores provide solid hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers and ray-traced scenes, though the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for very complex scenes.

Software Development: Developers will appreciate the CPU’s fast compilation times, driven by the integer math score of 138974 and data compression score of 443900. The support for ECC memory is a critical feature for servers or workstations where data integrity is paramount, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 ensures that office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheets run smoothly. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle daily tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, and the system’s 80th combined percentile indicates it is more than sufficient for academic and small business needs.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is 80, indicating it performs better than 80% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 in average benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29945, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 has a score of 30095, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.5%, meaning the RX 6800 is slightly ahead by 0.5%.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation or server platforms for improved data reliability.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the system, based on the GPU’s 290 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP, is 600 W.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s, utilizing 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus at 19 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the i7-13700’s performance compare to the Intel Core i9-12900T?

A: The i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the i9-12900T scores 37112, giving a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the i7-13700 is effectively 0.1% faster.

Q: What is the process node for the RTX 3070 Ti’s architecture?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung’s 8 nm process node.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, and should be treated as such.

Based on the GPU’s performance metrics, the system is expected to deliver excellent frame rates at 1440p resolution. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 suggest that it is well-equipped for modern titles at high settings. At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4101 will ensure that the system is not CPU-limited in most games, allowing the GPU to reach its full potential. The GPU’s texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s support high resolution and high refresh rate gaming.

At 1440p, users can expect high to ultra settings in most AAA games to run smoothly, with the 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth helping to maintain performance in texture-heavy scenes. For 4K gaming, the system is more likely to require medium to high settings to maintain playable frame rates, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and compute power are sufficient but not top-tier for this resolution. Esports titles like Fortnite or Counter-Strike 2, which are less demanding, should run at very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p given the GPU’s strong DirectX 11 score of 192. The CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache also benefits gaming by reducing memory latency, which can improve frame pacing. These estimates are based on the GPU’s 75th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking, indicating a system that is well above average for gaming but not at the absolute top end.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds